I'm having an issue.
I've implemented a PhaseListener, which is meant to add a style class to any UIInput components in the tree that have messages attached to them, and removes the style class if it doesn't have any messages attached to them.
The PhaseListener runs in the RENDER_RESPONSE phase, and does it's work in both the beforePhase and afterPhase methods while debugging. While debugging, I found that beforePhase doesn't have access to the full component tree, but afterPhase does. Any changes done in afterPhase aren't rendered though.
How do I go about this? I want this to be completely server side.
Thanks,
James
The JSF component tree is only available after the view build time. The RENDER_RESPONSE phase is not necessarily a good moment to have access to the full JSF component tree before it gets rendered. During an initial GET request without any <f:viewAction>, the full component tree is only available in the afterPhase as it's being built during the RENDER_RESPONSE. During a postback the full component tree is available in the beforePhase, however, when a navigation to a different view has taken place, then it would stil be changed during the RENDER_RESPONSE phase, so any modifications would get lost.
To learn what exactly the view build time is, head to the question What's the view build time?
You basically want to hook on "view render time" rather than beforePhase of RENDER_RESPONSE phase. JSF offers several ways to hook on it:
In some master template, attach a preRenderView listener to <f:view>.
<f:view ...>
<f:event type="preRenderView" listener="#{bean.onPreRenderView}" />
...
</f:view>
public void onPreRenderView(ComponentSystemEvent event) {
UIViewRoot view = (UIViewRoot) event.getSource();
// The view is the component tree. Just modify it here accordingly.
// ...
}
Or, implement a global SystemEventListener for PreRenderViewEvent.
public class YourPreRenderViewListener implements SystemEventListener {
#Override
public boolean isListenerForSource(Object source) {
return source instanceof UIViewRoot;
}
#Override
public void processEvent(SystemEvent event) throws AbortProcessingException {
UIViewRoot view = (UIViewRoot) event.getSource();
// The view is the component tree. Just modify it here accordingly.
// ...
}
}
To get it to run, register it as below in faces-config.xml:
<application>
<system-event-listener>
<system-event-listener-class>com.example.YourPreRenderViewListener</system-event-listener-class>
<system-event-class>javax.faces.event.PreRenderViewEvent</system-event-class>
</system-event-listener>
</application>
Or, provide a custom ViewHandler wherein you do the job in renderView().
public class YourViewHandler extends ViewHandlerWrapper {
private ViewHandler wrapped;
public YourViewHandler(ViewHandler wrapped) {
this.wrapped = wrapped;
}
#Override
public void renderView(FacesContext context, UIViewRoot view) {
// The view is the component tree. Just modify it here accordingly.
// ...
// Finally call super so JSF can do the rendering job.
super.renderView(context, view);
}
#Override
public ViewHandler getWrapped() {
return wrapped;
}
}
To get it to run, register as below in faces-config.xml:
<application>
<view-handler>com.example.YourViewHandler</view-handler>
</application>
Or, hook on ViewDeclarationLanguage#renderView(), but this is a bit on the edge as it isn't really intented to manipulate the component tree, but to manipulate how to render the view.
Unrelated to the concrete problem, this all is not the right solution for the concrete functional requirement as stated in your question:
which is meant to add a style class to any UIInput components in the tree that have messages attached to them, and removes the style class if it doesn't have any messages attached to them
You'd really better head for a client side solution rather than manipulating the component tree (which would end up in JSF component state!). Imagine the case of inputs in iterating components such as <ui:repeat><h:inputText>. There's physically only one input component in the tree, not multiple! Manipulating the style class via UIInput#setStyleClass() would get presented in every iteration round.
You'd best visit the component tree using UIViewRoot#visitTree() as below and collect all client IDs of invalid input components (this visitTree() approach will transparently take iterating components into account):
Set<String> invalidInputClientIds = new HashSet<>();
view.visitTree(VisitContext.createVisitContext(context, null, EnumSet.of(VisitHint.SKIP_UNRENDERED)), new VisitCallback() {
#Override
public VisitResult visit(VisitContext context, UIComponent component) {
if (component instanceof UIInput) {
UIInput input = (UIInput) component;
if (!input.isValid()) {
invalidInputClientIds.add(input.getClientId(context.getFacesContext()));
}
}
return VisitResult.ACCEPT;
}
});
And then thereafter pass invalidInputClientIds in flavor of a JSON array to JavaScript which will then grab them via document.getElementById() and alter the className attribute.
for (var i = 0; i < invalidInputClientIds.length; i++) {
var invalidInput = document.getElementById(invalidInputClientIds[i]);
invalidInput.className += ' error';
}
The JSF utility library OmniFaces has a <o:highlight> component which does exactly this.
