dom-if element not hiding when condition is false - vaadin

In a grid I want to display different elements. Depending on the type of the element I want to use a different TemplateRenderer. One solution to this problem would be to use dom-if elements in the template. if the «if» parameter is false, the element should not get rendered. The problem is, that in my templates all the elements get rendered, even though the debugger shows me that the method, that is responsible for determining the truth value, sometimes returns false.
every template gets rendered twice
Here is my code for the grid:
// these are the two javascript templates
#JsModule("./src/views/parts/card/graphics-card-card.js")
#JsModule("./src/views/parts/card/memory-card.js")
public class PcPartsDomIfGrid extends Grid<AbstractPcPart> {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 7474489703766322949L;
public PcPartsDomIfGrid() {
super();
initColumn();
}
private boolean isMemory(AbstractPcPart pcPart) {
return pcPart.getClass().equals(Memory.class);
}
private boolean isGraphicsCard(AbstractPcPart pcPart) {
return pcPart.getClass().equals(GraphicsCard.class);
}
private void initColumn() {
addColumn(Objects.requireNonNull(CardFactory.getTemplate())
.withProperty("partCard", CardFactory::create)
.withProperty("isMemory", this::isMemory)
.withProperty("isGraphicsCard", this::isGraphicsCard));
}
}
Here is the Code for the Factory:
public class CardFactory {
public static AbstractPcPartCard create(AbstractPcPart pcPart) {
if (pcPart.getClass().equals(GraphicsCard.class)) {
return GraphicsCardCard.create((GraphicsCard) pcPart);
} else if (pcPart.getClass().equals(Memory.class)) {
return MemoryCard.create((Memory) pcPart);
} else {
// different PC parts
return null;
}
}
public static TemplateRenderer<AbstractPcPart> getTemplate() {
String memoryTemplate = MemoryCard.getTemplateString();
String graphicsCardTemplate = GraphicsCardCard.getTemplateString();
String combinedTemplate = memoryTemplate + graphicsCardTemplate;
return TemplateRenderer.of(combinedTemplate);
}
}
Both MemoryCard and GraphicsCardCard are similar, here is the code for MemoryCard:
public class MemoryCard extends AbstractPcPartCard {
Memory pcPart;
public MemoryCard(Memory pcPart) {
this.pcPart = pcPart;
}
public static MemoryCard create(Memory pcPart) {
return new MemoryCard(pcPart);
}
// getters
public static String getTemplateString() {
return "<memory-card is='dom-if' if='[[item.isMemory]]'"
+ " part-card='[[item.partCard]]'>"
+ "</memory-card>";
}
}
The complete code can be found on github. The relevant view is located in the package:
com.example.application.ui.views.partsDomIf

The dom-if attribute must be used on a <template> tag, such as
<template is='dom-if' if='[[item.important]]'>this is shown when the item is <b>important</b></template>
<template is='dom-if' if='[[!item.important]]'>this is shown when the item is <b>NOT important</b></template>
Note that the !property.name negation is the only logical operation available, you can't use e.g. comparators there.
The pattern of using a factory method CardFactory::create also does not make much sense to me. The Grid receives a list of items through the DataProvider (either through setItems or setDataProvider) and the Renderer just processes those items to show them in the UI. You should not create new data objects in the Renderer if you can avoid it.

Related

Dynamically changing the localization of an app using Avalonia and resource-files is not working

Intro
I'm working on an application and I want to be able to change the language when the app is running. For cross-platform compatibility I'm using AvaloniaUI.
I've found a few helpful articles:
Simple localization in WPF
Simple localization in WPF, extended for multiple resource-files
Answer to question on StackOverflow (basically the first link)
The problem
On startup of the app a binding is created (in LocExtensionWithMultipleResxFiles) between my control on the view and string this[string key] ( in TranslationSourceWithMultipleResxFiles). The app correctly loads the translations on startup.
