Asked similar before.
Rails 3 has_many :through Form
But can't get the relationship with employmentships to be created from the users form.
Have read http://www.justinball.com/2008/07/03/checkbox-list-in-ruby-on-rails-using-habtm/
and http://millarian.com/programming/ruby-on-rails/quick-tip-has_many-through-checkboxes/ (which I was really hoping that it worked.)
Form submits, but only creates a blank record in employmentship.
<%= form_for #user do |f| %>
...
<p>
<% Company.all.each do |company| %>
<%= check_box_tag :company_ids, company.id, #user.companies.include?(company), :name => 'user[company_ids][]' -%>
<%= label_tag :companies_ids, company.id %>
<% end %>
</p>
<p><%= f.submit %></p>
<% end %>
Include a hidden field tag in the form to make sure something gets submitted when none of the check boxes are selected. This should work, after the <%end%>:
<%= hidden_field_tag "user[company_ids][]" %>
I may be wrong, but I think that the first arg of the check_box_tag function is the actual name of the input, so instead of
check_box_tag :company_ids, company.id, #user.companies.include?(company), :name => 'user[company_ids]'
you could try something like
check_box_tag 'user[company_ids]', company.id, #user.company_ids.include?(company.id)
Let me know if it works!
Related
Issue: I have a nested fields_for text_field not appearing, I am not sure what I have been done wrong.
Goal: While creating a record, iterate through a model with preset variables, and save a file (testing with text_field) to a join table which saves both the preset variables and the forms record ID
Models:
class PrintLocation < ApplicationRecord
has_many :shop_products, through: :shop_product_print_files
has_many :shop_product_print_files
accepts_nested_attributes_for :shop_product_print_files
end
class ShopProductPrintFile < ApplicationRecord
belongs_to :shop_products
belongs_to :print_locations
end
class ShopProduct < ApplicationRecord
...
has_many :shop_product_print_files
has_many :print_locations, through: :shop_product_print_files
accepts_nested_attributes_for :print_locations
accepts_nested_attributes_for :shop_product_print_files
...
end
Form:
<%= form_for #shop_product do |f| %>
<%= f.collection_select :product_id, #products, :id, :sku %>
<% PrintLocation.all.each do |print_location| %>
<%= print_location.title %>
<%= f.fields_for :shop_product_print_files do |a| %>
<%= a.text_field :print_file %>
<% end %>
<% end %>
<%= f.submit %>
<% end %>
With this, the text_field doesn't appear but the print_location.title's do appear. There are no errors with this.
While saving the #shop_product, I want to be able to iterate through the possible print_location variables, which are defined, and then for each possible print_location, to then be able to upload a file (text_field for testing), and then save that to the ShopProductPrintFile model which has shop_product_id and print_location_id and print_file attributes.
Is there something I am misunderstanding for how to use fields_for?
Shop Product Controller:
Create:
#shop_product = ShopProduct.new(shop_product_params)
shop = Shop.find(params["shop_product"]["shop_id"])
product = Product.find(params["shop_product"]["product_id"]) #shop_product.product_id = product.id
#shop_product.shop_id = shop.id
respond_to do |format|
if #shop_product.save!
...
