Some weeks ago I upgraded my NetBeans version from 6.7 to 6.8.
Yesterday, while trying to solve some issue, I updated the gems' versions and suddenly the app stop working, throwing me the error message:
Missing the Rails 2.3.4 gem. Please
gem install -v=2.3.4 rails, update
your RAILS_GEM_VERSION setting in
config/environment.rb for the Rails
version you do have installed, or
comment out RAILS_GEM_VERSION to use
the latest version installed.
Rails 2.3.4 is installed, and its specified correctly in environment.rb file as follows:
RAILS_GEM_VERSION = '2.3.4' unless defined? RAILS_GEM_VERSION
I spent hours trying to fix this, when I discovered I had gems both in my NetBeans directory and in the Ruby directory. So I changed the Gems Home to the Ruby directory(instead of the NetBeans dir) and the app magically started.
That being said, I think that's not the proper solution, because I'm using both directories and I guess it's bringing me problems. Fox example, I cannot send emails any more, as posted here.
Any help will be appreciated! Thanks in advance.
Why not keep gems in one place?
From your other post i'm assuming you're using windows so if you're not using pik (like rvm but for windows) then i don't see the point of 2 (or more) gem locations as it's obviously leading to problems.
I'm sticking with 1 gem location.
Related
I'm following Michael Hartl's Ruby on Rails tutorial, and I got stuck at trying to start rails server on my Windows 7 machine.
I'm trying to do this by following instructions in Chapter 1.2.5., i.e. by typing
rails server
However, instead of booting WEBrick, this returns the instructions for usage of 'rails' command. I've been googling this for a while, and some of the answers seem to have implied that something is wrong with the rails gem.
Now, I've found the rails gem folder ("C:\RailsInstaller\Ruby1.9.3\lib\ruby\gems\1.9.1\gems\rails-3.2.3"), and it's empty!
Also when I try
rails -v
it returns "Rails 3.2.16", although I've removed this version of the gem; if I try
gem list
it kept telling me that the version is 3.2.3.
This persisted until I deleted railties version 3.2.16, which resulted in
rails -v
returning 'Rails 3.2.3', but I still can't boot WEBrick.
Any help would be appreciated.
Did you run the installer?
At the time of this writing, I recommend using the Ruby 2.0.0-p353.
http://dl.bintray.com/oneclick/rubyinstaller/rubyinstaller-2.0.0-p353.exe?direct
Save yourself some future gem headaches and install the DevKit too.
http://rubyinstaller.org/downloads/
It should create a folder at C:\Ruby200. Start a new command prompt for the new paths to take affect.
Once Ruby is install, gem install Rails. From your other post, I recommend gem install rails -v 3.2.16
Then execute rails new project_name, then cd project_name. Then run rake db:migrate to create the initial database. At this point, you should be able to run rails server and visit localhost:3000 in your browser.
OK, I've managed to solve my problem.
I've seen a few more people having the same issue, but none of the solutions that I've found helped me, so here's what did it for me, though I'm not 100% sure what exactly was that one thing that actually did it...
I've followed the advice #scarver2 gave in response to my other question, and uninstalled both Rails and Railties gems from my crispy fresh installation of Ruby 1.9.3. (I've installed it using RailsInstaller). Then I've installed Rails 3.2.16 gem by typing
gem install rails -v 3.2.16
and this also installed the corresponding Railties 3.2.16 gem without my intervention.
Then I followed steps from chapters 1.2.3. and 1.2.5. of the tutorial, but making sure that line referencing ruby version in my Gemfile actually corresponds to the version of Ruby that I have installed.
I typed
ruby -v
in the console, to make sure that I have version 1.9.3. indeed. Confirming this, I've edited the Gemfile in my app so it says
ruby '1.9.3'
instead of ruby '2.0.0' line that's used in Listing 1.5. of the tutorial.
After that I've simply went to my app folder, and typed
bundle update
bundle install
in the console, and this time it did not return any errors as it did in my previous attempts. After that, typing
rails server
did what it should have, and my WEBrick server booted, allowing me to access my app on localhost. Yay!
Now, what I think may have gone wrong the last time was either me screwing up the Gemfile, so the gem versions and their dependencies got messed up. I also assume that ineptly trying to fix this by installing and uninstalling different versions of various gems did not quite help. What may have helped was uninstalling Rails and Railties gems, and installing Rails gem again.
I am facing issue when I am trying to work with rails 3.0.11. I initially worked with rails 3.2.6. Build a prototype application in Rails 3.2.6, Ruby 1.9.2 and gem 1.8.7. But then found, server on which we need to host is a shared server which can only support Rails 3.0.11, Ruby 1.8.7 and gem 1.7.2.
Hence I want to keep my dev environment exactly same before I ran into further issues. As I found there was some discrepancy in routes.rb of both the versions.
Steps I followed:
Uninstalled rails
Uninstalled ruby
Installed ruby from here.
This installed ruby version 1.8.7-p370 and gem 1.8.7
After this I installed rails by specifying version as 3.0.11
But still when I run command rails -v, it throws an error to me saying 'missing gem rails 3.2.6. Run bundle install to resolve the issue'
When I ran bundle install, it again completely installed rails 3.2.6 and problem remained unresolved.
Please suggest the clean way how shall I start my development on rails 3.0.11 without running into any issues?? Am I need to delete some registry or mapping in my system through which it is detecting rails 3.2.6 and creating issues??
Its urgent as I need to complete my dev by 7th September.
As I am new to stackexchange, please guide is it appropriate to ask question on the same related thread or shall I open new discussion for my problem?
