I'm publishing an ASP.Net MVC as an IIS7 site on my local workstation. Is it possible to get IIS7 to re-compile the project when needed?
No, IIS7 can't do that. There's a bunch of alternatives, I think from easiest to more complicated:
As mentioned: Just use Visual Studio to develop and test by hitting F5 and using VS.net built-in web server for asp.net
Point your IIS web site to where your site code is. When you compile your project the IIS web site should also be compiled since it's pointing to the same code as you development files. This is similar to what you are doing but there is no need to actually publish the site.
Use something like CruiseControl.net and nant to automatically compile and deploy your project to IIS at intervals or as needed.
Files published to IIS shouldn't be source code that needs to be re-compiled.
You could search for "automated build process", "continuous integration" or MSBuild if you want to set up a system that re-compiles and then publishes your site for you whenever you change the source code.
Related
I'm thoroughly confused about how to properly deploy ASP.NET MVC with my application. As far as I understand, there are the following ways you can get it on a machine:
You can download a separate installer and install it on a machine that has the approprite .NET framework (although which MVC version requires which .NET framework?)
Some versions come along with .NET framework itself (though I can't find which version of MVC is shipped with which version of .NET);
Some versions are installed with Visual Studio (though again, no idea which versions are installed with which versions of VS). In this case, you can set Copy Locally to true for these references and perform a "bin deploy". You might need to add some extra references though (not sure which though).
You can also download MVC as a NuGet package, in which case it also downloads some other unrelated packages like WebPages, Infrastructure and Razor (which is my personal WTF - wasn't Razor a core part of MVC?). In this case the build process will automatically do a "bin deploy" by default (I think...)
So... WTF? What is the proper way to add MVC to your development workstation, what is the proper way to add the references to your project (NuGet? GAC?), and what is the proper way to deploy it to the target server (separate installer? .NET installer? bin deploy?)
"Proper" Development:
The "proper way" (by which I mean standard/redistributable way) would be using Nuget for your references. This means you can easily manage different versions and anybody else working on your project has a standard repository from which to pull the external requirements.
The NuGet documentation has a decent explanation of how to add references.
To install the appropriate version of MVC for developing through Visual Studio, just download and install it from the ASP.NET MVC website. This will install the necessary templates for you to create a new MVC project in Visual Studio. This will also include the necessary binaries, etc.
"Proper" Deployment:
Use bin deploy to deploy to your webserver. This means you don't need full admin priviledges to install the MVC requirements.
Phil Haack's guide will walk you through the process of bin deploying MVC3+
Keep in mind, the web server does need the appropriate .NET platform installed. You should install this via the appropriate redistributable installer if it is not already installed on the server.
Referring to the deployment i publish my asp.net app (i usually make web applications) to the file system in a directory (you can set also a server there, but i don't like it) and make an upload to the server with an FTP client of all the deployed folders. All the changes that i make to the app after (like bug correction) i deploy all the app again and upload single parts.
I hope i get your question in part, this is my first answer in SO.
I have Visutal Studio 2012, MVC 4 & Razor. I am having trouble getting a website up and running with this technology.
The Web Server is a Windows Server 2008 server. I tried deploying using the Web Deploy method but am consistently getting something like 'set ACL" error.
I tried deploying using the File System. All files got deployed, but when I try and run the website, it fails because of missing ASP.NET MVC infrastruccture files.
Two things:
•If I use Web-Deploy, how do I solve the ACL error, because I assume with this method, everything needed will get deployed.
Note that the Web Deploy 3.0 service is on the server and started.
•If I use File System, where can I find the downloads needed to deploy on the server where MVC WILL work.
◦Note that I downloaded the 4.5 Framework and was successfully installed.
You need to be a bit more precise with what you need help with.
What's the exact error.
Often times you need to give the IIS users group access to at least read from the directory where you've deployed. Did you do this already?
Do you have .NET 4.5 and MVC4 installed on the server? If not, are you expecting those DLLs to be "packaged" with your deployment? They generally are not since they are "standard" assemblies. But if you want them to be included in your deployment you can do that by selecting the references in VS and saying "copy." This is not recommended because when you install patches to .NET and MVC on the server, those updates will not carry through to your app, since it'll use the local (old) copies of your assemblies.
