UISplitViewController delegate methods not called - ipad

I am using a UISplitViewController inside a UITabBarController with a plain UIViewController in the master pane of the split view and a UINavigationController in the detail pane, which itself contains a vanilla UIViewController.
I am aware that Apple advise to use split views at the root level only, however I have seen other applications (eg, Amazon- 'Wish List' tab) that use split views in tabs so I'm sure it's possible.
My problem is that the delegate methods of the split view, ie. those in UISplitViewControllerDelegate do not get called, which prevents me from creating my pop-over menu when switching into Portrait mode.
The methods in question are the following -
// Called when a button should be added to a toolbar for a hidden view controller
- (void)splitViewController: (UISplitViewController*)svc willHideViewController:(UIViewController *)aViewController withBarButtonItem:(UIBarButtonItem*)barButtonItem forPopoverController: (UIPopoverController*)pc;
// Called when the view is shown again in the split view, invalidating the button and popover controller
- (void)splitViewController: (UISplitViewController*)svc willShowViewController:(UIViewController *)aViewController invalidatingBarButtonItem:(UIBarButtonItem *)barButtonItem;
// Called when the view controller is shown in a popover so the delegate can take action like hiding other popovers.
- (void)splitViewController: (UISplitViewController*)svc popoverController: (UIPopoverController*)pc willPresentViewController:(UIViewController *)aViewController;
The UISplitViewController does receive the rotation notifications.
I can get the willShowViewController method to be called if I force the status bar orientation to landscape right (or left) at the beginning of the app launch, using
[[UIApplication sharedApplication] setStatusBarOrientation:UIInterfaceOrientationLandscapeRight];
However, the willHideViewController doesn't get called. And I don't want to force the app to start in landscape. If I do the same thing but force it to portrait, I don't receive the callbacks.
I don't understand why the split view controller is not calling it's delegate methods when it is otherwise behaving correctly. These methods should be called from its method-
- (void)willRotateToInterfaceOrientation:(UIInterfaceOrientation)toInterfaceOrientation duration:(NSTimeInterval)duration
internally, and when I breakpoint inside this, I can check that the delegate is set and that it is still alive.
Been stuck on this all day! Everything else is working great and I'm very pleased that the splitview / tabbar / navbar combination is working well. I just need these notifications.
Should I perhaps just call them manually when I rotate? Seems very wrong when the `UISplitViewController' should be doing this.

Solved, it has to be at either root level or a direct subview of a tabBar which also must be at root level. Annoying!

First, try to see if you are setting the correct delegates.
e.g., lets say you created three controllers,
UISplitViewController* splitView;
UIViewController* masterView;
UIViewController* detailView;
You implemented the delegate protocol at the detail view, so that when orientation changes, detail view should be able to put a button in the toolbar.
Now in order for splitView to call this function from delegate, you need to set the delegate itself.
So somewhere, if you are missing the following call,
splitView.delegate = detailView;
detailView's will never get notified of the orientation changes etc. At least this is where I was stuck.

I like the following method of sending a message from the master UIViewController to the detail UIViewController. Somewhere inside the master's implementation:
id detailViewController = [[self.splitViewController viewControllers] lastObject];
[detailViewController setSomeProperty:…];
This is from Paul Hegarty's Fall 2011 Stanford iTunesU iPad and iPhone Application Development course.

