I have just started Rails and have a basic question.
I need to add customer properties(like email id etc) so that the Rails app can read them at runtime. How can I do this ?
Can I add them to development.rb and if so how can I read it ?
In java I would have created a properties file and read it from my app.
thank you,
firemonkey
Are you trying to do store and load configuration settings?
It's easy to store configuration settings in a yaml file and load them with initializers - loads better than littering your environment files.
This Railscast: http://railscasts.com/episodes/85-yaml-configuration-file shows you how.
I'm not sure exactly what you are asking. I'm guessing you want an initial set of data in the database that you can access when you actually run the app? If that is so check out this other SO question How (and whether) to populate rails application with initial data
It's a little unclear exactly what you're trying to do, but it sounds like maybe you have a model called Customer and you would like to add some attributes to it, such as email address, id, and so on?
Basically, with Active Record you don't need to do anything special to add a simple attribute (like a string or an integer). Just add a field called "email_address" to your customers table in the database, and all of your Customer objects will automagically get "email_address" and "email_address=" methods (not to mention the Customer class itself getting "find_by_email_address" and other useful methods as well). If you are adding a field containing another model, it's a bit more complicated - add a "something_id" field to the table, and an association to the class definition (eg, "has_one :something"). For more information, see the ActiveRecord api documentation.
You don't have to use any particular means to add the field to your database, but you might want to consider Migrations. Migrations are a convenient way to keep your schema versioned and synchronized across multiple machines.
If you are building your model right now, there's a short cut built in to the generator to add fields. Instead of just saying...
script/generate scaffold customer
...you can say...
script/generate scaffold customer email:string name:string badge_number:integer
...and it will generate all the appropriate fields in your migration, as well as adding them to your generated views.
Related
I have a need for a certain model to contain a reference to a document. Most of the model could be stored in postgres. The model is for a "level" in a game. I'd like to store the level data itself inside of a document, which makes more sense than making a complex tree in sql.
I am able to use postgres with mongoid installed; however, after installing the mongoid gem I seem to only be able to scaffold mongoid (non active record) documents.
The problem is that I have references to other tables, and I don't neccesarily know how to link that up within a mongoid model.
Questions:
How can I force scaffolding to occur with active record instead of mongoid or vice versa. Edit: partly answered here: Using Active Record generators after Mongoid installation? (2nd answer works, but I don't know how to go back and forth easily)
Is there an easy way to reference a document from an active record model (I know the documentation said don't mix them, but it is ideal for what I am trying to do).
If it is not possible to mix them, then how should I make a document be referenced from a postgres/active record table. In other words how can I get both pieces of data at the same time?
Thanks!
Regarding your first question, the ideal solution would be something along the lines of the first answer in the referenced post. However, instead of a generating a migration, generate a model instead. So when you want an Active Record model simply run:
rails g active_record:model
As for your second and third questions, to associate an Active Record model with a Mongoid document simply store the ObjectId as a string in the model. Then, when you get retrieve a record make a new ObjectId out of the string and use that to query for the related document.
You can create object ids out of the strings like this:
BSON::ObjectId.from_string("object_id_string")
There isn't really an easy way to easily follow intra-orm relations when mixing and matching between ActiveRecord and Mongoid though so I'm afraid that will have to be done via Ruby code.
The models you define in rails either extend one ORM's base class or the other and they don't know about one another. There may be projects out there that act as a layer on top of these ORMs but I am not familiar with any that exist at the moment.
All of the tutorials I've seen so far for RoR have shown me generating models like:
rails generate User name:string placeofbirth:string
This generates a class for the model, and only actually references an attribute if I apply a validation of some kind.
So my question is, how do I use a 'code' first approach when creating my models. Or is it the rails way to just right down on paper the attributes you want, run the generate command with each attribute you want and it's type, then run the rake db:migrate command?
I'd love some more proven patterns on this subject because so far the way I've seen seems too empty.
Yes, this is the rails way- migration comes first and generates the code and the database- and the model class inspects the database to see what fields are there and make accessible via methods.
You can do gem install annotate_models if you want to get some comments in your model class with the attribute names and types.
