It happens to me that most of the builds are compiled correctly, but from time to time the same error appears (without changing any .travis.yml parameter)
The error is:
The command "sudo easy_install cpp-coveralls" failed and exited with 1 during .
Now my build got stucked on it when the previous builds have successfully passed this step without problems.
This is the failing build: https://travis-ci.org/pubnative/pubnative-ios-library/builds/49482893
This is the repo: https://travis-ci.org/pubnative/pubnative-ios-library/
Why is it so randomly failing?
try pip install cpp-coveralls --user `whoami`
edit:
pip install cpp-coveralls is the way to install package on python (instead of easy_install)
--user `whoami` is to install it without sudo, in a Travis container (like OP is doing)
Just went through this yesterday. I've attached a simplified version of the .travis.yml file I use for my project.
before_install:
- pip install --user cpp-coveralls
after_success:
- '$([ "$TRAVIS_OS_NAME" == "osx" ] && echo ~/Library/Python/2.7 || echo ~/.local)/bin/cpp-coveralls --gcov-options "\-lp"'
pip install cpp-coveralls --user
is indeed the correct way to do it, but where it ends up required a bit (a lot?) of research. The answer was simple, but incredibly un-documented.
Related
I have managed to install github cli in container but I am unable to run it as a random user (open shift does runs containers as random user due to security)
What directories should I create/chmod/chown beforehand to make it work?
THANK YOU!
docker file:
RUN wget https://github.com/cli/cli/releases/download/v1.0.0/gh_1.0.0_linux_amd64.deb
RUN dpkg -i gh_*_linux_amd64.deb
RUN chmod g+rwx -R /usr/local/bin/gh # <- not enough
RUN gh version
container log:
...
Step 7/28 : RUN gh version
---> Running in 09d1ffbfcc02
Welcome to GitHub CLI!
To authenticate, please run `gh auth login`.
You can also set the GITHUB_TOKEN environment variable, if preferred.
The command '/bin/sh -c gh version' returned a non-zero code: 4
`/` is not writable.
...
there is a bug in the docs, it is
gh --version
not
gh version
also RUN chmod g+rwx -R /usr/local/bin/ before mentioned command helps.
I seem to be missing some very basic utilities, namely the commands sudo and which seem to be missing. How can I install these, or even better is there an ami linux image which has all of these kind of things pre-installed.
Dockerfile:
FROM amazonlinux:2.0.20190823.1-with-sources
RUN echo $(which sudo)
Error:
/bin/sh: which: command not found
Or if I just try to use something like sudo yum
/bin/sh: sudo: command not found
Since it seems relevant, I also don't seem to have root permissions as trying to use the adduser command gives me a non zero response code of 2.
RUN yum update && yum install -y sudo, sudo is not installed in that image by default. you are already root in that images so you do not need sudo yum.
the idea from not installing too many packages by default ,is to let the image as small as possible and let the user install just what he needs
I am trying to set up a Docker image (my Dockerfile is available here, sorry for the french README: https://framagit.org/Gwendal/firefox-icedtea-docker) with an old version of Firefox and an old version of Java to run an old Java applet to start a VPN. My image does work and successfully allows me to start the Java applet in Firefox.
Unfortunately, the said applet then tries to run the following command in the container (I've simply removed the --config part from the command as it does not matter here):
INFO: launching '/usr/bin/pkexec sh -c /usr/sbin/openvpn --config ...'
Then the applet exits silently with an error. While investigating, I've tried running a command with pkexec with the same Docker image, and it gives me this result:
$ sudo docker-compose run firefox pkexec /firefox/firefox-sdk/bin/firefox-bin -new-instance
**
ERROR:pkexec.c:719:main: assertion failed: (polkit_unix_process_get_start_time (POLKIT_UNIX_PROCESS (subject)) > 0)
But I don't know polkit at all and cannot understand this error.
EDIT: A more minimal way to reproduce the problem is with this Dockerfile:
FROM ubuntu:16.04
RUN apt-get update \
&& apt-get install -y policykit-1
And then run:
$ sudo docker build -t pkexec-test .
$ sudo docker run pkexec-test pkexec echo Hello
Which leads here again to:
ERROR:pkexec.c:719:main: assertion failed: (polkit_unix_process_get_start_time (POLKIT_UNIX_PROCESS (subject)) > 0)
Should I conclude that pkexec cannot work in a docker container? Or is there any way to make this command work?
Sidenote: I have no control whatsoever on the Java applet that I try to run, it is a horrible and very dated proprietary black box that I am supposed to use at work, for which I have no access to the source code, and that I must use as is.
I have solved my own problem by replacing pkexec by sudo in the docker image, and by allowing passwordless sudo.
