I'm trying to get messages after a certain time-stamp, the way I've coded it was suggested by another programmer in this site:
GregorianCalendar date = new GregorianCalendar();
SearchTerm newer = new ReceivedDateTerm(ComparisonTerm.GT,date.getTime());
Message msgs[] = folder.search(newerThen);
The issue is that I get all the messages since the date, not the specific time. I was wondering if there is some work-around to emulate this. I mean, for an instance, if I want to get all the messages since today in the midday I would get those messages spicifically and not those ones received in today's morning.
Thanks in advance,
EDIT:
A new thought concerning to this: perhaps some date manipulation could do the job. I mean, comparing the minutes in the timestamp and filter programmatically those messages that don't fit the criteria. I know it's not the best way, but it could work.
PS: I'm using IMAP and trying to get mails from gmail, but I guess it should work no matter what the mail-server is.
Unfortunately, no. In this case, the IMAP protocol is being used by the JavaMail classes, and IMAP's SEARCH command takes only dates, not times (see the SINCE and SENTSINCE criteria).
You could use the setTime() method to query for some specific time.
Example:
setTime(timeInMilliseconds)
Related
I am working on building a replacement to MIRTH and it looks like we are sending out non-standard HL7 ORU_R01 messages. OBR.5 should be just a single field but looks like we are sending a bunch of other data in this section.
<OBR.5>
<OBR.5.1>XXXX</OBR.5.1>
<OBR.5.2>XXXX</OBR.5.2>
<OBR.5.3>XXXXX</OBR.5.3>
<OBR.5.5>XXXXX</OBR.5.5>
<OBR.5.6>XXXX</OBR.5.6>
<OBR.5.7/>
<OBR.5.8>XXXXXXXXXX</OBR.5.8>
<OBR.5.10>XXXXXXX</OBR.5.10>
<OBR.5.11>X</OBR.5.11>
<OBR.5.12>X</OBR.5.12>
<OBR.5.13>XXXXX</OBR.5.13>
<OBR.5.15>XXXXXXX</OBR.5.15>
</OBR.5>
It seems like I should be able to something like the following.
obr.getObr5_Priority().getExtraComponents().getComponent(2).setData(...)
But I am having issues trying to find the correct way to set the different segments. All the fields are Strings.
Found something that I think has ended up working for us.
ID expirationDate = new ID(obr.getMessage(), 502);
expirationDate.setValue(format2.format(date));
obr.getObr5_Priority().getExtraComponents().getComponent(0).setData(expirationDate);
Where 503 refers to which element you want to set. In this case I am trying to set OBR-5.2. getComponent(0) because it's the first extra component I am adding for this particular segment. I am not sure entirely if my explanation here is correct but it creates a message we need and parses as I'd expect so its my best guess.
Dereived the answer from this old email thread https://sourceforge.net/p/hl7api/mailman/hl7api-devel/thread/0C32A03544668145A925DD2C339F2BED017924D8%40FFX-INF-EX-V1.cgifederal.com/#msg19632481
I'm trying to display all user's conversations sorted by last message creation date and I'm a little bit confused.
I see getSubscribedConversation method in docs (https://media.twiliocdn.com/sdk/js/conversations/releases/1.1.0/docs/Client.html#getSubscribedConversations__anchor) but it says nothing about page size and sorting. It returns paginator so I assume it doesn't return all conversations at once.
On the other hand I see some examples in twilio github projects where conversations are added to the list only by listening for conversationAdded event (which indeed fires even for previously created conversations) but it doesn't seem like a clean solution - if user belongs to 50 conversation then I should handle every single event and rerender the list 50 times?
To sum up, I have following questions:
Does getSubscribedConversation returns all user's conversations at once?
If no, then what is default page size and is it possible to change it (together with sorting)
If getSubscribedConversation return paginator indeed - wouldn't it break if I add conversation from conversationAdded event in the meantime?
I can't answer all your questions but I can give some insight on a couple -
From what I can tell, getSubscribedConversations returns 50 Conversations. I have not found a way to change that limit or sort it (I'm not entirely sure in what order Twilio returns them even).