On my View I have a button, the ClickEvent correctly sets TranslationSourceWithMultipleResxFiles.Instance.CurrentCulture but the text in my view doesn't update. I'm not sure where I did something wrong or if I need to change the code somewhere, so any help is appreciated.
My code
Using the above articles I have the following code:
TranslationSourceWithMultipleResxFiles contains a Dictionary for all the ResourceManagers that are used. string this[string key] returns the translated text. CurrentCulture is the property you set to change the Culture.
public class TranslationSourceWithMultipleResxFiles : INotifyPropertyChanged
{
public static TranslationSourceWithMultipleResxFiles Instance { get; } = new TranslationSourceWithMultipleResxFiles();
private readonly Dictionary<string, ResourceManager> resourceManagerDictionary = new Dictionary<string, ResourceManager>();
// key is the baseName + stringName that is binded to, this returns the translated text.
public string this[string key]
{
get
{
var (baseName, stringName) = SplitName(key);
string? translation = null;
if (resourceManagerDictionary.ContainsKey(baseName))
translation = resourceManagerDictionary[baseName].GetString(stringName, currentCulture);
return translation ?? key;
}
}
// the culture TranslationSourceWithMultipleResxFiles uses for translations.
private CultureInfo currentCulture = CultureInfo.InstalledUICulture;
public CultureInfo CurrentCulture
{
get { return currentCulture; }
set
{
if (currentCulture != value)
{
currentCulture = value;
NotifyPropertyChanged(string.Empty); // string.Empty/null indicates that all properties have changed
}
}
}
// WPF bindings register PropertyChanged event if the object supports it and update themselves when it is raised
public event PropertyChangedEventHandler PropertyChanged;
private void NotifyPropertyChanged([CallerMemberName] string propertyName = "")
{
if (PropertyChanged != null)
PropertyChanged(this, new PropertyChangedEventArgs(propertyName));
}
public void AddResourceManager(ResourceManager resourceManager)
{
if (!resourceManagerDictionary.ContainsKey(resourceManager.BaseName))
resourceManagerDictionary.Add(resourceManager.BaseName, resourceManager);
}
public static (string baseName, string stringName) SplitName(string name)
{
int idx = name.LastIndexOf('.');
return (name.Substring(0, idx), name.Substring(idx + 1));
}
}
In xaml you set the Translation.ResourceManager per UserContorl/Window etc. This is used so multiple resource files can be used in the application. Each child Control looks to this ResourceManager for their translations.
public class Translation : AvaloniaObject
{
public static readonly AttachedProperty<ResourceManager> ResourceManagerProperty = AvaloniaProperty.RegisterAttached<Translation, AvaloniaObject, ResourceManager>("ResourceManager");
public static ResourceManager GetResourceManager(AvaloniaObject dependencyObject)
{
return (ResourceManager)dependencyObject.GetValue(ResourceManagerProperty);
}
public static void SetResourceManager(AvaloniaObject dependencyObject, ResourceManager value)
{
dependencyObject.SetValue(ResourceManagerProperty, value);
}
}
Creates a Binding between the Control on the view and the correct ResourceManager.
public class LocExtensionWithMultipleResxFiles : MarkupExtension
{
public string StringName { get; } // Key name of the translation in a resource file.
public LocExtensionWithMultipleResxFiles(string stringName)
{
StringName = stringName;
}
// Find out what ResourceManager this control uses
private ResourceManager? GetResourceManager(object control)
{
if (control is AvaloniaObject dependencyObject)
{
object localValue = dependencyObject.GetValue(Translation.ResourceManagerProperty);
if (localValue != AvaloniaProperty.UnsetValue)
{
if (localValue is ResourceManager resourceManager)
{
TranslationSourceWithMultipleResxFiles.Instance.AddResourceManager(resourceManager);
return resourceManager;
}
}
}
return null;
}
// Create a binding between the Control and the translated text in a resource file.
public override object ProvideValue(IServiceProvider serviceProvider)
{
object? targetObject = (serviceProvider as IProvideValueTarget)?.TargetObject;
if (targetObject?.GetType().Name == "SharedDp") // is extension used in a control template?
return targetObject; // required for template re-binding
string baseName = GetResourceManager(targetObject)?.BaseName ?? string.Empty; // if the targetObject has a ResourceManager set, BaseName is set
if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(baseName)) // if the targetobjest doesnt have a RM set, it gets the root elements RM.
