I want to let the user to create multiple instances of the same form (let's call it Form1 which is a MDI child form). So I have two procedures like this where I create the forms.
procedure MyProcedure1; // procedure 2 is similar. it also has a var called MyFrm
var MyFrm: TFrm1;
begin
...
MyFrm:= TFrm1.create(MainForm);
MyFrm.BringToFront;
MyFrm.LoadFromFile(someFile);
end;
As you can see MyFrm is local var. This is ok for me as I don't need to programatically access the form after I create it. There is no other global variable named Frm1. In the OnClose event of MyFrm I have Action:= caFree;
What could cause the error above?
A user sent that error. It happened only once and I cannot reproduce it.
Edit:
The error appears in the "MyFrm:= TFrm1.create" line.
Some people suggested that I need to programatically give unique names to my dynamically created forms. I also wondered myself what name a form takes when it is created so I stepped into the code while calling the MyProcedure1 procedure.
Delphi automatically gives unique names like
MyFrm.name= MyFrm, then
MyFrm.name= MyFrm_1,
MyFrm.name= MyFrm_2,
MyFrm.name= MyFrm_3, and so on.
The MyFrm.Name is not altered in LoadFromFile. I have checked (breakpoint) the value of 'MyFrm.Name' at the end of procedure MyProcedure1; after LoadFromFile. The name is unique.
As some people suggested, I override the SetName procedure and checked the name of TMyFrm. Indeed each form gets a unique name.
procedure TMyFrm.SetName(const Value: TComponentName);
begin
ShowMessage(Value);
inherited;
end;
I have many forms in this app but only the MainForm is auto-created.
I don't use threads. Anyway this will not be relevant since the forms are created by user (so multi-threading is irrelevant unless the user can create 2 forms at the same time).
Giving MainForm as the Owner in TFrm1.Create will include the newly created form in the components list of MainForm. A component ensures that this list doesn't contain any two components with the same non-empty name (otherwise FindComponent won't work). This mechanism also works when a component changes its name.
As long as you don't specify the name in TFrm1.Create it is most likely that it is set by the LoadFromFile method, which means that you don't have much influence on the name unless you change the file's content.
A valid workaround is to create the form with nil as Owner, load the form from the file, change the name to a unique value or to an empty string and finally call MainForm.InsertComponent.
procedure MyProcedure1;
var MyFrm: TFrm1;
begin
...
MyFrm:= TFrm1.create(nil);
MyFrm.BringToFront;
MyFrm.LoadFromFile(someFile);
MyFrm.Name := ''; // or some unique name
MainForm.InsertComponent(MyFrm);
end;
The message is caused because each form must be uniquely named.
When you create a form twice, you need to ensure each instance has a unique name, or set the Name to an empty string. The latter also is the trick when using multiple instances of a data module, so that the automatic linking of data-aware controls does not end up always using the first instance.
Add
MyFrm.Name := MyFrm.Name + <something unique>;
MyFrm.Name := '';
after the Create call and you should be fine
MyFrm.Name is the same for both instances...
Make sure than MyFrm.Name is unique...
As far as my exploration along this line, yes the problem of "already exists" stems from having intances of the editor with the same value for the Name property. As another work around do not visually create the editor(s). Create a new component based on TForm/TFrame/TPanel for the editor(s) you want the user to be able to create multiple instances of. You will have to hand code the creation & deletion of any sub-controls, Setting their properties within your code and assigning values - anything from V_Btn = new TBitBtn(this), V_Btn->Color = clTeal, to V_Btn->OnClick = Close_The_Window. BUT NEVER assign a value to the Name property of any component in the new class and do not set the Name property of the editor once you have created an instance of the editor. Treat the Name property for editor as if it did not exist. After you have created the class and added it to your project the following is valid :
TMyeditor* Editor_01 = new TMyeditor(Main_Form);
TMyeditor* Editor_02 = new TMyeditor(Main_Form);
Editor_01->Parent = Tab_Sheet_Addresses;
Editor_02->Parent = Tab_Sheet_Billing;
The more complex the design concept for your editor the more effort you will undergoe to code the class. However this approach will resolve the "already exists" error.
End of answer.
The following is tangental to the original question as it is an extension of what you may want to further do with your code & I write it to help you along should it be the case. The following allows you to efficiently store/retrieve the editor(s) and its published properties such as position on the user's screen, themes, etc. If you've gone the above route, add the following :
void RegisterClassesWithStreamingSystem(void)
{
// Make sure that as part of the startup
// code TMyEditor is registered
// with the streaming system.