For a project I'm working on we need Conversations sorted in order of recent message. The way I'm currently dealing with it is by storing the most recent message on an attribute on the Conversation. I also initialize the app by loading all the conversations with a recursive function.
Hope that sheds some light for you.
I want to fetch the call logs for the last 5 days, I read on the documentation
You can also specify an inequality, such as EndTime<=YYYY-MM-DD, to read calls that ended on or before midnight of this date
I am trying the following with no luck
#client.calls.list(to: phone_number, end_time: ">=#{Time.now - 5.days}")
Twilio developer evangelist here.
There are several things here, and I need to apologise for at least one of them.
Firstly, the less than/greater than equal that the Twilio API implemented was actually a bit of a hack with the way the parameters are formatted. The parameter as the docs point out is EndTime<=YYYY-MM-DD but this is made of the parameter name EndTime< and the parameter value YYYY-MM-DD separated by =. I apologise that this seemed like a cool hack but actually made things harder.
The Ruby library actually tries to unpick this and make it more sensible again. You can use the parameter end_time_after instead of trying to form the correct end_time format.
Second, I ran the string you were using for the end_time and it produced this:
irb(main):001:0> ">=#{Time.now - 5.days}"
=> ">=2021-02-28 14:35:44 +1100"
So when a time is stringified in Ruby, it doesn't just show up in the YYYY-MM-DD format.
So, to fix your API call, should format the date to YYYY-MM-DD and use end_time_after. Note, since you're using ActiveSupport, you can also call on 5.days.ago instead of Time.now - 5.days.
This should work for you:
#client.calls.list(to: phone_number, end_time_after: "#{5.days.ago.strftime("%Y-%m-%d")}")
Let me know if this helps at all.
Problem
Using the Twilio REST API, I want to request only messages that I haven't downloaded yet. It seems the cleanest way to do this would be to download only messages after a specified SID.
Information not in the docs
The Twilio filter docs don't have this option. They only describe to, from, and date_sent.
However, it appears that Twilio does have this feature. You can see in their paging information, that the the nextpageuri contains AfterSid.
When browing the website, the URL contains /user/account/log/messages?after=SMXXXXXX
What I've tried so far
Using the twilio-ruby client, I have tried the following without success:
list = #client.account.sms.messages.list({after: 'SMXXXXXX'})
list = #client.account.sms.messages.list({AfterSid: 'SMXXXXXX'})
list = #client.account.sms.messages.list({after_sid: 'SMXXXXXX'})
From Dan Markiewicz - Twilio Customer Support
Unfortunately, we do not support filtering by this field in our API at this time. Your best option would be to get the DateCreated info on the SID you want to filter by and then use that to filter the messages by only those sent after that date. Since the date filter only supports filtering down to the day, it may return some number of unwanted messages that were sent that day but before the message you want to filter by. However, each message in the list will have a full date_created field down to the second, so you should be able to filter these out fairly easily on your end. This should produce the result you need.
After looking at the documentation you outlined, it looks like what you want to accomplish can't be done by the twilio-ruby gem. This link shows which filters are supported by the list method inside the gem in regards to messages.
If you look at the source here, starting on line 45 the gem uses next_page_uri as a way of determining the offset of where the next page should begin. For instance:
calls = twilio_client.account.calls.list # returns the initial set of calls.
calls.next_page # this uses next_page_uri to return the next set of calls internally.
This isn't something that can be changed via the gem currently.
One feature/need for my application is that I have an audit trail for certain tables. This is something that I have done many times in the past using different languages. So far I have been able to come up with the idea of using an Observer to monitor changes to the model/table. This works exactly as expected. The issue I am having is with string manipulation/querying specific data.
I have a string such as this {{user.created_by}} changed {{user.id}}'s First Name from {{user.first_name_was}} to {{user.first_name}}
The main issue I am trying to solve is what would be the best way to convert a string to an object/attribute definition?