{
// rootObject is the root control of the visual tree (the top parent of targetObject)
object? rootObject = (serviceProvider as IRootObjectProvider)?.RootObject;
baseName = GetResourceManager(rootObject)?.BaseName ?? string.Empty;
}
if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(baseName)) // template re-binding
{
if (targetObject is Control frameworkElement)
baseName = GetResourceManager(frameworkElement.TemplatedParent)?.BaseName ?? string.Empty;
}
// create a binding between the Control and the correct resource-file
var binding = new ReflectionBindingExtension
{
Mode = BindingMode.OneWay,
Path = $"[{baseName}.{StringName}]", // This is the ResourceManager.Key
Source = TranslationSourceWithMultipleResxFiles.Instance,
FallbackValue = "Fallback, can't set translation.",
TargetNullValue = StringName,
};
return binding.ProvideValue(serviceProvider);
}
}
My View
<Window <!-- Standard Window xaml -->
xmlns:l="clr-namespace:TestAppForMVVMwithBaseClasses.Localization"
l:Translation.ResourceManager="{x:Static p:Resources.ResourceManager}">
<StackPanel>
<TextBlock Text="{l:LocExtensionWithMultipleResxFiles String1}"/>
<Button Content="Nl" Click="CurrentCultureNl_Click"/>
<Button Content="En" Click="CurrentCultureEn_Click"/>
</StackPanel>
</Window>

Customise TableCell in a tableView in javafx

Let's consider we have the following informations :
As you see an article can be stored in many stores, and vice versa : a store can store many articles : that's the class model (UML )
some code :
FXML Part :
#FXML
private TableView<Article> tblArticles;
#FXML
private TableColumn<Article, String> colStore;
#FXML
private TableColumn<Article, Integer> colQuantity;
getters and setter :
colStore.setCellValueFactory(new PropertyValueFactory<>("store"));
colStore.setCellValueFactory(new PropertyValueFactory<>("quantity"));
I recieve the result seen in the first table but I am not able to do what is in the second table .
And what I want exactly should give the following informations :
So my question is it possible to do this in a TableView ?
Here is a sample app. It follows an MVVM style, which is appropriate for this kind of work. The app was built using Java 13 and will not work in earlier Java versions such as Java 8. It's a relatively long answer, but, ah well, sometimes that is what it takes.
The overall approach is not to create a tableview row for each store that an article is stored in. Instead, we just create a row for each article and we have a custom cell renderer which produces a single formatted cell for all the stores and quantities that that item is stored at.
Now, you could do an alternative implementation based upon a custom rowFactory. However, I do not recommend that approach for this particular task, as I believe it would be unnecessarily complicated to implement and maintain, without providing sufficient value.
Another way to do this is to use nested columns. This approach, when appropriate care is taken, does allow you to create a tableview row for each store that an article is stored in. If you do this, you need some way of populating different data depending on whether a row is either the first row in the group or not. You don't allow the user to reorder and sort data in the table, as that would be quite difficult to cater for because the notion of what is the "first row in the group" would be forever changing. To allow for appropriate rendering with nested columns, you end up with a slightly different view model (the FlatLineItem class below and the accompanying method in the LineItemService that retrieves them).
The image below demonstrates the output of a TableView with a custom cell renderer on the left and a TableView using nested columns on the right. Note how the selection works differently in each case. On the left when a row is selected, it includes all the stores that attached to that row. On the right when the nested columns are used, the row selection is only selecting a row for a given store.
