I love iPython and am learning RoR along with some libraries like Mechanize and I'd like to be able to easily see what I'm working with in terms of introspection. I would like to be able to type "." + TAB and see.
There is an irb tool to help autocomplete
require 'irb/completion'
You should take a look at Pry (an IRB alternative and runtime developer console). It isn't as advanced as the current version of IPython, but it's the most advanced developer console we have in Ruby.
try IRB http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interactive_Ruby_Shell, or the rails console http://guides.rubyonrails.org/command_line.html. I don't know if either of them have autocomplete, but they are quality tools.
There is an IPython notebook backed by Ruby kernel. Details about the project
Wirble is a convenient, if infrequently-updated way of bringing together some of these tools. It's not quite as complete as iPython, but gets pretty close. Among other things, it pulls in irb/completion.
For rails, you can do the same, but use script/console from your rails' root directory to start irb.
Related
I don't like using the console terminal. Is it possible to use a text editor like bracket *(MY FAVORITE) to write ruby code? I've seen ruby files. Are those written on an editor? Or is it the case that all these schools teach you the basics through the console and later you can write code on an editor?
Ruby do not have to be written in the terminal.
I myself do most of my coding in sublime and do run some commands in the terminal to run tests and generate some files. (Rails generators are quite awesome by the way)
I have a colleague who uses Ruby mine and from what I understand you can use that to do rails development without using the console.
Yes obviously you can use text editors.
You can write code in editor save it as file_name.rb and run from console as ruby file_name.rb
And this is just a start with Ruby. Just give your 20 minutes and you will get to know
https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/documentation/quickstart/
When you will get familiar with all the great things about ruby
You can start with Rails, as it's name suggests it actually get you started
http://guides.rubyonrails.org/getting_started.html
Just go on and you get fell in love with Ruby on Rails what it is called.
It's a lot convenient to use text editors and write codes instead of giving yourself a hard time coding using the console.
Sublime Text is one of the widely used editors, very easy to use and free. I've always used this.
You could also check out some of the best editors here 5 Best editors - Lifehacker
You can use any text editor and save the codes with the .rb extension <file-name>.rb and run it through terminal like this: ruby filename.rb
When I run rails c and press the up key when irb starts up, I can see the last commands I entered when my app dropped to irb after encountering a debugger command for the ruby-debug gem. I would not only like to clear these commands out, but I would like it if rails c would pull the last commands I issued during my last rails console session. I think it used to do this but I'm not sure what has changed. I'm on ruby 1.8.7 and rails 3.0.3 on Mac OS 10.6.5 if that helps.
Update
Ray's answer helped me out in the interim. Recently I did a bit more digging to find out more and realized that there are a number of conflicting issues.
IRB checks if you have a ~/.irbrc and if not falls back to /etc/irbrc as Ray mentioned. However, if you are using rvm there is another file to consider ~/.rvm/scripts/irbrc which just loads up ~/.rvm/scripts/irbrc.rb (note the .rb) if you have rvm_path set in your ENV (you should if using rvm).
Interestingly while ~/.rvm/scripts/irbrc.rb was based off of /etc/irbrc they are not the same and differ in a few ways. The most obvious way and easiest way to detect which one is being used on your system is their history file's name. If /etc/irbrc is being used your history file will be ~/.irb_history where as rvm's is ~/.irb-history (Note: _ vs -).
Hopefully this additional information will help you determine what you need to setup your system as you would like.
Pry Concerns
I've since stopped using debugger and have moved to pry-byebug which includes the pry gem. Pry is an alternative to IRB but can also be used along side and within it. The reason I was able to provide the above update is because I was trying to figure out how to keep their respective histories separate. For more information please see my answer to the SO question on "why does pry history keep cloberring irb history?". I've included links there to the known Github issue for Pry as well as my attempt to fix it.
I interpret you question as asking how to turn history on in the Rails Console and off in the Ruby debugger. If this isn't true, please clarify.
IRB, and by extension, the Rails Console, read from ~/.irbrc, or if that doesn't exist, /etc/irbrc, to startup and configure irb. Your history is typically written to ~/.irb_history, but that is dictated by the contents of your irbrc file. The /etc/irbrc on my Mac OS X is set up to write the history from irb, so perhaps you've created a local .irbrc that doesn't have history, or perhaps you have a syntax error in that file.