Given an ubuntu docker image where a user called developer was created and configured with a USER statement, add these lines:
# Install sudo and make 'developer' a passwordless sudoer
RUN apt-get install sudo
ADD ./developersudo /etc/sudoers.d/developersudo
# Replacing pkexec by sudo
RUN rm /usr/bin/pkexec
RUN ln -s /usr/bin/sudo /usr/bin/pkexec
with the file developersudo containing:
developer ALL=(ALL) NOPASSWD:ALL
This replaces any call to pkexec made in a process running in the container, by a call to sudo without any password prompt, which works nicely.
Edit: Solved- typo
I have a Dockerfile that successfully creates a virtualenv using virtualenvwrapper (along with setting up a heap of "standard" settings/packages in our normal environment). I am using the resulting image as a "base image" for further use. All good so far. However, the following Dockerfile (based of the first image, "base_image_14.04") falls down at the last line:
FROM base_image_14.04
USER root
RUN DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive \
apt-get update && apt-get install -y \
libproj0 libproj-dev \
libgeos-c1v5 libgeos-dev \
libjpeg62 libjpeg-dev \
zlib1g zlib1g-dev \
libfreetype6 libfreetype6-dev \
libgdal20 libgdal-dev \
&& rm -rf /var/lib/apt/lists
USER webdev
RUN ["/bin/bash", "-ic", "mkproject maproxy"]
EXPOSE 80
WORKDIR $PROJECT_HOME/mapproxy
ADD ./requirements.txt .
RUN ["/bin/bash", "-ic", "workon mapproxy && pip install -r requirements.txt"]
The "mkproject mapproxy" works fine. If I comment out the last line it builds successfully and I can spin up the container and run "workon mapproxy" manually, not a problem. But when I try and build with the last line, it gives a workon error:
ERROR: Environment 'mapproxy' does not exist. Create it with 'mkvirtualenv mapproxy'.
workon is being called, but for some reason it can't find the mapproxy virtualenv.
WORKON_HOME & PROJECT_HOME both exist (defined in the parent image) and point to the correct locations (and are used successfully by "mkproject mapproxy").
So why is workon returning an error when the mapproxy virtualenv exists? The same error happens when I isolate that last line into a third Dockerfile building on the second.
Solved: It was a simple typo. mkproject maproxy instead of mapproxy. :sigh:
I am trying to build a docker image and am running into similar problems.
First question was why use a virtual env in docker? The main reason in a nutshell is to minimize effort to migrate an existing and working approach into a docker container. I will eventually use docker-compose, but I wanted to start by getting my feet wet with it all in a single docker container.
In my first attempt I installed almost everything with apt-get, including uwsgi. I installed my app "globally" with pip3. The app has command line functionality and a separate flask web app, hence the need for uwsgi. The command line functionality works, but when I make a request of the flask app uwsgi / python has a problem with locale: Fatal Python error: Py_Initialize: Unable to get the locale encoding and ImportError: No module named 'encodings
I have stripped away all my app specific additions to narrow down the problem. This is the Dockerfile I'm using:
# Docker image definition for testing
FROM ubuntu:xenial
# Create a user
RUN useradd -G sudo -ms /bin/bash tester
RUN echo 'tester:password' | chpasswd
WORKDIR /home/tester
# Skipping apt-get update to save some build time. Some are kept
# to insure they are the same as on host setup.
RUN apt-get install -y python3 python3-dev python3-pip \
virtualenv virtualenvwrapper sudo nano && \
apt-get clean -qy
# After above, can we use those installed in rest of Dockerfile?
# Yes, but not always, such as with virtualenvwrapper. What about
# virtualenv? How do you "source" the script? Doesn't appear to be
# installed, as bash complains "source needs a single parameter"
ENV VIRTUALENVWRAPPER_PYTHON /usr/bin/python3
ENV VIRTUALENVWRAPPER_VIRTUALENV /usr/bin/virtualenv
RUN ["/bin/bash", "-c", "source", "/usr/share/virtualenvwrapper/virtualenvwrapper.sh"]
# Create a virtualenv so uwsgi can find locale
# RUN mkdir /home/tester/.virtualenv && virtualenv -p`which python3` /home/bts_tools/.virtualenv/bts_tools
RUN mkvirtualenv -p`which python3` bts_tools && \
workon bts_tools && \
pip3 --disable-pip-version-check install --upgrade bts_tools
USER tester
ENTRYPOINT ["/bin/bash"]
CMD ["--login"]
The build fails on the line I try to source the virtualenvwrapper script. Bash complains source needs an argument - the file to be sourced. So I comment out the RUN lines and it builds without error. When I run the resulting container I see all the additions to the ENV that virtualenvwrapper makes (you can see all of them by executing the "set" command without any args), and the script to be sourced is there too.