This may be more of an IIS issue, but not sure based on the details in your question.
Check that the application pool that the site is running under is using .net 4.0.
Just a thought I would check.
is there anything special I need to do to get ASP.NET MVC3 enabled on my Windows 8 Release Preview install? Creating even a blank ASP.Net MVC3 Razor application in VS2010, deploying to the local IIS instance as a new application, and loading the page in the browser doesn't work. I'm met with the following error:
HTTP Error 403.14 - Forbidden
The Web server is configured to not list the contents of this directory.
So I've then gone in to the new VS2010 project, right click, select "Add Deployable Dependencies" and selected "ASP.NET MVC" along with "ASP.NET Web Page with Razor syntax"
Then I re-deploy the project to local IIS application. No change. Still "web server not configured to list contents of the directory".
It's worth noting the VS 2010 Development Web Server works fine.
Any ideas?
Found it. Turns out even though I'm using ASP.NET MVC3 and had the .Net 4.0 framework installed, the Windows 8 "feature" for ASP.NET 4.5 needed to be installed for all this to wire up. Seems a bit counter-intuitive, but changing that did it.
You may want to consider running the MVC3 installer on your host machine so that all dependencies for MVC3 projects are stored in the GAC. If you need the install package you can download it from:
http://www.microsoft.com/web/gallery/install.aspx?appid=MVC3
I can't verify that this works on the Windows 8 preview, but it would be my first instinct upon running into your problem.
Did you ensure that the worker process for the site is configured for .NET 4?
When you say you "Deployed", how did you do that? It sounds like the folder is not being set to an application.
For me .NET 3.5 was not installed for IIS 8 in Windows features. Although I'm pretty sure my app is .NET 4.0... Worth trying though.
I had problems installing MVC3 MS VS 2010. Windows 8 x64. The platform installer shows no errors.
Root cause : aspnetwebpages.msi breaks updating web.config files. I updated two web.config files which appeared to only contain blanks.
Here are my directions:
Ensure C:\Windows\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v4.0.30319\Config\web.config is valid. Use web.config.default, copy then rename to web.config to correct if it looks wrong.
Ensure C:\Windows\Microsoft.NET\Framework64\v4.0.30319\Config\web.config is valid. Use web.config.default, copy then rename to web.config to correct if it looks wrong.
I don't know why the files were bad in the first place.
Recently, I am a bit interested in the deployment of ASP.NET MVC application on IIS6 because Phil Haack posted an easier way to deploy ASP.NET MVC application on ASP.NET 4. So I decided to see how different version of ASP.NET MVC works on different version of ASP.NET.
First off, I created an ASP.NET MVC 2 project in Visual Studio 2010 and deploy it to IIS 6 on Windows Server 2003 (only .NET framework 3.5 installed). I set the application to run in ASP.NET 2.0 and no extra stuff. Because I just wanted to see what sort of error would occur. And as expected, some error was reported as following.
Then, I set the Copy Local attribute of System.Web.Mvc assembly to true as following and deploy again.
As a result, the application ran smoothly.
I had read tons of materials talked about the mess of deploying MVC application on IIS 6. And I did fight to tackle the deploying issues in my previous project. At least, if had used Extensionless Url in your application, you should have configured wildcard mapping in IIS. But in this case, I even didn’t have chance to do so.
What the heck was going on exactly? Did I discover a new continent?
Perhaps your IIS is configured with a wildcard module mapping. With other words, the request path ".*" is being send to the asp.net ISAPI module.
Today I gave in to all the banners asking me to test MS Expression web 2 demo.
After some setup hickups I fired up the thing and immediately encountered a problem:
How do I make this tool work with my asp.net-mvc projects? Actually, how do I make my websites work with ANY tool but visual studio 2008?
Untill now I did everything with VS2008 / Notepad++.
Does anybody have experience with using asp.net-mvc projects in tools like dreamweaver, expression web etc?
You can use any web tool to edit the HTML+CSS+Javascript side of the site, but you'll need to compile it with VS2008 or MSBuild to run it.