Related

iOS8 - prevent rotation on presenting viewController

We have a MainViewController with a tableView, and it presents a new modalViewController.
The MainViewController is restricted to portrait only, and the modalViewController can rotate.
The problem is in iOS8, that when the modalViewController rotates, the callback method of rotation in iOS8 in MainViewcontroller is called - - (void)viewWillTransitionToSize:(CGSize)size withTransitionCoordinator:(id<UIViewControllerTransitionCoordinator>)coordinator
Thus, the UITableView is getting its data reloaded, which is a behaviour we don't want.
Can we prevent this feature of iOS 8, and not rotate the presenting UIViewController?
So after long days of searching and investigating, I finally came up with a possible solution.
First of all, I can use navigation controller and push the viewController instead of presenting it, but it breaks my code and just isn't so true.
The second thing I can do is not setting constraints. I still can use autolayout, but if I don't set constraints, and let the default constraints to be set, the tableView doesn't get reloaded. of course this is also isn't very smart thing to do, as I have many elements in my viewController.
Finally, I figured out that I can show this "modal" viewController in another UIWindow. I create UIWindow and set the modalViewController as its rootViewController.
I put some example project in git:
https://github.com/OrenRosen/ModalInWindow
Hope it will be helpful.
I did something similar with a navigation controller, that wouldn't rotate unless the top pushed controller does rotate.
In your case check if the main controller is presenting another controller. If it isn't then just reject rotation, otherwise return whatever the presented controller returns for the rotation method.
As for your table view, it shouldn't get reloaded because of rotations.
In iOS 8 the view that rotates when you change the device orientation is the first view added to the UIWindow. So, if you save a reference to it in your presentedController, you can overwrite the shouldAutorotate and supportedInterfaceOrientations values.

Return values to presenting view controller when navigation back button pressed

I'm having trouble piecing this all together. I have a view controller that opens up another (pushes it on to the navigation stack). On that presented view controller, the user enters a value in a text view. When the user pushes the back button in the navigation, I want to be able to pass the value that they entered in the text view back to the presenting controller.
I've looked for a way to use unwind segue with the back button but haven't found anything. When I create my back button (programmatically) I use initWithTitle:style:target:action but I'm not sure how in implementing the action method that I'll be able to access the value set in the presented controller. Might have to use a delegate to link the two, but not sure of the exact integration point for this scenario.
I feel like I'm so close here and a little help would get me there. Thanks!
The two most common models to use for this interaction are for the child view controller to have either a delegate or a completion block. Either would be set in the prepareForSegue method. My personal preference is the completion block method just because it keeps code contained, but ymmv.
There are also multiple models for detecting when your child view controller is dismissed and you need to invoke the delegate and/or completion:
Use a custom back button. Not a fan of this as it can be an issue to create a back button that really looks and acts like the Apple original, especially if supporting iOS 6 and iOS 7.
Hook viewDidDisappear and see if you're still in the navigation controller's viewControllers array. This is better as the back button works right, but it still feels kind of hokey.
Use the UINavigationBarDelegate method navigationBar:shouldPopItem: This is attractive, especially if you have other validation that needs to happen like checking for saved/unsaved values. To implement this you'll have to subclass UINavigationController and forward the method to your child view controller.
EDIT: Details on Option 2:
-(void)viewDidDisappear:(BOOL)animated
{
[super viewDidDisappear:animated];
if(![self.navigationController.viewControllers containsObject:self])
{
// We're not still in the navigation stack so we must've been
// popped. If we were pushed, viewDidDisappear would be called
// but viewControllers containsObject:self would be true
}
}
EDIT: Clarified Option 3: in your navigation controller subclass
- (BOOL)navigationBar:(UINavigationBar *)navigationBar shouldPopItem:(UINavigationItem *)item
{
UIViewController* top = self.topViewController;
if([top respondsToSelector:#selector(navigationBar:shouldPopItem:)])
return [(id)top navigationBar:navigationBar shouldPopItem:item];
return [super navigationBar:navigationBar shouldPopItem:item];
}
Then you can implement navigationBar:shouldPopItem: in the classes that need the functionality.
the back button does not actually comes up with any event associated with itself so that you can pass the values between the previous and to be Popped ViewController.
You would have to implement Delegate pattern to pass values. In this case as you cant catch when backButton is pressed, you need to use custom leftBarButtonItem or use a image with < in itself.

viewWillAppear, viewDidAppear not called with pushViewController [duplicate]

