I am trying to change the connections in a flow to a different account, but I keep getting the following error. Kindly help me figure out how to solve this
I am not sure what to try kindly help
Make sure you have below things configured for new user account you are trying to use in Power automate flow:
The new user account should have license to use "Microsoft Forms" service.
Access/permissions to the Microsoft form you are trying to use in flow.
Related
Sorry for a fuzzy newbie question but I didn't find a similar yet - maybe I'm just asking wrong..
I'm working on an open source Python application which reads and processes emails from given mailboxes using IMAP and SMTP (from various (self hosted) email providers, so a MS/Google specific implementation is not an option for me).
Currently I'm extending that application to support OAuth2 after Microsoft announced they will no longer support standard IMAP/SMTP authorization.
I found lot's of HowTos, tutorials and examples and managed to read/write mails using OAuth2 with GMail-servers now but I hope I just missed the recommended scenario for open source applications.
Currently I've set up a Google "Project" using tutorials I found in order to get ClientID and ClientSecret. Google told me it would cost me $15k to $75k to get my application verified, while Microsoft wants me to create an Azure/Identity Platform account and want's my telephone and credit card number in advance in order to bill me after 12 months.
Question: What am I supposed to provide with my application regarding OAuth2? I don't want to publish my ClientID/Secret do I? Does every user have to go through those registration procedures in order to access its mails using a command line script?
How to other open source mail-applications solve this issue? At least Thunderbird can authenticate with GMail (see https://www.supertechcrew.com/thunderbird-oauth2-gmail/) do they provide ClientID and -secret with the application?
Here is an old thread discussing the issue: https://groups.google.com/g/tb-planning/c/RRSPwp36bi0?pli=1
Disclaimer 2: I know this question sounds very obvious but I really didn't find a hint yet :)
basically I want to deploy a NET.Core application where Calendar data will be read from an Exchange server account.
So the user has to fill out his login data and that it.
This works fine with Exchange.Webservices in Windows, but Exchange.Webservices are not working in Linux due the .NETFramework dependency.
I also tried the "Sherlock Exchange.WebservicesStandard" package which is also not working.
Microsoft Graph is a product I don't understand.
Is is correct, that every user needs to have an Azure Account and his own APPID?
If that is correct, this product seems to be a little bit useless in my opinion.
Any ideas?
Best regards!
As a developer, you will need an appid for your application which you will get from https://portal.azure.com/. Users of your application will not need any of this.
Please see this link with Quick Starts to help you with development using Microsoft Graph https://developer.microsoft.com/en-us/graph/quick-start
I implemented a simple API.ai bot and I wanted to add it to google home platform but I really need help for the linking account part.
I don't understand if I need to implement an oauth2 protocol for my service or not. Is there any exemple or framework that allow implement this linking account step (any language is ok, it's just for a simple POC).
My goal is to ask my bot some informations and send him some orders to achieve simple processing on a server.
Hope that someone can help me, add a simple bot to google home to access and modify some informations in a server isn't really easy for me ^^
As #Leon noted, you will need to implement the OAuth2 server yourself. The Actions on Google documentation give details about what they are expecting and what steps you can do to implement it yourself. The Authorization Code flow is slightly preferred (additional features from the Assistant will require it in the future), but you're also allowed to use the https://developers.google.com/actions/identity/oauth2-implicit-flow if you wish since it is slightly easier.
There are several packages that are out there that allow you to provide OAuth2, but require you to build the connection to your own account database. I've seen packages for .NET and JavaScript, but it shouldn't be too difficult to find one that meets your needs or to write one yourself.
If you need to authenticate the user, then you will need your own OAuth server. How to hook that up to an action is described in the docs: https://developers.google.com/actions/develop/identity/account-linking
If however, this is just a personal project and you want to test it on your own device, then account linking is not necessary for you to get the action to work. You simply need to hook up your server logic to the action fulfillment. We recommend that you use the API.AI Actions integration. The docs cover how to do that: https://developers.google.com/actions/develop/apiai/dialogs-and-fulfillment
I'm trying to create an oauth2 token for an organization. This seems to be impossible (or at least I'm not finding it). This will be used for various one of scripts (non-web use). This is also for an enterprise github (github.company.com/api/v3 vs api.github.com).
I created one under my user like this:
curl -u 'username:password' -d '{"scopes":["scripts!"],"note":"test?"}' https://github.company.com/api/v3/authorizations
and that worked as expected. What I can't figure out is the magical way to do this under an organization since an organization doesn't have basic auth credientals. I haven't been able to find any documentation that tells me how to give something a client id/secret and get an oauth token out of it, which seems like the thing I would want to do.
If anyone could help that would be much appreciated.
At the moment of this writting this is not supported
You can't create a token for the org directly, but if you have a dev account that has full access to the org, you can do this (sort of), just in a round about way.
Create the oauth token for that dev account.
When registering the token with a 3rd party (e.g. Confluence, Jira, etc...) you can specify the org as the "Team"/"Owner".
This will use the dev accounts credentials but only grant access to things under the org (not full access to the dev account's repos, etc...).
I came across your question when trying to link a github org account with my company's Jira account, so figured I'd share.
Hope that helps.
I'm pretty sure that's not possible currently. As you say -- the organization itself doesn't have any credentials associated with it. So, the only way to do it is to do it yourself, as a developer, with your credentials.
This might be a cool feature request to send to the GitHub folks.
Update: this setting is now under
Developer settings > OAuth Applications
I'm building a standalone couchdb application. These are called couchapps. The idea is that the database itself is served on port 80 and returns HTML and works as the actual website. This is a very powerful idea and I'm entirely amazed by this new concept of having your code live inside your database.
But I'm having some issues with user registration. The one built into couchdb allows for cookies to be set and makes it really easy to plug it into your website. But there's several quite important things missing that my app requires in order to say that it has a "proper" user registration system.
There's no signup verification. No email is sent, no captcha is displayed. This means that anyone could spam your _users database and create as many new users as they please.
If a user forgets their password there's no facility to help them recover it.
Any idea how I could overcome these issues without doing any hardcore Erlang development at a lower level (not an Erlang guy)? It would also be great if anybody knew if I could be using OAuth to authenticate against Twitter or GitHub accounts and have that integrate seemlessly with how couchdb data is handled (inside validate_doc_update functions).
Thank you
While the built in user database can work, I would not recommend it for the workflow you describe. Here are some other options:
Browser ID
I would really recommend using BrowserID. IrisCouch has provided a plugin to couchdb here:
https://github.com/iriscouch/browserid_couchdb
This will take care of the normal registration workflow.
If you want to take it a step further and have your users "Fairly Anonymous", you can follow the example of this couchapp called "Mingle"
https://github.com/thedod/Mingle
Twitter Integration
Max Ogden's "DataCouch" project has a log in via twitter, although it is using some Node external processors to make it work. See here:
https://github.com/maxogden/datacouch/blob/master/processors/auth/twitterauth.js
Facebook integration
https://github.com/ocastalabs/CouchDB-Facebook-Authentication
OpenID
https://github.com/mcaprari/couchdb-openid
I dont think you can use the oauth purely with Couch, as this post suggests:
http://bennolan.com/2011/01/11/couchdb-oath.html
so the closest you will get there is following what Datacouch has done.
Hope these suggestions help.