Implemented using a ViewHandler, however it's not efficient. PhaseListener in Render Response phase doesn't have access to the component tree.
Related
I'm translating a web application and things are generally going smoothly with wicket:message and properties files. But Wicket always wants to have a component for looking up strings.
How can I translate converters and renderers (i.e. implementations of IConverter and IChoiceRenderer) which don't have access to any Wicket component in their methods?
So far I found one way - Application.get().getResourceSettings().getLocalizer().getString(key, null) - but I have to make the strings "global", i.e. associated with the application class. That's not nice for separation and reuse. How can I do it better?
I think you should invent you own way how to achieve this. Here in my current project we registered our own IStringResourceLoader like this:
IStringResourceLoader stringResourceLoader = new OurOwnResourceLoaderImpl();
Application.get().getResourceSettings().getStringResourceLoaders().add(stringResourceLoader);
Then for example in IChoiceRenderer we just call Application.get().getLocalizer().getString("key", null).
Inside our IStringResourceLoader we are looking for bundles (property files) with some string pattern according our own conventions.
Or you can just register localization bundle (ie. properties file) distributed inside your library's jar in Application#init through org.apache.wicket.resource.loader.BundleStringResourceLoader.
Afaik there is no standard way to do that so it's up to you what path you choose.
Updated:
I found another solution how your library/extension can register it's own localization by itself so you needn't to touch Application#init or create your own IStringResourceLoaders.
There is preregistered string resource loader org.apache.wicket.resource.loader.InitializerStringResourceLoader (see wickets default IResourceSetting implementation ie. ResourceSetting and it's constructor) which uses wicket's Initializer mechanism - see IInitializer javadoc - basically you add wicket.properties file in your jar class root (ie. it is in default/none package) and inside file there is:
initializer=i.am.robot.MyInitilizer
then i.am.robot.MyInitilizer:
public class MyInitializer implements IInitializer {
/**
* #param application
* The application loading the component
*/
void init(Application application) {
// do whatever want
}
/**
* #param application
* The application loading the component
*/
void destroy(Application application) {
}
}
and now you create your localization bundles in same package and same name as IInitializer implementation (in our example MyInitializer)
I think I found another way...
I noticed that IStringResourceLoader also has a method String loadStringResource(Class<?> clazz, String key, Locale locale, String style); (and one more parameter for variation in newer Wicket versions) which does not require a component. clazz is supposed to be a component class, but... it doesn't actually have to be :)
I was able to implement my own class MyLocalizer extends Localizer with a new method
getString(String key, Class<?> cl, IModel<?> model, Locale locale, String defaultValue)
which works in a similar way to
getString(String key, Component component, IModel<?> model, String defaultValue)
but uses the class directly instead of a component. It still uses the same properties cache and resource loaders.
Then I wrote an abstract class MyConverter implements IConverter which has a MyLocalizer getLocalizer() and a few getString methods like the Component class. Basically it does getLocalizer().getString(key, getClass(), model, locale, defaultValue), so the properties can now be attached to the converter class.
Seems to work :)
If I understand your question...
You can use package based properties that means if you put your keys/values into a property file 'package.properties' in a package. Each localized resource of any subpackage under that package returns the value associated to the requested key until you override it in another property file.
The file name is 'package.properties' in Wicket prior to 1.6.x and 'wicket-package.properties' in Wicket 1.6+
See
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/Migration+to+Wicket+6.0#MigrationtoWicket6.0-package.propertiesrenamedtowicket-package.properties
However it works just for componet, outside the componet (when component argument is null), it is possible to use:
WicketApplication.properties (the WebApplication class is WicketApplication.class, this property file is in the same package).
