We have a single page web application. One of the functions of the application is to supervise the connection path from the client back to the server. This is implemented with a periodic ajax http request in javascript to the server every 60 seconds. This request acts as a heartbeat.
After a session is started, the server looks for that heartbeat. If it fails to receive a heartbeat request after a reasonable amount of time, it takes specific action.
The client also looks for a response to that heartbeat request. If it fails to receive a response after a reasonable amount of time, it displays a message on the screen via javascript.
We are getting reports from the field where a Chrome version of Edge is failing. Communication between the client and server is apparently failing. The server is seeing those heartbeat requests cease – and taking that specific action. However, the client is not taking the expected action on its side. It’s not displaying the message indicating a failed heartbeat request. It’s almost appears as though the javascript stopped running altogether.
The thing is, though… The customer has reported that if they disable automatic updates to Microsoft Edge the application runs fine. If the checking of updates is allowed to occur, the application eventually fails as described above. Note that this is apparently happening when Edge is just checking for updates - it's already up to date.
Updates are being turned off using several guid-named registry keys at [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Policies\Microsoft\EdgeUpdate].
Any thoughts?
Related
In our application we observe multiple ( two ) these same requests send from mobile application to server in milliseconds apart.
As we discuss the problem with dev team, they said they don't send two requests from an application perspective, but on the server-side, we see exactly these same two requests.
Does anybody know if iOS has this type of functionality to keep resending this same request in case of a lost connection or any other case? ( This is milliseconds that server doesn't respond yet )
The application should send only one request, wait for response success/failure, and then resend as needed. So far as we know, there is no logic in the application itself that will trigger sending two requests from the app to the server in milliseconds apart.
Thank you for any suggestions.
It's hard to tell without looking at the code or knowing your network infrastructure.
What I'd suggest to do first is to run the app through a debugging proxy server like Charles, Proxyman or mitmproxy. If it shows multiple requests, most likely the app is to blame, I'd bet on a concurrency bug.
If the debugging proxy shows just one request but your server observes two, you'll have to check your network infrastructure, it might be that some load balancer or reverse proxy is configured incorrectly.
We have a Vaadin 14 (Flow) application which is fronted by an Apache reverse proxy that integrates with Gluu for authentication using OpenID (mod_auth_openidc).
This is generally working fine, except when users leave their browser open with the application idle for a long time, until the max session time of the OpenID session is reached. The problem is, at that point the Vaadin client keeps trying to send heartbeat requests. This, in combination with this mod_auth_openidc issue, results in state cookies piling up and reaching a limit so that the user has to close her browser before being able to re-login.
I've tried various things (unsuccessfully) in order to get the server to instruct the browser to visit a logout URL when a heartbeat request is received after session timeout (in combination with vaadin.closeIdleSessions=true), but even if it worked it wouldn't be a solution for other browser tabs that may also be open at that time and sending heartbeat requests.
What we really want is to limit the number of times the Vaadin client retries to send the heartbeat requests (say max 3 times) and then just stop sending requests (maybe display a message to re-login).
Is this possible in any way? The current workaround is to disable the heartbeats completely, but this doesn't seem ideal (Vaadin won't detect idle UIs).
The UI instance has a ReconnectDialogConfiguration which includes reconnectAttempts property to control how many times to re-try requests (including heartbeat requests). Default seems to be 10000.
In Vaadin 14 (LTS) this can be set using PageConfigurator.
In Vaadin 18 (latest release) this is done using AppShellConfigurator
Disabling the heartbeats is the way to go. If you need something more nuanced than that, you'll need to make a change (maybe add a configuration option) in how Heartbeats work in Vaadin. Creating a ticket in GitHub could be a good place to start.
I'm using Electron, which is based on Chromium, to create an offline desktop application.
The application uses a remote site, and we are using a service worker to offline parts of the site. Everything is working great, except for a certain situation that I call the "airplane wifi situation".
Using Charles, I have restricted download bandwidth to 100bytes/s. The connection is sent through webview.loadURL which eventually calls LoadURLWithParams in Chromium. The problem is that it does not fail and then activate the service worker, like no connection at all would. Once the request is sent, it waits forever for the response.