The debugger reads a file called .rdebugrc on startup. You can turn off history in debug by adding this line to ~/.rdebugrc:
set history save off
Turn it back on with:
set history save on
You could also set your debug output to go to a different file than irb reads from with the command:
set history filename
These also work from the debug prompt, but aren't persistent.
There are a number of tools to help improve the irb experience. Bond and hirb are promising.
Here is Comprehensive list of Irb Tools and some tips on directly editing the .irbrc file.
Hope this help!
Although a very old question I got here by google.
Turns out RVM slightly changed over time.
Currently my IRB history (using rvm) is stored here:
user#host:~$ ls ~/.rvm/rubies/ruby-2.4.2/.irbrc*
/home/user/.rvm/rubies/ruby-2.4.2/.irbrc
/home/user/.rvm/rubies/ruby-2.4.2/.irbrc_history
I'm looking to write an app for the shell, *nix mostly. And I'm currently in love with Ruby, especially the 'rails way'.
So if there was a framework that applied rails like concepts to the commandline in ruby then that would be really fantastic.
I'v allready looked into SimpleCommand and Hirb, nothing quite what I was looking for.
To elaborate:
What I'm really looking for is a way to use a rails like (directory and application) structure to create a MVC command line application. So basically something like rails that doesn't respond to http, but instead reads and writes to the console.
Its not a shell, if i wanted that then irb works fine. It would be more like your options are A,B,C and they would work a bit like http links.
You should take a look at boson and hirb [2d] menus. First one for creation of commands, second one - for A,B,C options and custom/dynamic views for outputting data.
Maybe you should try script/console in your rails app. Is that what you wanted?
I'm one of those developers who isn't using TextMate with any of his Ruby/Ruby on Rails work. My particular loyalty in this arena lies with vim. What are your favorite tips/tricks for using vim with Ruby and/or Ruby on Rails to make you as efficient as possible when working?
Most important
Get a copy of rails.vim it is awesome on millions of levels. Read the doc. There are way too many tips, :Rview customer, :RSmodel foo, :Rinvert, gf, :Rextract, :Rake and the list goes on and on. You will probably want NERDTree as well for easy navigation (which you can access using :Rtree)
Second most important
Follow tpope on twitter (the author of fugative, rails.vim, haml.vim, vividchalk theme, cucumber.vim and so on), he seems to be posting new related to Rails vim plugins quite regularly (be it syntax highlighting or git integration).
You might want to checkout my ruby/rails specific vimfiles.
Its a useful starting point and has many useful Ruby/Rails plugins bundled and configured.
The one thing that really sucks about Textmate is that it doesn't run on Linux. My vim/gvim config is the same on Mac, Windows and Linux. Same fonts, same themes, same plugins and same customizations.
I mostly use Textmate for snippets and quick evaluations for posting here.
I wrote an in depth guide on using Textmate features (especially Rails related features) in VIM. It's very relevant to this question.
http://www.jackkinsella.ie/2011/09/05/textmate-to-vim.html
I don't use vim, instead, I'm like those millions of developers using Textmate. Nevertheless, a colleague does use vim/gvim.
By looking at him work, one of the things I wish I could do in Textmate is the ease of working on multiple files at the same time. Basically, you can easily manipulate multiple windows, which is quite handy.
I'm new to developing in Ruby and have mostly been using irb to experiment with code. For longer scripts, it would be helpful to be able to run them in my native browser (similar to how I run php scripts through MAMP). I believe there is a way to do this using localhost:3000 but I have not been able to get it to work. So my question is, what is the best way to view Ruby scripts in my native browser?
Well, running some Ruby code in IRB has nothing to do with using the Rails framework.
Follow a tutorial (for example this one) to learn the Rails framework itself now you have some understanding of the Ruby language.
Good luck.
I don't see how this would really be helpful to you, but it would be pretty easy to put your code into a simple Sinatra route and have that serve the result of the code into a browser if you want. Then you can just…
require 'rubygems'
require 'sinatra'
get '/' do
"Hello World! This is file #{$0} live from Boulder!"
end
And when you access the server on your local computer, it will print whatever you put in the method.
I would be interested to hear why you want to do this rather than IRB, though. This seems like kind of a perverse way to code in most cases.
Rack is a Ruby webserver interface, you probably want to use that to hook your ruby script up with a server.