applicationGlobalProperty=My Global Localized Property
wicket-package.properties (package based, place it in the same package as the page)
localText=Localized text: A local component text based on wicket-package.properties
LocalizedPage.html (markup template)
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<meta charset="UTF-8">
<title>Localized Page</title>
</head>
<body xmlns:wicket="http://wicket.apache.org">
<div>
<div>
<h2>Texts</h2>
<div>
<wicket:message key="localText"/> <br/>
<span wicket:id="localizedLabel"></span>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>
LocalizePage.java (code)
public class LocalizedPage extends WebPage {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
public LocalizedPage() {
super();
}
#Override
protected void onInitialize() {
super.onInitialize();
add(new Label("localizedLabel", new AbstractReadOnlyModel<String>() {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
#Override
public String getObject() {
return WicketApplication.get().getResourceSettings().getLocalizer().getString("applicationGlobalProperty", null);
}
}));
}
}
See the full example on https://repo.twinstone.org/projects/WISTF/repos/wicket-examples-6.x/browse
This question already has answers here:
Conversion Error setting value for 'null Converter' - Why do I need a Converter in JSF?
(2 answers)
Closed 6 years ago.
I just tried to change a value of a select input box. Loading the page runs into my breakpoint for the getter method of the pubcategory property. Good so far. Changing the value, does NOT invoke the setter method. I trigger an Richfaces ajax processing. I confirm, that all JSF phases are walked through (I also see the JPA-SQL select queries, where I would expect an update statement for changing the value - well, can't be, if the setter method is not triggered). This is my selectOneMenu code
<h:selectOneMenu id="pubCategoryId" converter="#{pubCategoryConverter}" value="#{pubController.pubCategory}">
<f:selectItems value="#{listPubCategoryController.pubCategories}" var="category" itemLabel="#{category.name}" itemValue="#{category}" />
<a4j:ajax event="change" execute="#this" />
</h:selectOneMenu>
<h:message for="pubCategoryId" style="color:red" />
My converter is invoked on both times. the getAsString method, when I load the page and the getAsObject when the on-change action is triggered. From this I concluse, the change really goes back to the server. But - again - it never triggers the setter method.
#ManagedBean(name = "pubCategoryConverterController")
#FacesConverter(value = "pubCategoryConverter")
//#Named
public class PubCategoryConverter implements Converter {
#Inject
private PubCategoryRepository pubCategoryRepository;
public PubCategoryConverter() {
}
// from page to backing bean
#Override
public Object getAsObject(FacesContext ctx, UIComponent component,
String value) {
PubCategory pubCat = pubCategoryRepository.getPubCategoryById(new Long(
value));
return pubCat;
}
// from backing bean to page
#Override
public String getAsString(FacesContext fc, UIComponent uic, Object o) {
PubCategory pubCat = ((PubCategory) o);
return pubCat.getId().toString();
}
}
Same story if I annotate the converter with #Named instead of #FacesConverter/#ManagedBean. Any clue or hints anyone?
Using JBoss 7.1.1, Richfaces 4.3.3, JSF 2.0
The converter is called in the "Process Validations" phase of the JSF lifecycle whereas the setter is called later, during the "Update Model Values" phase. Each phase goes through the entire page which means a validation error in any component will prevent all model updates. If you're not seeing validation errors on the page try checking your message tags.
The skipping of lifecycle phases is done by calling FacesContext.renderResponse(). See UIInput.executeValidate() and LifeCycleImpl.execute() for details.
I hooked up the phase listener and printed the event.getFacesContext().getMessageList(). And, there is an error although not printed to the <h:Message for="pubCategoryId"/>. The error is msg j_idt18:pubFormE:pubCategoryId: Validation Error: Value is not valid
package com.foo;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.logging.Logger;
import javax.faces.event.PhaseEvent;
import javax.faces.event.PhaseListener;
import javax.faces.application.FacesMessage;
import javax.faces.context.FacesContext;
public class PhaseTracker implements PhaseListener {
private static final Logger logger = Logger.getLogger("org.exadel.helper");
public void beforePhase(PhaseEvent e) {
List<FacesMessage> msgs = e.getFacesContext().getMessageList();
for (FacesMessage msg : msgs) {
logger.info("before msg " + msg.getSummary() + " :: " + msg.getDetail());
}
logger.info("BEFORE " + e.getPhaseId());
}
public void afterPhase(PhaseEvent e) {
logger.info("AFTER " + e.getPhaseId());
}
}
The issue is with the equals(Object o) method within of the model object (some call that DTO). As stated in many forums, the values that you compare within this method must not look like e.g. this.id == o.id, because it compares instances not the inner state. Use equals instead this.id.equals(o.id). Once that is fixed the error Value is not valid will go away.
After all, I noticed the following. If you want to use the selectOneMenu with the tag attribute converter instead of <f:converter ../>, e.g. ...