Update:
#shop_product = ShopProduct.find_by(store_variant_id: params["shop_product"]["store_variant_id"])
#product = Product.find(params["shop_product"]["product_id"])
Strong Params:
def shop_product_params
params.require(:shop_product).permit(:product_id, :store_product_id, :shop_id, :store_variant_id, :sync, :shop_product_print_file_attributes[:id, :print_files, :print_location_ids => [], :shop_product_ids => []], {print_location_ids: []})
end
UPDATE 2:
Update and Create Method:
#shop_product.shop_product_print_files.build
form:
<% PrintLocation.all.each do |print_location| %>
<%= print_location.title %>
<%= f.fields_for :shop_product_print_files_attributes do |a| %>
<%= a.text_field :print_file %>
<%= a.hidden_field :print_location_id, value: print_location.id %>
<%= a.hidden_field :shop_product_id, value: shop_product.id %>
<% end %>
<% end %>
params:
def shop_product_params
params.require(:shop_product).permit(:shop_product_print_files_attributes => [:ids => [], :print_files => [], :print_location_ids => [], :shop_product_ids => []])
end
error:
Shop product print files shop products must exist
Shop product print files print locations must exist
params that pass:
Parameters: {"utf8"=>"✓", "authenticity_token"=>"u/c103465uNCjF/trYrMleqxJ8b9wyLbU/vjPK4llYtCg/ODj92q5MN24==", "shop_product"=>{"sync"=>"1", "product_id"=>"3", "shop_product_print_files_attributes"=>{"print_file"=>"", "print_location_id"=>"6", "shop_product_id"=>"42"}, "store_product_id"=>"191234345", "store_variant_id"=>"15341234273", "id"=>"42"}, "commit"=>"Sync", "id"=>"42"}
The models haven't changed.
Print file in params still blank?
UPDATE 3:
**using this form: thanks to #arieljuod **
<%= f.fields_for :shop_product_print_files do |ff| %>
<%= ff.object.print_location.title # get the print location from the association %>
<%= ff.hidden_field :print_location_id # save the print_location_id as a hidden field %>
<%= ff.file_field :print_file # file input %>
<% end %>
with this in the new and method housing the view:
#shop_product = ShopProduct.new
PrintLocation.all.each{|p| #shop_product.shop_product_print_files.build(print_location: p)}
works on create.
Issue still arises due to not knowing the ID of the ShopProduct until the page loads due to API and there is a possibility of being multiple IDs on one page.
I use:
<% if #shop_products.find_by(store_variant_id: variant.id) %>
<% shop_product = #shop_products.find_by(store_variant_id: variant.id) %>
<%= form_for shop_product do |f| %>
...
Which, variant comes from a loop defined by an API:
<% #in_store_variants.each do |variant| %>
Now when using shop_products (from when shop_product already exists from finding by the variant.id), the fields_for won't appear. Assuming this is because no records exist in relation. Only if a shop_product.shop_product_print_files exist, will they appear.
The only work around, at this time to my knowledge, is to save all print_locations but use a boolean for which are actually active, or search for which print_locations have an ID attached. But i would rather not do it that way and just save which print_locations are chosen on create (chosen by uploading a print_file).
To "fix" this issue, I:
added accepts_nested_attributes_for reject_if: proc { |attributes| attributes['print_file'].blank? } which doesn't save ShopProductPrintFile's unless the print_file field is submitted with something...
use this form (2 forms depending on if exists or not)
<% if #shop_products.find_by(store_variant_id: variant.id) %>
<%= form_for shop_product do |f| %>
<% PrintLocation.all.each{|p| shop_product.shop_product_print_files.build(print_location: p)} %>
<%= f.fields_for :shop_product_print_files do |ff| %>
<%= ff.object.print_location.title %>
<%= ff.hidden_field :print_location_id %>
<%= ff.text_field :print_file %>
<% end %>
<%= f.submit "Sync" %>
<% end %>
<% else %>
<%= form_for #shop_product do |f| %>
<% PrintLocation.all.each{|p| #shop_product.shop_product_print_files.build(print_location: p)} %>
<%= f.fields_for :shop_product_print_files do |ff| %>
<%= ff.object.print_location.title %>
<%= ff.hidden_field :print_location_id %>
<%= ff.text_field :print_file %>
<% end %>
...
The issue with 2 is i have have PrintLocation 1,2,3 associated, it will show 9 fields, the 1,2,3 ready for update, and the 6 ready for create.
is it possible to call the PrintLocation.all.each{|p| #shop_product.shop_product_print_files.build(print_location: p)} on already created ShopProducts's for where a shop_product_print_file doesn't exist in relation to the possible print location.
So for example...