So my question is why doesn't docker find them? How does the docker build process work if the results of any previous RUNs or ENVs aren't applied for subsequent use in the Dockerfile? I know some things are applied and work, for example if you apt-get nginx you can refer to /etc/nginx or alter things under that folder. You can create a user and set it's password or cd into its home folder for example. If I move the WORKDIR before the RUN useradd -G I see a warning from useradd the home folder already exists. I tried to use the "time" program to time how long it takes to do various things in the Dockerfile and docker complains it can't find 'time'.
So what exactly is going on? I have spent the last 3 days trying to figure this out. It just shouldn't be this difficult. What am I missing?
Parts of the bts_tools flask app worked when I wasn't using virtual envs. Most of the app didn't work, and the issue was this locale problem. Since everything works on the host outside of docker, and after trying to alter the PATH, PYTHONHOME, PYTHONPATH in my uwsgi start script to overcome the dreaded "locale encoding" fatal error, I decided to try to replicate the host setup as closely as possible since that didn't have the locale issue. When I have had that problem before I could run dpkg-reconfigure python3 or fix with changes to PATH or ENV settings. If you google the problem you'll see many people have difficulties with python & locale. It's almost enough reason to avoid using python!
I posted this elsewhere about locale issue, if it helps.
Problem
My wercker build exits with Failed step: setup environment - Command exited with exit code: 1 when I'm switching user in my Docker image. I'm running wercker dev from the commandline. The Dockerfile builds fine with Docker itself on the commandline, as well as on Docker Hub. I can run it fine. It's just when I use it for wercker, that the error occurs.
For example in my Dockerfile is the following code:
# Adding user
RUN adduser --disabled-password --gecos '' dockworker && adduser dockworker sudo && echo '%sudo ALL=(ALL) NOPASSWD:ALL' >> /etc/sudoers
RUN mkdir -p /home/dockworker && chown -R dockworker:dockworker /home/dockworker
USER dockworker # Line the build seems to break on
When I comment this line out, it seems to pass. Now the problem with this, for me, is the following: I'd like to switch to another user, since I'm trying to install nvm (for gulp, bower). Generally I don't prefer to install this this as root, therefore I add a user for this.
Workaround?
However, when I do install nvm as root in my Dockerfile (so just removing the user related lines in the codeblock above completely):
ENV NODE_VERSION 0.12.7
ENV NVM_DIR /usr/local/nvm
# NVM
RUN curl https://raw.githubusercontent.com/creationix/nvm/v0.25.4/install.sh | NVM_DIR=/usr/local/nvm bash
#install the specified node version and set it as the default one, install the global npm packages
RUN . /usr/local/nvm/nvm.sh && nvm install $NODE_VERSION && nvm alias default $NODE_VERSION && npm install -g bower && npm install -g gulp
Then it does get past the setup environment stage, but during the steps it errors out that nvm and npm are not found. The step in the wercker.yml:
box:
id: francobolli/docker-ubuntu-14.04-php-5.6
tag: latest
env:
NVM_DIR: /usr/local/nvm
dev:
steps:
- script:
name: gulp styles and javascript
code: |
npm install
bower install --allow-root
gulp --env=production
I don't really understand this. When I run both docker images from the commandline (so with wercker removed from the context completely) I can execute nvm and npm just fine, but when I'm running it through wercker, it seems the .bashrc file is not being executed. When I cat ~/.bashrc during the steps, I can see:
export NVM_DIR="/usr/local/nvm"
[ -s "$NVM_DIR/nvm.sh" ] && . "$NVM_DIR/nvm.sh" # This loads nvm
Workaround!
When I enter this in a step, it will be executed and I can npm install without a problem, so it seems this is never executed through the .bashrc:
...
- script:
name: gulp styles and javascript
code: |
[ -s "$NVM_DIR/nvm.sh" ] && . "$NVM_DIR/nvm.sh" # It works when I put it here, but it's also in ~/.bashrc, which doesn't seem to get executed
npm install
...
Note: If I source ~/.bashrc in the wercker step instead, it does not work.
Question
So my question is: What am I doing wrong, for not being able to switch user in the Wercker build and even if I could, would I have the same problem as running nvm with root: nvm and npm CAN be found when a Docker container is instantiated from the commandline, but CAN'T be found when running it with Wercker. What's the best solution?
I'd rather not add commands in the wercker.yml if it can be resolved through proper user configuration or proper nvm configuration. Sorry if I'm missing something very obvious.
This has nothing to do with Docker configuration, but with how Wercker handles Docker boxes. From the documentation:
Using Sudo
The sudo command is no longer supported in wercker v2 and effectively does nothing when used.
And for deployment:
Please note that if you update a project to make use of Docker (Ewok version) and this project has autodeployment, this deploy will most likely fail. We will update our documentation in the future on how to deploy these containers.
However, I did get it to build (and deploy) with the solution (temporary workaround?) as displayed in the original question.