I am attempting to bind a socket to a port below:
if( bind(socket_desc,(struct sockaddr *) &server, sizeof(server)) < 0)
{
perror("bind failed. Error");
return 1;
}
puts("bind done");
But it gives:
$ ./serve
Socket created
bind failed. Error: Address already in use
Why does this error occur?
Everyone is correct. However, if you're also busy testing your code your own application might still "own" the socket if it starts and stops relatively quickly. Try SO_REUSEADDR as a socket option:
What exactly does SO_REUSEADDR do?
This socket option tells the kernel that even if this port is busy (in
the TIME_WAIT state), go ahead and reuse it anyway. If it is busy,
but with another state, you will still get an address already in use
error. It is useful if your server has been shut down, and then
restarted right away while sockets are still active on its port. You
should be aware that if any unexpected data comes in, it may confuse
your server, but while this is possible, it is not likely.
It has been pointed out that "A socket is a 5 tuple (proto, local
addr, local port, remote addr, remote port). SO_REUSEADDR just says
that you can reuse local addresses. The 5 tuple still must be
unique!" by Michael Hunter (mphunter#qnx.com). This is true, and this
is why it is very unlikely that unexpected data will ever be seen by
your server. The danger is that such a 5 tuple is still floating
around on the net, and while it is bouncing around, a new connection
from the same client, on the same system, happens to get the same
remote port. This is explained by Richard Stevens in ``2.7 Please
explain the TIME_WAIT state.''.
You have a process that is already using that port. netstat -tulpn will enable one to find the process ID of that is using a particular port.
Address already in use means that the port you are trying to allocate for your current execution is already occupied/allocated to some other process.
If you are a developer and if you are working on an application which require lots of testing, you might have an instance of your same application running in background (may be you forgot to stop it properly)
So if you encounter this error, just see which application/process is using the port.
In linux try using netstat -tulpn. This command will list down a process list with all running processes.
Check if an application is using your port. If that application or process is another important one then you might want to use another port which is not used by any process/application.
Anyway you can stop the process which uses your port and let your application take it.
If you are in linux environment try,
Use netstat -tulpn to display the processes
kill <pid> This will terminate the process
If you are using windows,
Use netstat -a -o -n to check for the port usages
Use taskkill /F /PID <pid> to kill that process
The error usually means that the port you are trying to open is being already used by another application. Try using netstat to see which ports are open and then use an available port.
Also check if you are binding to the right ip address (I am assuming it would be localhost)
if address is already in use can you just want to kill whoso ever process is using the port, you can use
lsof -ti:PortNumberGoesHere | xargs kill -9
source and inspiration this.
PS: Could not use netstat because it not installed already.
As mentioned above the port is in use already.
This could be due to several reasons
some other application is already using it.
The port is in close_wait state when your program is waiting for the other end to close the program.refer (https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/10106/orphaned-connections-in-close-wait-state).
The program might be in time_wait state. you can wait or use socket option SO_REUSEADDR as mentioned in another post.
Do netstat -a | grep <portno> to check the port state.
It also happens when you have not give enough permissions(read and write) to your sock file!
Just add expected permission to your sock contained folder and your sock file:
chmod ug+rw /path/to/your/
chmod ug+rw /path/to/your/file.sock
Then have fun!
I was also facing that problem, but I resolved it.
Make sure that both the programs for client-side and server-side are on different projects in your IDE, in my case NetBeans. Then assuming you're using localhost, I recommend you to implement both the programs as two different projects.
To terminate all node processes:
killall -9 node
First of check which port are listening,
netstat -tlpn
then select available port to conect,
sudo netstat -tlpn | grep ':port'
Fix it into also to your server and clients interfaces. Go Barrier tab -> change settings, -> port value type -> save/ok
Check both clients and server have similar port values
Then Reload.
Now it should be ok.
Check for running process pid:
pidof <process-name>
Kill processes:
sudo kill -9 process_id_1 process_id_2 process_id_3
I used mosquitto as MQTT broker, and it seems if connection number is more than 1000, the below log printed. Anybody know something about this?
1470896904: Client connection from 111.7.170.177 denied access by tcpd.
I feel your process(mosquitto) have hit the maximum number of open file descriptors limit. Check your max open files by ulimit -n. Then increase the limit to max number of connections expected by you. E.g. For 10k connection it would be ulimit -n 10000
A note on ulimit(1). It is only set for the current terminal and for persistent changes you will need to edit config files as per your Linux flavor( /etc/security/limits.conf + /etc/pam.d/common-session* on Ubuntu ).
There might be another reason for this error message. The same message wil be displayed in the log if a client tries to connect and access is denied by TCPD. You need to adjust hosts.allow (in my case for localhost 127.0.0.1) to connect.
I had similar problem using Ubuntu 14 with mosquitto 1.6.3 and I solved my issue making these changes:
Open the: /etc/init/mosquitto.conf file
Add limit nofile 4096 4096 before exec;
4096 indicate the number of clients
service mosquitto stop
service mosquitto start
I hope help another people that have the same issue.
$cache = Memcached.new("localhost:11211")
I am not quite sure what why do we need the localhost:11211.Is the number 11211 is the port the app is running? Does that mean all the cache is available for this instance of the app running. what if I leaving it blank.
can anybody explain this to me.
Yes, 11211 refers to the port on which memcached accepts connections.
It is not however specific to the instance of your app; any app that you run could theoretically connect to memcached on that same port, provided they have the proper credentials.
I m trying setup a cassandra cluster as a test bed but gave the JMX remote connection error. I seem to found the answer for my error from cassandra FAQ page
Nodetool says "Connection refused to host: 127.0.1.1" for any remote host. What gives?
Nodetool relies on JMX, which in turn relies on RMI, which in turn sets up it's own listeners and connectors as needed on each end of the exchange. Normally all of this happens behind the scenes transparently, but incorrect name resolution for either the host connecting, or the one being connected to, can result in crossed wires and confusing exceptions.
If you are not using DNS, then make sure that your /etc/hosts files are accurate on both ends. If that fails try passing the -Djava.rmi.server.hostname=$IP option to the JVM at startup (where $IP is the address of the interface you can reach from the remote machine).
But can somebody help me on how to do -Djava.rmi.server.hostname=$IP
Or what to add is hosts file, i know that in hosts normally we add "IP Alias", but whose ip and alias.
I dont know much java or either linux
I m currently working on ubuntu v10.04 and cassandra v0.74
Sudesh
For JMX you need to enable JMX-remoting:
java -Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote
Depending on from where you want to access the jmx-server, you also need to specify a port:
-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.port=12345
and set or disable passwords.
Have a look at http://download.oracle.com/javase/1.5.0/docs/guide/management/agent.html for more details.
I'm trying to run a NAS-UPC benchmark to study it's profile. UPC uses MPI to communicate with remote processes .
When I run the benchmark with 64 processes , i get the following error
upcrun -n 64 bt.C.64
"Timeout in making connection to remote process on <<machine name>>"
Can anybody tell me why this error occurs ?
this probably means that you're failing to spawn the remote processes - upcrun delegates that to a per-conduit mechanism, which may involve your scheduler (if any). my guess is that you're depending on ssh-type remote access, and that's failing, probably because you don't have keys, agent or host-based trust set up. can you ssh to your remote nodes without password? sane environment on the remote nodes (paths, etc)?
"upcrun -v" may illuminate the problem, even without resorting to the man page ;)