A font I am using does not have the slanted/oblique variant to it in LaTeX (NB: not italics), and I would like to have slanted text in places.
Is there an easy way to slant text without having to generate entirely new font files and such?
One suggested solution was to do:
\renewcommand{\textsl}[1]{\tikz[baseline=(X.base)] \node[xslant=0.2231153] (X) {#1};}
This works well for one or two words, but tikz nodes don't break across lines, so it's not adequate, for, say, a theorem environment.
Obviously, a quick-and-dirty method will not give exceptional kerning or spacing, but I am not concerned about that. However, a 13 degree shear/slant would be desirable.
You can do this easily in XeLaTeX:
\usepackage{fontspec}
...
\fontspec[ItalicFont=*,ItalicFeatures=FakeSlant]{Minion Pro}
Highly undesirable, however, if there's any chance you can get a real italic.
Update: why undesirable? Because font outlines are not designed to be distorted! Any sort of transformation besides linear scaling in both directions will change the relationship between the inner/outer curves of the letters, effectively going against the wishes of the font designer.
If you want to highlight something in a different font than the roman and not use italic, try something completely different like a harmonising sans serif, for example.
Use a font that does have italics. Standard fonts are best unless you're in marketing.
I use LuaLaTeX, but the following should also work with XeLaTeX. LuaLaTeX, from my experience, is fully backward compatible with good old LaTeX, and it's only marginally slower. And making new, clever macros is a breeze. Anyhow, enough proselytizing.
This is pulled almost directly from one of my documents. Some of it is hackish, yes, but it suits my needs well - and the results are quite respectable.
\usepackage{relsize} % For \texttt definition below
\usepackage{fontspec}
\setmainfont% Minion Pro, not redistributable?
[Ligatures=TeX,
SlantedFont=*,
SlantedFeatures={FakeSlant=0.2},
BoldSlantedFont=* Bold,
BoldSlantedFeatures={FakeSlant=0.2}
]{Minion Pro}
\setsansfont% Linux Biolinum O % SIL Open Font License
[Ligatures=TeX,
Extension=.otf,
BoldFont=fxbb,
ItalicFont=fxbri,
BoldItalicFont=fxbri,
BoldItalicFeatures={FakeBold=1.5}, % Note: This is not currently working in LuaTeX!
SlantedFont=fxbro,
BoldSlantedFont=fxbbo
]{fxbr}
\setmonofont[Ligatures=TeX]{DejaVu Sans Mono} % "Free License" No General Restictions
\makeatletter
\let\old#texttt\texttt
\renewcommand{\texttt}[1]{{\smaller\old#texttt{#1}}}
\makeatother
Here are some macros for shearing, but that will not be what you want either, I guess.
\usepackage{graphicx}
%\hshearbox{vertical_prescale_times_shearfactor}{one_divide_by_shearfactor}{content}
% an initial vertical downscale is often necessary for a 3d projection
\newcommand{\hshearbox}[3]{\scalebox{0.866025}[#2]{\rotatebox{210}%
{\scalebox{1.73205}[-0.57735]{\rotatebox{60}{\scalebox{-1.1547}[#1]{#3}}}}}}
%\vshearbox{horizontal_prescale_times_shearfactor}{one_divide_by_shearfactor}{content}
% an initial horizontal downscale is often necessary for a 3d projection
\newcommand{\vshearbox}[3]{\scalebox{#2}[0.866025]{\rotatebox{210}%
{\scalebox{-0.57735}[1.73205]{\rotatebox{60}{\scalebox{#1}[-1.1547]{#3}}}}}}
The XeLaTeX/fontspec answer mentioned above somehow wouldn't work for me, so I came up with this:
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{fontspec}
\setmainfont{Linux Libertine O}
\newcommand{\slsc}[1]{\fontspec[SmallCapsFeatures={FakeSlant=0.6}]{Linux Libertine O}\textsc{#1}\fontspec[]{Linux Libertine O}}
\begin{document}
normaltext
\textsc{textsc}
\slsc{textslsc} % this will produce slanted small caps
\end{document}
Related
I'm currently writing my CV and I'm running out of space. I wish to change the font in the whole CV template, but I want to do it proportionally. For example, some headings are 12pt, subheadings are 11pt. I want to be able to change them to 0.9 * 12 pt, 0.9 * 11 pt, aka to scale them accordingly. I want to change
\fontsize{12pt}{1em}
to
\fontsize{(0.9 * 12)pt}{1em}
, where \fontsize is a command from anyfontsize package.
