Hi i am working with a RoR project with ruby-2.5.0 and rails 5. I am using AWS SQS. I have created a job as follows:-
class ReceiptsProcessingJob < ActiveJob::Base
queue_as 'abc'
def perform(receipt_id)
StoreParserInteractor.process_reciept(receipt_id)
end
end
Now i want to write unit test for it. I tried like:-
# frozen_string_literal: true
require 'rails_helper'
describe ReceiptsProcessingJob do
describe "#perform_later" do
it "scan a receipt" do
ActiveJob::Base.queue_adapter = :test
expect {
ReceiptsProcessingJob.perform_later(1)
}.to have_enqueued_job
end
end
end
But it doesnot cover StoreParserInteractor.process_reciept(receipt_id). Please help how can i cover this. Thanks in advance.
The example is testing the job class. You need to write a spec for StoreParserInteractor and test the method process_reciept.
Something along the lines of (pseudo code):
describe StoreParserInteractor do
describe "#process_receipt" do
it "does that" do
result = StoreParserInteractor.process_receipt(your_data_here)
expect(result to be something)...
end
end
end
But, the Rails guide suggests this kind of test:
assert_enqueued_with(job: ReceiptsProcessingJob) do
StoreParserInteractor.process_reciept(receipt_id)
end
Maybe this increases code coverage as well.
In my opinion, you shouldn't actually test the ActiveJob itself, but the logic behind it.
You should write a test for StoreParserInteractor#process_reciept. Think of ActiveJob as an "external framework" and it is not your responsibility to test the internals of it (e.g. if the job was enqueued or not).
As kitschmaster said, don't test ActiveJob classes, in short
trying to upgrade to Rails 4.2, using delayed_job_active_record. I've not set the delayed_job backend for test environment as thought that way jobs would execute straight away.
I'm trying to test the new 'deliver_later' method with RSpec, but I'm not sure how.
Old controller code:
ServiceMailer.delay.new_user(#user)
New controller code:
ServiceMailer.new_user(#user).deliver_later
I USED to test it like so:
expect(ServiceMailer).to receive(:new_user).with(#user).and_return(double("mailer", :deliver => true))
Now I get errors using that. (Double "mailer" received unexpected message :deliver_later with (no args))
Just
expect(ServiceMailer).to receive(:new_user)
fails too with 'undefined method `deliver_later' for nil:NilClass'
I've tried some examples that allow you to see if jobs are enqueued using test_helper in ActiveJob but I haven't managed to test that the correct job is queued.
expect(enqueued_jobs.size).to eq(1)
This passes if the test_helper is included, but it doesn't allow me to check it is the correct email that is being sent.
What I want to do is:
test that the correct email is queued (or executed straight away in test env)
with the correct parameters (#user)
Any ideas??
thanks
If I understand you correctly, you could do:
message_delivery = instance_double(ActionMailer::MessageDelivery)
expect(ServiceMailer).to receive(:new_user).with(#user).and_return(message_delivery)
allow(message_delivery).to receive(:deliver_later)
The key thing is that you need to somehow provide a double for deliver_later.
Using ActiveJob and rspec-rails 3.4+, you could use have_enqueued_job like this:
expect {
YourMailer.your_method.deliver_later
# or any other method that eventually would trigger mail enqueuing
}.to(
have_enqueued_job.on_queue('mailers').with(
# `with` isn't mandatory, but it will help if you want to make sure is
# the correct enqueued mail.
'YourMailer', 'your_method', 'deliver_now', any_param_you_want_to_check
)
)
also double check in config/environments/test.rb you have:
config.action_mailer.delivery_method = :test
config.active_job.queue_adapter = :test
Another option would be to run inline jobs:
config.active_job.queue_adapter = :inline
But keep in mind this would affect the overall performance of your test suite, as all your jobs will run as soon as they're enqueued.
