For my client's custom-built CRM, I want users (technicians) to be notified of changes to marked cases via email.
This warrants a simple subscription mapping table between users and cases and automated emails to be sent every time a change is made to a case from within the logging method.
How do I send 10-100 emails to subscribed users without bogging down my logging method? My SMTP server is on a peer on my LAN, so sends should be quick, but ideally this should be handled by an external queuing process.
I can have a cron job send any outstanding emails every 10 minutes, but for this specific client cases are quite time-sensitive and instant notification (as instant as email can be) would be great.
How can I send bulk notification emails from within ASP.NET MVC without bogging down my logging method?
Back in 2007 I was asked to look into a case where Web Server would suddenly freeze and start sending 503 errors and come back after a few minutes. Cutting a long story short it turned out at the end that it was sending email which was blocking the server (in addition to some bad code).
Basically Microsoft's SMTP server is implemented as a single-thread service - last I checked. This will mean that all your valuable ASP.NET threads serving requests will have to queue to a single thread monolithic application to send a not so urgent email. You need to decouple your web site from sending emails - that is what everyone does and there is a good reason for it.
Write your emails to a queue and have a process reading and sending emails.
Sending emails from an ASP.NET application is not a good idea as it might monopolize valuable server resources. A better solution would be to setup a Windows Service to perform this task or even write a Console application which could be scheduled to run with Windows Scheduler. Quartz.NET is a good solution you might take a look at allowing you to schedule jobs.
If you want those email sending to be triggered from within a particular controller action you could also have a separate WCF service which could be invoked asynchronously.
Related
I'm in the process of planning the development of a mail-server to hand the sending of email across our multiple websites. Below is a description of what we are planning to implement and I'd like your opinion/suggestions.
We use ASP.NET MVC and have many web-sites hosted on Azure. We currently send mail internally within each of the web applications using SMTPServer.Send(). Obviously this is not the ideal way to send emails when you have a decently busy set of websites because the send mail call is blocking and cannot guarantee mails are sent. With this I'm worried out getting an influx of mail requests when we launch our next website (we think it'll get a decent amount of traffic and lots of emails will be sent).
My plan of action : to build a centralised mail-server that runs in the background (we use azure and this will be simply another web-application). When each one of our web applications wants to send a mail, instead of doing this internally, it'll call a web method on the mail-server called sendMail() this function will accept certain parameters and insert the mail parameters, content etc. into a database. The mail server will then poll the database at fixed time intervals, select a set of unsent emails and attempt to send them using the same SMTPServer.Send() function. If an email fails for some reason we won't flag it as sent and in the next poll interval the email will be selected again and another send attempt will be made. (we will cap the number of send attempts to say 20).
This will allow each of the websites to run smoothly without having loads of blocking send mail calls internally and the mail server will handle all the sending sequentially and in a controlled environment as a separate standalone web-application.
Thanks in advance!
Looks like a good design, Don't know the entire scenario which let to you building something like an email server. The problem has been solved well by using a service that already exist like Office 365.
Your design is good, My suggestions would be the following,
You can use Azure WebJobs to build the polling agent. You can make the web job run as a scheduled web job that does the polling and sending the mail and it can be written very clean as a simple console app.
You can use Azure API App to build the SendMail() call and you can use the Azure AD Auth on the API to authenticate the caller of the API using the Authentication and Authorization feature to easily secure your email server. You can also enable CORS easily as well to make sure you receive requests from other websites and process it.
Some issues I foresee for you,
Volume and Scaling : You can only process so much email between each polling. If you cannot then you will need to create another polling agent which will making things complicated as they need to know they are picking different sets of emails to send. If you volume is going to be low you should be fine.
Challenge : Why can't the websites send the mail them selves ? And then record it on the database for tracking. All you have to do build module or a component that they use on their web page to create and send the mail. Polymer 1.0 works well for this scenario.
Hope this helps to get you started.
I have some questions about ActionMailer :
How does Actionmailer connect to a smtp server ?
Are the connections concurrent or parallel if the number of emails high > 1000 ?
How will sending out emails like facebook does ( 1000's in numbers ) as immediate emails affect the ruby on rails application and how would actionmailer handle it ?
Any other solution/plugin to send out large number emails from a RoR application apart ActionMailer?
------------------------------------------------added :
We need to send out at least 1000 emails per 15 minutes . We are using a Notes Domino server as our smtp server .! what is the possible architecture for this kind of problem. We are already storing the emails in the database to send them later , but what is needed is the sending approach !
The usual thing is to create a background job to send email. ActionMailer is very good for single emails but does tend to run into trouble after sending multiple emails as each one can take several seconds to complete. That's why I created PostageApp to help solve those problems.