Created ShopProduct with print location, 1,2,3 (out of 6 possible)
Now, shop_product_print_location where print_location exists will show for updating in the form, so thats 1,2, and 3. How can I have it so the other 3 that weren't created now show to update the ShopProduct and create new ShopProductPrintFile's? so it is possible to update the ShopProduct to have more print_locations to the shop_product_print_file model.
I have a nested fields_for text_field not appearing, I am not sure
what I have been done wrong.
You should add this line in your create action
#shop_product = ShopProduct.new(shop_product_params)
#shop_product.shop_product_print_files.build #this one
Also change shop_product_print_file_attributes to shop_product_print_files_attributes to avoid any further errors.
You have to tell rails which PrintLocation to use on each iteration since your object does not have any
<%= f.fields_for :shop_product_print_files, print_location do |a| %>
I'm not really sure if that's what you want, but the field will appear.
EDIT: so, I think you need something like this:
On the controller
#shop_product = something_to_get_the_product
PrintLocation.all.each{|p| #shop_product.shop_product_print_files.build(print_location: p)}
I prefer to do this here, I don't like that logic on the view
Now you have all the possible print location prebuilt on the shop product object
On the form
# note here the multipart option to allow files
<%= form_for #shop_product, multipart: true do |f| %>
<%= f.collection_select :product_id, #products, :id, :sku %>
<%= f.fields_for :shop_product_print_files do |ff| %>
<%= ff.object.print_location.title # get the print location from the association %>
<%= ff.hidden_field :print_location_id # save the print_location_id as a hidden field %>
<%= ff.file_field :print_file # file input %>
<% end %>
<%= f.submit %>
<% end %>
I'm working on an app in Rails that has teacher and student users. I want to list all the users that belong to a teacher and then let the teacher select a student to send a message to. I have a message model that has :content and :user_id for params. I want to set the :user_id based on the student selected. Here is my code:
<% #students = Student.all %>
<% #students.each do |student| %>
<% if student[:teacher_id] == #current_user.id %>
<%= radio_button 'student', 'id', student.id %>
<%= student.name %>
<% #current_student = Student.find(student.id) %>
<% end %>
<% end %>
<%= form_for Message.new do |f| %>
<%= f.text_area :content, class: 'messageTextarea' %> <br>
<%= f.hidden_field :user_id, :value => #current_student.id %>
<%= f.submit %>
<% end %>
So, I am looping through all students and printing those that have the same ID as the current user (the teacher) with a radio button. The radio button's value is the student's id. Then I want to pass that value to the :user_id of the message so it will then be retrievable for the student's view.
Currently, this code always passes in the value of the last student listed rather than the student selected. How can I change
<% #current_student = Student.find(student.id) %>
to find the student selected rather than the last one?
I did test this code using
<%= f.hidden_field :user_id, :value => #current_user.id %>
and that did work, but I don't want the current_user's id, of course. Thanks for any help!
If you want one form with radio buttons for the students, You gonna need a little bit JavaScript(Or Jquery), All you have to do is to put a listener on these radio button and when user click on one of them you change the hidden input of user_id name.
User example in this link will help you to put listener on a bunch of radio buttons and change another field value, it will be something like this:
$('input[type=radio][name=student[id]]').change(function() {
$('#user_id').val($(this).val());
});
all you have to do is to make sure of name=student[id] and #user_id, if you used this approach you won't need this line anymore:
<% #current_student = Student.find(student.id) %>
Hope it works.
I have what I hope to be a simple question. I need to display the value for an attribute on the Edit page, while keeping the input field for the same attribute. How might this be accomplished?
Well generally you can just use the original object, like you'll have an #foo that you'll have used in your form_for statement, so you can just use that directly: = #foo.the_attribute
If you're within a partial, or elsewhere where you have only the form builder instance, then you can refer to the underlying object with the .object method, eg.:
= form_for #foo do |f|
# in here, f.object == #foo
In my case, I'm working with accepts_nested_attributes_for in two models. Event accept nested objects from Speaker. And Speaker has a perfil_id attribute which could be ['Maker', 'Developer', 'Entrepreneur', ...].