Main application class
This sets up a couple of TableViews.
For the first table view, all it does is create a TableView with a column for each of the elements to be displayed. All the data is extracted from a LineItem view model class using a standard PropertyValueFactory. The slightly different thing is a custom cell renderer for a StoredQuantity field via the StoredQuantityTableCell, this is explained later.
The second view uses nested columns and works based upon the FlatLineItem view model class, also using a standard PropertyValueFactory and uses no custom cell renderer.
import javafx.application.Application;
import javafx.scene.Scene;
import javafx.scene.control.TableColumn;
import javafx.scene.control.TableView;
import javafx.scene.control.cell.PropertyValueFactory;
import javafx.scene.layout.HBox;
import javafx.stage.Stage;
import java.util.List;
public class AggregateViewApp extends Application {
#Override
public void start(Stage stage) throws Exception {
LineItemService lineItemService = new LineItemService();
TableView<LineItem> tableView = createArticleTableView();
tableView.getItems().setAll(lineItemService.fetchAllLineItems());
TableView<FlatLineItem> nestedTableView = createNestedArticleTableView();
nestedTableView.getItems().setAll(lineItemService.fetchAllFlatLineItems());
HBox layout = new HBox(
40,
tableView,
nestedTableView
);
stage.setScene(new Scene(layout));
stage.show();
}
#SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
private TableView<LineItem> createArticleTableView() {
TableView tableView = new TableView();
TableColumn<LineItem, Long> articleIdCol = new TableColumn<>("Article ID");
articleIdCol.setCellValueFactory(new PropertyValueFactory<>("articleId"));
TableColumn<LineItem, String> nameCol = new TableColumn<>("Name");
nameCol.setCellValueFactory(new PropertyValueFactory<>("articleName"));
TableColumn<LineItem, List<StoredQuantity>> storedArticleCol = new TableColumn<>("Store Quantities");
storedArticleCol.setCellValueFactory(new PropertyValueFactory<>("storedQuantities"));
storedArticleCol.setCellFactory(lineItemStringTableColumn -> new StoredQuantityTableCell());
TableColumn<LineItem, DB.StoredArticle> totalCol = new TableColumn<>("Total");
totalCol.setCellValueFactory(new PropertyValueFactory<>("total"));
tableView.getColumns().addAll(articleIdCol, nameCol, storedArticleCol, totalCol);
tableView.setPrefSize(400, 150);
return tableView;
}
#SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
private TableView<FlatLineItem> createNestedArticleTableView() {
TableView tableView = new TableView();
TableColumn<FlatLineItem, Long> articleIdCol = new TableColumn<>("Article ID");
articleIdCol.setCellValueFactory(new PropertyValueFactory<>("articleId"));
articleIdCol.setSortable(false);
TableColumn<FlatLineItem, String> nameCol = new TableColumn<>("Name");
nameCol.setCellValueFactory(new PropertyValueFactory<>("articleName"));
nameCol.setSortable(false);
TableColumn<FlatLineItem, String> storeCol = new TableColumn<>("Store");
storeCol.setCellValueFactory(new PropertyValueFactory<>("storeName"));
storeCol.setSortable(false);
TableColumn<FlatLineItem, String> storeQuantityCol = new TableColumn<>("Quantity");
storeQuantityCol.setCellValueFactory(new PropertyValueFactory<>("storeQuantity"));
storeQuantityCol.setSortable(false);
TableColumn<FlatLineItem, List<StoredQuantity>> storedArticleCol = new TableColumn<>("Store Quantities");
storedArticleCol.getColumns().setAll(
storeCol,
storeQuantityCol
);
storedArticleCol.setSortable(false);
TableColumn<LineItem, DB.StoredArticle> totalCol = new TableColumn<>("Total");
totalCol.setCellValueFactory(new PropertyValueFactory<>("total"));
totalCol.setSortable(false);
tableView.getColumns().setAll(articleIdCol, nameCol, storedArticleCol, totalCol);
tableView.setPrefSize(400, 200);
return tableView;
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
launch(AggregateViewApp.class);
}
}
StoredQuantityTableCell.java
This takes a list of StoredQuantities which is a tuple of a store name and a quantity of things stored at that store and then renders that list into a single cell, formatting the display internally in a GridView. You could use whatever internal node layout or formatting you wish and add CSS styling to spice things up if necessary.