I've read numerous posts about people having problems with viewWillAppear when you do not create your view hierarchy just right. My problem is I can't figure out what that means.
If I create a RootViewController and call addSubView on that controller, I would expect the added view(s) to be wired up for viewWillAppear events.
Does anyone have an example of a complex programmatic view hierarchy that successfully receives viewWillAppear events at every level?
Apple's Docs state:
Warning: If the view belonging to a view controller is added to a view hierarchy directly, the view controller will not receive this message. If you insert or add a view to the view hierarchy, and it has a view controller, you should send the associated view controller this message directly. Failing to send the view controller this message will prevent any associated animation from being displayed.
The problem is that they don't describe how to do this. What does "directly" mean? How do you "indirectly" add a view?
I am fairly new to Cocoa and iPhone so it would be nice if there were useful examples from Apple besides the basic Hello World crap.
If you use a navigation controller and set its delegate, then the view{Will,Did}{Appear,Disappear} methods are not invoked.
You need to use the navigation controller delegate methods instead:
navigationController:willShowViewController:animated:
navigationController:didShowViewController:animated:
I've run into this same problem. Just send a viewWillAppear message to your view controller before you add it as a subview. (There is one BOOL parameter which tells the view controller if it's being animated to appear or not.)
[myViewController viewWillAppear:NO];
Look at RootViewController.m in the Metronome example.
(I actually found Apple's example projects great. There's a LOT more than HelloWorld ;)
I finally found a solution for this THAT WORKS!
UINavigationControllerDelegate
I think the gist of it is to set your nav control's delegate to the viewcontroller it is in, and implement UINavigationControllerDelegate and it's two methods. Brilliant! I'm so excited i finally found a solution!
Thanks iOS 13.
ViewWillDisappear, ViewDidDisappear, ViewWillAppear and
ViewDidAppear won't get called on a presenting view controller on
iOS 13 which uses a new modal presentation that doesn't cover the
whole screen.
Credits are going to Arek Holko. He really saved my day.
I just had the same issue. In my application I have 2 navigation controllers and pushing the same view controller in each of them worked in one case and not in the other. I mean that when pushing the exact same view controller in the first UINavigationController, viewWillAppear was called but not when pushed in the second navigation controller.
Then I came across this post UINavigationController should call viewWillAppear/viewWillDisappear methods
And realized that my second navigation controller did redefine viewWillAppear. Screening the code showed that I was not calling
[super viewWillAppear:animated];
I added it and it worked !
The documentation says:
If you override this method, you must call super at some point in your implementation.
I've been using a navigation controller. When I want to either descend to another level of data or show my custom view I use the following:
[self.navigationController pushViewController:<view> animated:<BOOL>];
When I do this, I do get the viewWillAppear function to fire. I suppose this qualifies as "indirect" because I'm not calling the actual addSubView method myself. I don't know if this is 100% applicable to your application since I can't tell if you're using a navigation controller, but maybe it will provide a clue.
Firstly, the tab bar should be at the root level, ie, added to the window, as stated in the Apple documentation. This is key for correct behavior.
Secondly, you can use UITabBarDelegate / UINavigationBarDelegate to forward the notifications on manually, but I found that to get the whole hierarchy of view calls to work correctly, all I had to do was manually call
[tabBarController viewWillAppear:NO];
[tabBarController viewDidAppear:NO];
and
[navBarController viewWillAppear:NO];
[navBarController viewDidAppear:NO];
.. just ONCE before setting up the view controllers on the respective controller (right after allocation). From then on, it correctly called these methods on its child view controllers.
My hierarchy is like this:
window
UITabBarController (subclass of)
UIViewController (subclass of) // <-- manually calls [navController viewWill/DidAppear
UINavigationController (subclass of)
UIViewController (subclass of) // <-- still receives viewWill/Did..etc all the way down from a tab switch at the top of the chain without needing to use ANY delegate methods
Just calling the mentioned methods on the tab/nav controller the first time ensured that ALL the events were forwarded correctly. It stopped me needing to call them manually from the UINavigationBarDelegate / UITabBarControllerDelegate methods.
Sidenote:
Curiously, when it didn't work, the private method
- (void)transitionFromViewController:(UIViewController*)aFromViewController toViewController:(UIViewController*)aToViewController
