I am implementing an application that manipulate XML documents using Ruby on Rails. I want to have models that encapsulate all the logic and then convert them to corresponding XML document when save. Although I do not need database persistence for my models, I want my models to have validation mechanism like ActiveRecord's. Also, for converting between XML and Ruby objects, an XML mapping library is preferred to make things easier.
Although there are quite a few solutions which allow using ActiveRecord without table, it seems to me the XML mapping libraries (e.g. ROXML, XML Mapping) do not seem to play well with ActiveRecord'S fields. In other words, it does not look like that they can be used together due to the conflict it their syntax.
Therefore, I would like to know what are the preferred solution in this case. The solution which allow the use of an XML binding library with tableless models with validation functionality.
For example, one solution is to have two separate models. One is tableless ActiveRecord and the other is plain Ruby objects with xml binding (like what is described in this post). The ActiveRecord models are for validation. To convert them to XML, it will need to be copies to XML binding models first. Although this solution does work, it is not elegant.
You are saying that you don't need "database persistence", but then you say that you want to save them to an XML file, and read them from it. So you need persistence - on a file. The difference between that and "database persistence" is only linguistic, since we have SQLite, which stores the whole database on a file.
What you want to do could be done by implementing your own adapter. It would not be complicated, but it would take some time.
I might made the question looks more complicated that it actually is. Essentially what I wanted are subset of ActiveRecord features (validations, create object from hash) and XML binding. In this case, it is probably better to use standard Ruby objects with libraries that provide comparable functionality to ActiveRecord. For validation, validatable is the right fit. Creating object from hash could also be easily implemented.
In summary, Ruby class + ROXML + validatable gem + custom hash-to-object implementation is the way to go for me.
Related
I have a Rails application and a JSON file which contains the data, instead of creating table for a model i want to point my model to read that jSON file, and i should be table to treat that file like a table, please suggest.
If I understand you correctly, you want a model that uses a JSON file as it's "backend DB" instead of a normal DB?
In order to get a Rails model to point to a JSON file, you would need to use a JSON DB adapter, and I'm not sure if there is one for Rails.
Rails uses what are called "adapters", where the same code:
Model.find(1)
Will work on any DB (PostgreSQL, MySQL, SQLite3, etc...) because the Model.find() method has been implemented by each adapter.
This allows the interface for the developer to remain the same as long as the adapter implements it.
It avoids the problem where every DB creator implements a different interface, and now everyone has to learn those particular methods (convention for the win!).
All that said, I can't find a JSON DB adapter, so if you want that functionality you'll have to read a JSON file and search against it.
However, if you're talking about using client-side storage with a JSON file, this isn't possible because client-side only understand JavaScript and a Ruby model (class) is on the backend server. They don't directly talk to each other. In that case, you'll have to implement a JavaScript model that maps to the JSON data.
MySQL as in-memory-database
Rails with in memory database has a way to use MySQL in-memory; then you load your data from the JSON file at the start and dump it out at the end (or after commits).
In-memory DB adapter
https://github.com/maccman/supermodel exists but looks dead (4 years old). Maybe you find others?
Rolling it yourself with Nulldb
Use https://github.com/nulldb/nulldb to throw away all SQL statements and register some hooks (after_save etc.) to store them in some hash. You then load that has into memory at the start and dump it out to JSON later.
Separating concerns
My favourite approach, maybe too late if you have lots of working code already:
Separate your active-record code from your actual domain model. That means, if you today have a model class Stuff < ActiveRecord::Base, then separate that into class StuffAR < ActiveRecord::Base and class Stuff.
Stuff then contains an instance of StuffAR.
Using the proper ruby mechanisms (i.e., BasicObject::method_missing), you can delegate all calls from Stuff to StuffAR by default.
You now have complete control over your data and can do whatever with it.
(This is only one way to do it, depending on how dynamic/flexible you want to be, and if you need a real DB part-time, you can do it different; i.e. class Stuff < StuffAR at the one extreme, or not using a generic method_missing but explicitly coded methods which call StuffAR etc. - Stuff is PORO (plain old ruby objects) now and you use StuffAR just for the DB contact)
In this approach, be careful not to use Stuff like an AR object. I.e., do not use Stuff.where(name: 'xyz') from outside, but create domain methods for that (e.g., in this example, Stuff.find_by_name(...).