import javafx.scene.control.Label;
import javafx.scene.control.TableCell;
import javafx.scene.layout.GridPane;
import java.util.List;
class StoredQuantityTableCell extends TableCell<LineItem, List<StoredQuantity>> {
private GridPane storedQuantityPane;
public StoredQuantityTableCell() {
storedQuantityPane = new GridPane();
storedQuantityPane.setHgap(10);
storedQuantityPane.setVgap(5);
}
#Override
protected void updateItem(List<StoredQuantity> storedQuantities, boolean empty) {
super.updateItem(storedQuantities, empty);
if (storedQuantities == null) {
setGraphic(null);
return;
}
storedQuantityPane.getChildren().removeAll(storedQuantityPane.getChildren());
int row = 0;
for (StoredQuantity storedQuantity: storedQuantities) {
storedQuantityPane.addRow(
row,
new Label(storedQuantity.getStoreName()),
new Label("" + storedQuantity.getQuantity())
);
row++;
}
setGraphic(storedQuantityPane);
}
}
LineItem.java
A view model class representing a row in the table.
import java.util.Collections;
import java.util.List;
public class LineItem {
private long articleId;
private String articleName;
private List<StoredQuantity> storedQuantities;
public LineItem(long articleId, String articleName, List<StoredQuantity> storedQuantities) {
this.articleId = articleId;
this.articleName = articleName;
this.storedQuantities = storedQuantities;
}
public long getArticleId() {
return articleId;
}
public String getArticleName() {
return articleName;
}
public List<StoredQuantity> getStoredQuantities() {
return Collections.unmodifiableList(storedQuantities);
}
public int getTotal() {
return storedQuantities.stream()
.mapToInt(StoredQuantity::getQuantity)
.sum();
}
}
StoredQuantity.java
A view model class representing a store name and quantity of things in the store. This is used by the StoredQuantityTableCell to render the stored quantities for a line item.
public class StoredQuantity implements Comparable<StoredQuantity> {
private String storeName;
private int quantity;
StoredQuantity(String storeName, int quantity) {
this.storeName = storeName;
this.quantity = quantity;
}
public String getStoreName() {
return storeName;
}
public int getQuantity() {
return quantity;
}
#Override
public int compareTo(StoredQuantity o) {
return storeName.compareTo(o.storeName);
}
}
FlatLineItem.java
A view model class supporting a table view with nested columns. A flat line item which can be created for each store that an article is stored in.
public class FlatLineItem {
private Long articleId;
private String articleName;
private final String storeName;
private final Integer storeQuantity;
private final Integer total;
private final boolean firstInGroup;
public FlatLineItem(Long articleId, String articleName, String storeName, Integer storeQuantity, Integer total, boolean firstInGroup) {
this.articleId = articleId;
this.articleName = articleName;
this.storeName = storeName;
this.storeQuantity = storeQuantity;
this.total = total;
this.firstInGroup = firstInGroup;
}
public Long getArticleId() {
return articleId;
}
public String getArticleName() {
return articleName;
}
public String getStoreName() {
return storeName;
}
public Integer getStoreQuantity() {
return storeQuantity;
}
public Integer getTotal() {
return total;
}
public boolean isFirstInGroup() {
return firstInGroup;
}
}
LineItemService.java
This translates values from the database into view model objects (LineItems or FlatLineItems) which can be rendered by the views. Note how the getFlatLineItemsForLineItem which constructs the FlatLineItems for the nested column table view has a notion of what it the first row in a group of line items and propagates the the FlatLineItem appropriately based on that, leaving some values null if they are just repeated from the first item in the group, which results in a clean display.
