I have the following RazorEngine call:
public class RazorEngineRender
{
public static string RenderPartialViewToString(string templatePath, string viewName, object model)
{
string text = System.IO.File.ReadAllText(Path.Combine(templatePath, viewName));
string renderedText = Razor.Parse(text, model);
return renderedText;
}
}
This is called from:
_emailService.Render(TemplatePath, "Email.cshtml", new { ActivationLink = activationLink });
I also have this view file (email.cshtml):
<div>
<div>
Link: #Model.ActivationLink
</div>
</div>
When the call to Razor.Parse() occurs, I always get a:
Unable to compile template. Check the Errors list for details.
The error list is:
error CS1061: 'object' does not contain a definition for 'ActivationLink' and no extension method 'ActivationLink' accepting a first argument of type 'object' could be found
I've tried everything under the sun, including trying a concrete type as opposed to anonymous type, declaring the #Model line at the top of the view file but no luck. I'm wondering if the library is at fault or definately me?
By the way, the razorengine I am referring to is available here at codeplex:
RazorEngine
If you make the call like so:
Razor.Parse(System.IO.File.ReadAllText(YourPath),
new { ActivationLink = activationLink });
That should give you the correct output. But after I see your method posted above I'll be able to make a determination where the problem lies.
Update
Change your method to the following:
public class RazorEngineRender {
public static string RenderPartialViewToString<T>(string templatePath, string viewName, T model) {
string text = System.IO.File.ReadAllText(Path.Combine(templatePath, viewName));
string renderedText = Razor.Parse(text, model);
return renderedText;
}
}
and you can call it like you do above.
The reason it doesn't work is because you're telling the Parser that the model is of type object rather than passing in what type it really is. In this case an anonymous type.
The accepted answer was perfect in 2011 (I believe pre-v3 of RazorEngine) but this code is now marked as obsolete in latest version (in time of typing it is 3.7.3).
For newer version your method can be typed like this:
public static string RenderPartialViewToString<T>(string templatePath, string templateName, string viewName, T model)
{
string template = File.ReadAllText(Path.Combine(templatePath, viewName));
string renderedText = Engine.Razor.RunCompile(template, templateName, typeof(T), model);
return renderedText;
}
and in order for it to work you need to add
using RazorEngine.Templating;
Here are a few hints you might try:
Make your razor view strongly typed to a model:
#model Foo
<div>
<div>
Link:
<a href="#Model.ActivationLink" style="color:#666" target="_blank">
#Model.ActivationLink
</a>
</div>
</div>
When rendering it pass a Foo model:
_emailService.Render(
TemplatePath,
"Email.cshtml",
new Foo { ActivationLink = activationLink }
)
If you are trying to send emails from your Views make sure you checkout Postal before reinventing something.
Related
I've got a page model that has an abp-tabs defined as
}
<abp-dynamic-form abp-model="Item" asp-page="/Anagrafiche/Clienti/EditModal">
<abp-modal size="Large">
<abp-modal-header title="#L["Update"].Value"></abp-modal-header>
<abp-modal-body>
<abp-tabs>
<abp-tab title="Generale">
<abp-form-content />
</abp-tab>
<abp-tab title="Scontistiche">
#{
await Html.RenderPartialAsync("_Scontistiche");
}
</abp-tab>
<abp-tab title="Clienti con stesso comune">
</abp-tab>
<abp-tab title="Clienti con stessa provincia">
Clienti con stessa provincia
</abp-tab>
</abp-tabs>
</abp-modal-body>
<abp-modal-footer buttons="#(AbpModalButtons.Cancel|AbpModalButtons.Save)"></abp-modal-footer>
</abp-modal>
</abp-dynamic-form>
I've defined the _Scontistiche.cshtml as
public class _ScontisticheModel : xxxPageModel
{
public _ScontisticheModel()
{
}
public void OnGet()
{
}
}
But when I run it I got
System.InvalidOperationException: 'The model item passed into the ViewDataDictionary is of type 'xxx.Web.Pages.Anagrafiche.Clienti.EditModalModel', but this ViewDataDictionary instance requires a model item of type 'xxx.Web.Pages.Anagrafiche.Clienti._ScontisticheModel'.'
What am I doing wrong?