If you find this question but are using ActiveJob rather than simply DelayedJob on its own, and are using Rails 5, I recommend configuring ActionMailer in config/environments/test.rb:
config.active_job.queue_adapter = :inline
(this was the default behavior prior to Rails 5)
I will add my answer because none of the others was good enough for me:
1) There is no need to mock the Mailer: Rails basically does that already for you.
2) There is no need to really trigger the creation of the email: this will consume time and slow down your test!
That's why in environments/test.rb you should have the following options set:
config.action_mailer.delivery_method = :test
config.active_job.queue_adapter = :test
Again: don't deliver your emails using deliver_now but always use deliver_later. That prevents your users from waiting for the effective delivering of the email. If you don't have sidekiq, sucker_punch, or any other in production, simply use config.active_job.queue_adapter = :async. And either async or inline for development environment.
Given the following configuration for the testing environment, you emails will always be enqueued and never executed for delivery: this prevents your from mocking them and you can check that they are enqueued correctly.
In you tests, always split the test in two:
1) One unit test to check that the email is enqueued correctly and with the correct parameters
2) One unit test for the mail to check that the subject, sender, receiver and content are correct.
Given the following scenario:
class User
after_update :send_email
def send_email
ReportMailer.update_mail(id).deliver_later
end
end
Write a test to check the email is enqueued correctly:
include ActiveJob::TestHelper
expect { user.update(name: 'Hello') }.to have_enqueued_job(ActionMailer::DeliveryJob).with('ReportMailer', 'update_mail', 'deliver_now', user.id)
and write a separate test for your email
Rspec.describe ReportMailer do
describe '#update_email' do
subject(:mailer) { described_class.update_email(user.id) }
it { expect(mailer.subject).to eq 'whatever' }
...
end
end
You have tested exactly that your email has been enqueued and not a generic job.
Your test is fast
You needed no mocking
When you write a system test, feel free to decide if you want to really deliver emails there, since speed doesn't matter that much anymore. I personally like to configure the following:
RSpec.configure do |config|
config.around(:each, :mailer) do |example|
perform_enqueued_jobs do
example.run
end
end
end
and assign the :mailer attribute to the tests were I want to actually send emails.
For more about how to correctly configure your email in Rails read this article: https://medium.com/#coorasse/the-correct-emails-configuration-in-rails-c1d8418c0bfd
Add this:
# spec/support/message_delivery.rb
class ActionMailer::MessageDelivery
def deliver_later
deliver_now
end
end
Reference: http://mrlab.sk/testing-email-delivery-with-deliver-later.html
A nicer solution (than monkeypatching deliver_later) is:
require 'spec_helper'
include ActiveJob::TestHelper
describe YourObject do
around { |example| perform_enqueued_jobs(&example) }
it "sends an email" do
expect { something_that.sends_an_email }.to change(ActionMailer::Base.deliveries, :length)
end
end
The around { |example| perform_enqueued_jobs(&example) } ensures that background tasks are run before checking the test values.
I came with the same doubt and resolved in a less verbose (single line) way inspired by this answer
expect(ServiceMailer).to receive_message_chain(:new_user, :deliver_later).with(#user).with(no_args)
Note that the last with(no_args) is essential.
But, if you don't bother if deliver_later is being called, just do:
expect(ServiceMailer).to expect(:new_user).with(#user).and_call_original
A simple way is:
expect(ServiceMailer).to(
receive(:new_user).with(#user).and_call_original
)
# subject
This answer is for Rails Test, not for rspec...
If you are using delivery_later like this:
# app/controllers/users_controller.rb
class UsersController < ApplicationController
…
def create
…
# Yes, Ruby 2.0+ keyword arguments are preferred
UserMailer.welcome_email(user: #user).deliver_later
end
end
You can check in your test if the email has been added to the queue:
# test/controllers/users_controller_test.rb
require 'test_helper'
class UsersControllerTest < ActionController::TestCase
…
test 'email is enqueued to be delivered later' do
assert_enqueued_jobs 1 do
post :create, {…}
end
end
end
If you do this though, you’ll surprised by the failing test that tells you assert_enqueued_jobs is not defined for us to use.