Yes, this is coding overhead, but it does wonders to improve your code when your models become big and unwieldy after a time.
Don't need AR at all?
If you do only want to use JSON ever, and never use a real DB, then do the same as before, just leave StuffAR out. It's just PORO then.
I think you have to import your JSON file to the database (e.g. sqlite3) to handle it as a table.
The other workaround would be:
Create a JSON importer for your model which fills the Users from the JSON into an Array of users.
If you do that, you'll have to write the whole searching/ordering by yourself in plain ruby.
I don't know what your current circumstances are, but if you would like to change some data or add data, I suggest using a simple and lightweight database like sqlite3
I want to save settings for my users and some of them would be one out of a predefined list! Using https://github.com/ledermann/rails-settings ATM.
The setting for f.e. weight_unit would be out of [:kg, :lb].
I don't really want to hardcode that stuff into controller or view code.
It's kind of a common functionality, so I was wondering: Did anyone come up with some way of abstracting that business into class constants or the database in a DRY fashion?
Usually, when I have to store some not important information which I don't care to query individually, I store them on a serialized column.
In your case you could create a new column in your users table (for example call it "settings").
After that you add to user model
serialize :settings, Hash
from this moment you can put whatever you like into settings, for example
user.settings = {:weight_unit => :kg, :other_setting1 => 'foo', :other_setting2 => 'bar'}
and saving with user.save you will get, in settings column, the serialized data.
Rails does also de-serialize it so after fetching a user's record, calling user.settings, you will get all saved settings for the user.
To get more information on serialize() refer to docs: http://api.rubyonrails.org/classes/ActiveRecord/AttributeMethods/Serialization/ClassMethods.html#method-i-serialize
UPDATE1
To ensure that settings are in the predefined list you can use validations on your user model.
UPDATE2
Usually, if there are some pre-defined values it's a good habit to store them in a constant inside the related model, in this way you have access to them from model (inside and outside). Acceptable values does not change by instance so it makes sense to share them between all. An example which is more valuable than any word. Defining in your User model:
ALLOWED_SETTINGS = {:weight_unit => [:kg, :lb],
:eyes_color => [:green, :blue, :brows, :black],
:hair_length => [:short, :long]}
you can use it BOTH
outside the model itself, doing
User::ALLOWED_SETTINGS
inside your model (in validations, instance methods or wherever you want) using:
ALLOWED_SETTINGS
Based on your question, it sounds like these are more configuration options that a particular user will choose from that may be quite static, rather than dynamic in nature in that the options can change over time. For example, I doubt you'll be adding various other weight_units other than :kg and :lb, but it's possible I'm misreading your question.
If I am reading this correctly, I would recommend (and have used) a yml file in the config/ directory for values such as this. The yml file is accessible app wide and all your "settings" could live in one file. These could then be loaded into your models as constants, and serialized as #SDp suggests. However, I tend to err on the side of caution, especially when thinking that perhaps these "common values" may want to be queried some day, so I would prefer to have each of these as a column on a table rather than a single serialized value. The overhead isn't that much more, and you would gain a lot of additional built-in benefits from Rails having them be individual columns.
That said, I have personally used hstore with Postgres with great success, doing just what you are describing. However, the reason I chose to use an hstore over individual columns was because I was storing multiple different demographics, in which all of the demographics could change over time (e.g. some keys could be added, and more importantly, some keys could be removed.) It sounds like in your case it's highly unlikely you'll be removing keys as these are basic traits, but again, I could be wrong.
TL;DR - I feel that unless you have a compelling reason (such as regularly adding and/or removing keys/settings), these should be individual columns on a database table. If you strongly feel these should be stored in the database serialized, and you're using Postgres, check out hstore.
If you are using PostgreSQL, I think you can watch to HStore with Rails 4 + this gem https://github.com/devmynd/hstore_accessor
I'm trying to use Models in my Rails application that retrieve information from an external API. What I would like to do is access my data models (which may consist of information resulting from multiple API calls) in a way similar to what an ActiveRecord model would provide (specifically associations, and the same style of chain-able query methods).
My initial instinct was to recreate the parts of ActiveRecord that I wanted and incorporate this API. Not wanting to 'reinvent the wheel' and seeing exactly how much work would be required to add more functionality have made me take a step back and reevaluate how to approach this.