Thanks
The error is saying you are passing the wrong model to your partialview. Looking at the code, this error is indeed correct. The following line is causing the issue.
#{
await Html.RenderPartialAsync("_Scontistiche");
}
By default the model of your parent page will be sent to the partial view, unless you define a different model. You can do this by passing a _ScontisticheModel model like so.
#{
await Html.RenderPartialAsync("_Scontistiche", Item);
}
Considering Item is the correct model you are referring to. If you don't have a model, you can also pass a new class like so:
await Html.RenderPartialAsync("_Scontistiche", new _ScontisticheModel());
I want to create complicate form which will create structure of wizard, partial steps form, validation and submit. This structure have to use model attributes annotations to create one structure object over the model. So after reflection I have model and one other class with structure description. All properties within are strings with Fields which I have to pass on 'asp-for' tag helper. So part of the code is:
#foreach(var field in #group.Fields) {
<div class="col-12 col-md-6 col-lg-4">
<div class="form-group md-form md-outline">
<label asp-for="#field.Name" class="control-label"></label>
<input asp-for="#field.Name" class="form-control" />
<span asp-validation-for="#field.Name" class="text-danger"></span>
</div>
</div>
}
This is nor working because tag helper expect expression and generate wrong values which are not expected from me. The value in #field.Name is 'PostAddress.Street1'. If I replace all of "#field.Name" with "PostAddress.Street1" everything work properly how I expected.
It looks small issue but I'm trying many things and reading some theads in forums but didn't find the answer. What I tried:
Experiment 1
Tried to inherit InputTagHelper class from dotnet library and override property For but without success. It changed ModelExpression but no changes in interface. May be base class have some logic to skip this changed object or is not correct generated:
[HtmlAttributeName("asp-for")]
public new ModelExpression For
{
get
{
return base.For;
}
set
{
ModelExpression me = value;
if (value.Model != null)
{
var viewData = this.ViewContext.ViewData as ViewDataDictionary<AbnServiceModel>;
me = ModelExpressionProvider.CreateModelExpression<AbnServiceModel, string>(viewData, model => model.PostAddress.Street1);
}
base.For = me;
}
}
=================================================
2. Experiment 2
Try to get original implementation from .NET Core code and made some modification in code to fix the issue. But the code and dependencies with internal libraries were very complicated and I reject this idea.
Expiriment 3
Using HTML helpers
#Html.Label(#field.Name, "", new{ #class="control-label" })
#Html.Editor(#field.Name, new { htmlAttributes = new{ #class="form-control" } })
#Html.ValidationMessage(#field.Name,"",new { htmlAttributes = new{ #class="text-danger" } })
It render components correct into the browser but client side validation using jquery.validate.unobtrusive.js is not working. Not sure why.
Expiriment 4
Using HTML helpers:
#Html.LabelFor(m=>m.PostAddress.Street1, new{ #class="control-label" })
#Html.EditorFor(m=>m.PostAddress.Street1, new { htmlAttributes = new{ #class="form-control" } })
#Html.ValidationMessageFor(m=>m.PostAddress.Street1,"",new { htmlAttributes = new{ #class="text-danger" } })
The validation is working but class weren't applied well, may be my mistake. But other problem here is that I'm not using expression which is string which can get from model object. Also It doesn't catch all logic which is included in asp-for tag helper.
Experiment 5
Tried to create my own tag helper and using generator to create the content html. But this means that I have to implement all logic like helper in dotnet core to have all functionality which is same like Expiriment 2
So I didn't find good solution of this "simple" problem and lost some days to investigate and doing some code to resolve it. I'm surprised that no way to pass string variable with property name and it wouldn't work.
Can someone help me to fix this problem with real example? I didn't find the answer in all posts. I want to have all logic from asp-for tag helper but use variable to pass the expression. It cab be and tricky, just want to have some resolution to continue with my project.
Thank you
I resolved my issue.