#Gun - please note in response to one of your comments posted above - you DO need to change your Gemfile - if you are running rails -v from withing your project's directory, it will read the Gemfile.
There is a script located at script/rails - this is what runs when you run the rails command from the project directory. NOTE that this rails script requires your config/application.rb file - which in turn reads the Gemfile and bundles the referenced gems. Thus is your Gemfile still references 3.2.6, and it is not installed, rails -v will not work
Glad to hear the problem is fixed :)
As for the asset pipeline - if you are using rails 3.2.6 (or were using it) then you may have been using the asset pipeline to serve your assets (javascript files, CSS files, images, etc). If you were, and you downgrade to anything pre rails version 3.1, then anything being served through the asset pipeline will no longer work.
Here is a pretty good description of the asset pipeline: http://guides.rubyonrails.org/asset_pipeline.html
You should check also remove your Gemfile.lock or manually 'bundle update rails' when you change your rails dependency.
I suggest to use rbenv or rvm to create a virtual environment/sandbox where you can install your preferred ruby versions (e.g. 1.8.7) and keep tracking of your dependencies separately. This would save you a lot of effort.
Keep in mind that rails 3.0 has no asset pipeline support (it has been included in rails 3.1)! This is a very important difference and if you depend on it you will have big issues to solve for the downgrade.
Thanks a lot everyone for help.
I believe it was weird issue. I had heroku on the system. I was initially deploying my app on the same and then changed to another hosting server.
After uninstalling the heroku, it works perfectly fine. Probably, that was interfering somewhere. Although, not sure but problem is resolved.
Thanks a lot again for a great great help!!!
Meanwhile, I would request alup to throw some more light on asset pipeline support. Wots that? Could you please explain more??
Need to delete C:\Users\.ror folder and C:\Users\.gemfile and C:\Users\.gemfile.lock from your desktop..
I've gotten a Rails app from someone via heroku to modify. How can I tell, by examining the source code, what version of Rails was used to write the app?
For Rails 3.x
It should be specified in the GEM file
For Rails 2.x - try the config/environment.rb
The file config/environment.rb may specify it e.g.
\# Specifies gem version of Rails to use when vendor/rails is not present
RAILS_GEM_VERSION = '2.3.11' unless defined? RAILS_GEM_VERSION
... but it is not required to.
You can take some educated guesses and try 2.3.2 or 2.3.11. Our own system uses a ton of gems and was pretty happy with 2.3.2 for at least a year.
Which Ruby Version?
A reasonable guess would be 1.8.7 as it has been around for so long. You could also try 1.9.2 but if the app has been around for more than a year, it is unlikely to be using 1.9.x - too many popular gems had problems with 1.9 until this last year or so.
As of Rails 3 it will be in the Gemfile:
gem 'rails', '3.1.0.rc4'
Before Rails 3 it was in config/environment.rb:
RAILS_GEM_VERSION = '2.3.9' unless defined? RAILS_GEM_VERSION
As for the ruby version, there's no way to tell from code. Most rails code will run fine on either Ruby 1.8 or 1.9.
It's listed in the Gemfile file.
To find out the version of ruby there is a possibility that you can go into the .rvm/log file to see the versions that have been used and the dates they were installed.
I'm working on two different rails installations for two different projects. They are on different versions of rails. Here's what I have installed:
gem list --local | grep rails
shows that I have this installed:
rails (3.0.0.beta4, 2.3.5)
When I run a command to do a deployment for the app that uses 2.3.5, I get the following error:
Missing the Rails 2.3.5 gem. Please `gem install -v=2.3.5 rails`, update your
RAILS_GEM_VERSION setting in config/environment.rb for the Rails version you do
have installed, or comment out RAILS_GEM_VERSION to use the latest version installed.
It's not finding the correct rails version, even though I have it installed. What are good short- and longer-term solutions for this problem?
I suggest you RVM. It allow you to have different ruby/gems versions on the same machine.
The long term solution is to look into rvm, especially the gemset feature makes it really easy to keep separate versions of gems and even ruby versions for different projects.
A short trem solution may be to add the the following line to your boot.rb file, somewhere before rails is required:
gem rails, "2.3.5"
This loads the right version of the gem, otherwise gem will think you want the latest version.
As others have noted, rvm is one way to solve this problem. The other is to use bundler, which involves some setup in your application and potentially requiring you to use 'bundle exec command' everywhere you want to run conflicting versions of a command (eg cucumber)
I was trying to fix this error and I ended up with a new one.
I have installed ruby 1.8.6, but using Built-in JRuby 1.4.0 for my app.
Everything was working fine until I updated every gem(as specified by the answer I got from that link) and everything crashed: ever since I tried to start the app I received the following error message:
Missing the Rails 2.3.4 gem. Please
gem install -v=2.3.4 rails, update
your RAILS_GEM_VERSION setting in
config/environment.rb for the Rails
version you do have installed, or
comment out RAILS_GEM_VERSION to use
the latest version installed.
Then, I tried to uninstall the updates(to v2.3.8, most of them), so the last version is 2.3.4.
In my config/environment.rb file I have this:
RAILS_GEM_VERSION = '2.3.4' unless defined? RAILS_GEM_VERSION
so I guess everything is as I left it before the update.
The question is....why do I keep getting the error and I can't start the app?
Well, I got this working by changing the gem path for my Built-in Jruby 1.4.0 platform, pointing to the gems' directory of Ruby, instead of NetBeans(as it was before).
I hope it works well in the future.