I have this dataset that has three sites with sum of the values:
A - 1000
B - 500
C - 200
I want to make the A to be a diffrence from itself and B + C, so it should be 1000 - (500 + 200). A should show 300. Any ideas how to approach this?
hi, haven't beea around fr a while, my data lokks like this - two columns, one with Site, second with a value assigned, the gola is to get site A to be A-(B+C)
Related
I am trying to determine how often values appear in a row based on the lead value of the row. Essentially, if "A" is the first value of the row, what percentage of those "A" rows contain the value "B" in the subsequent columns, what percentage contain "C" in subsequent columns, etc.
Below is an example table with the leads and their partners
Lead
Partner 1
Partner 2
A
B
C
A
C
E
B
A
E
C
B
A
A
D
B
B
C
E
A
B
D
B
E
D
C
D
B
A
E
C
I want to output a table which stays what percentages of times values B-E appear for rows which start with A. In the example above, A is the lead 5 times, and B appears in those A rows 3 times, so the value is 60%
A Partners:
Value
%
B
60%
C
60%
D
40%
E
40%
Partners will always be unique, i.e. the same value wont appear in both columns 2 and 3 (e.g. no "BEE"). It doesn't matter which column the partner appears in (2 or 3), it only matters if they appear in either column after where A is the lead.
I plan to have multiple "Partner tables" like the solution above, so I can also see how many times A&C-E appear in B-led rows, etc. But once I know how to make one table I can then make the others.
I tried a combination of IF and COUNTIF formulas, basically trying to say
If A2 contains A, then count the number of times B appears in the subsequent columns and divide it by the number of times A is in the lead.
=If((A2="A"),((COUNTIF(B2:C11,"B")/COUNTIF(A2:A11,"A")),0)
This of course results in skewed results because it counts how many times B appears in all rows, not just the ones which are lead by A. I'm having trouble limiting the count of Bs to only A rows.
Thank you!
You can set this formula:
=COUNTIF(FILTER(B:C,A:A = $F$1),F2)/COUNTA(FILTER(A:A,A:A = $F$1))
Or with BYROW for the four (or all you need) rows:
=BYROW(F2:F5,LAMBDA(each,COUNTIF(FILTER(B:C,A:A = $F$1),each)/COUNTA(FILTER(A:A,A:A = $F$1))))
Ok so the need - I have about 3700 lines of email addresses, names, schools, and professions(those are column headers) I want to split this sheet into 4 with 1000 lines(I understand one will be short) in each but here is the catch I can only have 25 lines/emails from each school. So how would someone go about doing this? Keep in mind each sheet needs to have its own unique emails not repeated on the other sheets.
There are 2 problems here and as I don't know how many schools are on the list and if it's possible to have always less than 25 people from one school (for example - if there are only 30 schools, it would be impossible to distribute them in 1000 row batches).
First task:
Distribute database into 4 sheets, 1000 rows each:
It's simple.
Let's say my data has 4 columns from A to D
I make sheets named 1-1000, 1001-2000, etc.
In each one I put a formula:
1)
=query(Master!A1:D,"select * limit 1000 offset 0")
=query(Master!A1:D,"select * limit 1000 offset 1000")
=query(Master!A1:D,"select * limit 1000 offset 2000")
=query(Master!A1:D,"select * limit 1000 offset 3000")
Etc.
In order to limit number of occurences of each schools, I have to count these occurences and define what is the minimal page number on which this student can be displayed (for example - 17th student from certain school can be on 1st page, but 27th can be at least on 2nd page. 60th student can be on third or further.
When I determine minimal page number, I can sort my data accordingly and display sorted by minimal number:
In this situation my query on next pages have additional parameters:
=query(Master!A1:G,"select A,B,C,D order by G limit 1000 offset 0")
I use column G for sorting, but I don't display it.
You can find my solution here:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1TP6MlMmLiUExOELFhgZnti7LR7VQouMg3h-X7QRcHzQ/copy
Names are generated randomly from polish names generator.
My form reactions are coming in, I have translated this in another
second sheet.
That sheet pulls data that matches the form questions.