Created one helper method:
public static class CommonHelperMethods
{
public static ModelExplorer GetModelExplorer(this ModelExplorer container, string field, IModelMetadataProvider modelMetadataProvider = null)
{
ModelExplorer result = container;
var fields = field.Split(".").ToList();
var match = Regex.Match(fields[0], #"(.+)\[(\d)+\]");
if (!match.Success)
{
fields.ForEach(x =>
{
result = result?.GetExplorerForProperty(x) ?? result;
});
}
else
{ //List have to create own Property browser
string proName = match.Groups[1].Value;
int idx = Convert.ToInt32(match.Groups[2].Value);
var model = ((IList)result?.GetExplorerForProperty(proName).Model)[idx];
var targetProperty = model.GetType().GetProperty(fields[1]);
var targetValueModel = targetProperty.GetValue(model);
var elementMetadata = modelMetadataProvider.GetMetadataForProperty(model.GetType(), fields[1]);
return new ModelExplorer(modelMetadataProvider, container, elementMetadata, targetValueModel);
}
return result;
}
}
And just override the tag helper class with this:
using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Infrastructure;
using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.ModelBinding;
using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.TagHelpers;
using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.ViewFeatures;
using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Razor.TagHelpers;
namespace GetTaxSolutions.Web.Infrastructure.TagHelpers
{
[HtmlTargetElement("input", Attributes = ForAttributeName, TagStructure = TagStructure.WithoutEndTag)]
public class InputTextGtTaxHelper : InputTagHelper
{
private const string ForAttributeName = "asp-for";
[HtmlAttributeName("not-exp")]
public bool NotExpression { get; set; } = false;
[HtmlAttributeName(ForAttributeName)]
public new ModelExpression For
{
get
{
return base.For;
}
set
{
ModelExpression me = value;
if (NotExpression)
{
var modelExplorertmp = value.ModelExplorer.Container.GetModelExplorer(value.Model.ToString(), ModelMetadataProvider);
var modelExplorer = new ModelExplorer(ModelMetadataProvider, value.ModelExplorer.Container, modelExplorertmp.Metadata, modelExplorertmp.Model);
me = new ModelExpression(value.Model.ToString(), modelExplorer);
}
base.For = me;
}
}
public IModelExpressionProvider ModelExpressionProvider { get; }
public IModelMetadataProvider ModelMetadataProvider { get; }
public IActionContextAccessor Accessor { get; }
public InputTextGtTaxHelper(
IHtmlGenerator generator,
IModelExpressionProvider modelExpressionProvider,
IModelMetadataProvider modelMetaDataProvider) : base(generator)
{
ModelExpressionProvider = modelExpressionProvider;
ModelMetadataProvider = modelMetaDataProvider;
}
}
}
Also should skip original class in tag helper registration:
#addTagHelper *, Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.TagHelpers
#removeTagHelper Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.TagHelpers.InputTagHelper, Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.TagHelpers
#removeTagHelper Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.TagHelpers.LabelTagHelper, Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.TagHelpers
#removeTagHelper Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.TagHelpers.ValidationMessageTagHelper, Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.TagHelpers
#removeTagHelper Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.TagHelpers.SelectTagHelper, Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.TagHelpers
#addTagHelper GetTaxSolutions.Web.Infrastructure.TagHelpers.*, GetTaxSolutions.Web
And when use model in expression just have to pass attribute 'no-exp' on input elements. Otherwise will work like original tag helper.
<input not-exp="true" asp-for="#field.Name" class="form-control" />
Also you have to do same with label, select and other used tag helpers which you want to support this way of model passing.
public ActionResult Index()
{
var groups = db.SHP_Products
.GroupBy(c => c.SHP_Category.Name,
(category, items) => new
{
CategoryName = category,
ItemCount = items.Count(),
Items = items
}
);
ViewBag.group = groups.ToList();
return View();
}
When running this it will show an error like this:
<ul>
#foreach (var m in ViewBag.group)
{
<h2>#m.CategoryName</h2>
PreviousNext
<li></li>
}
</ul>
'object' does not contain a definition for 'CategoryName'
You are passing a list of anonymous objects to the View.
Take a look at this answer Dynamic Anonymous type in Razor causes RuntimeBinderException
i think you are trying to access the <h2>#m.CategoryName</h2> directly, may be you can access it like #m.SHP_Category.Name i don't really know you the sequence on class in your code. try #m.
See this answer MVC Razor dynamic model, 'object' does not contain definition for 'PropertyName'
The reason for the error is that the dynamic type created by your GroupBy statement has an access level of "internal", which is not visible to the View. You can rectify by declaring a type or using an Explando - as discussed in this and other answers.