.. which you can see from the callstack on a working implementation, usually calls the viewWill/Did.. methods but didn't until I performed the above (even though it was called).
I think it is VERY important that the UITabBarController is at window level though and the documents seem to back this up.
Hope that was clear(ish), happy to answer further questions.
As no answer is accepted and people (like I did) land here I give my variation. Though I am not sure that was the original problem. When the navigation controller is added as a subview to a another view you must call the viewWillAppear/Dissappear etc. methods yourself like this:
- (void) viewWillAppear:(BOOL)animated
{
[super viewWillAppear:animated];
[subNavCntlr viewWillAppear:animated];
}
- (void) viewWillDisappear:(BOOL)animated
{
[super viewWillDisappear:animated];
[subNavCntlr viewWillDisappear:animated];
}
Just to make the example complete. This code appears in my ViewController where I created and added the the navigation controller into a view that I placed on the view.
- (void)viewDidLoad {
// This is the root View Controller
rootTable *rootTableController = [[rootTable alloc]
initWithStyle:UITableViewStyleGrouped];
subNavCntlr = [[UINavigationController alloc]
initWithRootViewController:rootTableController];
[rootTableController release];
subNavCntlr.view.frame = subNavContainer.bounds;
[subNavContainer addSubview:subNavCntlr.view];
[super viewDidLoad];
}
the .h looks like this
#interface navTestViewController : UIViewController <UINavigationControllerDelegate> {
IBOutlet UIView *subNavContainer;
UINavigationController *subNavCntlr;
}
#end
In the nib file I have the view and below this view I have a label a image and the container (another view) where i put the controller in. Here is how it looks. I had to scramble some things as this was work for a client.
Views are added "directly" by calling [view addSubview:subview].
Views are added "indirectly" by methods such as tab bars or nav bars that swap subviews.
Any time you call [view addSubview:subviewController.view], you should then call [subviewController viewWillAppear:NO] (or YES as your case may be).
I had this problem when I implemented my own custom root-view management system for a subscreen in a game. Manually adding the call to viewWillAppear cured my problem.
Correct way to do this is using UIViewController containment api.
- (void)viewDidLoad {
[super viewDidLoad];
// Do any additional setup after loading the view.
UIViewController *viewController = ...;
[self addChildViewController:viewController];
[self.view addSubview:viewController.view];
[viewController didMoveToParentViewController:self];
}
I use this code for push and pop view controllers:
push:
[self.navigationController pushViewController:detaiViewController animated:YES];
[detailNewsViewController viewWillAppear:YES];
pop:
[[self.navigationController popViewControllerAnimated:YES] viewWillAppear:YES];
.. and it works fine for me.
A very common mistake is as follows.
You have one view, UIView* a, and another one, UIView* b.
You add b to a as a subview.
If you try to call viewWillAppear in b, it will never be fired, because it is a subview of a
iOS 13 bit my app in the butt here. If you've noticed behavior change as of iOS 13 just set the following before you push it:
yourVC.modalPresentationStyle = UIModalPresentationFullScreen;
You may also need to set it in your .storyboard in the Attributes inspector (set Presentation to Full Screen).
This will make your app behave as it did in prior versions of iOS.
I'm not 100% sure on this, but I think that adding a view to the view hierarchy directly means calling -addSubview: on the view controller's view (e.g., [viewController.view addSubview:anotherViewController.view]) instead of pushing a new view controller onto the navigation controller's stack.
I think that adding a subview doesn't necessarily mean that the view will appear, so there is not an automatic call to the class's method that it will
I think what they mean "directly" is by hooking things up just the same way as the xcode "Navigation Application" template does, which sets the UINavigationController as the sole subview of the application's UIWindow.
Using that template is the only way I've been able to get the Will/Did/Appear/Disappear methods called on the object ViewControllers upon push/pops of those controllers in the UINavigationController. None of the other solutions in the answers here worked for me, including implementing them in the RootController and passing them through to the (child) NavigationController. Those functions (will/did/appear/disappear) were only called in my RootController upon showing/hiding the top-level VCs, my "login" and navigationVCs, not the sub-VCs in the navigation controller, so I had no opportunity to "pass them through" to the Nav VC.
I ended up using the UINavigationController's delegate functionality to look for the particular transitions that required follow-up functionality in my app, and that works, but it requires a bit more work in order to get both the disappear and appear functionality "simulated".
Also it's a matter of principle to get it to work after banging my head against this problem for hours today. Any working code snippets using a custom RootController and a child navigation VC would be much appreciated.
