I'm having a problem with an ASP.NET MVC application that I'm developing. I'm still fairly new at web development and in particular MVC, so please forgive me is this is a really stupid newbie mistake ;-)
I have a view that displays a list of products. Each product has a 'details' link that I want to link to a details view for that product. So, here's the relevant markup from the view:
<% foreach (var item in Model) { %>
<tr>
<td>
<%= Html.ActionLink("Edit", "Edit", new { id=item.StockCode.ToString() }) %>
<%= Html.ActionLink("Details", "Details", new { id=item.StockCode.ToString() })%>
</td>
<td>
<%= Html.Encode(item.StockCode) %>
</td>
<td>
<%= Html.Encode(item.Description) %>
</td>
</tr>
So far so good. When I hover the mouse over the details link in the web browser, the link shows up as:
http://localhost:40733/RawMaterial/Details/R8517
R8517 is the stock code for the item. So, that's what I expect to see in my Action Method. Here's the Action Method:
//
// GET: /RawMaterial/Details/5
public ActionResult Details(string stockCode)
{
return View(repository.GetByStockCode(stockCode));
}
But... when the Action Method executes, the parameter (stockCode) is null.
Any thoughts?
The parameter you need to accept shouldn't be "stockCode" is should be "id"
MVC is trying to model bind the "id=item.StockCode.ToString()" to a parameter that is named the same. Your action method should be:
public ActionResult Details(string id)
+1 to DM's answer, but you also have another option. You can register special route for your case. Something like this:
routes.MapRoute("RawMaterial", "RawMaterial/{action}/{stockCode}",
new { controller = "RawMaterial", action = "Index" } );
Related
I have a problem with calls to action with POST attribute exclusively from Grid.MVC tool.
I set up a column within the Grid.MVC tool, setting the property RenderValueAs follows:
#Html.Grid(Model).Columns(columns =>
{
// other lines...
columns.Add().Encoded(false)
.Sanitized(false)
.RenderValueAs(item => Html.ActionLink("Delete", "Delete", new { item.ID }));
}).WithPaging(3).Sortable(true)
In my controller I have set the following code which refers to the Delete action:
[HttpPost]
public ActionResult Delete(int id)
{
// anything here
return RedirectToAction("Index");
}
The best practices tell you that the action method should support only POST requests, because deleting objects is not an idempotent operation. This because browsers and caches are free to make GET requests without the user’s explicit consent, and so I must be careful to avoid making changes as a consequence of GET requests.
But, when I try to apply this configuration I have the next error:
Server Error in application '/'
Can not find the resource.
Description: HTTP 404. The resource you are looking for (or one of its dependencies) could have been removed, had its name changed, or is temporarily unavailable. Please review the following URL and make sure that it is spelled correctly
But if I remove the [HttpPost] attribute the code works. Is this behavior correct?
Thanks
UPDATE:
Bayu, you have reason, now I explain the problem from another scenario: I had my View as follows:
<table>
<tr>
<th>ID</th>
#*another columns*#
<th>Name</th>
<th>Actions</th>
</tr>
#foreach (var item in Model)
{
<tr>
<td>#item.ID</td>
#*another columns*#
<td>#item.Name</td>
<td>
#using (Html.BeginForm("Delete", "Admin"))
{
#Html.Hidden("ID", item.ID)
<input type="submit"
value="Delete row" />
}
</td>
</tr>
}
</table>
That is, I used HTML tables, and therefore I could use an input to build a button that allows me to delete a row from the table.
Now, I want to use the tool Grid.View (because among other benefits allows me effortlessly filter columns), but I can not use an input for this purpose.
You have any idea how?
Change new { item.ID }) to new {id = item.ID })
Suppose I have a simple search form with a textbox. And upon submitting the form I send the contents of the textbox to a stored procedure which returns to me the results. I want the results to be displayed on the same page the form was, except just below it.
Right now I'm doing the following but it's not working out exactly the way I want:
"Index" View of my SearchController
#using (Html.BeginForm("SearchResults", "Search", FormMethod.Post, new { #class = "searchform" }))`{
<fieldset>
<legend>Name</legend>
<div class="editor-label">
#Html.Label("Search")
</div>
<div class="editor-field">
#Html.TextBox("Name")
</div>
<input type="submit" value="Search" class="formbutton" />
</fieldset>
#{ Html.RenderPartial("SearchResults", null);
This is my "SearchResults" View:
#model IEnumerable<MyProject.Models.spSearchName_Result>
<table>
#foreach (var item in Model)
{
<tr>
<td>
#item.Name
</td>
</tr>
}
</table>
This is my Controller:
// GET: /Search/SearchResult
[HttpPost]
public ActionResult SearchResult(FormCollection collection)
{
var result = myentity.spSearchName(collection["Name"]);
return PartialView("SearchResults", result);
}
I can only seem to get the results to display on an entirely new page (not being embedded as a partial view), or I get an error when I load the search page because there are no results (since I hadn't searched yet).
Is there any better way to achieve what I'm trying to do? I feel like I'm going against some of the best practices in MVC.