See here for an example: https://github.com/ctran/annotate_models
Rails uses an active record pattern for models which basically means that a model object will automatically map each DB column to an attribute so you don't have to specify all attributes in the model. It's a feature, but I agree that it might not be perfect for everyone. If you're using Rails 3 it should be easy to use another ORM of your choice if ActiveRecord's approach doesn't suit you. Here are some alternative ORMs that you could use.
Usually when you are developing some database backed web application, you know the database design(name of the tables, name of the columns in those tables and associations between different tables) beforehand.
Rails, as mentioned by maarons in his answer, uses Active Record pattern. Your models are classes that represent a table in your database, an instance of your model class a row in that table and different attributes of an object represent values under different columns in the same table.
When you create a model, usually, you are creating a class that represents one of the tables in your database. And while you are creating a model, you are also going to create a table in your database. That means knowing the name of the table and columns within that table.
So to answer your question, you must know all the columns, required for the time being, that will be in your tables. And hence available as attribute methods for your model objects. You specify these columns to added in the table in the migration generated by rails generator while generating this model. This is what usually everyone does.
You can take a code first approach by creating a class, without running the rails model generator,under app/models/ but not inheriting it from ActiveRecord::Base. As you move forward in your development, you can generate migrations by $ rails generate migration MigrationName and creating table and adding columns using [add_column][2]to that table as required. Once you have created a table for this model, you will have to inherit that model from ActiveRecord::Base so that you can get all the Rails magic in your application.
I'm creating a model in Ruby on Rails that will act like a file system. You'll have assets (like files) that could either be folders or files themselves. How can I create a command for this?
Asset
id (unique auto-incrementing number)
name
is_directory (bool)
user_id (id of the owner)
parent_asset_id (id of parent directory, or null if under the root)
access_token (randomly generated token, used to send shareable links)
contents
I'm thinking something like:
rails generate model Asset
name:string
is_directory:boolean
user_id:integer
parent_asset_id:integer
access_token:string contents:??
Some questions I have:
What's the difference betweeen blob vs longblob vs mediumblob vs longtext vs etc, and which would I want to use? (The assets are essentially text... not sure what the max size will be yet)
Is the parent_asset_id a good naming convention, or is there something else that would make Rails give me some secret sauce, similar to why I picked the name user_id (to match the User model)?
Is there a way to declare a default random string value for the access_token? (The access token will be used for a shareable link to the asset)
Anything else I'm overlooking?
This is a detailed question, so I hope it serves as a case study for anyone looking to implement something like a file system in RoR.
Obviously if you really wanted to implement a file system you'd use an actual file system or Amazon S3... but if you want a light-weight file-like system in RoR, this seems like the best approach.
First off, I strongly recommend you consider an existing gem like Paperclip, which will handle a lot of these details for you.
Answers in order:
You would use the binary field type to store general data, but if you use Paperclip there are some specific fields you would need to use instead, which are explained in Paperclip's docs.
If by parent_asset_id you really mean the asset can 'belong' to many other models, then look into setting up a polymorphic relationship, with an id and type field. If instead you mean storing the path to the stored file, then Paperclip handles this for you. See #3 for details...
You can access a stored file on Paperclip by calling something as simple as asset.url in your view. If you wish to go manual and insert a random code, you can insert a callback into your Asset.rb model that does something like:
before_create :generate_key
def generate_key
self.key = ActiveSupport::SecureRandom.hex
end
S3 is not a complex system to set up on Rails, and it is far more flexible and scaleable than storing the files elsewhere - however, if you want to, then use the 'assets' path.
I'm working through the Ruby on Rails tutorial and just made a Comment model with three properties.
rails generate model Comment commenter:string body:text post:references
It generated an ActiveRecord class with post but not commenter and body.
class Comment < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :post
end
Why doesn't rails formally define the non-reference properties anywhere other than the DB migration scripts?
Rails dynamically loads attributes - specifically, the names of the columns and their types - based on the database schema. There is no need to define or declare them in your models. For apps running in production, it does this once, at load time. For development, it will reload them as often as every request, but only loads them when each model is used.
Rails does not infer other things from your database, though. For instance, if you were to place a unique index on a name column, it would not automatically add a validates_uniqueness_of :name to your model. Of course, the database would still enforce this constraint when you save the record, causing an exception to be raised should the name field contain a duplicate value. The recommendation, in this case, is to do both.
Why doesn't rails formally define the non-reference properties anywhere other than the DB migration scripts?