I have found ways to use ActiveRecord without a table (see: Railscast #193 Tableless Model and the blog post here) and looked into ActiveRecord. Because ActiveModel only seems to include Validations I'm not sure that's very helpful in this situation. The workaround to using ActiveRecord without a table seems like the best option, but I suspect there's a cleaner way of doing this that I'm just not seeing.
Here is a gist containing some of the code written when I was trying to recreate the ActiveRecord functionality, borrowing heavily from the ActiveRecord source itself.
My question boils down to: I can get the functionality I want (chaining query methods, relations) by either implementing the workaround to ActiveRecord specified above or recreating the functionality myself, but are these really ideal solutions?
Remember that Rails is still just Ruby underneath.
You could represent the external API as instantiated classes within your application.
class Event
def self.find(id)
#...External http call to get some JSON...#
new(json_from_api)
end
def initialize(json)
#...set up your object here...#
end
def attendees
#...external http call to get some JSON and then assemble it
#...into an array of other objects
end
end
So you end up writing local abstractions to create ruby objects from api calls, you can probably also mix in ActiveModel, or Virtus into it, so you can use hash assignment of attributes, and validations for forms etc.
Take a look at an API abstraction I did for the TfL feed for the tube. service_disruption
I have a need for a certain model to contain a reference to a document. Most of the model could be stored in postgres. The model is for a "level" in a game. I'd like to store the level data itself inside of a document, which makes more sense than making a complex tree in sql.
I am able to use postgres with mongoid installed; however, after installing the mongoid gem I seem to only be able to scaffold mongoid (non active record) documents.
The problem is that I have references to other tables, and I don't neccesarily know how to link that up within a mongoid model.
Questions:
How can I force scaffolding to occur with active record instead of mongoid or vice versa. Edit: partly answered here: Using Active Record generators after Mongoid installation? (2nd answer works, but I don't know how to go back and forth easily)
Is there an easy way to reference a document from an active record model (I know the documentation said don't mix them, but it is ideal for what I am trying to do).
If it is not possible to mix them, then how should I make a document be referenced from a postgres/active record table. In other words how can I get both pieces of data at the same time?
Thanks!
Regarding your first question, the ideal solution would be something along the lines of the first answer in the referenced post. However, instead of a generating a migration, generate a model instead. So when you want an Active Record model simply run:
rails g active_record:model
As for your second and third questions, to associate an Active Record model with a Mongoid document simply store the ObjectId as a string in the model. Then, when you get retrieve a record make a new ObjectId out of the string and use that to query for the related document.
You can create object ids out of the strings like this:
BSON::ObjectId.from_string("object_id_string")
There isn't really an easy way to easily follow intra-orm relations when mixing and matching between ActiveRecord and Mongoid though so I'm afraid that will have to be done via Ruby code.
The models you define in rails either extend one ORM's base class or the other and they don't know about one another. There may be projects out there that act as a layer on top of these ORMs but I am not familiar with any that exist at the moment.
So I have a model that I need to be able to serialize to/read from an Excel(XLS) document. I am a bit of a loss as to where this code actually belongs. My initial thought is that the to_xls is a view, but after poking around and seeing things like (to|from)_xml and (to|from)_json in ActiveRecord, I was wondering if maybe this stuff belonged in the model. Alternatively, does it belong in just a whole separate container somewhere?
For what it's worth, users will be downloading models from the site, modifying them in excel, then posting them.
to_xls should definitely be a view. I'd try a /app/views/foos/show.xls.erb, but if you don't like ERB for XLS views, try the RbTemplateHandler to do rendering in pure Ruby.
from_xls is a different beast altogether. It certainly doesn't belong in a controller. It logically belongs in the model, but I'd extract it to a mixin. If you're only pulling in XLS for one model, then the following setup should suffice:
# app/models/foo.rb
class Foo
extend XLS2Foo
...
end
# lib/foo_from_xls
module XLS2Foo
def to_foo(xls)
...
end
end
If you need to do it for a bunch of models, you might try a parser-generator DSL in you lib directory and declare yourself parsers for each model in the model classes.
to/from_xls are not supported by Rails. There is a plugin, but I haven't used it to_xls plugin for Rails. A better way might be for you to go to and from a CSV using FasterCSV and get something that is usable. Here is one example: Export to_csv from ActiveRecord