I am working on Topic Modeling where the given text corpus have lots of noise in form of supporting words after removal of stop words. These words have high term frequency but does not help in forming topic terms by using LDA along with other words with high frequency that are useful . How can this noise be removed?
LDA algorithms don't take tf-idf weights in input, but bag of words, however you could first filter words from your corpus based on their tf-idf score, and then feed the new texts to your LDA program.
Basic thing is that you do a TF-IDF and clean on scores, if that still doesnt help then you can create domain specific custom stopwords list. Suppose if I'm in a jobs domain, the word "job" is not a regular stopword but in jobs domain it is or the company name is a stopword since it repeats across many documents. So, building custom stopwords list is another way to go with.
Related
I have been searching and attempting to implement a word embedding model to predict similarity between words. I have a dataset made up 3,550 company names, the idea is that the user can provide a new word (which would not be in the vocabulary) and calculate the similarity between the new name and existing ones.
During preprocessing I got rid of stop words and punctuation (hyphens, dots, commas, etc). In addition, I applied stemming and separated prefixes with the hope to get more precision. Then words such as BIOCHEMICAL ended up as BIO CHEMIC which is the word divided in two (prefix and stem word)
The average company name length is made up 3 words with the following frequency:
The tokens that are the result of preprocessing are sent to word2vec:
#window: Maximum distance between the current and predicted word within a sentence
#min_count: Ignores all words with total frequency lower than this.
#workers: Use these many worker threads to train the model
#sg: The training algorithm, either CBOW(0) or skip gram(1). Default is 0s
word2vec_model = Word2Vec(prepWords,size=300, window=2, min_count=1, workers=7, sg=1)
After the model included all the words in the vocab , the average sentence vector is calculated for each company name:
df['avg_vector']=df2.apply(lambda row : avg_sentence_vector(row, model=word2vec_model, num_features=300, index2word_set=set(word2vec_model.wv.index2word)).tolist())
Then, the vector is saved for further lookups:
##Saving name and vector values in file
df.to_csv('name-submission-vectors.csv',encoding='utf-8', index=False)
If a new company name is not included in the vocab after preprocessing (removing stop words and punctuation), then I proceed to create the model again and calculate the average sentence vector and save it again.
I have found this model is not working as expected. As an example, calculating the most similar words pet is getting the following results:
ms=word2vec_model.most_similar('pet')
('fastfood', 0.20879755914211273)
('hammer', 0.20450574159622192)
('allur', 0.20118337869644165)
('wright', 0.20001833140850067)
('daili', 0.1990675926208496)
('mgt', 0.1908089816570282)
('mcintosh', 0.18571510910987854)
('autopart', 0.1729743778705597)
('metamorphosi', 0.16965581476688385)
('doak', 0.16890916228294373)
In the dataset, I have words such as paws or petcare, but other words are creating relationships with pet word.
This is the distribution of the nearer words for pet:
On the other hand, when I used the GoogleNews-vectors-negative300.bin.gz, I could not add new words to the vocab, but the similarity between pet and words around was as expected:
ms=word2vec_model.most_similar('pet')
('pets', 0.771199643611908)
('Pet', 0.723974347114563)
('dog', 0.7164785265922546)
('puppy', 0.6972636580467224)
('cat', 0.6891531348228455)
('cats', 0.6719794869422913)
('pooch', 0.6579219102859497)
('Pets', 0.636363685131073)
('animal', 0.6338439583778381)
('dogs', 0.6224827170372009)
This is the distribution of the nearest words:
I would like to get your advice about the following:
Is this dataset appropriate to proceed with this model?
Is the length of the dataset enough to allow word2vec "learn" the relationships between the words?
What can I do to improve the model to make word2vec create relationships of the same type as GoogleNews where for instance word pet is correctly set among similar words?
Is it feasible to implement another alternative such as fasttext considering the nature of the current dataset?
Do you know any public dataset that can be used along with the current dataset to create those relationships?
Thanks
3500 texts (company names) of just ~3 words each is only around 10k total training words, with a much smaller vocabulary of unique words.
That's very, very small for word2vec & related algorithms, which rely on lots of data, and sufficiently-varied data, to train-up useful vector arrangements.
You may be able to squeeze some meaningful training from limited data by using far more training epochs than the default epochs=5, and far smaller vectors than the default size=100. With those sorts of adjustments, you may start to see more meaningful most_similar() results.
But, it's unclear that word2vec, and specifically word2vec in your averaging-of-a-name's-words comparisons, is matched to your end goals.