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.stream.Collectors;
public class LineItemService {
private final DB db = DB.instance();
public List<LineItem> fetchAllLineItems() {
return db.findAllArticles()
.stream()
.map(article -> createLineItemForArticle(article.getArticleId()))
.collect(Collectors.toList());
}
public List<FlatLineItem> fetchAllFlatLineItems() {
return fetchAllLineItems().stream()
.flatMap(lineItem -> getFlatLineItemsForLineItem(lineItem).stream())
.collect(Collectors.toList());
}
private List<FlatLineItem> getFlatLineItemsForLineItem(LineItem lineItem) {
ArrayList<FlatLineItem> flatLineItems = new ArrayList<>();
boolean firstStore = true;
for (StoredQuantity storedQuantity: lineItem.getStoredQuantities()) {
FlatLineItem newFlatLineItem;
if (firstStore) {
newFlatLineItem = new FlatLineItem(
lineItem.getArticleId(),
lineItem.getArticleName(),
storedQuantity.getStoreName(),
storedQuantity.getQuantity(),
lineItem.getTotal(),
true
);
firstStore = false;
} else {
newFlatLineItem = new FlatLineItem(
null,
null,
storedQuantity.getStoreName(),
storedQuantity.getQuantity(),
null,
false
);
}
flatLineItems.add(newFlatLineItem);
}
return flatLineItems;
}
private LineItem createLineItemForArticle(long articleId) {
DB.Article article =
db.findArticleById(
articleId
).orElse(
new DB.Article(articleId, "N/A")
);
List<DB.StoredArticle> storedArticles =
db.findAllStoredArticlesForArticleId(articleId);
return new LineItem(
article.getArticleId(),
article.getName(),
getStoredQuantitesForStoredArticles(storedArticles)
);
}
private List<StoredQuantity> getStoredQuantitesForStoredArticles(List<DB.StoredArticle> storedArticles) {
return storedArticles.stream()
.map(storedArticle ->
new StoredQuantity(
db.findStoreById(storedArticle.getStoreId())
.map(DB.Store::getName)
.orElse("No Store"),
storedArticle.getQuantity()
)
)
.sorted()
.collect(
Collectors.toList()
);
}
}
Mock database class
Just a simple in-memory representation of the database class. In a real app, you would probably use something like SpringData with hibernate to provide the data access repositories using a JPA based object to relational mapping.
The database classes aren't related to the view at all but are just presented here so that a running app can be created within a MVVM style framework.
import java.util.Collections;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.Optional;
import java.util.stream.Collectors;
class DB {
private static final DB instance = new DB();
public static DB instance() {
return instance;
}
private List<Article> articles = List.of(
new Article(1, "Hp101"),
new Article(3, "Lenovo303"),
new Article(4, "Asus404")
);
private List<Store> stores = List.of(
new Store(1, "S1"),
new Store(2, "S2")
);
private List<StoredArticle> storedArticles = List.of(
new StoredArticle(1, 1, 30),
new StoredArticle(1, 2, 70),
new StoredArticle(3, 1, 50),
new StoredArticle(4, 2, 70)
);
public Optional<Article> findArticleById(long articleId) {
return articles.stream()
.filter(article -> article.getArticleId() == articleId)
.findFirst();
}
public Optional<Store> findStoreById(long storeId) {
return stores.stream()
.filter(store -> store.getStoreId() == storeId)
.findFirst();
}
public List<StoredArticle> findAllStoredArticlesForArticleId(long articleId) {
return storedArticles.stream()
.filter(storedArticle -> storedArticle.articleId == articleId)
.collect(Collectors.toList());
}
public List<Article> findAllArticles() {
return Collections.unmodifiableList(articles);
}
static class Article {
private long articleId;
private String name;
public Article(long articleId, String name) {
this.articleId = articleId;
this.name = name;
}
public long getArticleId() {
return articleId;
}
public String getName() {
return name;
}
}
static class Store {
private long storeId;
private String name;
public Store(long storeId, String name) {
this.storeId = storeId;
this.name = name;
}
public long getStoreId() {
return storeId;
}
public String getName() {
return name;
}
}
static class StoredArticle {
private long articleId;
private long storeId;
private int quantity;
public StoredArticle(long articleId, long storeId, int quantity) {
this.articleId = articleId;
this.storeId = storeId;
this.quantity = quantity;
}
public long getArticleId() {
return articleId;
}
public long getStoreId() {
return storeId;
}
public int getQuantity() {
return quantity;
}
}
}
Answers to some follow-up questions
Which Approach is the best for updating data ?