From
The reason for this is that the anonymous type being passed in the controller in internal, so it can only be accessed from within the assembly in which it’s declared. Since views get compiled separately, the dynamic binder complains that it can’t go over that assembly boundary.
One way to solve this is to use System.Dynamic.ExpandoObject.
public static ExpandoObject ToExpando(this object obj)
{
IDictionary<string, object> expandoObject = new ExpandoObject();
new RouteValueDictionary(obj).ForEach(o => expandoObject.Add(o.Key, o.Value));
return (ExpandoObject) expandoObject;
}
Then:
ToExpando(groups); // might need toList() it too.
Please use ViewData instead of ViewBag here like.
Controller:
public ActionResult Index()
{
var groups = db.SHP_Products
.GroupBy(c => c.SHP_Category.Name,
(category, items) => new
{
CategoryName = category,
ItemCount = items.Count(),
Items = items
}
);
ViewData["groups"] = groups.ToList();
return View();
}
View:
<ul>
#foreach (var m in (dynamic) ViewData["groups"])
{
<h2>#m.CategoryName</h2>
PreviousNext
<li></li>
}
Assume this model:
Public Class Detail
...
<DisplayName("Custom DisplayName")>
<Required(ErrorMessage:="Custom ErrorMessage")>
Public Property PercentChange As Integer
...
end class
and the view:
#Html.TextBoxFor(Function(m) m.PercentChange)
will proceed this html:
<input data-val="true"
data-val-number="The field 'Custom DisplayName' must be a number."
data-val-required="Custom ErrorMessage"
id="PercentChange"
name="PercentChange" type="text" value="0" />
I want to customize the data-val-number error message which I guess has generated because PercentChange is an Integer. I was looking for such an attribute to change it, range or whatever related does not work.
I know there is a chance in editing unobtrusive's js file itself or override it in client side. I want to change data-val-number's error message just like others in server side.
You can override the message by supplying the data-val-number attribute yourself when rendering the field. This overrides the default message. This works at least with MVC 4.
#Html.EditorFor(model => model.MyNumberField, new { data_val_number="Supply an integer, dude!" })
Remember that you have to use underscore in the attribute name for Razor to accept your attribute.
What you have to do is:
Add the following code inside Application_Start() in Global.asax:
ClientDataTypeModelValidatorProvider.ResourceClassKey = "Messages";
DefaultModelBinder.ResourceClassKey = "Messages";
Right click your ASP.NET MVC project in VS. Select Add => Add ASP.NET Folder => App_GlobalResources.
Add a .resx file called Messages.resx in that folder.
Add these string resources in the .resx file:
FieldMustBeDate The field {0} must be a date.
FieldMustBeNumeric The field {0} must be a number.
PropertyValueInvalid The value '{0}' is not valid for {1}.
PropertyValueRequired A value is required.
Change the FieldMustBeNumeric value as you want... :)
You're done.
Check this post for more details:
Localizing Default Error Messages in ASP.NET MVC and WebForms
This is not gonna be easy. The default message is stored as an embedded resource into the System.Web.Mvc assembly and the method that is fetching is a private static method of an internal sealed inner class (System.Web.Mvc.ClientDataTypeModelValidatorProvider+NumericModelValidator.MakeErrorString). It's as if the guy at Microsoft coding this was hiding a top secret :-)
You may take a look at the following blog post which describes a possible solution. You basically need to replace the existing ClientDataTypeModelValidatorProvider with a custom one.
If you don't like the hardcore coding that you will need to do you could also replace this integer value inside your view model with a string and have a custom validation attribute on it which would do the parsing and provide a custom error message (which could even be localized).
As an alternate way around this, I applied a RegularExpression attribute to catch the invalid entry and set my message there:
[RegularExpression(#"[0-9]*$", ErrorMessage = "Please enter a valid number ")]
This slightly a hack but this seemed preferable to the complexity the other solutions presented, at least in my particular situation.
EDIT: This worked well in MVC3 but it seems that there may well be better solutions for MVC4+.