<h:selectOneMenu value="#{pubController.pubCategory}" converter="#{pubCategoryConverterController}">
... you need to annotate your converter also as a #ManagedBean instance in addition to #FacesConverter, e.g.
#ManagedBean(name="pubCategoryConverterController")
#FacesConverter(value = "pubCategoryConverter")
On the other hand, if you want to use <f:converter converterId="pubCategoryConverter"> tag, you need to reference the faces converter name - NOT an instance of a managed bean. Notice, there is no EL #{...} around the converter name. However, in this case, you CANNOT inject a bean into your converter. As a consequence, in your converter bean, you need to instantiate a controller from the application context in order to use EJB services. e.g.
PubCategoryController pubCategoryController = ctx.getApplication().evaluateExpressionGet(ctx, "#{pubCategoryController}", PubCategoryController.class);
'm trying to create a reusable link class that extends Link. I have a webpage with about 7 menu items and I'm using inheritance for my application. I want to create a reusable link class to shorten the length of my code..
As of now the link creates and runs fine when I add(new Link....) as an anonymous class inside oninitialize().
The custom link class (which is an inner class of the base page) works fine when I hard code the instance of the new page to go to, and assign it to a "Page" reference, then pass it into setResponsePage();
The problem is, I'm passing trying to be able to pass object through the constructor generically. When I pass it through the constructor, and try to travel to the new page, I get a session has expired.
I've tried using generics for the class, and I've also tried just declaring a Page reference as a parameter value. Am I supposed to use some sort of Model? Or can someone provide an example of how to do this? I want to be able to use this custom link class to add new links for the 7 menu items, which each have there own class...
Code that works:
add(new Link("userPageLink")
{
public void onClick()
{
pageTitle = "User";
Page next = new UserPage();
setResponsePage(next);
}
});
Modified code that gives page expired upon click:
public class CustomLinkToNewPage extends Link
{
private String title;
private Page next;
public CustomLinkToNewPage(String id, String title, Page newPage)
{
super(id);
next = newPage;
this.title = title;
}
#Override
public void onClick()
{
SSAPage.pageTitle = title;
setResponsePage(next);
}
}
This might be due to the fact that in the first version you crate the Page object when the onClick method of the Link object is called and in the second version, the Page object is created on Page-construction (way earlier).
You might get the result if you pass the Pageclass of the responsepage instead on an instance.
Component features setters for these either with
public final <C extends IRequestablePage> void setResponsePage(java.lang.Class<C> cls, PageParameters parameters)
or without parameters.
public final <C extends IRequestablePage> void setResponsePage(java.lang.Class<C> cls)
See Javadoc for more information.
I ended up doing:
public class CustomLinkToNewPage<T extends SSAPage> extends Link
SSAPage is my base page that extends WebPage... So any object passed in to this class's constructor must extend SSAPage as well.
public CustomLinkToNewPage(String id, Class<T> name)
Then I passed in the .class reference to the object, and created a new instance of the object using reflection.. then set that instance to Page, and passed it to setResponsePage in my onClick. Worked nicely, as I couldn't figure out how to do Nicktar's way. So this an alternative in case anyone else runs into this issue.
We are currently facing one problem in our portlet-environment using JSF2.
The application is creating dynamic portal-pages for the actual user session...think of it as Eclipse editor-views where the user can edit entities. So for now I call the dynamic-views editors :-)
The problem we are facing now, is following. The user navigates to a editor and works on the portlet(s). The displayed views in each portlet change over time of course. Now he wants to have a look on another entity which is displayed in another editor. But when he navigates back to the first editor, the state of portlets changes back to the default views.
In the portlet-world each portlet each portlet gets the view it should display via a parameter which is stored in the PortletSession and I can easily change that parameter as well. I know that this parameter is causing the trouble because when the changes the editors, the portlets will always check this parameter to decide which view to show.
request.getPortletSession().setAttribute("com.ibm.faces.portlet.page.view", "/MyPage.xhtml");
My idea was, to somehow add a callback to each JSF-navigation which will set this parameter to the view the navigation is going to display (possibly including view-params).