#pragma startup RegisterClassesWithStreamingSystem
Classes::RegisterClass(__classid(TMyEditor));
}
You can now ComponentToString <---> StringToComponent[*1] the editor(s).
You can now create a simple database of each editor saving it [*2] and re-creating the editor(s) at runtime. Saving & Recreating is almost entirely done by the TReader/TWriter objects.
{It is worth while to read about TReader/TWriter which is included in the Delphi help file}
[ Presupposing you have an instances of TMyEditor you want to save called Editor_01 & Editor_02 and
you've created the dataset and assigned it to a TClientDataSet named "CDS" ]
//How to write the Editors
String_Version_Of_Editor = ComponentToString(Editor_01);
CDS->Insert();
CDS->FieldByName("Data")->AsString = String_Version_Of_Editor;
CDS->Post();
String_Version_Of_Editor = ComponentToString(Editor_02);
CDS->Insert();
CDS->FieldByName("Data")->AsString = String_Version_Of_Editor;
CDS->Post();
//How to read, create an instance of, set the Owner of
//(allowing for automatic destruction/deletion
// if desired, Vis-à-vis Let the compiler/runtime package handle that),
//& setting the form's Parent
AnsiString String_Version_Of_Editor;
TWinControl* New_Editor;
String_Version_Of_Editor = CDS->FieldByName("Data")->AsString;
//The next line creates/constructs the new editor
New_Editor = StringToComponent(String_Version_Of_Editor);
//The next line sets the new editor's Owner to Main_Form
//It also assigns Main_Form the responsibility of object cleanup
Main_Form->Insert(New_Editor);
//The next line sets the Editor's Parent causing it to be part of the
//displayed user interface (it has been invisble since creation)
New_Editor->Parent = Tab_Sheet_Addresses;
//Move on to the next editor;
CDS->Next();
String_Version_Of_Editor = CDS->FieldByName("Data")->AsString;
New_Editor = StringToComponent(String_Version_Of_Editor);
Main_Form->Insert(New_Editor);
New_Editor->Parent = Tab_Sheet_Billing;
People who read the above who are astute will have noted that in the above code the New_Editor is of type TWincontrol not TMyEditor - though it likely should have been. However I did this to draw attention to the fact that problematically the TReader object in Delphi which is really doing the work of converting a string to a component object instance creates/constructs any object which has been registered with the streaming class via RegisterClass. In this manner explicit creation of the editor via explicitedly naming it's type is avoided. If thought is given to the design of TMyEditor and its descendents the only change required to the code is to change TWinControl* to TMyEditor* - even that is not required if published properties beyond TWinControl* are not accessed outside the scope of TMyEditor - Example TMyEditor has access to the variables whose values it is editing and does not require this information to be supplied to the editor.(If working from a DataModule, #include the datamodule's header into TMyEditor).
Side Note:
You may have a utility to know what class was read from the database so that you may place the instance where it belongs. To do this #include <typeinfo> into your code.
Example : If you have instances of TMyEditor, TMyEditor_Generation_01, TMyEditor_Generation_02, etc writen to the database the following will allow you to examine the instances read at runtime for placement into the user interface :
if (typeid(New).name() == "TMyEditor *")
New_Editor->Parent = Tab_Sheet_Addresses;
else
if (typeid(New).name() == "TMyEditor_Generation_01 *")
New_Editor->Parent = Tab_Sheet_Billing;
else
if (typeid(New).name() == "TMyEditor_Generation_02 *")
New_Editor->Parent = Tab_Sheet_Other_Editor;
typeid(__).name() will return a string which is the name of the class, in this case will also inculde " *".
The above allows ANY object(s) to be stored in the database and recreated. The entries within the database are not required to be related. The TReader object buried in Delphi's code will decide at runtime what they are and use the correct constructor.
[*1] Note : The ComponentToString and StringToComponent are examples in the delpi/c++ help file.
[*2] Note : What is being saved are the published properties, therefore in your editor class any values you want stored and retrieved which are not already inherited and published should be declared in the __published section of your new class. Those items may also be custom objects, for those you will likely code custom specific methods/functions for the read/write access specifiers in defining the _property. I would suggest translating any complex object into a string value for ease of examining your code while under development.
Related
When you have a select * from XXX query eventually you can get more fields than you expected, do you know if there is a way to check if new fields have been added since you created that query and defined its persistent fields ?.
