I have been working on an app in Xcode (not submitted to the App Store or anything like that) that has a lot of very important data whose loss is insurmountable. The app has recently started crashing on startup; therefore, I have tried to update the code to Swift2 so that it works.
After having Xcode automatically update this app to the new version of Swift, I have been having a major issue: When I re-download the app using a cable plugged into the iMac and the iDevice, the new version of the app does not replace the old one––it adds another app to the device. Why would this be happening, and, more importantly, is there any way to fix that?
The point of this is to retrieve the data which was saved in UserDefaults to the previous version of the app. Hence, I'll do pretty much anything to get that data back.
It is absolutely imperative that I retrieve the data stored in UserDefaults; the data is not stored anywhere else.
You are correct that the key is the bundle ID. We have a main bundle ID for production and a second target with a different ID for testing. Pretty convenient to have different versions of the app on the same device.
The second thing you can check is that the version number in the new project is greater than the version on the original project.
To see what apps and versions are installed on your phone, go to Devices (Shift-Command-2). Select your phone from the list on the left and the manually installed apps will be listed near the bottom. Sometimes this gets covered by the Console messages so you might need to scroll down.
Here's what the Device Manager looks like--I deleted my console logs...
Here is the Installed Apps view. It is behind the console logs so you need to scroll down in the top area...
Related
Before Swift 2.2 the UUID value was the same every time I opened the app, now changes at every opening
I use this code:
UIDevice.currentDevice().identifierForVendor!.UUIDString
How can I do now to identify the user?
Every time you delete the app, the UUID may change.
If you just close and open the app, it's should be the same.
But if you delete the app (or install it again via xcode), it might change.
There are a couple of answers that explain why the UUID is resetting. There's one that offers a potential work around, but I'd consider it far from ideal. But I want to highlight something important about the way UUID's work that serves as a great workaround that has absolutely zero impact on the production OR debug version of your code base or compiled binary.
The value in this property remains the same while the app (or another app from the same vendor) is installed on the iOS device. The value changes when the user deletes all of that vendor’s apps from the device and subsequently reinstalls one or more of them.
All you have to do to prevent this value from changing while developing App-A is to simply install App-B from the same vendor (yourself) and keep it installed during the life time of App-A's development. This is literally as simple as starting a blank new iOS project and install the blank slate to your test device (using the same developer account & such), and then never uninstall it again during development.
App-B keeps a constant UUID for the vendor (yourself) so no matter how many times you delete and reinstall App-A, it will always keep the same UUID.
This actually seems to be a bug IMO. Everytime I run my app in the simulator it generates a new Vendor ID. You can probably get round it by storing the ID into NSUserDefaults on the first bootup then retrieving / comparing the value from NSUserDefaults instead of getting it from identifierForVendor. This will save a static vendor id in defaults but in theory the vendor id will still be changing every boot up.
Kind Regards,
Krivvenz.
Update: I can confirm I have installed multiple apps on the same simulator too but the vendor ID is still changing on every boot.
Update 2: - I have logged this as a bug with Apple - 26195931.
The value of this property is the same for apps that come from the
same vendor running on the same device. A different value is returned
for apps on the same device that come from different vendors, and for
apps on different devices regardless of vendor.
The value in this property remains the same while the app (or another
app from the same vendor) is installed on the iOS device. The value
changes when the user deletes all of that vendor’s apps from the
device and subsequently reinstalls one or more of them. The value can
also change when installing test builds using Xcode or when installing
an app on a device using ad-hoc distribution. Therefore, if your app
stores the value of this property anywhere, you should gracefully
handle situations where the identifier changes.
Refer this link for more info.
I have hundreds of people using my app, but a handful are reporting that the app does not make it past the black launch screen (it immediately closes, before entering into my app). I'm using Crittercism but it's not even getting far enough to catch any exception, which makes it sound like a springboard / backboard problem.
Here's what I've asked the users to do:
Reinstall the app
Delete some apps (to free some space)
Restart the device
None of the above worked. I'm completely at a loss as to what's wrong. The app is in the AppStore and works fine for most users. Furthermore, I can't find anything unique about these users (they're using recent versions of iOS with fairly modern hardware).
Crittercism doesn't show anything, because after the crash - log will be send only at the next launch, so if user doesn't open your app anymore (or can't do it, because he has constant crash).
I advice your to try next ideas:
Do use use keychain or store smth there? It's not cleared after uninstall
Maybe your data is backed up in icloud
Did it begin with the new iOs version (9.0 for example)
Maybe it's some cache problem after installing one version on another,
Can it be the problem of different timezones
Can it be a crash with local settings
If you have feedback with users with crash - contact them and ask about device, iOs version and other
your have crash sections in your itunesconnect profile, maybe there you'll get some information
One user has a problem with one of my apps after the latest upgrade. She says the app will not open. It sounds like she sees the Default launch screen for a second and then it disappears i.e. it crashes when trying to run app code.