From this book on MVC 3 that I have. All you have to do is this:
public class ClientNumberValidatorProvider : ClientDataTypeModelValidatorProvider
{
public override IEnumerable<ModelValidator> GetValidators(ModelMetadata metadata,
ControllerContext context)
{
bool isNumericField = base.GetValidators(metadata, context).Any();
if (isNumericField)
yield return new ClientSideNumberValidator(metadata, context);
}
}
public class ClientSideNumberValidator : ModelValidator
{
public ClientSideNumberValidator(ModelMetadata metadata,
ControllerContext controllerContext) : base(metadata, controllerContext) { }
public override IEnumerable<ModelValidationResult> Validate(object container)
{
yield break; // Do nothing for server-side validation
}
public override IEnumerable<ModelClientValidationRule> GetClientValidationRules()
{
yield return new ModelClientValidationRule {
ValidationType = "number",
ErrorMessage = string.Format(CultureInfo.CurrentCulture,
ValidationMessages.MustBeNumber,
Metadata.GetDisplayName())
};
}
}
protected void Application_Start()
{
// Leave the rest of this method unchanged
var existingProvider = ModelValidatorProviders.Providers
.Single(x => x is ClientDataTypeModelValidatorProvider);
ModelValidatorProviders.Providers.Remove(existingProvider);
ModelValidatorProviders.Providers.Add(new ClientNumberValidatorProvider());
}
Notice how the ErrorMessage is yielded, you specify the current culture and the localized message is extracted from the ValidationMessages(here be culture specifics).resx resource file. If you don't need that, just replace it with your own message.
Here is another solution which changes the message client side without changed MVC3 source. Full details in this blog post:
https://greenicicle.wordpress.com/2011/02/28/fixing-non-localizable-validation-messages-with-javascript/
In short what you need to do is include the following script after jQuery validation is loaded plus the appropriate localisation file.
(function ($) {
// Walk through the adapters that connect unobstrusive validation to jQuery.validate.
// Look for all adapters that perform number validation
$.each($.validator.unobtrusive.adapters, function () {
if (this.name === "number") {
// Get the method called by the adapter, and replace it with one
// that changes the message to the jQuery.validate default message
// that can be globalized. If that string contains a {0} placeholder,
// it is replaced by the field name.
var baseAdapt = this.adapt;
this.adapt = function (options) {
var fieldName = new RegExp("The field (.+) must be a number").exec(options.message)[1];
options.message = $.validator.format($.validator.messages.number, fieldName);
baseAdapt(options);
};
}
});
} (jQuery));
You can set ResourceKey of ClientDataTypeModelValidatorProvider class to name of a global resource that contains FieldMustBeNumeric key to replace MVC validation error message of number with your custom message. Also key of date validation error message is FieldMustBeDate.
ClientDataTypeModelValidatorProvider.ResourceKey="MyResources"; // MyResource is my global resource
See here for more details on how to add the MyResources.resx file to your project:
Here is another solution in pure js that works if you want to specify messages globally not custom messages for each item.
The key is that validation messages are set using jquery.validation.unobtrusive.js using the data-val-xxx attribute on each element, so all you have to do is to replace those messages before the library uses them, it is a bit dirty but I just wanted to get the work done and fast, so here it goes for number type validation:
$('[data-val-number]').each(function () {
var el = $(this);
var orig = el.data('val-number');
var fieldName = orig.replace('The field ', '');
fieldName = fieldName.replace(' must be a number.', '');
el.attr('data-val-number', fieldName + ' باید عددی باشد')
});
the good thing is that it does not require compiling and you can extend it easily later, not robust though, but fast.
Check this out too:
The Complete Guide To Validation In ASP.NET MVC 3 - Part 2
Main parts of the article follow (copy-pasted).
There are four distinct parts to creating a fully functional custom validator that works on both the client and the server. First we subclass ValidationAttribute and add our server side validation logic. Next we implement IClientValidatable on our attribute to allow HTML5 data-* attributes to be passed to the client. Thirdly, we write a custom JavaScript function that performs validation on the client. Finally, we create an adapter to transform the HTML5 attributes into a format that our custom function can understand. Whilst this sounds like a lot of work, once you get started you will find it relatively straightforward.
Subclassing ValidationAttribute
In this example, we are going to write a NotEqualTo validator that simply checks that the value of one property does not equal the value of another.