All of the approaches I have shown use read only data models and views. To make it read-write would be a bit more work (and out of scope for what I would be prepared to add to this already long answer). Probably, of the two approaches outlined above, the approach which uses a separate row for each store containing an item would be the easiest to adapt to making the data updatable.
Which approach in general I should use to update data ( data are stored for sure in db) ?
Defining a general approach to updating data in a database is out of scope for what I would answer here (it is a purely opinion based answer, as there are many different ways to accomplish this, and as such is off topic for StackOverflow). If it were me, I'd set up a SpringBoot based rest service that connected to the database and have my client app communicate with that. If the app does not need to communicate over the internet, but only communicate with a local DB over a LAN, then adding direct database access by making the app a SpringBoot app and using Spring Data repositories with the embedded H2 database is what I would use.
Is when modifying in a specific row modify in db or wait until user modify in the whole tableview and click on a save button ?
Either way would work, I don't have any strong opinion on one versus the other. I'd probably lean towards the immediate update scenario rather than a delayed save scenario, but it would depend on the app and desired user experience.
Please can you provide me with some code for either to draw a line under every cell or to make it just like usual tableView ( one row gray and one not etc ...)
You can ask that as a separate question. But, in general, use CSS styling. If you use the second approach outlined above which has a row per store, then everything is already a "usual tableView" in terms of styling, with one row gray and one row not, etc., so I don't know that any additional styling is really required in such a case.

Binding between an Object and a SimpleIntegerProperty

I have a combo box over my GUI in JavaFX.
This Combo Box is composed of a complex type elements :
public class DureeChoiceBoxElement extends ObservableValueBase<DureeChoiceBoxElement> {
private IntegerProperty duree;
#Override
public String toString() {
return duree.get() + " an";
}
}
I want to map (or bind) the selected complex element with my model which contains the simple type :
public class Pel {
private IntegerProperty duree = new SimpleIntegerProperty(1);
public Property<Number> dureeProperty() {
return duree;
}
public void setDuree(Integer duree) {
this.duree.setValue(duree);
}
public Integer getDuree() {
return duree.getValue();
}
}
How to do it ?
I tried in the controller with :
public class PelController {
#FXML
private ChoiceBox<DureeChoiceBoxElement> duree;
//etc..
pel.dureeProperty().bind(createElapsedBindingByBindingsAPI2(duree.getValue()));
/*
* #return an ObjectBinding of immutable TimeElapsed objects for the player
*/
private ObjectBinding<Property<Number>> createElapsedBindingByBindingsAPI2(
final DureeChoiceBoxElement dureeChoiceBoxElement) {
return Bindings.createObjectBinding(new Callable<Property<Number>>() {
#Override
public IntegerProperty call() throws Exception {
return dureeChoiceBoxElement.dureeProperty();
}
}, dureeChoiceBoxElement.dureeProperty());
}
}
But it doesn't work (even not compile). I want to say that "Bind this simple property to this complex Object calling the method I give you through the method named "createElapsedBindingByBindingsAPI2(..)".