In case this helps anyone. I had a similar problem where my ViewWillAppear is not firing on a UITableViewController. After a lot of playing around, I realized that the problem was that the UINavigationController that is controlling my UITableView is not on the root view. Once I fix that, it is now working like a champ.
I just had this problem myself and it took me 3 full hours (2 of which googling) to fix it.
What turned out to help was to simply delete the app from the device/simulator, clean and then run again.
Hope that helps
[self.navigationController setDelegate:self];
Set the delegate to the root view controller.
In my case problem was with custom transition animation.
When set modalPresentationStyle = .custom viewWillAppear not called
in custom transition animation class need call methods:
beginAppearanceTransition and endAppearanceTransition
For Swift. First create the protocol to call what you wanted to call in viewWillAppear
protocol MyViewWillAppearProtocol{func myViewWillAppear()}
Second, create the class
class ForceUpdateOnViewAppear: NSObject, UINavigationControllerDelegate {
func navigationController(_ navigationController: UINavigationController, willShow viewController: UIViewController, animated: Bool){
if let updatedCntllr: MyViewWillAppearProtocol = viewController as? MyViewWillAppearProtocol{
updatedCntllr.myViewWillAppear()
}
}
}
Third, make the instance of ForceUpdateOnViewAppear to be the member of the appropriate class that have the access to the Navigation Controller and exists as long as Navigation controller exists. It may be for example the root view controller of the navigation controller or the class that creates or present it. Then assign the instance of ForceUpdateOnViewAppear to the Navigation Controller delegate property as early as possible.
In my case that was just a weird bug on the ios 12.1 emulator. Disappeared after launching on real device.
I have created a class that solves this problem.
Just set it as a delegate of your navigation controller, and implement simple one or two methods in your view controller - that will get called when the view is about to be shown or has been shown via NavigationController
Here's the GIST showing the code
ViewWillAppear is an override method of UIViewController class so adding a subView will not call viewWillAppear, but when you present, push , pop, show , setFront Or popToRootViewController from a viewController then viewWillAppear for presented viewController will get called.
My issue was that viewWillAppear was not called when unwinding from a segue. The answer was to put a call to viewWillAppear(true) in the unwind segue in the View Controller that you segueing back to
#IBAction func unwind(for unwindSegue: UIStoryboardSegue, ViewController subsequentVC: Any) {
viewWillAppear(true)
}
I'm not sure this is the same problem that I solved.
In some occasions, method doesn't executed with normal way such as "[self methodOne]".
Try
- (void)viewWillAppear:(BOOL)animated
{
[self performSelector:#selector(methodOne)
withObject:nil afterDelay:0];
}
You should only have 1 UIViewController active at any time. Any subviews you want to manipulate should be exactly that - subVIEWS - i.e. UIView.
I use a simlple technique for managing my view hierarchy and have yet to run into a problem since I started doing things this way. There are 2 key points:
a single UIViewController should be used to manage "a screen's worth"
of your app
use UINavigationController for changing views
What do I mean by "a screen's worth"? It's a bit vague on purpose, but generally it's a feature or section of your app. If you've got a few screens with the same background image but different overlays/popups etc., that should be 1 view controller and several child views. You should never find yourself working with 2 view controllers. Note you can still instantiate a UIView in one view controller and add it as a subview of another view controller if you want certain areas of the screen to be shown in multiple view controllers.
As for UINavigationController - this is your best friend! Turn off the navigation bar and specify NO for animated, and you have an excellent way of switching screens on demand. You can push and pop view controllers if they're in a hierarchy, or you can prepare an array of view controllers (including an array containing a single VC) and set it to be the view stack using setViewControllers. This gives you total freedom to change VC's, while gaining all the advantages of working within Apple's expected model and getting all events etc. fired properly.
Here's what I do every time when I start an app:
start from a window-based app
add a UINavigationController as the window's rootViewController
add whatever I want my first UIViewController to be as the rootViewController of the nav
controller
(note starting from window-based is just a personal preference - I like to construct things myself so I know exactly how they are built. It should work fine with view-based template)
All events fire correctly and basically life is good. You can then spend all your time writing the important bits of your app and not messing about trying to manually hack view hierarchies into shape.

