I have a Webhook for my repository in github which is triggered when there is a push to master branch and then webhook starts the build in Jenkins
At the end of build process, I change the version in the pom and push it to master again which would trigger the webhook again and make a loop of builds in Jenkins.
Is there something I can do about this? What is the better practice for this scenario?
Thank you
When you deliver a new change you can commit with a specific message like ('pom modified from jenkins build'). Then add a rule in Jenkins Git plugin to ignore commits with that message ("Polling ignores commit with certain messages" using exact or a pattern). This way you avoid an infinite loop!
Try and break the loop by pushing the updated pom to a dedicated "release" branch from which the final release is built (and the webhook you mention is not active)
From there, any new development should first merge the latest release (and get the updated pom), before making new commits for the next feature to merge to master.
Related
We are using Bitbucket cloud to host our repos and Jenkins for CI/CD.
I have setup a multibranch pipeline which has develop and release branches. I want to trigger develop branch whenever a PR is merged from the feature branches to develop a branch (In fact on any manual webhook edit).
Below are the cases I tried:
Setup Manage hook in Jenkin:
This creates a webhook in bitbucket and when PR is merged, build is triggered.
But when I disable the Repository Push option in the webhook, the build is not triggering on PR merge.
Setup the webhook manually:
In this case, the Jenkins logs show the branch name as PR-XY since not triggering the develop branch.
I have set up a regex to filter branches (only develop and release are allowed) and when I add regex like PR(.*) then build gets triggers from the PR section (not desired case).
I want the build to be triggered from the develop branch, not as the PR branch. I have followed most of the options available in the forums but it's not working. Any help regarding this will be appreciated.
I faced the same issue, it's look like most of jenkins plugins like bitbucket plugin does not trigger the pipeline on merge only. even though i set the bitbucket trigger options like this:
unless you add a check mark next to push option.
to solve this i used another Jenkins plugin called Bitbucket Push and Pull Request
just make sure to uninstall Bitbucket plugin if you have it.
so you can use this one as they mentioned in there docs.
and follow the setup instructions.
note: i only test it with normal pipeline job
I think I'm missing something quite simple here so I thought I would ask.
I have a development branch that developers raise PR's against, when this occurs I would like my Jenkins pipeline to automatically trigger.
Then once a merge happens and a push goes to the development branch, I want to do some extra steps which I have configured in the pipeline successfully.
The problem is how do I get Jenkins to automatically checkout and build branches that have a PR raised against development?
Currently I'm using GitHub hook trigger for GITScm polling and I can see the triggers in github being fired but it just constantly rebuilds the master branch instead of the branch that the PR is being raised on.
We are using github-branch-source and this automatically builds PRs.
There is a nice documentation: cloudbees docu
I'm trying to add some very basic functionality that exists in every other modern ci product, but which unfortunately seems to be a completely foreign concept in Jenkins land.
I have the github plugin hooked up, and the git plugin set to build the "inverse" of "origin/master", so that pushing any branch except master triggers a build.
The problem is, if there's a flaky test and the build fails there's no way to restart it in jenkins. I added the Naginator plugin but it rebuilds the last branch that ran, not the branch of the build that you clicked "retry" on. Using the Naginator plugin, it seems that I need the git branch or sha to be a real parameter of the build. But, I can't find a way to set the git branch as a parameter of the build when a build gets triggered.
The only thing I can think of is to split it into two builds that link to the same git repo, and have the second one be a parameterized build that the first one triggers with the GIT_COMMIT value as the parameter. Then, retrying the second one with Naginator should retry it on the same SHA. This isn't a good solution though, it sucks to have to configure 2 builds for every one of my builds.
Does anyone know of a good way to accomplish this? I'm hoping I'm just missing something simple.
Unfortunately i'm unfamiliar with this exact setup, however the Git plugin documentation, section Push notification from repository, mentions that in the trigger url, the <commit ID is optional. If set, it will trigger a build immediately, without polling for changes.