But I end up with weird results and lots of logs/mistakes. Is there a way to ensure that '*' will produce a number, like in "regular" programming languages?
Other things I've tried include:
\newcommand{\myfont}[2]{\fontsize{0.9*#1pt}{0.9*#2}em}
\myfont{12}{1}
But it doesn't work the way I expect it to. I also tried adding brackets () and making a new command \newcommand{\mymultiply}[2]{#1*#2}
Is there an elegant and neat way to do this? Is there a "regular" way in LaTeX of doing actual calculations, or should I avoid this approach? Thanks in advance!
3 possible approaches:
I would avoid using hard coded font sizes altogether. If you instead us font commands like \smaller or \larger you can simply change the overall size with documentclass options like 10pt or 12pt and all the fonts in the document will scale, including sections etc.
if you store your base fontsize in a length, you could use \dimexpr to make the calculations
if for whatever reason you don't want to create a new length, you use an expl3 command to do the calculations
\documentclass[
%10pt
12pt
]{article}
\usepackage{anyfontsize}
\ExplSyntaxOn
\cs_new_eq:NN \fpeval \fp_eval:n
\ExplSyntaxOff
\begin{document}
\section{section}
section
\newlength{\foo}
\setlength{\foo}{12pt}
\fontsize{\dimexpr.9\foo\relax}{\dimexpr1.08\foo \relax}\selectfont
test
\fontsize{\dimexpr\fpeval{.9*12}pt\relax}{\dimexpr\fpeval{.9*1.2*12}pt\relax}\selectfont
test
\end{document}
I want to change the font size to small for the entire document. I have searched online. But I am not able to find a reasonable (one line) answer. Is this possible to change the font size of latex document by only one command.? Thanks.
I think either
\documentclass[10pt]{article}
where you replace 10 with whatever font point-size you want, or, perhaps less likely,
\begin{document}
\small
where you replace \small with whatever size-command you want, might be what you are looking for.
I've been looking for a more elegant solution to the following typesetting problem. Consider those banners found in print media where the text is aligned like:
B I G T E X T
small text small text small text
m o r e m e d i u m t e x t
The font sizes are adjusted so that the height is scaled down for longer lines of text such that each line has equal width. I've written a small script that runs each line separately, compiles, crops the resulting pdf and then \includegraphics each in a table. This gives the desired effect but requires an both an outside script and pdfcrop (which only crops to a white bounding box). Since much of LaTeX is self-aware, I imagine it would be possible to have it recognize the width of a box and scale it appropriately so that any text fits exactly into the desired width.
Any thoughts or ideas on how a pure LaTeX implementation might work?
EDIT As a supplement to the suggested solution by AVB (since large code in comments looks awful), I've posted below the code used so that others may find it easily.
\documentclass[]{article}
\usepackage[pdftex]{graphicx}
\begin{document}
\begin{table}[l]
\resizebox{10cm}{!}{BIG Text} \\
\resizebox{10cm}{!}{small text small text small text} \\
\resizebox{10cm}{!}{Medium Text Medium Text}
\end{table} \end{document}
First, read the TeX FAQ entry titled Changing the space between letters. Depending on your circumstances, the packages and recommendation in that FAQ may suffice.
Also, take a look at the \scalebox and \resizebox commands in the graphicx package. They do what the names imply.