It is logical read but I didn't managed to make it works anyway.
That's poor ....
Any help please :).
Example that (obviously) works with legacy code style (Swing coding) :
duree.getSelectionModel().selectedItemProperty().addListener(new ChangeListener<DureeChoiceBoxElement>() {
#Override
public void changed(ObservableValue<? extends DureeChoiceBoxElement> observable,
DureeChoiceBoxElement oldValue, DureeChoiceBoxElement newValue) {
// changement durée
log.debug("Durée sélectionnée : {}", duree.getSelectionModel().getSelectedItem().getDuree());
log.debug("Durée bindée ? : {}", pel.getDuree());
pel.setDuree(duree.getSelectionModel().getSelectedItem().getDuree());
}
});
Like this my model is set to selected item. But it implies some boilerplate code. Any better idea based on high level bindings of JavaFX ?

How to make an edittext focusable in mvvmcross

I would like to know if there is a binding mechanism from a viewmodel property that provides focus (the cursor to blink or something to indicate that the textedit has focus) in a specific edittext of my choice.
This is a general Mvvm question - like MVVM Focus To Textbox
Just as in the general question, in MvvmCross you could do this in some code behind in your View. For example, you could create a helper class like:
public class Helper
{
private Activity _a;
public Helper(Activity a)
{
_a = a;
}
// TODO - this should probably be a ViewModel-specific enum rather than a string
private string _focussedName;
public string FocussedName
{
get { return _focussedName; }
set
{
_focussedName = value;
var mapped = MapFocussedNameToControlName(_focussedName);
var res = _a.Resources.GetIdentifier(mapped, "id", _a.PackageName);
var view = _a.FindViewById(res);
view.RequestFocus();
}
}
private string MapFocussedNameToControlName(string value)
{
// TODO - your mapping here...
return value;
}
}
This could then be bound in the View and in OnCreate as:
private Helper _helper;
protected override void OnCreate (Bundle bundle)
{
base.OnCreate (bundle);
// Set our view from the "main" layout resource
SetContentView (Resource.Layout.main);
_helper = new Helper(this);
this.CreateBinding(_helper)
.For(h => h.FocussedName)
.To<MyViewModel>(x => x.FocusName)
.OneWay()
.Apply();
}
This code not tested - but should roughly work.

How can i call dynamic object like a function?

I am studying orchard architecture.i have faced with a strange concept in display management section.
in Partial view page there is a 'function call like' syntax like so Display(Model.Head). that is not a function thought, it is a dynamic object defined in orchard WebViewPage.
I am wondering how to define a dynamic object so that you can call it (and pass it an argument as well) like a function as i mentioned.
thanks in advance.
A lighter weight way to do it without clay would be to subclass the built-in DynamicObject class.
public static dynamic Display;
void Main()
{
Display = new MyCallableObject();
//this is what i was after
Console.Write(Display("bla bla bla"));
}
public class MyCallableObject:DynamicObject
{
public override bool TryInvoke(InvokeBinder binder, object[] args, out Object result)
{
result = string.Format("This is response for {0}",args.FirstOrDefault());
return true;
}
}
I finally found it my self!
all the operations have done with Clay Library behind the scene.i have wrote a sample console app for demonstrating the process.
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
Display = ClayActivator.CreateInstance<MyResponser>(new List<IClayBehavior> {new MyFunctionCallBehavior()});
//this is what i was after
Console.Write(Display("bla bla bla"));
}
public static dynamic Display;
}
public class MyFunctionCallBehavior : IClayBehavior
{
public object InvokeMember(Func<object> proceed, object self, string name, INamedEnumerable<object> args)
{
return ((MyResponser)self).ResponseForRequest(args.FirstOrDefault().ToString());
}
}
public class MyResponser
{
public string ResponseForRequest(string param)
{
return string.Format("This is response for {0}",param);
}
}

Resources