I'm trying to figure out IBM Informix database versioning, or release naming conventions. I'm trying to map out the differences between minor versions and fixpacks.
According to IBM's own documentation, the convention is:
X.Y.C.
But I'm looking at Informix version 12.10 documentation and the list of "what's new in " looks more like a list of new features rather than bug fixes.
So what's the difference between a minor version and a fixpack??
IBM documentation is godawful and no amount of keyword googling helped me.
Thanks!
Related
This CoralUI documentation page has a migration guide from earlier versions of CoralUI.
How do I learn which Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) CoralUI version I am using?
I think I can see it by going into CRXDE package manager and using the browser search (not the Search packages field) for coral:
We are using spring-data-elasticsearch version 4.1.3 currently. We need to use ES deep paging and it's search_after feature. Looking at the spring-data-elasticsearch NativeSearchQueryBuilder javadoc, it does not look like ES search_after is supported. I might not look at the right place or there is a way to incorporate search_after into the query builder that I don't know. Any guidance is appreciated.
Currently this is not supported, there is an issue to have this implemented.
Edit 25.09.2022:
Support for the Point In Time API is contained since version 5.0M6 and is either available now from the milestone releases or with the release of version 5 in November 2022.
The last Type Provider I wrote just after F# 3.0 was released, and I used the ProvidedTypes.fs(i) files that came with the sample pack.
These files are quite old by now, and I wondered if there are more recent versions.
By googling alone I came up with six different versions. Where can I find the current, official version of ProvidedTypes.fs and ProvidedTypes.fsi?
Moreover, I heard that generated types are now easier to implement. Is this funtionality already inside newer versions of those files?
As requested by Nikon, here is the comment promoted to an answer :)
The starter pack is maintained at https://github.com/fsprojects/FSharp.TypeProviders.StarterPack
I was using Veewee, the VirtualBox image generator for Vagrant, and I noticed it advised to compile ruby from source using a version manager.
Now I had a look at RoR and I see the same advice. I've been doing sysadmin work for a couple of years and I've never seen this requirement for Perl or Python.
Does the language has some specific requirements which make hand-compiled installations a need ? How to do people comply with this on servers ?
When I take a look at the great looking Grails Reference Documentation (http://grails.org/doc/latest/) and compare it with my lousy gdoc documentation, I wonder what makes the difference?
is it just a different style sheet?
or do they use another tool?
How do I get these great looks for my own project without having too much to do?
The easy way to get the new look is to upgrade to 2.0M1 which uses the new look and feel. Peter Ledbrook created the current 1.3.7 docs with the new approach but I'm not sure how easy it'd be to do for a regular Grails application. And there are obviously many reasons to upgrade to 2.0.
You might want to wait a day or so - we're planning on releasing M2 this week. But upgrading from M1 to M2 will be trivial. The real work will be upgrading from 1.3 to 2.0, which isn't that bad.
They use the same exact documentation building tool. It's clearly customized CSS but nothing else. You can read more about it in the reference documentation itself.
Since Grails 1.2, the documentation engine that powers the creation of this documentation is available to your Grails projects.
From the documentation itself.