This is because our test inherits from ActionController::TestCase which, at the time of writing, does not include ActiveJob::TestHelper.
But we can quickly fix this:
# test/test_helper.rb
class ActionController::TestCase
include ActiveJob::TestHelper
…
end
Reference:
https://www.engineyard.com/blog/testing-async-emails-rails-42
For recent Googlers:
allow(YourMailer).to receive(:mailer_method).and_call_original
expect(YourMailer).to have_received(:mailer_method)
I think one of the better ways to test this is to check the status of job alongside the basic response json checks like:
expect(ActionMailer::MailDeliveryJob).to have_been_enqueued.on_queue('mailers').with('mailer_name', 'mailer_method', 'delivery_now', { :params => {}, :args=>[] } )
I have come here looking for an answer for a complete testing, so, not just asking if there is one mail waiting to be sent, in addition, for its recipient, subject...etc
I have a solution, than comes from here, but with a little change:
As it says, the curial part is
mail = perform_enqueued_jobs { ActionMailer::DeliveryJob.perform_now(*enqueued_jobs.first[:args]) }
The problem is that the parameters than mailer receives, in this case, is different from the parameters than receives in production, in production, if the first parameter is a Model, now in testing will receive a hash, so will crash
enqueued_jobs.first[:args]
["UserMailer", "welcome_email", "deliver_now", {"_aj_globalid"=>"gid://forjartistica/User/1"}]
So, if we call the mailer as UserMailer.welcome_email(#user).deliver_later the mailer receives in production a User, but in testing will receive {"_aj_globalid"=>"gid://forjartistica/User/1"}
All comments will be appreciate,
The less painful solution I have found is changing the way that I call the mailers, passing, the model's id and not the model:
UserMailer.welcome_email(#user.id).deliver_later
This answer is a little bit different, but may help in cases like a new change in the rails API, or a change in the way you want to deliver (like use deliver_now instead of deliver_later).
What I do most of the time is to pass a mailer as a dependency to the method that I am testing, but I don't pass an mailer from rails, I instead pass an object that will do the the things in the "way that I want"...
For example if I want to check that I am sending the right mail after the registration of a user... I could do...
class DummyMailer
def self.send_welcome_message(user)
end
end
it "sends a welcome email" do
allow(store).to receive(:create).and_return(user)
expect(mailer).to receive(:send_welcome_message).with(user)
register_user(params, store, mailer)
end
And then in the controller where I will be calling that method, I would write the "real" implementation of that mailer...
class RegistrationsController < ApplicationController
def create
Registrations.register_user(params[:user], User, Mailer)
# ...
end
class Mailer
def self.send_welcome_message(user)
ServiceMailer.new_user(user).deliver_later
end
end
end
In this way I feel that I am testing that I am sending the right message, to the right object, with the right data (arguments). And I am just in need of creating a very simple object that has no logic, just the responsibility of knowing how ActionMailer wants to be called.
I prefer to do this because I prefer to have more control over the dependencies I have. This is form me an example of the "Dependency inversion principle".
I am not sure if it is your taste, but is another way to solve the problem =).
I have a test that looks like this:
class PageTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase
describe "test" do
test "should not save without attributes" do
page = Page.new
assert !page.save
end
end
end
When running the tests, I get 0 tests, 0 assertions. If I remove the describe "test" do, I get the 1 test, 1 assertions. So I have the feeling that the describe "..." do is actually making the test disappear.
What is going on here? What am I missing?
Looks like you're mixing up minitest specs and ActiveSupport::TestCase. If you check the rails guides on testing the test method is explained but it's not used with describe.