If there is a built-in "button" in some plugin to issue this manually from inside jenkins UI i don't know, if not that could be a nice feature request.
So, if there really is no easy option aviable yet, as a workaround you could write yourself some script which builds and calls the url for a given branch + commit ID.
Trigger url format, as found in Git Plugin docs:
curl http://yourserver/git/notifyCommit?url=<URL of the Git repository>&branches=branch1[,branch2]*][&sha1=<commit ID>]
To give some context the question is about GitLab and Jenkins setup.
I know how to setup a web hook, I know how to setup a job to be triggered by the hook. The problem is that I need to have multiple jobs and only a single entry-point (parent job) trigger for them.
The downstream jobs at the same time need to be git repo aware so I have to set repo url for them. This causes them to be triggered independently by the hook and I don't want that as this means that they are triggered twice.
On the other hand if I don't configure repo url on a downstream job and the parent job triggers it, it fails as it is not able to do a checkout.
I may try to hack around with some 'execute shell' build step, I believe it's not a valid way to go. Has anybody a good tip how to solve that?
For the reference here is the GitLab Jenkins plugin documentation according to which:
Plugin will parse the GitLab payload and extract the branch for which
the commit is being pushed and changes made. It will then scan all Git
projects in Jenkins and start the build for those that:
match url of the GitLab repo
match the configured refspec pattern if any
and match committed GitLab branch
I tried playing around with different settings, without a great result though.
For the project you want to get only local triggers, just enable Don't trigger a built on commit notification in the Additional behaviours of git plugin.
(https://github.com/elvanja/jenkins-gitlab-hook-plugin/issues/11#issuecomment-35385032, as you actually have discovered).
But a better solution could be to make your downstream jobs reference the repository locally cloned by main job (not sure if actually possible), so the plugin will never consider them for schedule a build, as the git url don't match.
We are using Jenkins,GerritTrigger setup for CI and it will start build for each commit though all commits came from single push. Since all changes are dependent on each other its enough to make a single build with all changes, but I don't see that option in GerritTrigger plugin.
I believe many companies use Jenkins and Gerrit combination and I am curious to know how they are handling these cases.
Example:
If a developer pushes below 4 commits at once to gerrit it will create 4 changes accordingly in gerrit say 1,2,3,4 and it starts 4 builds in jenkins for all commit
git log --oneline
e3dfdwd CommitD
5fgfdgh CommitC
df34dsf CommitB
a23sdr3 CommitA
Here 4 commits as a whole will pass all tests in jenkins but individually they will fail. Now jenkins builds will fail for A, B, C and will succeed for D as it will checkout A,B,C as they are its dependencies.
In this case though Commit-D is successful it can't be merged as its dependencies are not passed in Jenkins.
It seems reasonable from development to expect jenkins verification for each push instead of each commit. But GerritTrigger can run for each commit only.
Question:
Is there a way to inform jenkins to start build only for commit-D as it will have all dependencies C,B,A ??
Or can we start a build for each git push from development instead of commits?
Sorry if I had any info
I found a way to start build only for commit-D.
I have introduced a gerrittrigger job which runs immediately after every commit, this job will not do any clone/build/verification.
It will just do some set of verifications like, check if given change has needed-by change, dependency exists and dependencies on same branch etc
This job will trigger another main job which does real clone, checkout change, build, verification etc only for changes which pass all validations.
So this will start job always for top commit and approve/reject all dependent changes based on job result.
Though it has few limitations, we found this method is suitable for our workflow
Most companies don't use git and gerrit :) Most companies don't even use git, unfortunately. And most of the ones that do, don't use gerrit. I've consulted for dozens of companies: two use git, and neither of them have even heard of gerrit.
I don't think it's possible to get gerrit to think of pushes as if they were commits. Since each commit in a push can be separately reviewed and rejected, each commit has to be considered and built separately. If you don't want it to work that way, gerrit might not be for you.
Instead, you should squash your related commits locally before pushing them to gerrit. This will achieve the desired results.