I have a Hybrid app I rebuilt after setting the Target Android version to API 30, per a new warning that Google now requires this, and am trying it on a Tablet with Android 11. Originally following an old hybrid sample app, my app copies files from the resources to the file system. This seems to work, as no exceptions are thrown from the File operations. The first thing it does is display a splash screen from an HTML file copied from the afore-mentioned resource copy, using the LoadHtml function of a created WebView, and giving it a URL formatted like this:
file:///data/data/com.mycompanyname.myappnameandroid/files/Content/Splash.html
LoadHtml doesn't throw an exception, but then the screen displays an error message referencing this path and the error "ERR_ACCESS_DENIED". This file does reference CSS files copied to the same directory (referenced like "<link rel="stylesheet" href="site.css" />
" in the HTML header). It will continue on to display the main app pages, but it apparently failed to load CSS files and so forth, as all the styling and scripting is missing. What do I need to change to make this work?
Searching, I find talk of "Scoped Storage", but I can't make any sense of it. I'm hoping there is a simple fix.
There is a simple fix. Add the following to your set up of the WebView:
webView.Settings.AllowFileAccess = true;
Apparently the default changed from true to false.
Thanks to this posting for the clue: Load file into webView with scoped storage
Related
When I open the Umbraco (7.6.3) backoffice, I'm unable to view or make changes to templates. It seems like other functionality is unaffected, and I can create & edit specific pages. However, attempting to open the templates themselves just leads to a white screen. This problem exists across browsers:
Other screens render just fine:
What gives?
Checking the console when attempting to load gives an interesting error:
Error: Argument 'Umbraco.Editors.Templates.EditController' is not a function, got undefined...
Resolution:
The issue seemed to be caused by outdated files in the Umbraco folder. Copying most directories over from packages\UmbracoCms.7.6.3\UmbracoFiles\umbraco\ seems to have done the trick.
Looking at the changelog, it seems like the JS folder was the most influential in getting this fixed.
Are you sure that you're on 7.6.3? The UI appears to be pre-7.6 (I can tell because the colours haven't been updated).
If you have just upgraded, it's possible that your browser has cached the JS which is used - hard refresh your browser to see if the UI updates.
Umbraco also uses a dependency service to compile all of the used JS/CSS files together into one large one. This service will not be used if your website is in debug mode. Either:
Turn debug mode on in the Web.config
Delete any files in the \App_Data\ClientDependency\ folder as this is where the cached compiled files are kept (these will be regenerated)
My first thought would be file permissions.
Have you run the health check for permissions in the developer section? Need to make sure that your application pool user has write permissions on the Views folder.
I am new to FF extensions development. I work on Windows OS. I am using web extensions. I started my first extension. I created a directory in My Documents which contains my extension files. The files are based on the example in: Your First WebExtension which are: manifest.json, icons/myicon.png, myextension.js. Like the example, all what the extension does is a border aroud mozilla page. This is the js code: document.body.style.border = "5px solid red";
When I come to installing the extension in my browser, I navigated to:about:debugging then I clicked in the Load Temprary Addon button and I selected the the .js file. I get this error: There was an error during installation: Extension is invalid. Can you point what the problem is?
Most likely an error in the manifest.json file. Double-check that code; if it all looks good, try temporarily removing optional things from it, then removing-and-reloading your addon in the debugger until it works. Then you can narrow down what's up (hard to say exactly, without seeing your code). The most minor error in the JSON will result in the addon failing to load (such as an out-of-place bracket, etc).
See also: Anatomy of a WebExtension
Problem with my setup was incorrect use of content_scripts.matches, correct solution for a "match-all" is
"matches": ["*://*/"],
Attribution : https://discourse.mozilla.org/t/web-extensions-noob-getting-there-was-an-error-during-installation-extension-is-invalid/12828/3
The problem was that extensions must be saved in specific directory. In winows, the directory is: C:\Users\"YourUser"\AppData\Roaming\Mozilla\Firefox\Profiles\"YourFireFoxProfile"\extensions
After that, try the steps I mentioned in the original post and you should find the extension added.