You could return the results in a ViewData object then only show on the view it if is not null.
Very similar to this question MVC 3 form post and persisting model data
For this instance it looks like you are not passing the results to your partial view. Try this?
#{ Html.RenderPartial("SearchResults", Model.Results);
Since you are not persisting your search information using a model, the search information will be lost when the search form is posted.
Given your design and stated goal, it would be best to convert the form in your Index view into an Ajax form, then your controller can send your partial view back to populate a div below your Ajax form.
counsellorben
I have feature on my website (some UI and associated functionality) that I want to be able to reuse on multiple pages. For the purposes of this question, let's say it's a "Comments" feature.
There is an area in my application for Components and within the area are a controller: /Controllers/CommentController, and two partial views: /Views/Comment/Index.ascx (for listing comments) and /Views/Comment/Create.ascx (for creating comments).
CommentController looks something like this:
public class CommentController : Controller
{
[ChildActionOnly]
public ActionResult Index()
{
return PartialView(GetComments());
}
[HttpGet]
[ChildActionOnly]
public ActionResult Create()
{
return PartialView(); //this is wrong.
}
[HttpPost]
[ChildActionOnly]
public ActionResult Create(FormCollection formValues)
{
SaveComment(formValues);
return RedirectToAction("Index"); //this is wrong too.
}
}
Index Partial View:
<%# Control Language="C#" Inherits="System.Web.Mvc.ViewUserControl<dynamic>" %>
<div>
<% foreach (var item in Model) { %>
<div>
<%: item.Comment %>
</div>
<% } %>
<%: Html.ActionLink("Add a Comment", "Create", "Comment", new { area = "Components" }, null) %>
</div>
Create Partial View:
<%# Control Language="C#" Inherits="System.Web.Mvc.ViewUserControl<dynamic>" %>
<div>
<% using (Html.BeginForm())
{%>
Enter your comment:
<div>
<input type="text" name="comment" />
</div>
<p>
<input type="submit" value="Create" />
<% //also render a cancel button and redirect to "Index" view %>
</p>
<% } %>
</div>
The Index partial view is included in a view with RenderAction, like so:
<% Html.RenderAction("Index", "Comment", new { area = "Components" }); %>
This code doesn't work because the forms within the partial views submit to actions on the CommentsController that are marked [ChildActionOnly] (this is by design, I don't want the "Components" to be requested independently of a hosting page).
How can I make this "component" approach work, i.e. have a partial view that submits a form to change the state of a component within a page without losing the hosting page itself?
EDIT:
To clarify, the use of [ChildActionOnly] is not my problem here. If I remove the attribute from my action methods, my code only "works" in that it doesn't throw an exception. My "component" still breaks out of its hosting page when its form is submitted (because I'm telling the form to submit to the partial view's URL!).
You are making MVC fight itself by asking a form to target an action that is marked as ChildActionOnly.
My solution to this problem when I was designing a highly reusable wizard framework, was to NOT mark the actions as ChildActionOnly but instead to detect if the request was an ajax one or just a plain vanilla request.
The code for all this is packaged into a base controller class. In your derived controllers, you do something like:
[WizardStep(4, "Illness Details")]
public ActionResult IllnessDetails()
{
return Navigate();
}
Where the Navigate() method of the base controller has decided whether to return the full view or just the partial view, depending on whether it is, or isn't, an ajax request. That way, you can never return the partial view in isolation.
To ascertain if it is an Ajax request, I used a combination of Request.IsAjaxRequest() and TempData. The TempData is needed because my wizard framework implements the PRG pattern out of the box, so I need to persist the fact that the original post was an ajax one.
I guess this is just one solution and it took a bit of trial and error to get it right. But now I live happily ever after developing wizards like I was JK Rowling...
Use Ajax to post the partial.
I have a partial view that is bound to an object Cart. Cart has a collection of CartLines. My view is below:
<tbody>
<% foreach (var line in Model.Lines) { %>
<tr>
<td align="center"><%=Html.CatalogImage(line.Product.DefaultImage, 80) %></td>
<td align="left">
<%=Html.ActionLink(line.Product.Name, "Product", "Catalog",
new { productId = line.Product.Id }, new { title = "View " + line.Product.Name })%>
</td>
<td align="right"><%= line.Product.Price.ToString("c")%></td>
<td align="center">
<%=Html.Hidden("lines[" + i + "].key", line.Product.Id) %>
<%=Html.TextBox("lines[" + i + "].value", line.Quantity, new { #class = "quantity" })%>
</td>
<td align="right"><%= (line.LineTotal).ToString("c")%></td>
<td>
<%using (Ajax.BeginForm("RemoveFromCart", "Cart",
new {ProductId = line.Product.Id, returnUrl = ViewData["returnUrl"]},
new AjaxOptions { UpdateTargetId="cart", LoadingElementId="loading" }))
{%>
<input type="image" src="<%=AppHelper.ImageUrl("delete.gif")%>" value="Remove item" />
<%} %>
</td>
</tr>
<% i++; } %>
</tbody>
There are two things to note. The first is that I am using a form per line for removing items.