The Speaker's form is a partial rendered from the principal form, Event's form:
<%= form_for(event) do |f| %>
<%= f.text_field :title %>
<%= f.label :title, 'Event name' %>
<%= f.fields_for :speakers do |builder| %>
<%= render 'events/partials/speaker_fields', f: builder %>
<% end %>
<%= f.submit %>
<% end %>
Partial
<%= builder.number_field :name %>
<%= builder.label :name %>
<% options = options_from_collection_for_select(#profiles, 'id', 'name', f.object.member_profile_id ) %>
<%= select_tag "event[speakers_attributes][profile_id]", options, prompt: 'Select a Profile' %>
When editing Event's Speakers I wanted a select_tag to select the profile name for the actual Speaker.
I could not use an input field for this. So I need to get the correct values from the builder object and I get what I need by doing this:
f.object.profile_id
Passing it as a fourth param to the select options I get this working:
<% options = options_from_collection_for_select(#profiles, 'id', 'name', f.object.profile_id ) %>
I hope it could be useful for you too!
I am a little confused.
Despite all questions around this theme here, I can't find the right solution.
What I want to do is to simply add check-boxes to my index filter form.
I am using Metasearch gem and here is my current code :
<form class="filter_form">
<%= form_for #search do |f| %>
<%= f.collection_select :categories_id_equals, Category.all, :id, :name, :include_blank => true, :prompt => "All categories" %>
<%= f.collection_select :location_id_equals, Location.all, :id, :name, :include_blank => true, :prompt => "All locations" %>
<ul>
<b> Type </b>
<% Type.all.each do |type|%>
<li>
<%= check_box_tag :types_id_equals, type.id %>
<%=h type.name %>
</li>
<% end %>
</ul>
<%= submit_tag "Find Now", :class => "find" %>
<% end %>
All works fine, except the checkboxes.
I don't have much experience in rails, so I don't really see what I am doing wrong and what could be the most convenient and simplest way.
Update
.....................
More explanation - I have a model Trips, which has HABTM relationship with two models (
Categories, Types) and belongs to Location.
I want to be able to filter Trips on it's index by categories (f.collection select) ,location (f.collection select) and types (checkboxes).
After checking types and submitting - nothing changes, no filtering is done!
<%= check_box_tag "type_ids[]", type.id %>
Will do it for you. The selected ids will be transfered as a string seperated by commatas. You can find them in params[:type_ids] but you have to deal with them manually! Rails is not a magican, its a framework.
Here's how I handled it.
<% #sub_categories.each do |cat| %>
<h2><%= cat.name %> <%= check_box_tag "q[product_category_id_in][]", cat.id %></h2>
<% end %>
Basically just q is whatever your query param is, then right after that in brackets sub in your meta_search method. I used whatever_foreign_key_in since I want to be able to add more than one id to the array to search on. Then add empty brackets after it so rails handles the post params correctly.
On the front page of my rap lyrics explanation site, there's a place where users can try explaining a challenging line:
alt text http://dl.dropbox.com/u/2792776/screenshots/2010-02-06_1620.png
Here's the partial I use to generate this:
<div class="stand_alone annotation" data-id="<%= annotation.id %>">
<%= song_link(annotation.song, :class => :title) %>
<span class="needs_exegesis"><%= annotation.referent.strip.gsub(/\n/, "\n <br />") %></span>
<% form_for Feedback.new(:annotation_id => annotation.id, :created_by_id => current_user.try(:id), :email_address => current_user.try(:email)), :url => feedback_index_path, :live_validations => true do |f| %>
<%= f.hidden_field :annotation_id %>
<%= f.hidden_field :created_by_id %>
<p style="margin-top: 1em">
<%= f.text_area :body, :rows => 4, :style => 'width:96%', :example_text => "Enter your explanation" %>
</p>
<p>
<% if current_user %>
<%= f.hidden_field :email_address %>
<% else %>
<%= f.text_field :email_address, :example_text => "Your email address" %>
<% end %>
<%= f.submit "Submit", :class => :button, :style => 'margin-left: .1em;' %>
</p>
<% end %>
</div>
However, putting more than one of these on a single page is problematic because Rails automatically gives each form an ID of new_feedback, and each field an ID like feedback_body (leading to name collisions)
Obviously I could add something like :id => '' to the form and all its fields, but this seems a tad repetitive. What's the best way to do this?
