Consider that we are given an isometric grid (consider something like Diablo) of tiles. We have some measures for the grid, like grid height, grid width and tile height/width. Consider this image:
The center cell of the grid is 0,0 extending iso-north (+y), iso-south(-y), iso-east(+x), iso-west(-x).
Let's say we to draw a rectangle at an arbitrary location on the grid. We do NOT have the isometric positions for the rectangle, but rather have the normal draw coordinates for the grid where the top left hand corner is 0,0 and south is y+, right is x+.
If we had the top, left, height, width of the rectangle in question - how could we calculate an array of iso-cells that crossed by the bottom edge of the rectangle.
Any language you choose to demonstrate this will suffice.
In some papers and books about isometric programming (Isometric programming with Direct X7, yes its old but gives an overview about the problems and techniques) they use mousemaps.
Also there is the technique to render the area of the map covered by the rectangle into an image, each tile gets a unique color (and it is just the color rendered). Afterwards they check which colors are in the image and so extract the list of tiles.
Since you are using a classic isometric tile width half height there could be a mathematical solution too. Unfortunatly an suggested algorithm would depend heavily on your map layout.
The code for a Java based TileSystem can be found here
Related
Given and image and 4 corner points of an area inside the image, I want to figure out if a point p (x,y) lays inside the given area. The area is not necessarily in form of a rectangle, as the area is the result of a perspective projection of some other image.
For example:
Here I want to figure out if the pink point actually lays within the shape inside the image. In this case it does.
I was thinking about drawing an contour with drawContours and then using pointPolygonTest but I was wondering if there is an easier and more tailored way of doing it.
I have a list view with "Hero" icons on the left. When I click a list item, it loads the next screen with the article text and the Hero image (which animates nicely/automatically to the correct spot on the 2nd screen).
I would have thought that was the "tough" part, but I'm now trying to get a curved shape as the top background of the 2nd screen. I would love to make it a drawn vector shape, as opposed to a bitmap and even have it drip/bounce onto the page, but at the moment...
I'm just trying to figure out how to:
draw a vector shape
have it as the background of a screen with other widgets on top (see purple curve on 2nd screen below)
I made a full sample for your curved shape in a gist here
I used CustomPainter to draw on a canvas then, with some geometric calculations, I achieved the curved shape.
Final result
How I draw it?
Before coding and on a Whiteboard I determined somethings:
My Canvas Area:
The canvas dimensions I need to draw that shape (which equals to Flutter widget's dimensions).
How and where my brush will move?
how means: what are the APIs I need to draw that shape on the canvas using the Path class.
e.g. lineTo() for a straight line, quadraticBezierTo() for a curve.
where means: Where are the points (coordinates) I need to draw the whole shape. (see yellow and green dots in the image above)
Points (coordinates) Calculations:
I used some geometric equations to calculate the coordinates. e.g. Point on a circle’s circumference
All of my calculations depend on the canvas size, that gives me a responsive shape.
Full sample here!
I am currently trying to map textures using image labels onto 2 different triangles (because im using right angle wedges so i need 2 to make scalene triangles), but here is the problem, I can only set positional, size, and rotational data so I need to figure out how I can use this information to correctly map the texture onto the triangle
the position is based on the topleft corner and size of triangle (<1,1> corner is at the bottom right and <0,0> corner is at top left) and the size is based on triangle size also (<1,1> is same size as triangle and <0,0> is infinitely tiny) and rotation is central based.
I have the UV coordinates (given 0-1) and face vertices, all from an obj file. The triangles in 3D are made up of 2 wedges which are split at a right angle from the longest surface and from the opposite angle.
I don't quite understand this however it may be help to change the canvas properties on the Surface GUI
My aim is to draw a set of texures (128x128 pixels) as (gap-less) tiles without filtering artifacts in XNA.
Currently, I use for example 25 x 15 fully opaque tiles (alpha is always 255) in x-y to create a background image in a game, or a similar number of semi-transparent tiles to create the game "terrain" (foreground). In both cases, the tiles are scaled and drawn using floating-point positions. As it is known, to avoid filtering artifacts (like small but visible gaps, or unwanted color overlaps at the tile borders) one has to do "edge padding" which is described as adding an additional fringe of a width of one pixel and using the color of adjacent pixels for the added pixels. Discussions about this issue can be found for example here. An example image of this issue from our game can be found below.
However, I do not really understand how to do this - technically, and specifically in XNA.
(1) When adding a fringe of one pixel width, my tiles would then be 129 x 129 and the overlapping fringes would create quite visible artifacts of their own.
(2) Alternatively, once could add the padding pixels but then not draw the full 129x129 pixel texture but only its "center" (without the fringe) e.g. by choosing the source rectangle of this texture to be (1,1,128,128). But are then the padding pixels not simply ignored or is the filtering hardware really using this information?
So basically, I wonder how this is done properly? :-)
Example image of filtering issue from game: Unwanted vertical gap in brown foreground tiles.
I need to find orientation of corn pictures (as examples below) they have different angles to right or left. I need to turn them upside (90 degree angle with their normal) (when they look like a water drop)
Is there any way I can do it easily?
As starting point - find image moments (and Hu moments for complex forms like pear). From the link:
Information about image orientation can be derived by first using the
second order central moments to construct a covariance matrix.
I suspect that usage of some image processing library like OpenCV could give more reliable results in common case
From the OP I got the impression you a rookie in this so I stick to something simple:
compute bounding box of image
simple enough go through all pixels and remember min,max of x,y coordinates of non background pixels
compute critical dimensions
Just cast few lines through the bounding box computing the red points positions. So select the start points I choose 25%,50%,75% of height. First start from left and stop on first non background pixel. Then start from right and stop on first non background pixel.
axis aligned position
start rotating the image with some step remember/stop on position where the red dots are symmetric so they are almost the same distance from left and from right. Also the bounding box has maximal height and minimal width in axis aligned position so you can also exploit that instead ...
determine the position
You got 4 options if I call the distance l0,l1,l2,r0,r1,r2
l means from left, r means from right
0 is upper (bluish) line, 1 middle, 2 bottom
then you wanted position is if (l0==r0)>=(l1==r1)>=(l2==r2) and bounding box is bigger in y axis then in x axis so rotate by 90 degrees until match is found or determine the orientation directly from distances and rotate just once ...
[Notes]
You will need accessing pixels of image so I strongly recommend to use Graphics::TBitmap from VCL. Look here gfx in C specially the section GDI Bitmap and also at this finding horizon on high altitude photo might help a bit.
I use C++ and VCL so you have to translate to Pascal but the VCL stuff is the same...