Also, she says when she double taps the Home button to see the apps currently running, she sees my app, with the "normal" type of screen i.e. a table with a few entries (which was created with the version prior to the upgrade).
She has tried powering off and on.
Can anyone offer any suggestions on what might be happening. No other user has reported the same problem.
It may be that she could remove the app and reinstall, but then she would lose all of her data which would be bad. Is there any way of reinstalling without removing from the iPhone?
EDIT: I just got a little more information from the user. As I said before, after the crash, when she presses the Home button twice to see running apps, she sees my app, with a few entries in the opening screen table. What is interesting, for the upgrade, I changed the order of the entries. I also added a tool bar with 2 buttons. She sent me a screen shot and what she is getting is the screen you would expect when running the old version i.e. the table ordered in the old way, and no toolbar. I don't know if this just means my app started to run and crashed before reordering the table and adding the toolbar, or if the installation got corrupted so she is not really running the new application properly. Does that sound feasible? Would there be any way to reinstall the app without removing it (and its data) first?
Are you using CoreData? If you are, and you made changes to the manage model without properly migrating, you may have caused your app to crash.
Look here for more information:
https://developer.apple.com/library/ios/documentation/Cocoa/Conceptual/CoreDataVersioning/Articles/Introduction.html
I have a development distribution of an app out on a couple of devices.
Turns out my export functionality causes a memory leak - meaning I can't get that screen to open without reinstalling the distribution of the app.
Is that data totally lost? I'd really like to be able to save it.
Some ideas:
Write a second helper app that could grab the data
Write some sort of shell script that could retrieve the data plugged into a comptuer
Plug in the devices to a computer... do something in Xcode... no lost data?
Is there any hope?
UPDATE
There was hope!
First - Your data is accessible via Organizer in XCode.
Second - New versions in iTunes do not overwrite core data. BUT you're going to want to make sure the version # increases as iTunes was somewhat finicky about sending over the new version. Your testers might be tempted to delete the app - replacing it in iTunes and re-syncing is all they need to do.
If you update the app without deleting it first, the data is not removed by the OS. So the new version of your app has the opportunity to read the old data.
We need to test our app in the context of an iOS upgrade (e.g., 5.1 -> 6.0). Unfortunately, Apple doesn't allow downgrading devices. We thought of doing it in the simulator, but different versions of the simulator are different environments in themselves. I think we can copy the bundle from one simulator to the other, but that won't migrate the keychain (will it?).
Thanks!
To test a transition from one state (before) to another (after), you need a way to put the app in the before state.
Your app surely won't be running while the OS is being updated, so you really only need to worry about the app starting up and discovering that the OS has been updated. There are a couple options:
Copy all your app's data files from a device running the "old" iOS version (5.1 according to your question) to a device running the new (6.0) version. The organizer in Xcode will let you easily copy your app's "container" from a device to your Mac or vice versa.
Make your app write it's data in the "old" format. It's not uncommon for an app to have methods for reading and writing data in different formats depending on the environment, so it's often easier to get your app to write data out in the old format than to actually copy from an old device.
Whichever path you choose, think about any other places (like user defaults) where you might made OS version-dependent changes and set those back to values that correspond to the previous OS. This applies especially to keychain items, which aren't stored in your app's sandbox.
Unit testing frameworks (like Apple's XCTest framework) generally have a setup mechanism that you could use to reset your app to the before state, including copying files, adding and removing keychain items, setting defaults items, etc. You can then add unit tests that run whatever code might be involved in an update and test the results. With a set of easily repeatable tests you'll be able to debug any problems more easily.
However you approach it, the goal is to put the app in the same state that it would be in if it were running for the first time after an OS update occurred. You don't have to worry about simulating the actual OS update, you only need to trick the app into thinking that the update has just happened.
For now, you can still install iOS 8.2. When a new version is released, Apple leaves both versions open for installation for a short time. While that "signing window" is open you can upgrade a device, test, and then restore it from an image of the older version. So you could do some intensive testing while the window is open, but obviously that's not a long-term solution (it typically lasts only a few days).
If you have the budget for it, you could install 8.2 on a device, put a big sticker on it saying "do not upgrade", and keep it on 8.2 for as long as it's relevant. Install your app on that device and take a backup (with backup encryption enabled so that keychain entries will be included), then restore that backup to another device that's on 8.3 - this is basically the same procedure you'll go through when doing an upgrade/restore through iTunes so it should be pretty close. It won't be exactly the same as an OTA update on-device of course, but for that, see option 1 above (and see it soon).