Umbraco CMS is free or paid? Please give me information i want to start work on project for my organization using Umbraco CMS
Umbraco is open source CMS so you can install it and host it yourself for free.
They have a cloud if you want to host the site on their servers and that is not free - more about it here
Umbraco is free open source however there are some packages/addons such as Umbraco Forms/Contour which you need to pay for, when using it in production. Forms allows you to manage HTTP form submissions within the CMS and configure what to do next such as send an email on submission etc.
Like Davor mentioned they have a cloud service which will handle upgrades and it include forms too. https://umbraco.com/pricing/
What's also a good thing to checkout is the https://our.umbraco.org/ site which has useful information on packages created by the community and tutorials.
Related
In my system, it will be multiple front-end portal for consumer.
All the different portals contains same logic but different css style only.
For example:
Portal Default : www.myweb.com
Portal A : a.myweb.com
And a user belongs to portal A could access the system from both default portal and A portal.
If the user login the default portal, just redirect him to Portal A.
I just wonder if there is an easy way to implement this with Symfony 3.
Meanwhile I am thinking about the CMS for these portals.
It seems that CMF only support symfony 2.
I am not sure if it could fit symfony 3.
As all the portals use the same content, the CMS only maintain default portal contents.
Thank you for your time and please kindly share your suggestions.
I recently integrated Symfony CMF 2.0.0 with Symfony 3.3 project. It works, although most of its bundles are deprecated or poorly maintained.
Also I encountered an issue that having multiple tree roots (for each subdomain for example) in Symfony CMF is not implemented
Besides Symfony CMF there are some other Symfony and PHP based content management solutions:
Sylius (ecommerce solution)
Drupal 8
eZPublish 5
Bolt CMS
October CMS
PageKit
Sulu CMS
I've an umbraco site which is currently on my localhost IIS..
I've see several hosting and it's have different price plan between umbraco hosting and the asp mvc site hosting..
To make my site live, are I need to choose the umbraco hosting plan, because my logic thing on local my umbraco site work normally in IIS without additional IIS plugin or setup.. So I can just choose the general asp mvc site hosting
I'm new to umbraco and this is my first time deploy an umbraco site..
Any idea guys? Thanks
Umbraco will run on any standard IIS based hosting that supports .Net and SQL Server. If you're using a SQL CE database rather than full SQL Server (or MySQL), you'll need to make sure that your host supports that too.
Also, ensure your hosting provider supports Medium trust and generally not Shared Server, although I have heard users getting this going.
If its within your budget buying a VM Server and handling the hosting provides total control over the environment.
Have you looked at Umbraco Cloud?
I need to build web application that will do:
build web pages.
build template for page.
add module(by module I mean ContacUs form, Search, Billing System...). Each module can be constructed by submodules or diveded to submodules
build module(add form, textbox, button...) and that all entered data by user could be saved in db
Can you advise me a DB structure that will contain it all
I looked some cms db, but it's NOT this.
Please, don't ask why I mess with it. I just need to build it.
I suggest you DotnetNuke.
DotNetNuke is the leading Web Content Management Platform for Microsoft ASP.NET, powering over 600,000 production web sites worldwide. The flexible DotNetNuke platform functions as either a Web CMS or a web application development framework. Depending on your role within your organization, DotNetNuke provides powerful benefits to support your Web initiatives.
http://www.dotnetnuke.com/tabid/125/Default.aspx
Just a sidenote: I'm not sure whether I should post this to serverfault as well, because some MOSS admin may have some info for me as well?
Additional note 1: I've found this document (Asp.net MVC 2 & Sharepoint integration) if anybody with sufficient expirience is willing to comment on its content whether this can be used in my described scenario or not.
Additional note 2: I've discovered (later) that Silverlight is supported in Sharepoint 2010 so I'm considering it as well. So if anyone would comment on silverlight integration as well.
A bit of explanation first (without Asp.net MVC/Silverlight)
Is it possible to integrate the two? Is it possible to write an application that would share at least credential information with MOSS?
I have to write a MOSS application that has to do with these technologies:
MOSS 2010
Personal client certificates authentication (most probably on USB keys)
Active Directory Federation Services
Separate SQL DB that would serve application specific data (separate as not being part of MOSS DB)
How should it work?
Users should authenticate using personal certificates into MOSS 2010
There would be a certain part of MOSS that would be related to my custom application
This application should only authorize certain users via AD FS - I guess these users should have a certain security claim attached to them
This application should manage users (that have access to this app) with additional (app specific) security claims related to this application (as additional application level authorization rights for individual application parts)
This application should use custom SQL 2008 DB heavily with its own data
This application should have the possibility to integrate with external systems as well (Exchange for instance to inject calendar entries, ERP systems etc)
This application should be able to export its data (from its DB) to files. I don't know if it's possible, but it would be nice if the app could add these files to MOSS and attach authorization info to them so only users with sufficient rights would be able to view/open these files.
Why Asp.net MVC/Silverlight then?
I'm very well versed in Asp.net MVC (also with the latest version) and I haven't done anything on Sharepoint since version 2003 (which doesn't do me no good or prepare me for the latest version in any way shape or form). This project will most probably be a death march project so I would rather write my application as a UI rich Asp.net MVC application and somehow integrate it into MOSS. But not only via a link, because I would like to at least share credentials, so users wouldn't need to re-login when accessing my app. Using Asp.net MVC I would at least have the possibility to finish on time or be less death marching. Is this at all possible?
I haven't done any serious project using SIlverlight, but I will sooner or later have to. So I'm also considering a jump into it at this moment, because it still might make this application development easier than strict Sharepoint 2010.
Questions
Is it possible to integrate Asp.net MVC/Silverlight into MOSS as described above?
If integration is not possible, would it be possible to create a completely MOSS based application that would work as described?
Which parts of MOSS 2010 should I use to accomplish what I need?
The Patterns and Practices Sharepoint Guidance release on CodePlex has a model-view-presenter equivalent to MVC but targeted at SharePoint development.
My company is rolling out Sharepoint 2007 Enterprise. I will not have admin access to the server. I will be given an account to use so I may make my departments website. Will I be able to use all of Sharepoint's features (workflow, searching, content management, developer level modifications) in the website I am building. Put another way, will I be able to develop any kind of dynamic website I want considering my department does not "own" the Sharepoint installation?
You have two approaches:
To install your application as a feature; you'll need to run some stsadm commands and potentially some administrator permissions to activate it. This is recommended approach.
To deploy your web application on a virtual directory, where you'll just need a file share permission to copy your files. This makes developer life easier.