Is it possible to have a standard callback? If not, would be possible to execute some kind of EL in the navigation-rule that will set this parameter?
somehow add a callback to each JSF-navigation
You could perform the job in a custom ConfigurableNavigationHandler. Here's a kickoff example:
public class MyNavigationHandler extends ConfigurableNavigationHandler {
private NavigationHandler parent;
public MyNavigationHandler(NavigationHandler parent) {
this.parent = parent;
}
#Override
public void handleNavigation(FacesContext context, String from, String outcome) {
// TODO: Do your job here.
// Keep the following line untouched. This will perform the actual navigation.
parent.handleNavigation(context, from, outcome);
}
#Override
public NavigationCase getNavigationCase(FacesContext context, String fromAction, String outcome) {
return (parent instanceof ConfigurableNavigationHandler)
? ((ConfigurableNavigationHandler) parent).getNavigationCase(context, fromAction, outcome)
: null;
}
#Override
public Map<String, Set<NavigationCase>> getNavigationCases() {
return (parent instanceof ConfigurableNavigationHandler)
? ((ConfigurableNavigationHandler) parent).getNavigationCases()
: null;
}
}
To get it to run, register it as follows in faces-config.xml:
<application>
<navigation-handler>com.example.MyNavigationHandler</navigation-handler>
</application>
I am attempting to create an AttachedProperty for a DataGridColumn within Silverlight 3.0 and I am having some issues.
Here is the AttachedProperty:
public class DataGridColumnHelper
{
public static readonly DependencyProperty HeaderProperty =
DependencyProperty.RegisterAttached("Header", typeof(string), typeof(DataGridColumnHelper),
new PropertyMetadata(OnHeaderPropertyChanged));
private static void OnHeaderPropertyChanged(DependencyObject d, DependencyPropertyChangedEventArgs e)
{
string header = GetHeader(d);
var dataGridColumn = d as DataGridColumn;
if (dataGridColumn == null)
{
return;
}
dataGridColumn.Header = GetHeader(dataGridColumn);
}
public static string GetHeader(DependencyObject obj)
{
return (string)obj.GetValue(HeaderProperty);
}
public static void SetHeader(DependencyObject obj, string value)
{
obj.SetValue(HeaderProperty, value);
}
}
As you can see it is really simple, I am trying to overcome the limitation that the Header Property in the DataGridColumn class cannot be bound.
This XAML works as expected...
<Controls:DataGridTextColumn Binding="{Binding OwnerName}"
HeaderStyle="{StaticResource DataGridColumnHeaderStyle}"
Behaviors:DataGridColumnHelper.Header="User Name"/>
However this XAML throws an error...(Specifically: {System.Windows.Markup.XamlParseException: AG_E_PARSER_PROPERTY_NOT_FOUND [Line: 224 Position: 112]
at System.Windows.Application.LoadComponent(Object component, Uri resourceLocator)
....})
<Controls:DataGridTextColumn Binding="{Binding OwnerName}"
HeaderStyle="{StaticResource DataGridColumnHeaderStyle}"
Behaviors:DataGridColumnHelper.Header="{Binding Resources.UserNameListViewHeading, Source={StaticResource Labels}}"/>
Just for experimentation I attached this property (with the binding syntax above) to a DataGrid and checked the DataGridColumnHelper.Header property in the OnHeaderPropertyChanged method and the value was correct (and an exception wasn't thrown)
It is my understanding that the object that the AttachedProperty is attached to must be a DependencyProperty. Looking through Reflector, DataGridColumn (from which DataGridTextColumn derives) derives from DependencyProperty.
Can somebody please shed some light on this? I am trying to Localize our application, and I am having trouble with the DataGrid. I am sure I can do this in code-behind, but I am trying to avoid that.
Chris, the problem is very simple, this won't work because the DataGridTextColumn is "detached" from the Visual Tree. Your DataGridTextColumn object is rooted in the Columns collection of the DataGrid - see the indirection. So even attached properties will not work as you expect. Now there is a way to make all this work using something I'm calling Attached Bindings, see:
http://www.orktane.com/Blog/post/2009/09/29/Introducing-nRouteToolkit-for-Silverlight-(Part-I).aspx
Just remember to attach the binding properties using something that is in the VisualTree (so the Grid holding the column would do just fine.)
Hope this helps.
Try using this, im assuming UserName is a property in your viewmodel
<Controls:DataGridTextColumn Binding="{Binding OwnerName}"
HeaderStyle="{StaticResource DataGridColumnHeaderStyle}"
Behaviors:DataGridColumnHelper.Header="{Binding UserName}"/>
I cant test your scenario so my post is just an idea. Might work, might not.