[AttributeUsage(AttributeTargets.Property, AllowMultiple = false, Inherited = true)]
public sealed class NotEqualToAttribute : ValidationAttribute
{
private const string DefaultErrorMessage = "{0} cannot be the same as {1}.";
public string OtherProperty { get; private set; }
public NotEqualToAttribute(string otherProperty)
: base(DefaultErrorMessage)
{
if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(otherProperty))
{
throw new ArgumentNullException("otherProperty");
}
OtherProperty = otherProperty;
}
public override string FormatErrorMessage(string name)
{
return string.Format(ErrorMessageString, name, OtherProperty);
}
protected override ValidationResult IsValid(object value,
ValidationContext validationContext)
{
if (value != null)
{
var otherProperty = validationContext.ObjectInstance.GetType()
.GetProperty(OtherProperty);
var otherPropertyValue = otherProperty
.GetValue(validationContext.ObjectInstance, null);
if (value.Equals(otherPropertyValue))
{
return new ValidationResult(
FormatErrorMessage(validationContext.DisplayName));
}
}
return ValidationResult.Success;
}
}
Add the new attribute to the password property of the RegisterModel and run the application.
[Required]
[DataType(DataType.Password)]
[Display(Name = "Password")]
[NotEqualTo("UserName")]
public string Password { get; set; }
...
Implementing IClientValidatable
ASP.NET MVC 2 had a mechanism for adding client side validation but it was not very pretty. Thankfully in MVC 3, things have improved and the process is now fairly trivial and thankfully does not involve changing the Global.asax as in the previous version.
The first step is for your custom validation attribute to implement IClientValidatable. This is a simple, one method interface:
public IEnumerable<ModelClientValidationRule> GetClientValidationRules(
ModelMetadata metadata,
ControllerContext context)
{
var clientValidationRule = new ModelClientValidationRule()
{
ErrorMessage = FormatErrorMessage(metadata.GetDisplayName()),
ValidationType = "notequalto"
};
clientValidationRule.ValidationParameters.Add("otherproperty", OtherProperty);
return new[] { clientValidationRule };
}
If you run the application now and view source, you will see that the password input html now contains your notequalto data attributes:
<div class="editor-field">
<input data-val="true" data-val-notequalto="Password cannot be the same as UserName."
data-val-notequalto-otherproperty="UserName"
data-val-regex="Weak password detected."
data-val-regex-pattern="^(?!password$)(?!12345$).*"
data-val-required="The Password field is required."
id="Password" name="Password" type="password" />
<span class="hint">Enter your password here</span>
<span class="field-validation-valid" data-valmsg-for="Password"
data-valmsg-replace="true"></span>
</div>
Creating a custom jQuery validate function
All of this code is best to be placed in a separate JavaScript file.
(function ($) {
$.validator.addMethod("notequalto", function (value, element, params) {
if (!this.optional(element)) {
var otherProp = $('#' + params);
return (otherProp.val() !=
}
return true;
});
$.validator.unobtrusive.adapters.addSingleVal("notequalto", "otherproperty");
}(jQuery));
Depending on your validation requirements, you may find that the jquery.validate library already has the code that you need for the validation itself. There are lots of validators in jquery.validate that have not been implemented or mapped to data annotations, so if these fulfil your need, then all you need to write in javascript is an adapter or even a call to a built-in adapter which can be as little as a single line. Take a look inside jquery.validate.js to find out what is available.
Using an existing jquery.validate.unobtrusive adapter
The job of the adapter is to read the HTML5 data-* attributes on your form element and convert this data into a form that can be understood by jquery.validate and your custom validation function. You are not required to do all the work yourself though and in many cases, you can call a built-in adapter. jquery.validate.unobtrusive declares three built-in adapters which can be used in the majority of situations. These are:
jQuery.validator.unobtrusive.adapters.addBool - used when your validator does not need any additional data.
jQuery.validator.unobtrusive.adapters.addSingleVal - used when your validator takes in one piece of additional data.
jQuery.validator.unobtrusive.adapters.addMinMax - used when your validator deals with minimum and maximum values such as range or string length.
If your validator does not fit into one of these categories, you are required to write your own adapter using the jQuery.validator.unobtrusive.adapters.add method. This is not as difficulty as it sounds and we'll see an example later in the article.