The second is that I had attempted to allow users to change the quantity of line items and then click an update button to pass all the changes to the controller action:
// POST: /Cart/Update
[HttpPost]
public ActionResult Update(Cart cart, IDictionary<int,int> lines, string returnUrl)
{
foreach (var line in lines) {
Product p = _catalogService.GetProduct(line.Key);
cart.UpdateItem(p, line.Value);
}
if (Request.IsAjaxRequest())
return PartialView("Cart", cart);
else
return RedirectToAction("Index", new { returnUrl });
}
Note that I am using a dictionary since I am only concerned about the product and quantity. I don't really like the fact that I am having to retrieve the product again before calling cart.UpdateItem but I couldn't figure out how to pass the Product from the model to my action instead of the id.
The main problem however, is rather stupidly I wrapped the entire cart in a form so that I could post back the values and then spent a good hour wondering why things were not working correctly in IE - doh! nested forms
So I am stuck on how to get round this. I want the ability to remove items individually but allow a user to change item quantities and then pass all changes at once to the controller. I can't use links for my remove action as I would need to use javascript to force a post and everything must work without javascript enabled.
[Update]
Would a better solution be to allow updates on my custom model binder? This way I could make changes inside my view and post the cart object back to the controller - although I'm not sure whether this is possible with child collections (Cart.CartItems).
I've had a look on sites like Amazon and it would appear they wrap the entire cart in a form and both global update buttons and indidivual remove item buttons post back to the same action when javascript is disabled.
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Ben
There is only one way here and thats the ugly way. Have 1 form around everything.
Then in the action you have to check which button was pressed (you get the name of the button in the request).
It gets even more ugly with differences in firefox and ie. If you have a button pressed ie or firefox (Dont remember which one) not only sends the name of the pressed button, but also the location where the button was pressed.
You have more options if your solution can rely on JS enabled browsers. But thats another story.
I have a database menu structure which I would like to add to the site.master file.
I’ve looked at other questions on StackOverflow but cannot get this to work on my website.
How do I add a User Control to the Site.Master file?
Menu.ascx
<%foreach (MainMenuSort mainMenuSort in (List<MainMenuSort>)ViewData["MainMenuSortListDisplay"])
{ %>
<li><%= Html.Encode(mainMenuSort.MainMenuId.MainMenuName)%></li>
<%foreach (SubMenuSort subMenuSort in (List<SubMenuSort>)ViewData["SubMenuSortListDisplay"])
{%>
<%if (mainMenuSort.MainMenuId.Id == subMenuSort.SubMenuId.MainMenu.Id)
{ %>
<li><%= Html.Encode(subMenuSort.SubMenuId.SubMenuName)%></li>
<%} %>
<%} %>
<%}%>
You need to use the Html.RenderPartial method in your master page.
You will need to set the MainMenuSortListDisplay and SubMenuSortListDisplay view data keys in whatever action is calling the view that uses your master page.
In your master use this
<% Html.RenderPartial("~/Views/Shared/Menu.ascx");
The path needs to be the app relative path to the control's folder. Typically these go under Shared. You can make the structure how you want below the Shared folder.
To make this technique stronger, use a strongly typed partial. In the question you would perhaps make a new class (MenuModel) with two generic collections as properties and place it in the models folder of the application. Then in the model's constructor call a method that populates the lists.
public class MenuModel
{
public IEnumerable<MainMenuSort> OuterList {get; set;}
public IEnumerable<SubMEnuSort> InnerList {get; set;}
public MenuModel()
{
VoidThatFillsTheInnerAndOuterList();
}
This will mean that you can do this in your controller
public ActionResult ShowAForm()
{
ViewData["MenuPartialData"] = new MenuModel();
return View();
}
Having set this key, your master page can use the overload of RenderPartial, like this
<% Html.RenderPartial(
"~/View/Shared/Menu.ascx",
(MenuModel)ViewData["MenuPartialData"]); %>
This assumes that your partial is strongly typed to the MenuModel class. Then in the partial you can use the model which rewrites your code slightly
<% foreach (MainMenuSort mainMenuSort in Model.OuterList) { %>
<li><%= Html.Encode(mainMenuSort.MainMenuId.MainMenuName)%></li>
<% foreach (SubMenuSort subMenuSort in Model.InnerList) {%>
<%if (mainMenuSort.MainMenuId.Id == subMenuSort.SubMenuId.MainMenu.Id)
{ %>
<li><%= Html.Encode(subMenuSort.SubMenuId.SubMenuName)%></li>
<%} %>
<%} %>
<%}%>
Hope that helps
Try something like
<% Html.RenderPartial("Menu") %>
EDIT: Corrected a typo
You could also do it as a HTMLHelper and in the MasterPage just call <%= Html.Menu() %>. Then in your HTMLHelper you have the code to get the database records and loop through them. Here is a link I found to get you started. Note my comments as there is a bug in the code example provided. I'm still having issues handling subitems of menus, I guess I need a recursive function or something??
With the help of this link. I was able to display a menu in the site.master page.