The data that matches have a value for example 306 what I'm trying to achieve is that the respondents that match the criteria get a part of the 306 if only 1 match is there then they get 306 but if 2 match I want to divide to these 2 respondents but with the conditions it's divided % in a way above the sheet.
I don't know even where to start because it's so dynamical I get stuff half done so I'm not thinking in the right direction.
try something like this:
=ARRAYFORMULA(IFERROR(VLOOKUP(B2:B8, A10:C13, 3, 0)))
=IFERROR(B10/COUNTIF(B$2:B$8, A10))
I have a google sheet that I am using to try and calculate leveling and experience points. Column A has the level and Column B has the exp needed to reach the next level. i.e. To get to Level 3 you need 600 exp.
A B
1 200
2 400
3 600
...
99 19800
In column I2 I have an integer for an amount of exp (e.g. 2000), in column J2 I want to figure out what level someone would be at if they started from 0.
Put this in column J and ddrag down as required. Rounddown(I2,-2) rounds I2 down to the nearest 100. Index match finds a match in column B and returns the value in column A of the matched row.
=index(A2:A100,match(ROUNDDOWN(I2,-2),B2:B100,0))
Using a helper column (for example Z): put =sum(B$1:B1) in cell Z1 and drag down. This will compute the sums required for each level. In J2, use the formula
=vlookup(I2, {B:B, Z:Z}, 2) + 1
which looks up I2 in column B, and returns the nearest match that is less than or equal to the search key. It adds 1 to find the level that would be reached, because your table has this kind of an offset to you: the entry against level N is about achieving level N+1.
You may want to put 0 0 on top of the table, to correctly handle the amounts under 200. Or treat them with a separate if condition.
Using algebra
In your specific scenario, the point amount required for level N can be computed as
200*(1+2+3+...+N-1) = 200*(N-1)*N/2 = 100*(N-1/2)^2 - 25
So, given x amount of points, we can find N directly with algebra:
N = floor(sqrt((x+25)/100)+1/2)
which means that the formula
=floor(sqrt((I2 + 25) / 100) + 1/2)
will have the desired effect in cell J2, without the need for an extra column and vlookup.
However, the second approach only works for this specific point values.
I have a spreadsheet that I'm starting to use for personal money analysis.
My main sheet is called "transactions" and has headers of Category, Description, Date and Amount (it's basically a check register).
I've created a pivot report off of that sheet that contains sum, min and max of Amount by Category.
I would like to make a custom average function on that pivot report but not sure how to go about it.
What I would like to see is the average amount of negative transactions between positive ones.
My positive transactions are my paychecks and the negative transactions are any spending I do.
An example might help in what I'm trying to do here...
Let's say for category "Food" I have the following transactions (in this order)...
-20
-25
-30
100
-30
-35
-40
I'd like my average to be calculated like this...
( ( (-20 + -25 + -30) / 3 ) + ( (-30 + -35 + -40) / 3 ) ) / 2
Anyone have the slightest idea on how I can enhance my pivot report to do this?
You do it with something like:
=ARRAYFORMULA(AVERAGE(IF(Sheet1!D2:D8<0,Sheet1!D2:D8, 0)))
where column D is the amount of your example and Sheet1 contains the "transactions" of your example.
If you want to fill it for the pivot table (having the category as another criterion) you can check the answer at: https://stackoverflow.com/a/9165254/179529
=SUM(ARRAYFORMULA(((Transactions!$A2:$A)=$A2) * ((Transactions!$D2:$D)>0) * (Transactions!$D2:$D) ))
/
SUM(ARRAYFORMULA(((Transactions!$A2:$A)=$A2) * ((Transactions!$D2:$D)>0) * (1) ))
where $A2 is the cell where you have the category name in the pivot table (The $ will allow you to copy the formula to other columns in you want it per month or other second criterion.
If you want to SUM the element in column D only if they great than 0, you need to have ((Transactions!$D2:$D)>0) as the second argument and (Transactions!$D2:$D) as the 3rd argument (otherwise you will count the cells instead of SUM them).
Since AVERAGE will take blank cells as well, I've used SUM/COUNT instead. Note that COUNT is actually SUM with the 3rd argument as 1.
Also note that if you want to ignore a header line you need to define your columns with Transactions!$D2:$D, to start from the 2nd row.