I have two tables, AppTemplate and AppTemplateMeta
AppTemplate table has column id, MetaID, name etc.
I have associated these two model like this
class AppTemplate < ActiveRecord::Base
set_table_name 'AppTemplate'
belongs_to :app_template_meta, :class_name => "AppTemplateMeta", :foreign_key => 'MetaID'
end
If we fetch data using AppTemplate.all, I want associated meta details also. But currently it's not returning associated meta details. It just returns AppTemplate details.
any guys can help me for this
If I understood correctly, you want something like the following:
# models
class AppTemplate < ActiveRecord::Base
# table names usually looks like this: app_template.
# the same for columns names. so you should have 'meta_id' as foreign key
set_table_name 'AppTemplate'
belongs_to :app_template_meta, :class_name => "AppTemplateMeta",
:foreign_key => 'MetaID'
end
class AppTemplateMeta < ActiveRecord::Base
has_one :app_template # or has_many
end
# controller
# get all app templates and load the associated app_template_meta for each one
#app_templates = AppTemplate.all(:include => :app_template_meta)
# get associated app_template_meta for the first app_template
#app_templates.first.app_template_meta
Related
I am totally confused about how I should go about "the rails way" of effectively using my associations.
Here is an example model configuration from a Rails 4 app:
class Film < ActiveRecord::Base
# A movie, documentary, animated short, etc
has_many :roleships
has_many :participants, :through => :roleships
has_many :roles, :through => :roleships
# has_many :writers........ ?
end
class Participant < ActiveRecord::Base
# A human involved in making a movie
has_many :roleships
end
class Role < ActiveRecord::Base
# A person's role in a film. i.e. "Writer", "Actor", "Extra" etc
has_many :roleships
end
class Roleship < ActiveRecord::Base
# The join for connecting different people
# to the different roles they have had in
# different films
belongs_to :participant
belongs_to :film
belongs_to :role
end
Given the above model configuration, the code I wish I had would allow me to add writers directly to a film and in the end have the join setup correctly.
So for example, I'd love to be able to do something like this:
## The Code I WISH I Had
Film.create!(name: "Some film", writers: [Participant.first])
I'm not sure if I'm going about thinking about this totally wrong but it seems impossible. What is the right way to accomplish this? Nested resources? A custom setter + scope? Something else? Virtual attributes? thank you!
I created a sample app based on your question.
https://github.com/szines/hodor_filmdb
I think useful to setup in Participant and in Role model a through association as well, but without this will work. It depends how would you like to use later this database. Without through this query wouldn't work: Participant.find(1).films
class Participant < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :roleships
has_many :films, through: :roleships
end
class Role < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :roleships
has_many :films, through: :roleships
end
Don't forget to give permit for extra fields (strong_parameters) in your films_controller.rb
def film_params
params.require(:film).permit(:title, :participant_ids, :role_ids)
end
What is strange, that if you create a new film with a participant and a role, two records will be created in the join table.
Update:
You can create a kind of virtual attribute in your model. For example:
def writers=(participant)
#writer_role = Role.find(1)
self.roles << #writer_role
self.participants << participant
end
and you can use: Film.create(title: 'The Movie', writers: [Participant.first])
If you had a normal has_and_belongs_to_many relationship i.e. beween a film and a participant, then you can create a film together with your examples.
As your joining model is more complex, you have to build the roleships separately:
writer= Roleship.create(
participant: Participant.find_by_name('Spielberg'),
role: Role.find_by_name('Director')
)
main_actor= Roleship.create(
participant: Participant.find_by_name('Willis'),
role: Role.find_by_name('Actor')
)
Film.create!(name: "Some film", roleships: [writer, main_actor])
for that, all attributes you use to build roleships and films must be mass assignable, so in a Rails 3.2 you would have to write:
class Roleship < ActiveRecord::Base
attr_accessible :participant, :role
...
end
class Film < ActiveRecord::Base
attr_accessible :name, :roleships
...
end
If you want to user roleship_ids, you have to write
class Film < ActiveRecord::Base
attr_accessible :name, :roleship_ids
...
end
Addendum:
Of cause you could write a setter method
class Film ...
def writers=(part_ids)
writer_role=Role.find_by_name('Writer')
# skiped code to delete existing writers
part_ids.each do |part_id|
self.roleships << Roleship.new(role: writer_role, participant_id: part_id)
end
end
end
but that makes your code depending on the data in your DB (contents of table roles) which is a bad idea.