Word2vec needs lots of data, doesn't look at subword units, and can't say anything about word-tokens not seen during training. An average-of-many-word-vectors can often work as an easy baseline for comparing multiword texts, but might also dilute some word's influence compared to other methods.
Things to consider might include:
Word2vec-related algorithms like FastText that also learn vectors for subword units, and can thus bootstrap not-so-bad guess vectors for words not seen in training. (But, these are also data hungry, and to use on a small dataset you'd again want to reduce vector size, increase epochs, and additionally shrink the number of buckets used for subword learning.)
More sophisticated comparisons of multi-word texts, like "Word Mover's Distance". (That can be quite expensive on longer texts, but for names/titles of just a few words may be practical.)
Finding more data that's compatible with your aims for a stronger model. A larger database of company names might help. If you just want your analysis to understand English words/roots, more generic training texts might work too.
For many purposes, a mere lexicographic comparison - edit distances, count of shared character-n-grams – may be helpful too, though it won't detect all synonyms/semantically-similar words.
Word2vec does not generalize to unseen words.
It does not even work well for wards that are seen but rare. It really depends on having many many examples of word usage. Furthermore a you need enough context left and right, but you only use company names - these are too short. That is likely why your embeddings perform so poorly: too little data and too short texts.
Hence, it is the wrong approach for you. Retraining the model with the new company name is not enough - you still only have one data point. You may as well leave out unseen words, word2vec cannot work better than that even if you retrain.
If you only want to compute similarity between words, probably you don't need to insert new words in your vocabulary.
By eye, I think you can also use FastText without the need to stem the words. It also computes vectors for unknown words.
From FastText FAQ:
One of the key features of fastText word representation is its ability
to produce vectors for any words, even made-up ones. Indeed, fastText
word vectors are built from vectors of substrings of characters
contained in it. This allows to build vectors even for misspelled
words or concatenation of words.
FastText seems to be useful for your purpose.
For your task, you can follow FastText supervised tutorial.
If your corpus proves to be too small, you can build your model starting from availaible pretrained vectors (pretrainedVectors parameter).
I have lyrics from srt subtitle files. If I want to match them to stanzas from another lyrics website, what is the best approach to this?
My approach has been taking tf-idf vector each lyric line and trying to fuzzy match to the staza, using starting and end time of the lyric line as a clue to whether the line might belong to the previous stanzas, next stanzas, or belong to a stanzas of it's own.
I've also tried dynamic programming, but with less success. Due to the high variance in the structure of the lyrics and the stanza, sometimes the results come out completely shifted or messed up, especially if there are repeated chorus.
If there is a Recurrent Neural Networks or other Machine Learning algorithm, is there an existing approach to such problem?
I suggest using Doc2Vec or Word2Vec methods, basically you train a NN with some corpus, the NN will generate a vector for each word/document, those vectors will have similarity based on the similarty of words in the real world (corpus)
so vector of love and care will be very similar, those vectors hold some other cool properties like if yo subtract or add them you can get a word that posses some meaning of the substation or addition induce
once you will get the vector of words or docs you can check similarity between vectors with various methods, commonly used is the cosine similarity
this method mixed with tf-idf to generate weights for best results
usage is very easy, for example
from gensim.models import Word2Vec
from nltk.corpus import brown
b = Word2Vec(brown.sents())
print b.most_similar('money', topn=5)
output
[(u'care', 0.9145717024803162), (u'chance', 0.9034961462020874), (u'job', 0.8980690240859985), (u'trouble', 0.8751360774040222), (u'everything', 0.873866856098175)]
I suggest to take a look at gensim
I am trying to build my own corpus for particular categories such as Engineering, Business, Math, Science and etc... This will be for automatic web page categorization. Let's say I manually collect 100 websites that are related to Math. Can these 100 websites be considered a corpus for Math?
Another related question. How does this differentiate from a lexicon wherein instead of a list of websites it shows a list of words with weights such as 0 or 1 to particular categories? Example would be a sentiment lexicon with words that has weights for positive and negative. But instead of positive and negative, categories such as Math, Science are used.
You say you want to make some web page categorization, then the problem you're facing is a supervised learning problem. The data you get are web pages, so I guess you actually extract their content as text. You work with textual input data. Since you want to categorize them, each of your input data has one or more corresponding labels, which are the outputs you want to predict. You have multiple label so you want to do multi-label classification
To tackle this problem, since most machine learning algorithms work with numerical vector, you need to transform your corpus of texts into vectors (or into one matrix). To do so, you can use the bag of word technique which first build a dictionary or lexicon and then count the occurrences of each word of the dictionary in each text. Actually, you can transform your output label in the same way, attributing an index of you output vector for each category.