Normally you can open your queries without having to worry if new fields have been added. If new fields are not within your persistent fields then you just won't see them. But on a Datasnap REST Server you get an AV when trying to return a Dataset from a query that now has more fields than when you created its persistent fields.
If would like to know if there is a quick check that I can do so I can return a more helpful error instead of an AV.
Something like :
MyQuery.Open;
if MyQuery.FieldDefs.Count <> MyQuery.Fields.Count then begin
raise Exception.Create('The number of returned Fields doesn''t match the expected');
end;
Thank you
If the dataset has persistent fields and you want those additional fields to be created when the query opens, you have to set dataset.FieldOptions.AutoCreateMode to acCombineAlways first.
Now after opening the query, you can check for the existance of additional fields with lcAutomatic in dataset.Fields.LifeCycles.
In case you are interested in which fields are new, just iterate dataset.Fields and check for field.LifeCycle = lcAutomatic.
BTW, using the setting above you probably might not need that check anymore.
I use common procedures for all Virtual Treeviews (TVirtualStringTree) so I only have 1 code to maintain, like for OnClick I use Common_VST_OnClick which all VST controls has set:
procedure TForm1.Common_VST_OnClick(Sender: TObject);
And to execute code based on which VST calls this on click procedure, I realized I use many different ways to recognize which control is Sender:
if Sender = VST1 then
if Sender.Name = VST1.Name then
if TVirtualStringTree(Sender) = VST1 then
if TVirtualStringTree(Sender).Name = VST1.Name then
if TVirtualStringTree(Sender).Name = 'VST1' then
The last is probably worst as the name is hardcoded, so I'm trying to only use 1 type of identification, in all procedures.
What is the best way to identify which control is Sender?
You should prefer the test that uses object identity. That is, the first test in your question:
if Sender = VST1 then
An object reference such as Sender or VST1 is the address of the object. If two such addresses are equal, then the references point to same object. And vice versa.
The tests based on control name can work but are brittle. It is possible for multiple controls to have the same name. It is possible to change the control name but not update all the uses of the name in the program.
As for the type casting option
if TVirtualStringTree(Sender) = VST1 then
the type cast has no impact on object identity and so is needless. Don't ever type cast an operand to an object identity test since doing so is spurious.
I've not been able to find an answer on this anywhere. Using Delphi XE7 with TClientDataSet, DataSnap & SQL Server. I need to insert a record, apply updates and then refresh that record so I can get the Id and assign it to my object. Seems pretty basic requirement, but on the contrary it is proving to be a royal pain.
I've found the obvious stuff on EDN, SO and Dr Bob:
http://edn.embarcadero.com/article/20847
DataSnap and the autoinc field
http://www.drbob42.com/examines/examinC0.htm
However these seem to focus on a "Refresh" of the TClientDataSet to re-fetches the entire table/query. Whilst this does actually resolve the Id field itself (good!), it also moves the cursor off the current record which was just inserted and so I'm not able to get the Id and assign it to my object. Also, for performance over HTTP I don't really want to refetch the entire table every time a record is inserted, if there's 10,000 records this will consume too much bandwidth and be ridiculously slow!
Consider the following code:
function TRepository<I>.Insert(const AEntity: I): I;
begin
FDataSet.DisableControls;
try
FDataSet.Insert;
AssignEntityToDataSet(AEntity); // SET'S ALL THE RELEVANT FIELDS
FDataSet.Post;
FDataSet.ApplyUpdates(-1);
FDataSet.Refresh; // <--- I tried RefreshRecord here but it cannot resolve the record
AEntity.Id := FDataSet.FieldByName('Id').AsInteger; // <----- THIS NOW POINTS TO WRONG ROW
finally
FDataSet.EnableControls;
end;
end;
Does anyone know how to achieve this? I need to be able to refresh and stay on the current record otherwise I do not know the Id of the record just created and the GUI cannot stay focused on the current record.
Hopefully something obvious I'm missing.
Cheers.
Rick.
Assuming you can get hands on the new ID inside the AfterUpdateRecord event of your DataProvider, your event handler then may look like this (the current record of DeltaDS is the one just inserted into SourceDS):
if (UpdateKind = ukInsert) then begin
DeltaDS.FindField('Id').NewValue := <TheNewID>;
end;
Make sure to have the poPropogateChanges option set in the provider. This will transfer the changed Id field back to the ClientDataSet.
Now you can get rid of the FDataSet.Refresh call.