Well, where do you need them "defined" anyways? Migrations are the only place where these attributes matter coz its responsibility is to create database tables with those attributes.
If you do a scaffold on comments with similar parameters, it would also generate the views and it would be using the attributes. They don't need to be "defined" as such anywhere else.
The short answer to your question is "no". Even the migration is not a definitive place to look as there might be many migrations related to a model.
However, you may have a look at the generated "db/schema.rb" which is an aggregation of all migrations. It contains the schema definition of all activerecord models. This maybe your best bet.
Additionally, you may want to use the https://github.com/ctran/annotate_models plugin that inserts a comment in your model to help you keep track of all your model's attributes.
I have a standard rails application, that uses a mysql database through Active Record, with data loaded through a separate parsing process from a rather large XML file.
This was all well and good, but now I need to load data from an Oracle database, rather than the XML file.
I have no control how the database looks, and only really need a fraction of the data it contains (maybe one or two columns out of a few tables). As such, what I really want to do is make a call to the database, get data back, and put the data in the appropriate locations in my existing, Rails friendly mysql database.
How would I go about doing this? I've heard* you can (on a model by model basis) specifiy different databases for Rails Models to use, but that sounds like they use them in their entirety, (that is, the database is Rails friendly). Can I make direct Oracle calls? Is there a process that makes this easier? Can Active Record itself handle this?
A toy example:
If I need to know color, price, and location for an Object, then normally I would parse a huge XML file to get this information. Now, with oracle, color, price, and location are all in different tables, indexed by some ID (there isn't actually an "Object" table). I want to pull all this information together into my Rails model.
Edit: Sounds like what I'd heard about was ActiveRecord's "establish_connection" method...and it does indeed seem to assume one model is mapped to one table in the target database, which isn't true in my case.
Edit Edit: Ah, looks like I might be wrong there. "establish_connection" might handle my situation just fine (just gotta get ORACLE working in the first place, and I'll know for sure... If anyone can help, the question is here)
You can create a connection to Oracle directly and then have ActiveRecord execute a raw SQL statement to query your tables (plural). Off the top of my head, something like this:
class OracleModel < ActiveRecord::Base
establish_connection(:oracle_development)
def self.get_objects
self.find_by_sql("SELECT...")
end
end
With this model you can do OracleModel.get_objects which will return a set of records whereby the columns specified in the SELECT SQL statement are attributes of each OracleModel. Obviously you can probably come up with a more meaningful model name than I have!
Create an entry named :oracle_development in your config/database.yml file with your Oracle database connection details.
This may not be exactly what you are looking for, but it seems to cover you situation pretty well: http://pullmonkey.com/2008/4/21/ruby-on-rails-multiple-database-connections/
It looks like you can make an arbitrarily-named database configuration in the the database.yml file, and then have certain models connect to it like so:
class SomeModel < ActiveRecord::Base
establish_connection :arbitrary_database
#other stuff for your model
end
So, the solution would be to make ActiveRecord models for just the tables you want data out of from this other database. Then, if you really want to get into some sql, use ActiveRecord::Base.connection.execute(sql). If you need it as a the actual active_record object, do SomeModel.find_by_sql(sql).
Hope this helps!
I don't have points enough to edit your question, but it sounds like what you really need is to have another "connection pool" available to the second DB -- I don't think Oracle itself will be a problem.
Then, you need to use these alternate connections to "simply" execute a custom query within the appropriate controller method.
If you only need to pull data from your Oracle database, and if you have any ability to add objects to a schema that can see the data you require . . . .
I would simplify things by creating a view on the Oracle table that projects the data you require in a nice friendly shape for ActiveRecord.
This would mean maintaining code to two layers of the application, but I think the gain in clarity on the client-side would outweigh the cost.
You could also use the CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW Object AS SELECT tab1., tab2. FROM tab1,tab2 syntax so the view returned every column in each table.
If you need to Insert or Update changes to your Rails model, then you need to read up on the restrictions for doing Updates through a view.
(Also, you may need to search on getting Oracle to work with Rails as you will potentially need to install the Oracle client software and additional Ruby modules).
Are you talking about an one-time data conversion or some permanent data exchange between your application and the Oracle database? I think you shouldn't involve Rails in. You could just make a SQL query to the Oracle database, extract the data, and then just insert it into the MySQL database.