Adobe DTM: Event based rule to track form submission - adobe-analytics

I am trying to track form submission for a form using event based rule in DTM. I know that the ideal way to do it is to do via direct call rule but need to track the form fields as well through a data element and then into an eVar.
The form code looks something like this on the page:
<div style='display:none'>
<div id="popupform">
<div class="form_container">
<img src="/images/New-Offer-Pop-Up-Without-form_18-Jan-16.jpg" style="width: 100%;">
<form class="offerform" accept-charset="UTF-8" action="/site/sendtohs">
<div class="formrow"><input type="text" name="popup_fullname" class="new-input1 required" placeholder="Name" /></div>
<div class="formrow"><input type="email" name="popup_email" class="new-input1 required" placeholder="Email" /></div>
<div class="formrow"><input type="number" name="popup_phone" class="new-input1 required" placeholder="Mobile"
minlength="10" maxlength="15" /></div>
<input type="hidden" name="popup_url" value="/" /></br>
<p align="right"><input class="tbn newtbn" type="submit" name="submit" value="Submit" /></p>
</form>
</div>
<div class="offerform_success" style="display: none">
<img src="/images/Thank-you-pop-up-new-xyz.jpg" style="height: 440px; width: 100%; position: absolute;width: 99%;">
</div>
</div>
</div>
The even based rule in DTM is :
DTM Rule
The event fires when I click on the Submit button but the rule does not validates if the form fields have been filled or not. Any hints how can I add validation to the form submit event within DTM.

Targeting the form
Firstly, based on your screenshot vs. posted code, your event will not trigger because the form tag does not have an id attribute of "popupform" (or any id attribute at all) (You do have that as an id in a parent div, but that's not what you are targeting). So, you will need to remove that.
If you only want to target the form if it's within a div, then you will need to add it as a Rule Condition. Under Rule Conditions > Criteria, choose "Data > Custom", and click Add Criteria.
In the code box, add the following:
if ($(this).parents('#popupform').length)
return true;
return false;
Note: I'm using jQuery syntax here for brevity and easy cross-browser compatibility. The overall goal is this references the targeted form, and you want to check that it is within an html element with the popupform id. The jQuery above traverses up the form's ancestor chain to look for it. If it finds it, we return true. Otherwise we return false. Ultimately, custom rule conditions should return true if you want it to pass, or false if not. Also note that if you have multiple rule conditions (which you will; see below), all conditions must return true in order for the rule to trigger. If your site does not use jQuery or you do not want to use jQuery for this, then you will need to write your own code following the above concept.
Validating the form fields
Before I get into this, one thing I should note is in general you should not rely on client-side form validation for your forms. It is super easy to disable/get around it. You should be doing form validation with server-side code when the form is submitted, and then pop whatever you need to pop (form complete tracking or w/e) after it has been server-side validated.
Maybe you already have server-side validation in place but for whatever reason you can't control popping a dtm rule after validation, and this is your next best thing. Well hopefully the only thing you are doing is popping tracking and not using the dtm rule for actual site functionality, but even then, just want you to be aware that this is a "lesser evil" solution, not a "good" solution.
Having said that, you can again turn to a custom condition to make sure all the form fields are filled out. Here is a quick and dirty custom rule condition to demonstrate. Again, under Rule Conditions > Criteria, choose "Data > Custom", and click Add Criteria (so you will now have another custom code box). Add the following:
var isFieldsFilled=true;
$.each($(this).serializeArray(),function(i,v) {
if (!v.value||v.value=='')
isFieldsFilled=false;
});
return isFieldsFilled;
This code again uses jQuery to grab the form fields of the targeted form and loops through them and sets a flag to false if one is found not to have a value. Again, this is kind of quick and dirty and will work based on your current form example, but you may need to expand upon it in practice.