How to hide the master popover view on first-time app load?

I have nice helper functions that allow me to show/hide the master popover view controller. However, I can not for the life of me figure out how to hide it on initialization, so that it is hidden when the app first starts.
I've tried a couple of things (such as trying to dismiss is from the viewLoaded or viewDidAppear) but these throw strange errors (e.g. too made slider counts...etc).
Now I'm starting to believe there must be a simpler, and the right way, to do this.
Are you trying to hide the splitviewController Master Popover? Which orientation would make this question more specific. I will assume you are in fact trying to hide the SplitView MasterPopover in landscape (since it should already be hidden in portrait).
Do this:
Your detailViewController should have UISplitViewControllerDelegate. And simply just drop this code in:
- (BOOL)splitViewController:(UISplitViewController *)svc shouldHideViewController:(UIViewController *)vc inOrientation:(UIInterfaceOrientation)orientation{
return YES;
}
This will make popoverView hidden when the app starts up. Let me know, if it works for you.

UISplitViewController Detail View not Resizing on rotation

I am hoping I can describe this situation correctly. It is easy to see on the screen when it is happening, but hard to explain in words, but I will do my best.
I have a UISplitViewController with a fixed Master view (UITableView) and one of two Detail views, depending on what kind of cell is touched in the Master. Each of the Detail views is also a UITableView. I have used Todd Bates conversion of Apple's MultipleDetailViews sample to using storyboards as the basis for my code (Adventures in UISplitViewController).
I am using storyboards, so this is where the explaining part gets tricky. The Master and the first displayed Detail view Navigation Controllers are wired up in the storyboard as Relationships to the UISplitViewController. The second Detail Navigation Controller is just sitting in the storyboard with no connections.
Here's the problem. Detail #1 is active in landscape mode and Detail #2 is set as active by tapping a row in the Master. The iPad is rotated to Portrait mode which causes Detail #2 to resize properly for portrait mode. Detail #1 is set as active by tapping a row in the Master. Detail #1 is the same size as it was when it was last displayed in landscape mode, it doesn't fill the screen like it should.
My question is, can I tell the Detail controller that is not currently displayed to resize itself when the orientation is changed? Or maybe a better question is how can I resize the Detail view that was just displayed to fill the Detail portion of the UISplitView?
I hope I described this with enough detail for someone to help.
The UISplitViewControllerDelegate methods are implemented in a Manager class that's supposed to forward those calls to the Detail view controllers. Here's the implementation for that method:
#pragma mark - UISplitViewControllerDelegate
/* forward the message to the current detail view
* all detail views must implement UISplitViewControllerDelegate
*/
-(void)splitViewController:(UISplitViewController *)svc willHideViewController:(UIViewController *)aViewController withBarButtonItem:(UIBarButtonItem *)barButtonItem forPopoverController:(UIPopoverController *)pc
{
self.masterBarButtonItem = barButtonItem;
self.masterPopoverController = pc;
barButtonItem.title = NSLocalizedString(#"Games", #"Games");
[self.currentDetailController.navigationItem setLeftBarButtonItem:self.masterBarButtonItem animated:YES];
}
/* forward the message to the current detail view
* all detail views must implement UISplitViewControllerDelegate
*/