The final pipeline would be something like this:
[input_text] --bag_of_word--> [input_vector] --prediction--> [output_vector] --label_matchnig--> [labels]
I'm looking for library whatever it's machine learning or something else it doesn't matter which will help me categorize the content I have. Basically content I have is articles written and I wanna know which of them are politics or sport bla bla so I have categorize them.
I was trying openNLP but cannot get it working as I need, is there anything else that will solve my need?
I guess I need some kind of Machine learning with natural language processing NLP but I can't find something that will do my job at this point.
This is a Naive implementation, but you could improvise it further. For classifying a paragraph under a category, first try to extract the unique words of the training data of a particular topic.
For example: Use NLTK to extract the unique words from the collection of paragraphs that talks about Sports and store it in a set. And then similarly do it for the other topics and store them in sets. Now subtract the common words in sets, so that you can now find the particular unique words that might represent a particular topic.
So, now when you input a paragraph it should give you the one-hot output.
Now Combine all the unique words of the list.
Now when you are analyzing a paragraph and if you find those words, just put them as 1.
Like, after analysing your first paragraph, you might get the result as,
[ 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, .... 1, 0, 0] -> Hereby this denotes that the unique words in the position 3 is found and etc.
So your training data will be this as input and output as one-hot encoded.
ie, if you have three categories, and if your first paragraph belongs to 1st topic, then outcome will be like [1,0,0].
Collect many inputs and outcomes to train and then test it with new inputs. You will get the higher probability on the topic it fits.
You can train it with basic neural network and a normal softmax loss function. This might take you just an hour to do.
All the best.
I would suggest two method and it depends on your data :
First if you know already how many classes you are going to have in your textual data, e.g. sports vs politics vs science. In this case you can use a supervised learning algorithm (SVM, MLP,LR ..).
In the second case where you don't know how many classes you will encounter in your data, it's best to use unsupervised learning algorithm LDA or LSI which will cluster documents with similar topics and you will only have to examine by hand some document from each cluster and assign a label to it.
As for you data representation you can use SKlearn or SPARK countvectorizer to create BoW (Bag of Word) vectors to feed to your learning algorithm.
I will just add that it's best (memory efficient and faster) to use scipy sparse vectors if you have a big vocabulary.
I am trying to do document classification. But I am really confused between feature selections and tf-idf. Are they the same or two different ways of doing classification?
Hope somebody can tell me? I am not really sure that my question will make sense to you guys.
Yes, you are confusion a lot of things.
Feature selection is the abstract term for choosing features (0 or 1). Stopword removal can be seen as feature selection.
TF is one method of extracting features from text: counting words.
IDF is one method of assigning weights to features.
Neither of them is classification... they are popular for text classification, but they are even more popular for information retrieval, which is not classification...
However, many classifiers work on numeric data, so the common process is to 1. Extract features (e.g.: TF) 2. Select features (e.g. remove stopwords) 3. Weight features (e.g. IDF) 4. Train a classifier on the resulting numerical vectors. 5. Predict the classes of new/unlabeled documents.
Taking a look at this explanation may help a lot when it comes to understanding text classifiers.
TF-IDF is a good way to find a document that answers a given query, but it does not necessarily assigns documents with classes.
Examples that may be helpful:
1) You have a bunch of documents with subjects ranging from politics, economics, computer science and the arts. The documents belonging to each subject are separated into the appropriate directories for each subject (you have a labeled dataset). Now, you received a new document whose subject you do not know. In which directory should it be stored? A classifier can answer this question from the documents that are already labeled.
2) Now, you received a query regarding computer science. For instance, you received the query "Good methods for finding textual similarity". Which document in the directory of computer science can provide the best response to that query? TF-IDF would be a good approach to figure that out.
So, when you are classifying documents, you are trying to make a decision about whether a document is a member of a particular class (like, say, 'about birds' or 'not about birds').
Classifiers predict the value of the class given a set of features. A good set of features will be highly discriminative - they will tell you a lot about whether the document is of one class or another.
Tf-idf (term frequency inverse document frequency) is a particular feature that seems to be discriminative for document classification tasks. There are others, like word counts (tf or term frequency) or whether a regexp matches the text or what have you.
Feature selection is the task of selecting good (discriminative) features. Tfidf is probably a good feature to select.