Related

Capybara unable to select radio button in data tables

I have a bit of an issue, im trying to select a radio button in a data-tables data. Im able to filter the single data-tables row down to one so it's the only one appearing on the page...but i've tried page.choose, page.find(<xpath>), page.find(<css>), i've also tried doing all the previous within a certain css selection and I can't quite figure out what's left to try.
The relevant HTML is here, unfortunately as this is a work item I can't post everything. however I AM able to click on the label if I specify the id via:
find(:xpath, "//label[#for='approve_row_5']").click however this doesn't actually seem to 'select' the radio button. I've also tried doing a wait after I filter the data-table results
anyways, here is the HTML for the 2 radio buttons after the row has been filtered (the radio buttons reside in a column)
<td class=" align-middle">
<div class="radio">
<input type="radio" name="approve_deny_row_5" id="approve_deny_row_5_approve" value="person_approve" data-ui-verify-key="test_approve" data-ui-verify-title="2017-07-13 14:59:46 -0400">
<label for="approve_deny_row_5_approve">
<span>Approve</span>
</label>
</div>
<div class="radio">
<input type="radio" name="approve_deny_row_5" id="approve_deny_row_5_deny" value="person_deny" data-ui-verify-key="test_deny" data-ui-verify-title="2017-07-13 14:59:46 -0400" data-ui-verify-url="/irrelevant/stuff">
<label for="approve_deny_row_5_deny">
<span>Deny</span>
</label>
</div>
</td>
I thought about just finding the span by the text and clicking it, which passes....but doesn't actually select the radio button. Also I tried searching by the specific value selector as well via a find('input[value="test_approve"]').click but that had no luck either
Any ideas?
Assuming the actual radio inputs are visible on the page (and not hidden to allow for styling) the methods that should work for this are
choose("Approve")
choose("Deny")
or
choose("approve_deny_row_5_approve")
choose("approve_deny_row_5_deny")
If those tell you they can't find the elements then it's most likely the input elements are actually hidden (for styling reasons) and you should be able to use the
choose('Approve', allow_label_click: true)
which will click on the label element associated with the input rather than the input element. That should produce the same result (setting the radio button) unless the behavior you're looking for is based on JS looking for a click on a very specific element (rather than the change event on the input). If that happens to be the case then you need to figure out exactly what element the JS is looking for clicks on, or fix the JS to behave in a more intuitive manner.

Is ASP.NET MVC's Checkbox Implementation Accessible / Screen Reader-Friendly?

If you've ever looked at what ASP.NET MVC actually renders when you use #Html.CheckBoxFor, then you've seen that each checkbox you request to be rendered actually results in the emission of not one but two input tags. One is the "true" value checkbox, and the other is for "false." The latter input is of type "hidden".
Generally this doesn't cause problems if you're using ASP.NET MVC correctly. You wouldn't notice the input doubling unless you tried to, for example, do something directly with Request.Form(e.g. Why does ASP.NET MVC Html.CheckBox output two INPUTs with the same name?)
My question, though, is how screen readers deal with this. For example, can they be relied upon to correctly report only the visible checkbox to the site user?
Screen readers will ignore hidden inputs.
Given the example you cite in your comment, it returns this code:
<div class="col pure-u-xl-1-3 pure-u-lg-1-3 pure-u-md-1 pure-u-sm-1 pure-u-xs-1">
<label>Home Club Newsletter</label>
<input checked="checked" … id="newsletter" name="JoinHomeClub" type="checkbox" value="true">
<input name="JoinHomeClub" type="hidden" value="false">
<span class="checkbox-label">Yes, please sign me Up!</span>
</div>
Right off the bat there is a problem here because the <label> is not associated with the control, and the visible text that is next to the checkbox is not associated with the field.
When I access the field in NVDA, all it says is "checkbox checked". There is no accessible name at all.
But to your question…
Your question was related to the <input type="hidden">. As #SLaks said, screen readers ignore <input type="hidden">. The fact that they have the same name value is no problem. If they had the same id value, then you would have a problem (how it would manifest in a screen reader depends on things and stuff).