Some services on the market to help you with sending lots of email from Rails:
MailGun
SendGrid
PostmarkApp
MailChimp
Mailjet
PostageApp
All of these have ways of sending multiple messages with a single API call or SMTP transaction.
1) Actionmailer connects to your smtp server via a set of parameters including a host, port and protocol.
3) The effect will be a slow site as a result of the many synchronous tasks being executed.
2 & 4)
Actionmailer is a bit too slow to be sending out a ton of emails under load, remember that it is a synchronous operation and as such its not really the sort of thing you want to be doing a lot on a busy site.
To be honest you're better off not sending that quantity of email from your website. It's not really designed to be used in such a way. If I had to send that sort of volume I'd look at doing the work in the background, something like Delayed Job would work well here or one of the many async rails mailers found here would do the trick.
What you really want to look at here is the requirement that you're trying to fulfil, is it absolutely necessary that the website be responsible for sending the mail in a synchronous fashion? In most cases the answer to that question is no. If you can, you'll be far better off deferring this sort of task to another part of your system, keep your site as lean and focused as you can.
Simple solution here for you...
Sidekiq or Resque
I'd highly recommend Sidekiq as it's not near as server intense for running multiple workers for this one - only be careful with concurrency issues (make sure you don't have 2 workers pick up the same job and send duplicate emails that is).
Say you set 20 Sidekiq workers, each should be able to send an email every 2-4 seconds, you're looking at an easy 300-600 per minute.
DO NOT try to do this without background workers like Sidekiq, Resque, or DelayedJob. You will freeze your entire app if you try sending in app with any large amount of emails. Even sending activation emails in app and what not will cause you unnecessary slow down issues.
I'd have one Worker that handles the queueing periodically and another Worker class that handles the sending. We're using Resque (6 workers maybe?) for this on an older app (pre-sidekiq) to send around 500 emails every 5 minutes with no issues.
You can aways use a third party like someone mentioned. Sendgrid is decent. But that wasn't the question, this is how you do it yourself simply and easily.
You define the SMTP settings in a config file if left blank it uses sendMail local
concurrent
multiple handlers
Is there a bulk email plugin for Rails apps?
you may also do 1000.times do email.deliver but it will probably collapse ur server
I'm building an API using Rails where requests come in and they need to be executed by a cluster of workers running on a different server (these workers call remote APIs and parse the data, etc...). I'm going to be using Sidekiq or Resque to handle the queueing/processing of that.
My issue is the client needs to wait while this is happening and the controller needs to return the response to the client once it's complete. How would I handle this in the controller? We're using a redis backend, so I was thinking something along the lines of subscribing to a pub/sub channel and waiting for the worker to publish a status message. The controller would wait for a set time period and then return a 'check back later' response to the client if it doesn't receive a message in time. What would be the best way to implement that, or is there a better solution?
Do not make your clients wait! There are a lot of issues if you make the controller block for a long running job:
Other programs may assume the request timed out (proxies, browsers, scripts, etc.)
It makes your API endpoints become a source for denial of service
It requires you to put more engineering work into web servers (since a rails process can't handle another web request while it's handling the blocking call)
Part of the reason of using Sidekiq or Resque is the avoid controllers that do heavily lifting during the http request.
Instead, background jobs should report their status to the database. Then web server should query and return to the client the latest status from the database.
If clients need more immediate feedback, you can:
make clients constantly poll
post request to the client (if the API consumer is another webserver)
use another protocol mechanism (eg - websockets).
Following a specific action the user takes on my website, a number of messages must be sent to different emails. Is it possible to have a separate thread or worker take care of sending multiple emails so as to avoid having the response from the server take a while to return if there are a lot of emails to send?
I would like to avoid using system process or scheduled tasks, email queues.
You can definitely spawn off a background thread in your controller to handle the emails asynchronously.
I know you want to avoid queues, but another thing i have done in the past is written a windows service that pulls email from a DB queue and processes it at certain intervals. This way you can separate the 2 applications if there is a lot of email to be sent.
This can be done in many different ways, depending on how large your application is and what kind of reliability you want. Any of these ways should help you achieve what you want (in ascending order based on complexity):
If you're using IIS SMTP Server or another mail server that supports a pickup directory option, you can go with that. With this option, instead of sending the emails directly, they are saved first in the pickup directory. Your call will immediately return after the email is saved in the pickup directory, so the user won't have to wait until the email is sent. On the other hand, the server will try to send the email as soon as it's saved in the pickup directory so it's almost immediate (just without blocking the call).
You can use a background thread like described in other answers. You'll need to be careful with this option as the thread can end unexpectedly before it finishes its job. You'll need to add some code to make sure this works reliably (personally, I'd prefer not to use this option).
