Is ASP.NET MVC's Checkbox Implementation Accessible / Screen Reader-Friendly? - asp.net-mvc

If you've ever looked at what ASP.NET MVC actually renders when you use #Html.CheckBoxFor, then you've seen that each checkbox you request to be rendered actually results in the emission of not one but two input tags. One is the "true" value checkbox, and the other is for "false." The latter input is of type "hidden".
Generally this doesn't cause problems if you're using ASP.NET MVC correctly. You wouldn't notice the input doubling unless you tried to, for example, do something directly with Request.Form(e.g. Why does ASP.NET MVC Html.CheckBox output two INPUTs with the same name?)
My question, though, is how screen readers deal with this. For example, can they be relied upon to correctly report only the visible checkbox to the site user?

Screen readers will ignore hidden inputs.

Given the example you cite in your comment, it returns this code:
<div class="col pure-u-xl-1-3 pure-u-lg-1-3 pure-u-md-1 pure-u-sm-1 pure-u-xs-1">
<label>Home Club Newsletter</label>
<input checked="checked" … id="newsletter" name="JoinHomeClub" type="checkbox" value="true">
<input name="JoinHomeClub" type="hidden" value="false">
<span class="checkbox-label">Yes, please sign me Up!</span>
</div>
Right off the bat there is a problem here because the <label> is not associated with the control, and the visible text that is next to the checkbox is not associated with the field.
When I access the field in NVDA, all it says is "checkbox checked". There is no accessible name at all.
But to your question…
Your question was related to the <input type="hidden">. As #SLaks said, screen readers ignore <input type="hidden">. The fact that they have the same name value is no problem. If they had the same id value, then you would have a problem (how it would manifest in a screen reader depends on things and stuff).

Related

Adobe DTM: Event based rule to track form submission

I am trying to track form submission for a form using event based rule in DTM. I know that the ideal way to do it is to do via direct call rule but need to track the form fields as well through a data element and then into an eVar.
The form code looks something like this on the page:
<div style='display:none'>
<div id="popupform">
<div class="form_container">
<img src="/images/New-Offer-Pop-Up-Without-form_18-Jan-16.jpg" style="width: 100%;">
<form class="offerform" accept-charset="UTF-8" action="/site/sendtohs">
<div class="formrow"><input type="text" name="popup_fullname" class="new-input1 required" placeholder="Name" /></div>
<div class="formrow"><input type="email" name="popup_email" class="new-input1 required" placeholder="Email" /></div>
<div class="formrow"><input type="number" name="popup_phone" class="new-input1 required" placeholder="Mobile"
minlength="10" maxlength="15" /></div>
<input type="hidden" name="popup_url" value="/" /></br>
<p align="right"><input class="tbn newtbn" type="submit" name="submit" value="Submit" /></p>
</form>
</div>
<div class="offerform_success" style="display: none">
<img src="/images/Thank-you-pop-up-new-xyz.jpg" style="height: 440px; width: 100%; position: absolute;width: 99%;">
</div>
</div>
</div>
The even based rule in DTM is :
DTM Rule
The event fires when I click on the Submit button but the rule does not validates if the form fields have been filled or not. Any hints how can I add validation to the form submit event within DTM.
Targeting the form
Firstly, based on your screenshot vs. posted code, your event will not trigger because the form tag does not have an id attribute of "popupform" (or any id attribute at all) (You do have that as an id in a parent div, but that's not what you are targeting). So, you will need to remove that.
If you only want to target the form if it's within a div, then you will need to add it as a Rule Condition. Under Rule Conditions > Criteria, choose "Data > Custom", and click Add Criteria.
In the code box, add the following:
if ($(this).parents('#popupform').length)
return true;
return false;
Note: I'm using jQuery syntax here for brevity and easy cross-browser compatibility. The overall goal is this references the targeted form, and you want to check that it is within an html element with the popupform id. The jQuery above traverses up the form's ancestor chain to look for it. If it finds it, we return true. Otherwise we return false. Ultimately, custom rule conditions should return true if you want it to pass, or false if not. Also note that if you have multiple rule conditions (which you will; see below), all conditions must return true in order for the rule to trigger. If your site does not use jQuery or you do not want to use jQuery for this, then you will need to write your own code following the above concept.
Validating the form fields
Before I get into this, one thing I should note is in general you should not rely on client-side form validation for your forms. It is super easy to disable/get around it. You should be doing form validation with server-side code when the form is submitted, and then pop whatever you need to pop (form complete tracking or w/e) after it has been server-side validated.
Maybe you already have server-side validation in place but for whatever reason you can't control popping a dtm rule after validation, and this is your next best thing. Well hopefully the only thing you are doing is popping tracking and not using the dtm rule for actual site functionality, but even then, just want you to be aware that this is a "lesser evil" solution, not a "good" solution.
Having said that, you can again turn to a custom condition to make sure all the form fields are filled out. Here is a quick and dirty custom rule condition to demonstrate. Again, under Rule Conditions > Criteria, choose "Data > Custom", and click Add Criteria (so you will now have another custom code box). Add the following:
var isFieldsFilled=true;
$.each($(this).serializeArray(),function(i,v) {
if (!v.value||v.value=='')
isFieldsFilled=false;
});
return isFieldsFilled;
This code again uses jQuery to grab the form fields of the targeted form and loops through them and sets a flag to false if one is found not to have a value. Again, this is kind of quick and dirty and will work based on your current form example, but you may need to expand upon it in practice.