We use the addSingleVal method, passing in the name of the adapter and the name of the single value that we want to pass. Should the name of the validation function differ from the adapter, you can pass in a third parameter (ruleName):
jQuery.validator.unobtrusive.adapters.addSingleVal("notequalto", "otherproperty", "mynotequaltofunction");
At this point, our custom validator is complete.
For better understanding refer to the article itself which presents more description and a more complex example.
HTH.
I just did this and then used a regex expression:
$(document).ready(function () {
$.validator.methods.number = function (e) {
return true;
};
});
[RegularExpression(#"^[0-9\.]*$", ErrorMessage = "Invalid Amount")]
public decimal? Amount { get; set; }
Or you can simply do this.
#Html.ValidationMessageFor(m => m.PercentChange, "Custom Message: Input value must be a number"), new { #style = "display:none" })
Hope this helps.
I make this putting this on my view
#Html.DropDownListFor(m => m.BenefNamePos, Model.Options, new { onchange = "changePosition(this);", #class="form-control", data_val_number = "This is my custom message" })
I have this problem in KendoGrid, I use a script at the END of View to override data-val-number:
#(Html.Kendo().Grid<Test.ViewModel>(Model)
.Name("listado")
...
.Columns(columns =>
{
columns.Bound("idElementColumn").Filterable(false);
...
}
And at least, in the end of View I put:
<script type="text/javascript">
$("#listado").on("click", function (e) {
$(".k-grid #idElementColumn").attr('data-val-number', 'Ingrese un número.');
});
</script>
a simple method is, use dataanotation change message on ViewModel:
[Required(ErrorMessage ="الزامی")]
[StringLength(maximumLength:50,MinimumLength =2)]
[Display(Name = "نام")]
public string FirstName { get; set; }
How can I change this DropDownList declaration so that the disabled attribute is enable/disabled conditionally?
<%= Html.DropDownList("Quantity", new SelectList(...), new{#disabled="disabled"} %>
non-working example:
<%= Html.DropDownList("Quantity", new SelectList(...), new{#disabled=Model.CanEdit?"false":"disabled"} %>
p.s. adding an if condition around the entire statement is not a desired approach :)
EDIT: based on this extension method from another question I came up with the following extension:
public static IDictionary<string, object> Disabled (this object obj, bool disabled)
{
return disabled ? obj.AddProperty ("disabled", "disabled") : obj.ToDictionary ();
}
which can then be used as
<%= Html.DropDownList("Quantity", new SelectList(...), new{id="quantity"}.Disabled(Model.CanEdit) %>
There is no need to add helper methods, you can just use
<%= Html.DropDownList("Quantity", new SelectList(...), IsEditable == true ? new { #disabled = "disabled" } as object : new {} as object %>
If you were to remove the as object entries this wouldn't work because by default new {} is a dynamic object compiled at runtime, therefore the two possible objects must have the same properties. But the Html attributes parameter is actually just an object, so these dynamics can be cast as objects to get around this.
This solution even allows you to use multiple HTML attributes where one is optional and another is not, i.e class='whatever' is not optional but disabled is so you put class='whatever' in both the objects, but the optional one only in the first. Dimitrov's answer does not support any custom attributes other than disabled.
Please don't write spaghetti code. Html helpers are there for this purpose:
public static MvcHtmlString DropDownList(this HtmlHelper html, string name, SelectList values, bool canEdit)
{
if (canEdit)
{
return html.DropDownList(name, values);
}
return html.DropDownList(name, values, new { disabled = "disabled" });
}
And then:
<%= Html.DropDownList("Quantity", new SelectList(...), Model.CanEdit) %>
Or maybe you could come up with something even better (if the model contains the options):
<%= Html.DropDownList("Quantity", Model) %>
You will also get the bonus of having more unit testable code.
One option is creating a custom version of Html.DropDownList that takes an extra parameter and does what you want... but then you would have to make a new one for every type of helper - TextBoxFor, TextAreaFor, CheckBoxFor, etc... and you still have to figure out how to make the guts of it work.
I opted, instead, to create an Html Helper to replace the normal anonymous HtmlAttributes object since then it would be compatible with all of the Helpers that use HtmlAttributes without any special work. This solution also lets you pass through additional Attributes like Class, Name, or whatever you want. It doesn't lock you down to only disabled.