-(void)splitViewController:(UISplitViewController *)svc willShowViewController:(UIViewController *)aViewController invalidatingBarButtonItem:(UIBarButtonItem *)barButtonItem
{
self.masterBarButtonItem = nil;
self.masterPopoverController = nil;
[self.currentDetailController.navigationItem setLeftBarButtonItem:nil animated:YES];
}
And I have implemented the following in each one of the Detail view controllers:
#pragma mark - Split view
- (void)splitViewController:(UISplitViewController *)splitController willHideViewController:(UIViewController *)viewController withBarButtonItem:(UIBarButtonItem *)barButtonItem forPopoverController:(UIPopoverController *)popoverController
{
barButtonItem.title = NSLocalizedString(#"Games", #"Games");
[self.navigationItem setLeftBarButtonItem:barButtonItem animated:YES];
self.masterPopoverController = popoverController;
}
- (void)splitViewController:(UISplitViewController *)splitController willShowViewController:(UIViewController *)viewController invalidatingBarButtonItem:(UIBarButtonItem *)barButtonItem
{
// Called when the view is shown again in the split view, invalidating the button and popover controller.
[self.navigationItem setLeftBarButtonItem:nil animated:YES];
self.masterPopoverController = nil;
}
Problem is that neither of the Detail view controllers are receiving these messages. I can't see how they's get triggered anyway...
I don't see how forwarding the didRotateFromInterfaceOrientation: will cause the Detail controller that is not displayed from resizing itself. From Apple's documentation:
When the orientation of an iOS–based device changes, the system sends out a UIDeviceOrientationDidChangeNotification notification to let any interested parties know that the change occurred. By default, the UIKit framework intercepts this notification and uses it to update your interface orientation automatically. This means that, with only a few exceptions, you should not need to handle this notification at all. Instead, all you need to do is implement the appropriate methods in your view controller classes to respond to orientation changes.
The window object does much of the work associated with changing the current orientation. However, it works in conjunction with the root view controller to determine whether an orientation change should occur at all and, if so, what additional methods should be called to respond to the change. If this controller is a container, it may rely on a child to decide whether the orientation should occur.
When a rotation occurs, methods of the view controller are called at various stages of the rotation to give the view controller a chance to perform additional tasks. You might use these methods to hide or show views, reposition or resize views, or notify other parts of your app about the orientation change. Because your custom methods are called during the rotation operation, you should avoid performing any time-consuming operations there. You should also avoid replacing your entire view hierarchy with a new set of views. There are better ways to provide unique views for different orientations, such as presenting a new view controller (as described in “Creating an Alternate Landscape Interface”).
Similar to the splitViewController methods, you should forward the following call:
- (void)didRotateFromInterfaceOrientation:(UIInterfaceOrientation)fromInterfaceOrientation {
[super didRotateFromInterfaceOrientation:fromInterfaceOrientation];
// Forward to detail view controller here:
}
to the detail view controller that is NOT visible (i.e. NOT self.currentDetailController, but the other one).
I ended up solving my own problem. In the code that swaps the Detail views, I set the view about to be displayed to the same size as the view that was just displayed. I still have further testing to do, but this solution looks like a winner.

Resources