I wonder if we could eager load in model level:
# country.rb
class Country < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :country_days
def country_highlights
country_days.map { |country_day| country_day.shops }.flatten.uniq.map { |shop| shop.name }.join(", ")
end
end
# country_day.rb
class CountryDay < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :country
has_many :country_day_shops
has_many :shops, :through => :country_day_shops
end
# shop.rb
class Shop < ActiveRecord::Base
end
Most of the times it's difficult to use .includes in controller because of some polymorphic association. Is there anyway for me to eager load the method country_highlights at the model level, so that I don't have to add .includes in the controller?
You can't "eager load" country_days from a model instance, but you can certainly skip loading them all together by using a has_many through:. You can also skip the extra map, too.
# country.rb
class Country < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :country_days
has_many :country_day_shops, through: :country_days #EDIT: You may have to add this relationship
has_many :shops, through: :country_day_shops #And change this one to use the new relationship above.
def country_highlights
shops.distinct_names.join(", ")
end
end
# country_day.rb
class CountryDay < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :country
has_many :country_day_shops
has_many :shops, :through => :country_day_shops
end
# shop.rb
class Shop < ActiveRecord::Base
def self.distinct_names
pluck("DISTINCT shops.name") #Edit 2: You may need this instead of 'DISTINCT name' if you get an ambiguous column name error.
end
end
The has_many through: will use a JOIN to load the associate shop records, in effect eager loading them, rather than loading all country_day records and then for each country_day record, loading the associated shop.
pluck("DISTINCT name") will return an array of all of the unique names of shops in the DB, using the DB to perform a SELECT DISTINCT, so it will not return duplicate records, and the pluck will avoid loading ActiveRecord instances when all you need is the string name.
Edit: Read the comments first
You could cache the end result (the joined string or text record in your case), so you'll not have to load several levels of records just to build this result.
1) Add a country_highlights text column (result might be beyond string column limits)
2) Cache the country_highlights in your model with a callback, e.g. before every save.
class Country < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :country_days
before_save :cache_country_highlights
private
def cache_country_highlights
self.country_highlights = country_days.flat_map(&:shops).uniq.map(&:name).join(", ")
end
end
Caching you calculation will invoke a little overhead when saving a record, but having to load only one instead of three model records for displaying should speed up your controller actions so much that it's worth it.
I'm starting out with the whole (wonderful) idea of database associations in Rails but I'm having problems because I'm working with an existing database that does not conform to Rails standards and cannot figure out how to name the associations. There are a couple of similar posts, but I can't wrap my head around the naming for my particular situation which is as follows:
table book with book.formatId looks up values in book_format.id
So foreign key book.formatId
My models are named: Book and BookFormat (I read that you use camelCase when your tables are separated by underscore).
Under the Book model I have this:
has_one :bookFormat, :foreign_key => 'book_format.id' # not sure if this format table.field is correct or I have to use something else here. Also not sure about the bookFormat, should it be BookFormat or bookformat?
The BookFormat model has this:
belongs_to :book
But when I try to do
book = Book.first
book.bookFormat.empty?
I get an error of method not found for bookFormat. So obviously something's wrong, but I can't figure out where.
A second part of the question is the use of many to many relationships. Example:
Tables
book, book_subjects, book_subjects2title
book_subjects.id => book_subjects2title.pId
book.id => book_subjects2title.bookId
I'm reading the Beginning Rails 3 book from Apress (which is a great book) but it's not very clear on all this or I'm just not getting it.
Thanks.
Since the book stores the formatId on it, you should use belongs_to, and change the foreign key as such:
belongs_to :book_format, :class_name => 'BookFormat', :foreign_key => 'formatId'
For the table name, i did some quick searching, and found the following method: set_table_name
So you should be able to add it at the top of your model, like so:
class Book < ActiveRecord::Base
set_table_name 'book'
# the rest of book model code
end
class BookFormat < ActiveRecord::Base
set_table_name 'book_format'
# rest of book_format model code
end
Normally rails uses plural table names, so hence why you need to specify it there.