I created the following Helper - it takes a boolean and an anonymous object. If disabled is true, it adds the disabled attribute to the anonymous object (which is actually a Dictionary) with the value "disabled", otherwise it doesn't add the property at all.
public static RouteValueDictionary ConditionalDisable(
bool disabled,
object htmlAttributes = null)
{
var dictionary = HtmlHelper.AnonymousObjectToHtmlAttributes(htmlAttributes);
if (disabled)
dictionary.Add("disabled", "disabled");
return dictionary;
}
An example of it in action:
#Html.TextBoxFor(m => m.SomeProperty,
HtmlHelpers.ConditionalDisable(true, new { #class = "someClass"))
One huge advantage to this approach for me was that it works with virtually all of the MVC HtmlHelpers since they all have Overloads that accept a RouteValueDictionary instead of an anonymous object.
Caveats:
HtmlHelper.AnonymousObjectToHtmlAttributes() uses some fancy code ninja work to get things done. I'm not entirely sure how performant it is... but it's been sufficient for what I use it for. Your mileage may vary.
I don't especially like the name of it - but I couldn't come up with anything better. Renaming is easy.
I also don't love the usage syntax - but again I couldn't come up with anything better. It shouldn't be difficult to change. An extension method on object is one idea... you'd end up with new { #class = "someClass" }.ConditionalDisable(true) but then if you only want the disable attribute and don't have anything additional to add you end up with something gross like new {}.ConditionalDisable(true); and you also end up with an extension method that shows up for all objects... which is probably not desirable.
#bool IsEditable=true;
#if (IsEditable)
{
Html.DropDownListFor(m => m, selectList);
}
else
{
Html.DropDownListFor(m => m, selectList, new { disabled = "disabled" })
}
Strongly typed verison:
public static MvcHtmlString DropDownListFor<TModel, TProperty>(this HtmlHelper<TModel> html,
Expression<Func<TModel, TProperty>> expression,
IEnumerable<SelectListItem> selectList,
string optionText, bool canEdit)
{
if (canEdit)
{
return html.DropDownListFor(expression, selectList, optionText);
}
return html.DropDownListFor(expression, selectList, optionText, new { disabled = "disabled" });
}
For completeness here is one that preservers all parameters and it would post select value to the server:
public static MvcHtmlString DropDownListFor<TModel, TProperty>(this HtmlHelper<TModel> html, Expression<Func<TModel, TProperty>> expression, IEnumerable<SelectListItem> selectList, object htmlAttributes, bool enabled)
{
if (enabled)
{
return SelectExtensions.DropDownListFor<TModel, TProperty>(html, expression, selectList, htmlAttributes);
}
var htmlAttributesAsDict = HtmlHelper.AnonymousObjectToHtmlAttributes(htmlAttributes);
htmlAttributesAsDict.Add("disabled", "disabled");
string selectClientId = html.ViewContext.ViewData.TemplateInfo.GetFullHtmlFieldId(ExpressionHelper.GetExpressionText(expression));
htmlAttributesAsDict.Add("id", selectClientId + "_disabled");
var hiddenFieldMarkup = html.HiddenFor<TModel, TProperty>(expression);
var selectMarkup = SelectExtensions.DropDownListFor<TModel, TProperty>(html, expression, selectList, htmlAttributesAsDict);
return MvcHtmlString.Create(selectMarkup.ToString() + Environment.NewLine + hiddenFieldMarkup.ToString());
}
Usage example, disable drop down if there is only one item in list, that one value is still posted to server with correct client id:
#Html.DropDownListFor(m => m.SomeValue, Model.SomeList, new { #class = "some-class" }, Model.SomeList > 1)
You can do:
var dropDownEditDisable = new { disabled = "disabled" };
var dropDownEditEnable = new { };
object enableOrDisable = Model.CanEdit ?
(object)dropDownEditEnable : (object)dropDownEditDisable;
#Html.DropDownList("Quantity", new SelectList(...), enableOrDisable)
Html.DropDownListFor() can be long, so doing that, there is no need to repeat it.
I don't know if ASP.NET offers a more succinct special-case approach, but presumably you could do:
<%= Html.DropDownList("Quantity", new SelectList(...), Model.CanEdit? new{#class="quantity"} : new{#class="quantity", #disabled:"disabled"}) %>