JQuery Mobile, find a specific input form on a given page

Here is the answer from another question: jQuery find $.find('selector') versus $('selector') difference
The reason this does not work is because find() lets you filter on a set of elements based on a selection you've already made.For example if you wanted to select all of the inputs within a particular form, you could write:
$('#aParticularForm').find('input')
It cannot be called on its own.
How can I expand this statement to find specific inputs on a page? (Specifically listviews)
Working example: http://jsfiddle.net/Gajotres/93VFG/
Wanted element must have a unique identification, like id or class.
HTML :
<form id="aParticularForm">
<input type="text" value="One" id="input1"/>
<input type="text" value="Two" id="input2"/>
</form>
Javascript :
var input = $('#aParticularForm').find('#input1');
alert(input.val());
You can even go further, because you are working with a jQuery Mobile you can have several pages loaded into the DOM and they can all have identical input fields, so to find elements only in a current active page you would use:
$.mobile.activePage.find('#input1');

Rails will_paginate custom renderer manual page number

Hy
What i want to do is to create a custom renderer for will_paginate which renders first, previous, next and last page and a input field where the user can type in the page number manually. I already have the links for first, last etc. but i stuck at the input field. I could create a form in the view but the input field has to be rendered between the previous and next links.
Does anyone know how to do this?
Thanks for your help
You can do this as a separate form (make sure it is a GET). All you
need is the one input element named page. Something as simple as this
should work (not all browsers may like the #). I dropped it into a
site I'm playing with now and it worked. Put it anywhere on your page.
You might have to make something more complicated if you need to
incorporate search terms.
<form action="#" method="get">
Go to page: <input type="text" name="page" value="" size="2"
maxlength="4" />
<input type="submit" name="btnSubmit" />
</form>

How do I change the records being displayed on the page with buttons on the page (RoR)

I have a rails app that shows statistics based on an employee's daily production. currently my page shows ALL records.
I know how to show various different combinations such as records made between two dates etc... but what I really would like to do is make it so that single page (say the index page) has 3 controls that allow for it to switch between daily statistic records, weekly statistic records and a custom date constraint of statistic records (such as from date xx/xx/2009 to date xx/xx/2010). I have been searching for a while to attempt to figure this out but I am obviously missing something as I cannot find anyone else who has run into the same issues.
If this is too difficult to do this way, the other - mostly easy way I can see to do this is to create a page for each view, however it still leaves a question on how I set up the control to choose the custom date constraints.
I aplogise in advance for my newbyness but if someone could explain this to me, I think it is going to really increase my understanding of rails. Thanks in advance
Your control can easily append some information to the query string. Like this form does:
<form action="" method="get">
<fieldset>
<button type="submit" name="show" value="daily">Daily stats</button>
<button type="submit" name="show" value="weekly">Weekly stats</button>
</fieldset>
<fieldset>
From <input type="text" name="interval-start" value="" /> till
<input type="text" name="interval-end" value="" />
<button type="submit" name="show" value="interval">Stats for the specified interval</button>
</fieldset>
</form>
When user clicks on some button, browser sends all form fields to the server-side. On the server-side, in your action, you can check for the show property of the params array. Like this:
#reports = case params["show"]
when "daily"
#Just an example. Use ActiveRecord's query interface or Arel in Rails 3, not plain queries
Report.find_by_sql "SELECT * FROM reports WHERE DATE(report_date) = DATE(NOW())"
when "weekly"
Report.find_by_sql "SELECT * FROM reports WHERE WEEK(report_date) = WEEK(NOW())"
when "interval"
Report.find_by_sql "..."
else
#Some other possible values, filters, so on
end
And in your view just output the #report variable as usual.
You could also create a new route for that filtering, maybe /reports/:name, and avoid using forms. In this case, you only create some links that point to the right filter (/reports/daily, /reports/weekly, etc). On the server-side you need to check reports[:name] for the appropriate value.

Resources