If you don't want to change your input names or your model structure, you can use the id option to make your form ID unique and the namespace option to make your input IDs unique:
<%= form_for Feedback.new(...),
id: "annotation_#{annotation.id}_feedback"
namespace: "annotation_#{annotation.id}" do |f| %>
That way our form ID is unique, i.e. annotation_2_feedback and this will also add a prefix, e.g. annotation_2_, to every input created through f.
Did you consider nested_attributes for rails models? Instead of having multiple new feedback forms where each is tied to an annotation, you could have multiple edit annotation forms where each annotation includes fields for a new feedback. The id's of the generated forms would include the annotations id such as edit_annotation_16.
The annotation model would have a relationship to its feedbacks and will also accept nested attributes for them.
class Annotation < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :feedbacks
accepts_nested_attributes_for :feedbacks
end
class Feedback < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :annotation
end
You could then add as many forms as you want, one for each annotation. For example, this is what I tried:
<% form_for #a do |form| %>
Lyrics: <br />
<%= form.text_field :lyrics %><br />
<% form.fields_for :feedbacks do |feedback| %>
Feedback: <br/>
<%= feedback.text_field :response %><br />
<% end %>
<%= form.submit "Submit" %>
<% end %>
<% form_for #b do |form| %>
Lyrics: <br />
<%= form.text_field :lyrics %><br />
<% form.fields_for :feedbacks do |feedback| %>
Feedback: <br/>
<%= feedback.text_field :response %><br />
<% end %>
<%= form.submit "Submit" %>
<% end %>
And the quick and dirty controller for the above edit view:
class AnnotationsController < ApplicationController
def edit
#a = Annotation.find(1)
#a.feedbacks.build
#b = Annotation.find(2)
#b.feedbacks.build
end
def update
#annotation = Annotation.find(params[:id])
#annotation.update_attributes(params[:annotation])
#annotation.save!
render :index
end
end
I had this same issue on a site I'm currently working on and went with the solution you mention at the bottom. It's not repetitive if you generate the ID programmatically and put the whole form in a partial. For example, on my site, I have multiple "entries" per page, each of which has two voting forms, one to vote up and one to vote down. The record ID for each entry is appended to the DOM ID of its vote forms to make it unique, like so (just shows the vote up button, the vote down button is similar):
<% form_for [entry, Vote.new], :html => { :id => 'new_up_vote_' + entry.id.to_s } do |f| -%>
<%= f.hidden_field :up_vote, :value => 1, :id => 'vote_up_vote_' + entry.id.to_s %>
<%= image_submit_tag('/images/icon_vote_up.png', :id => 'vote_up_vote_submit' + entry.id.to_s, :class => 'vote-button vote-up-button') %>
<% end -%>
I also had the same issue but wanted a more extensible solution than adding the ID to each field. Since we're already using the form_for ... |f| notation the trick is to change the name of the model and you get a new HTML ID prefix.
Using a variant of this method: http://www.dzone.com/snippets/create-classes-runtime (I removed the &block stuff)
I create a new model that is an exact copy of the model I want a second form for on the same page. Then use that new model to render the new form.
If the first form is using
#address = Address.new
then
create_class('AddressNew', Address)
#address_new = AddressNew.new
Your ID prefix will be 'address_new_' instead of 'address_' for the second form of the same model. When you read the form params you can create an Address model to put the values into.
For those stumbling here, looking for the solution for Rails 3.2 app, look at this question instead:
Rails: Using form_for multiple times (DOM ids)