My question is, how do I timeout the request after a certain amount of time and load everything from the service worker as if the user was truly offline?
An alternative to writing this yourself is to use the sw-toolbox library, which provides routing and runtime caching strategies for service workers, along with some built in options for helping with these sorts of advanced use cases. In particular, you'd want to use the networkTimeoutSeconds parameter to configure the amount of time to wait for a response from the network before you fall back to a previously cached response.
You can use it like the following:
toolbox.router.get(
new RegExp('my-api\\.com'),
toolbox.networkFirst, {
networkTimeoutSeconds: 10
}
);
That would configure a route that matched GET requests with URLs containing my-api.com, and applied a network-first strategy that will automatically fall back to the previously cached response after 10 seconds.
We have a web application which does some computing and returns a file to the client. When the computing takes less then 5 minutes everything works fine on IE and Chrome and we get the file but if computing takes more than 5 minutes IE times-out with "Internet Explorer cannot display the webpage" message where as Chrome keeps running and eventually gets the file from the server.
I've tried changing registry settings like KeepAliveTimeout, ReceiveTimeout, ServerInfoTimeout of WinInet but it didn't help. Clicking the Diagnose Connection Problems button shows "Windows received an HTTPerror message: 403 (forbidden) from " message which I think is because it tries to again access the site without credentials and fails. When using fiddler the request terminates with 504 status and show this message "ReadResponse() failed: The server did not return a response for this request." Interestingly I've once observed that even Chrome times-out if Fiddler is running (haven't verified this by re-running though.)
This is an ASP.Net web application using MVC framework.
I've spent considerable amount of time but haven't been able to find a solution for this. Any useful pointers would really be appreciated.
From KB181050
You can usually break down long processes into smaller pieces. Or, the server can return status data to update users about the process. In addition, you can create a long server process that has a messages-based or asynchronous approach so that it returns immediately to the user after the job is submitted, and then notifies the user after the long process is finished.
In other words, create a <div> and fill that <div> immediately with a "processing" value after the request has been accepted by the server. Then, use ajax or javascript to update that same <div> with the result whenever you're finished with processing.
I am trying to use jQuery's .ajax functionality to make a progress bar.
A request is submited via .ajax, which starts a long running process. Once submited another .ajax request is called on an interval which checks the progress of this process. Then a progress meter is updated using this information.
However, the progress .ajax call only returns once the long running process has completed. Its like its being blocked by the initial request.
The weird thing is this process works fine on dev but is failing on the deployment server. I am running on IIS using ASP.Net MVC.
Update: Apparently, it is browser related because it is working fine on IE 7 but is not working on IE 8. This is strange because IE 8 allows up to 6 connections on broadband where IE 7 only allows 2 requests per domain.
Update2: I think it's a local issue because it appears to be working fine on another IE 8 machine.
The server will only run one page at a time from each user. When you send the requests to get the progress status, they will be queued.
The solution is to make the page that returns the status sessionless, using EnableSessionState="false" in the #Page directive. That way it's not associated with any user, so the request isn't queued.
This of course means that you can't use session state to communicate the progress state from the thread running the process to the thread getting the status. You have to use a different way of keeping track of running processes and send some identifier along with the requests that gets the status so that you know which user it came from.
Some browsers (in particular, IE) only allows two requests to the same domain at the same time. If there are any other requests happening at the same time, then you might run into this limitation. One way around it is to have a few different aliases for the domain (some sites use "www1.example.com" and "www2.example.com", etc)
You should be able to use Firebug or Fiddler to determine how many requests are in progress, etc.
Create an Asynchronus handler (IHttpAsyncHandler) for your second ajax request.
use any parameter required via the .ashx querystring in order to process what you want because the HttpContext won't have what you'll need. You barely will have access to the Application object.
Behind the scenes ASP.NET will create for you a thread from the CLR pool, not the application pool, so You'll have an extra performance gain with IHttpAsyncHandler