agmcleod put me on the right track, so here's the full answer in the hopes that this helps other people with similar problems:
I created the model with a different name for easier reading. So model Books will have:
class Books < ActiveRecord::Base
set_table_name 'bookpedia'
belongs_to :format, :foreign_key => 'formatId' # we need to specify the foreign key because it is not the rails default naming
has_many :author2title, :foreign_key => 'bookId'
has_many :author, :through => :author2title
end
model Format:
class Format < ActiveRecord::Base
set_table_name 'book_format'
has_many :books
end
Then an instance of the class will have the format method:
#book = Books.first
#book.format # Hardcover
For many to many relationships I'll paste the syntax here as well since that took me a while to figure out:
class Author < ActiveRecord::Base
set_table_name 'book_author'
has_many :author2title, :foreign_key => 'pId' # junction table
has_many :books, :through => :author2title # establishing the relationship through the junction table
end
This is the actual junction table:
class Author2title < ActiveRecord::Base
set_table_name 'book_author2title'
belongs_to :author, :foreign_key => 'pId' # foreign key needs to be here as well
belongs_to :books, :foreign_key => 'bookId'
end
The book model above has the necessary entries for this many to many relationship already in it.
If anyone needs clarification on this I'd be happy to oblige since I struggled for more than a day to figure this out so would be glad to be of help.
Cheers.
I am creating an app for uploading and sharing files between users.
I have User and Files models and have created a third File_Sharing_Relationships model which contains a sharer_id, file_id and shared_with_id columns. I want to be able to create the following methods:
#upload.file_sharing_relationships - lists users that the file is shared with
#user.files_shared_with - lists files that are shared with the user.
#user.files_shared - lists files that the user is sharing with others
#user.share_file_with - creates a sharing relationship
Are there any rails associations, such as 'polymorphic' that I could be using to make these relationships?
Any suggestions appreciated. Thanks.
All you need to do is to read Rails Guides and apply all what you learn.
Basically you need to store info about:
user who created a "sharing"
user or group or whatever is a target of a sharing action
resource that is being shared
So:
class SharedItem < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :sharable, :polymorphic => true #this is user, please think of better name than "sharable"...
belongs_to :resource, :polymorphic => true #can be your file
belongs_to :user
end
You need SharedItem to have:
user_id: integer, sharable_id: integer, sharable_type: string, resource_id: integer, resource_type: string
Then you can get "methods" you specified by writing named scopes like:
named_scope :for_user, lambda {|user| {:conditions => {:user_id => user.id} }}
or by specifying proper associations:
class File < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :shared_items, :as => :resource, :dependent => :destroy
end
I think you should create relationships something like this:
class User
has_many :files
has_many :user_sharings
has_many :sharings, :through => :user_sharings
end
class File
belongs_to :user
end
class Sharing
has_many :user_sharings
has_many :users, :through => :user_sharings
end
class UserSharing
belongs_to :user
belongs_to :sharing
end
.. this is very basic model of relations(It is just my point of view :)). User can have many sharings and also belongs to sharings. You can set file id to UserSharing table when you create user and it's share. And then you can create methods, you listed above, as scopes in proper models. I hope I helped you a little.
Im very new to Ruby on Rails 3 and ActiveRecord and seem to have been thrown in at the deep end at work. Im struggling to get to grips with querying data from multiple tables using joins.
A lot of the examples Ive seen either seem to be based on much simpler queries or use < rails 3 syntax.
Given that I know the business_unit_group_id and have the following associations how would I query a list of all related Items and ItemSellingPrices?
class BusinessUnitGroup < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :business_unit_group_items
end
class BusinessUnitGroupItem < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :business_unit_group
belongs_to :item
belongs_to :item_selling_price
end
class Item < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :business_unit_group_items
end
class ItemSellingPrice < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :business_unit_group_items
end
I'm confused as to whether I need to explicity specify any joins in the query since the associations are in place.
Basically, you do not need to specify the joins:
# This gives you all the BusinessUnitGroupItems for that BusinessUnitGroup
BusinessUnitGroup.find(id).business_unit_group_items
# BusinessUnitGroupItem seems to be a rich join table so you might
# be iterested in the items directly:
class BusinessUnitGroup < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :items through => :business_unit_group_items
# and/or
has_many :item_selling_prices, through => :business_unit_group_items
...
end
# Then this gives you the items and prices for that BusinessUnitGroup:
BusinessUnitGroup.find(id).items
BusinessUnitGroup.find(id).item_selling_prices
# If you want to iterate over all items and their prices within one
# BusinessUnitGroup, try this:
group = BusinessUnitGroup.include(
:business_unit_group_item => [:items, :item_selling_prices]
).find(id)
# which preloads the items and item prices so while iterating,
# no more database queries occur