I'm sure that this could be improved upon, and due to different font implementations at different sizes then it isn't going to be exact, but here's a quick-and-dirty way to do it:
\documentclass[10pt]{article}
\usepackage{pgfmath}
\usepackage{anyfontsize}
\newlength{\mywidth}
\newlength{\testwidth}
\setlength{\mywidth}{4in}
\newcommand{\fixedwidth}[1]{%
\settowidth{\testwidth}{#1}%
\pgfmathsetmacro{\x}{round(\mywidth/\testwidth * 10)}%
\pgfmathsetmacro{\y}{round(\mywidth/\testwidth * 15)}%
\bgroup\fontsize{\x pt}{\y pt}\selectfont#1\egroup}
\begin{document}
\fixedwidth{hello world}
\fixedwidth{greetings earthlings}
\end{document}
In practice, it's a little less than the 4in, but the two lines of text do get scaled to the same amount.
Check out the package textfit. Usage:
\scaletowidth{width}{text}
or
\scaletoheight{height}{text}
I have a block of text in a quotation. Some of that text will be in a very small font (\scriptsize) and some much bigger (\Large). My problem is that the letters in the big font push right up against the letters in the line above. This effect is unacceptably distracting to the reader. (Trust me; for my use, it is.)
My question, then: how do I insert space to push apart the lines so that the large text does not scrape against the text above it?
You can specify \vspace in postscript points. This will give you very fine-grained control.
or...
you can use the setspace package: \usepackage{setspace} then use the commands:
\singlespacing
\onehalfspacing
\doublespacing
or...
you can use \linespacing{factor}: Use
\linespread{1.3} for "one and a half" line spacing, and
\linespread{1.6} for "double" line spacing.
Normally the lines are not spread, so the default line spread factor is 1.
There are myriad methods, but in paper writing, I often use a \vspace{0.75cm} after the separating newline (I'm metric, so pick a unit you like).
In LaTeX figures, one can use \textwidth and \columnwidth to specify sizes of the graphic relative to the size of surrounding text, e.g.
\includegraphics[width=.5\textwidth]{myimage}.
I would like to easily switch from onecolumn to twocolumn template (and back) without the figure growing too large for onecolumn template. For twocolumn template (where \columnwidth is roughly half the \textwidth), I would like to have something like:
\includegraphics[width=.9\columnwidth]{myimage}.
and for onecolumn template (where \columnwidth and \textwidth are equal):
\includegraphics[width=.5\textwidth]{myimage}.
Now, I figured I could limit this using some kind of a min operator:
\includegraphics[width=min(.5\textwidth,.9\columnwidth)]{myimage} but this is invalid syntax. Is there something like this to solve this problem, possibly through the use of LaTeX macro system?
Although it's possible to write this sort of macro, I wouldn't want to hardcode it into each figure; how about something like this
\makeatletter
\newlength \figwidth
\if#twocolumn
\setlength \figwidth {0.9\columnwidth}
\else
\setlength \figwidth {0.5\textwidth}
\fi
\makeatother
and then use
\includegraphics[width=\figwidth]{myimage}
to insert the graphic.
\textwidth is the horizontal width of the page body and not really appropriate for your purposes.
\linewidth is the width of the current line; it will be updated appropriate to columns, indentation, etc.
The following paragraph produces a picture that should precisely fit the entire line width (i.e. no overful warning):
\noindent\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{myimage}
If you prefer small margins on the left and right, you can use:
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=.9\linewidth]{myimage}
\end{center}
Or, if you want to specify the margins in an absolute size:
\usepackage{calc}
...
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth-20pt]{myimage}
\end{center}
Hmm... the code above (\if#twocolumn etc.) is not working for me at all. No idea why not. :( tetex on osX using fink. Trying to use revtex4, so perhaps that's the problem. I really like the idea of this type of change because I'm going to be dorking with widths etc. for my thesis and various journal articles, and to have these distances specified with a macro may be helpful for these types of conversions.
Any comments greatly appreciated!
-Allen
Somebody else who is more familiar with this will probably answer, but note that you would also need to change your figure type to be figure* if you are going two-column.