SQL Server does allow you to get the last identity it generated in several ways - there's no need to "refresh" the record/query which means re-issuing a SELECT and can generate undesiderable side-effects. You can use SELECT SCOPE_IDENTITY() or use an OUTPUT clause. If the Delphi database driver supports it, TField.AutogenerateValue should accomplish that task automatically (see http://docwiki.embarcadero.com/Libraries/XE7/en/Data.DB.TField.AutoGenerateValue)
Otherwise you have to put that new data into your delta (see Raabe answer - this has to be done on the datasnap server which actually talks to the database) after reading it, so it's sent back to the client. You also need to set properly and TField.ProviderFlags to ensure data are applied correctly (see http://docwiki.embarcadero.com/RADStudio/XE7/en/Influencing_How_Updates_Are_Applied), usually you don't want those field appear in an UPDATE.
This could be a very basic question, but hopefully someone will be able to answer it.
I am receiving messages (HL7) using a custom receive pipeline. Inside my custom pipeline, I am promoting properties into the context. I have set up a map where I need to access these properties. However, I would like to access these properties on the send side. The reason why it needs to be on the send side is because I am attaching my map to the send port, so I assume that the message will have already hit the MessageBox and will be mapped on the send side. Hopefully that makes sense...
I know that there are a few 3rd party tools I can use, but I was hoping that there's a simple functoid, or some code I can enter in a scripting functoid that will access the context for me.
Would someone be able to point me in the right direction with this?
There is, indeed a C# functoid that allows access to context properties but it seems to only work with maps on a Receive Port or inside an Orchestration.
You can use the Context Accessor Functiod to do this... Combine it's pipeline component with yours and it should work... Beware it should be handled within the same thread...
http://contextaccessor.codeplex.com/
I don't know if this is possible. However, I had a similar requirement to access message context properties and I was able to populate a message with the context properties in an orchestration thanks to
Greg.Forsythe's excellent instructions
I had a similar situation to access the context properties to get the filename property in the my map. I did the below steps without using any external functoids. Hope this helps someone
Steps:
create a new schema say "FileSchema"
FileNode(rootNode)
-FileName (fieldElement)
Click the schema and in the properties target namespace - clear the namespace.
make the FileName property distinguished. Rt.Click FileName and show promotions and add FileName to Distinguished property tab.
In your target schema, add the field FileName. for me I added it to a SQL schema, since I need the filename for every row in the database
In your orchestration, use the message assignment shape and type the below
// create a variable varFileXML of type System.XML.XMLDocument
// I'm creating a xml same like the file schema and loading that to the XML variable and then assigning that to the Message of type FileSchema
varFileXML = new System.Xml.XmlDocument();
varFileXML.LoadXml("<FileNode><FileName>FileName_0</FileName></FileNode>");
Msg_FileSchema = varFileXML;
//Get the FileName to a variable of string type
varFileName = Msg_FlatFileSchema(FILE.ReceivedFileName);
varFileName = System.IO.Path.GetFileName(varFileName);
//Access the filename property from the message and assign the variable to that
Msg_File.FileName = varFileName;
Now that we got the FileName in to the message you can use that in mapping to your target schema
I used a transform shape to create a new inline map with source as your target schema and fileschema together and the destination as the target schema.I mapped the filename from the fileschema to my target schema the filename property
this is one of the many ways to get the context property. Hope it helps
thanks & regards
Silam
I'm building an app around Vici Coolstorage (asp.net version). I have my classes created and mapped to my database tables and can pull a list of all records fine.
I've written a stored procedure where the query jumps across databases that aren't mapped with Coolstorage, however, the fields in the query result map directly to one of my classes. The procedure takes 1 parameter.
so 2 questions here:
how do i execute the stored procedure? i'm doing this
CSParameterCollection collection = new CSParameterCollection();
collection.Add("#id", id);
var result = Vici.CoolStorage.CSDatabase.RunQuery("procedurename", collection);
and getting the exception "Incorrect syntax near 'procedurename'." (i'm guessing this is because it's trying to execute it as text rather than a procedure?)
and also, since the class representing my table is defined as abstract, how do i specify that result should create a list of MyTable objects instead of generic or dynamic or whatever objects? if i try
Vici.CoolStorage.CSDatabase.RunQuery<MyTable>(...)
the compiler yells at me for it being an abstract class.
There's a shortcut in CoolStorage to run a stored procedure. Simply prefix the stored procedure name with "!":
CSDatabase.RunQuery("!procedurename", collection);