JQuery Mobile, find a specific input form on a given page

Here is the answer from another question: jQuery find $.find('selector') versus $('selector') difference
The reason this does not work is because find() lets you filter on a set of elements based on a selection you've already made.For example if you wanted to select all of the inputs within a particular form, you could write:
$('#aParticularForm').find('input')
It cannot be called on its own.
How can I expand this statement to find specific inputs on a page? (Specifically listviews)
Working example: http://jsfiddle.net/Gajotres/93VFG/
Wanted element must have a unique identification, like id or class.
HTML :
<form id="aParticularForm">
<input type="text" value="One" id="input1"/>
<input type="text" value="Two" id="input2"/>
</form>
Javascript :
var input = $('#aParticularForm').find('#input1');
alert(input.val());
You can even go further, because you are working with a jQuery Mobile you can have several pages loaded into the DOM and they can all have identical input fields, so to find elements only in a current active page you would use:
$.mobile.activePage.find('#input1');

Rails will_paginate custom renderer manual page number

Hy
What i want to do is to create a custom renderer for will_paginate which renders first, previous, next and last page and a input field where the user can type in the page number manually. I already have the links for first, last etc. but i stuck at the input field. I could create a form in the view but the input field has to be rendered between the previous and next links.
Does anyone know how to do this?
Thanks for your help
You can do this as a separate form (make sure it is a GET). All you
need is the one input element named page. Something as simple as this
should work (not all browsers may like the #). I dropped it into a
site I'm playing with now and it worked. Put it anywhere on your page.
You might have to make something more complicated if you need to
incorporate search terms.
<form action="#" method="get">
Go to page: <input type="text" name="page" value="" size="2"
maxlength="4" />
<input type="submit" name="btnSubmit" />
</form>

Why doesn't TextBoxFor include validation elements if called twice for the same model property?

Simple question... Here is an example of some razor code:
#Html.TextBoxFor(c => c.RevisedEstimate)
#Html.TextBoxFor(c => c.RevisedEstimate)
Here is how this renders:
<input data-val="true" data-val-number="The field Revised Estimate must be a number." id="RevisedEstimate" name="RevisedEstimate" type="text" value="0" />
<input id="RevisedEstimate" name="RevisedEstimate" type="text" value="0" />
The obvious question you ask is, "Why are you doing that?". The razor view is actually building client side detail-row templates that are used in KendoUI grids. There are two similar grids and we use the same viewmodel server side. We actually do provide the id element for the template so each field in each row ends up with a unique id.
Why does the second input element not have the data-val and data-val-number elements?
Off the top of my head knowing what the JS does in the background, it seems to do this to prevent conflicts. The JS looks for the elements with the data- attributes to do it's validation, along with other functions, so it could possibly pick the wrong one if there are multiple instances of it.
since we were generating HTML for use in a client side template what we did was just create a variable to hold the HTML generated by the helper, and then render out that code in the Views..
Something like:
#{
var revisedEstimateInput = Html.TextBoxFor(c => c.RevisedEstimate)
}
Then later in the view:
#(revisedEstimateInput)
...in as many places as needed. This way the validation and other metadata attributes were in place in our client templates and all the kenodUI validation worked correctly.

Double CheckBox Creation mistake?

I have a foreach wich populates a table and one field of the line tables is:
<% foreach (var item in Model.List){%>
<td align="center">
<%: Html.CheckBox(item.ID.ToString(),item.isChecked)%>
</td>
<%}%>
Inside my post function I was trying to get the Request.Form["45"]( 45 is a sample ID) and saw that the value "true,false" was being recieved.
Taking a look into the Code generated, I just saw that:
<input name="45" type="checkbox" value="true" /><input name="45" type="hidden" value="false" />
How its possible since Im just asking to generate one input? I dont know too if Html.CheckBoxForis better to use in this case
Thanks !
You can read the explanation here
the same approach that both Ruby on Rails and MonoRail use.
When you submit a form with a checkbox, the value is only posted if
the checkbox is checked. So, if you leave the checkbox unchecked then
nothing will be sent to the server when in many situations you would
want false to be sent instead. As the hidden input has the same name
as the checkbox, then if the checkbox is unchecked you'll still get a
'false' sent to the server. When the checkbox is checked, the
ModelBinder will automatically take care of extracting the 'true' from
the 'true,false'
Why don't you use model so that model take care of it. Using request object is not recommended in asp.net-mvc You may also use formcollection parameter in your actionresult and handle this scenario using this approach.
You may always use html tags if helpers don't fit in your requirement.

Resources