Using a messaging queue server like MSMQ. This is more work and you probably should only look into this if you have a large scale application or have good reasons not to use the first option with the pickup directory.
There are a few ways you could do this.
You could store enough details about the message in the database, and write a windows service to loop through them and send the email. When the user submits the form it just inserts the required data about the message and trusts the service will pick it up. Almost an email queue which you said you didn't want, but you're going to end up in a queue situation with almost any solution.
Another option would be to drop in NServiceBus. Use that for these kinds of tasks.
I typically compile the message body and store that in a table in the db along with the from and to addresses, a subject, and a timestamp indicating when the email was sent. Then I have a background task check the table periodically and pull any that haven't been sent. This task attempts to send each email and updates the timestamp accordingly. One advantage of storing the compiled message body up front is that the background task doesn't have to do any processing of context-specific data, and therefore can be pretty darn simple.
Whenever an operation like is hingent upon an event, there is always the possibility something will go wrong.
In ASP.NET you can spawn multiple threads and have those threads do the action. Make sure you tell the thread it's a background thread, otherwise ASP.NET might way for the thread to finish before rendering your page:
myThread.IsBackground = true;
I know you said you didn't want to use system process or scheduled tasks, but a windows service would be a viable approach to this as well. The approach would be to use MS Queue, or save the actions needing to be done in a DataBase table. Then have a windows service check every minute or so and do those actions.
This way, if something fails (Email server down) those emails / actions can still be done.
They will also be recorded for audit's (which is very nice to have).
This method allows you're web site to function as a website while offloading these tasks to another service. The last thing you need is for multiple ASP.NET processes to be used up waiting for emails to send. let something else handle that.
How would i go about to receive mails in a Ruby on Rails application without going through a mail server like PostFix or to fetch them by pop3 etc.
What i was to do is to catch all mails sent to #mydomain.com and just do something with them in my application. I don't need to store the mails or anything like that.
Is this posible?
I just implemented this for my SAAS to autoprocess mailer-bounce notification messages.
Call me, call you?
You call me
You can set up a local mail server. It would then respond to an incoming email, and start up a rails executable to process the email. This method is NOT recommended since starting up rails is a big task (takes multiple secs and lots of memory). You don't want a Rails bad boy started up just because you received an email. You'd be writing your own DDOS attack. (Attacking yourself.)
I call you
Instead, poll for email on your own schedule by using a single job to process all currently waiting emails. You need to set up a background job handler since stock rails is focused on responding to web requests. I use delayed_job, but there are other alternatives including kicking off a cron job every so in often.
Another benefit is that you don't need to manage a mail server. Leave that headache to someone else. Then use the Ruby library net::imap to read the incoming mail and process it.
If your process doesn't recognize the email format, then forward the msg to a human for processing.
And be sure that if the process sends mail in addition to reading/processing it, that the process uses a different email address as its From address. Otherwise, odds are good that sometime along the way, you'll end up in an email loop and many gigabytes of messages going back and forth. For example, your process receives a message, responds to it, but in the meantime the sender (a human) has switched on vacation response. And your robot then responds to the vacation response..... oops....
Writing your own mail server
Re:
How would i go about to receive mails in a Ruby on Rails application without going through a mail server like PostFix or to fetch them by pop3 etc.
What i was to do is to catch all mails sent to #mydomain.com and just do something with them in my application. I don't need to store the mails or anything like that.
Direct answer: Yes, you could do this by writing an smtp server and setting up dns so your machine will be the mail destination for the domain. Your smtp server would process the messages on the fly, they would not be stored on your system at any point.
Is this a good idea? No, not at all. While appearances may be to the contrary, email is a store and forward system. Trying to avoid storing the messages before your app processes them is not smart. It would be a very very poor "optimization." However, using an access protocol (POP3 or IMAP) is a good way to avoid the costs of installing, configuring and managing a mail server.
You can do this if you write your own mail server, or if your mail server supports hooks to run external programs upon receipt of mail (e.g. procmail).
If you don't have procmail available (or, if on something like Exchange Server, don't feel like writing custom rules or extensions), you're simply better off using a pop3 library to fetch mail.
Obviously, writing a mail server is more difficult than any of the alternatives.
If you're mostly worried about checking potentially hundreds of email accounts, that's solvable by configuring your email server properly. If you're on a hosted provider, ask your server administrator about creating a "catch-all" account that routes all mail to unknown addresses to a single account.
If you're aiming to avoid having to poll a server, consider the IMAP IDLE command. I've successfully written a Ruby client that opens a connection to an IMAP server, and gets told by the server when new mail arrives.