I am developing a share extension for iOS 8 and it seem like i can run javascript code on page to grab some information like markup of the mage
But on the apple document it says that javascript code must be inside a .js file but my javascript code is coming from server and it is dynamic.
Is it possible to run javascript i downloaded from server or can I change js file contents everytime I need to use it?
You can't do this using the built-in support in the current share extension system.
The Javascript file needs to be listed by name in the extension's Info.plist, in the value of the NSExtensionJavaScriptPreprocessingFile key. The file named there needs to exist in the app extension's bundle. But bundles are not writeable, so you can't replace or change the file.
You might be able to do something like you describe if you:
Include a basic JS file that just returns the entire page source to your extension.
Use JavaScriptCore.framework to further process that data in your extension.
I don't know of any reason why that wouldn't work, but I haven't tried it, and it's kind of unusual. Still, given your needs, it's worth investigating.
I am currently trying to figure out an issue with an Application Protocol Handler I've created. Following the directions listed on MSDN (http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa767914%28v=vs.85%29.aspx), I was able to register my application, PDF Annotator, to open via a URL. The issue I am experiencing is when I try to pass a parameter along with the call. The application will open, but the file parameter that gets passed is not opening within the application.
My registry key is verbatim as dictated by MSDN. My HTML code is as follows:
PDFAnnotator:C:\path\to\file\file.pdf
The way I understood the protocol handler is it takes the URL and tries to launch it via the command line. That being said, I am able to open my pdf file in PDFAnnotator with following command in the prompt:
PDFAnnotator.exe C:\path\to\file\file.pdf
I've tried formatting the file path in the HTML differently thinking that would be the issue too. Has anyone else come across this issue or something similar?
Obligatory Update for future generations (http://xkcd.com/979/):
The reason I was doing this is because half of the PDFs my application handled would be editable while the other half were read-only. I was trying to keep the read-only ones in browser with the Acrobat plugin (I'm targeting chrome only) while the protocol would allow me to set the links of the editable ones to open with Annotator. I tried, on whim, to reverse this (setting the default to Annotator and creating a protocol for Acrobat). I did this, first by trying Acrobat's URI Scheme (acrobat://), which didn't work outside of opening Acrobat. Then, I tried creating a protocol for Acrobat. When that fired off, it gave me an error stating the path was wrong for the file name, path name, or volume. So, progress? I'm giving up on this for now as other priorities have come up, but hopefully this helps somebody down the road.
I am using appfile:/. The path is correct; if I put it on screen and copy-paste it in the explorer it links to the image.
Is there anything else I need to do?
UPDATED I have updated the library, now is more easy to use. Can you test it?
I am the author of the StageWebViewBridge class. There is a known problem if you are using Android. Anyway, I have a working solution I will update the next week.
If the problem is not in Android, then send me some code.
I am also confused on how to access locally packaged assets. I put them in the HTML folder as requested and when I send a signal to the StageWebViewBridge to set the .src attribute of a video I'm not sure how to do it.
Without StageWebViewBridge and entirely in a website I can just reference the file for a video object via JavaScript directly e.g. swvRef.src = 'file.mp4';. This works perfectly fine. When I try to tell flash to send a call via StageWebViewBridge it does receive the call to the StageWebView (I have JavaScript reporting it). However when I try to set the .src of a video object I can't figure out the correct path.
The documentation says to put all things in a 'html' folder. I did so. No reference to a .src of 'html/a.mp4' or 'a.mp4' or 'htmlCache/a.mp4' ever makes the new javascript html5 video class work.
Bridge otherwise is working perfectly sending AS->JS and JS->AS. I'm just looking for info on how to reference packaged files. I want to play a video I put in the /html folder and so far, I just can't do it.
Got the same issue and fixed it with "appfile:/"
Why do you require "appfile:/ for a local html file ?
If the treated html/js/css is local and asset is relative (aka ../ or no http://) you should treat them as "appfile:/" ?
If the treated file is distant you do not have to handle assets ?
Is there a best practice to work with "appfile:/" ?
Actually I debug my html/js/css game in the browser but if I use appfile:/ it will no longer works. I will have to handle 2 behaviors.