Rails adds a test method that takes a test name and a block. It
generates a normal MiniTest::Unit test with method names prefixed with
test_. So,
test "the truth" do
assert true
end
acts as if you had written
def test_the_truth
assert true
end
The describe syntax is explained in the minitest docs under the spec section and is used with it (and not test). Like so:
describe "when asked about cheeseburgers" do
it "must respond positively" do
#meme.i_can_has_cheezburger?.must_equal "OHAI!"
end
end
Currently in my tests I do something like this to test if an email is queued to be sent
assert_difference('ActionMailer::Base.deliveries.size', 1) do
get :create_from_spreedly, {:user_id => #logged_in_user.id}
end
but if i a controller action can send two different emails i.e. one to the user if sign up goes fine or a notification to admin if something went wrong - how can i test which one actually got sent. The code above would pass regardless.
As of rails 3 ActionMailer::Base.deliveries is an array of Mail::Message's. From the mail documentation:
# mail['from'] = 'mikel#test.lindsaar.net'
# mail[:to] = 'you#test.lindsaar.net'
# mail.subject 'This is a test email'
# mail.body = 'This is a body'
#
# mail.to_s #=> "From: mikel#test.lindsaar.net\r\nTo: you#...
From that it should be easy to test your mail's in an integration
mail = ActionMailer::Base.deliveries.last
assert_equal 'mikel#test.lindsaar.net', mail['from'].to_s
assert_equal 'you#test.lindsaar.net', mail['to'].to_s
When using the ActionMailer during tests, all mails are put in a big array called deliveries. What you basically are doing (and is sufficient mostly) is checking if emails are present in the array.
But if you want to specifically check for a certain email, you have to know what is actually stored in the array. Luckily the emails themselves are stored, thus you are able to iterate through the array and check each email.
See ActionMailer::Base to see what configuration methods are available, which you can use to determine what emails are present in the array. Some of the most suitable methods for your case probably are
recipients: Takes one or more email addresses. These addresses are where your email will be delivered to. Sets the To: header.
subject: The subject of your email. Sets the Subject: header.
Using current Rspec syntax, I ended up using the following:
last_email = ActionMailer::Base.deliveries.last
expect(last_email.to).to eq ['test#example.com']
expect(last_email.subject).to have_content 'Welcome'
The context of my test was a feature spec where I wanted to make sure a welcome email was sent to a user after signing up.
As of 2020 (Rails 6 era, probably introduced earlier) you can do the following:
(using a SystemTest example) TL;DR: use assert_emails from ActionMailer::TestHelper and ActionMailer::Base.deliveries.last to access the mail itself.
require "application_system_test_case"
require 'test_helper'
require 'action_mailer/test_helper'
class ContactTest < ApplicationSystemTestCase
include ActionMailer::TestHelper
test "Send mail via contact form on landing page" do
visit root_url
fill_in "Message", with: 'message text'
# Asserting a mail is sent
assert_emails 1 do
click_on "Send"
end
# Asserting stuff within that mail
last_email = ActionMailer::Base.deliveries.last
assert_equal ['whatever'], last_email.reply_to
assert_equal "contact", last_email.subject
assert_match /Mail from someone/, last_email.body.to_s
end
end
Official doc:
ActionMailer Guide/Testing
Testing Guide/ActionMailer
Note
Instead of manually checking the content of the mail as in the system test above, you can also test whether a specific mailer action was used, like this:
assert_enqueued_email_with ContactMailer, :welcome, args: ["Hello", "Goodbye"]
And some other handy assertion, see https://api.rubyonrails.org/v6.0.3.2/classes/ActionMailer/TestHelper.html#method-i-assert_emails .
The test framework shoulda has an excellent helper which lets you assert certain conditions about an email that was sent. Yes, you could do it yourself with ActionMailer.deliveries, but shoulda makes it all one neat little block
A little late, but it may help others:
You could use Email-spec, a collection of Rspec/Minitest matchers and Cucumber steps.
Here is the best way I've found to do it.
1) Include the action mailer callbacks plugin like this:
script/plugin install git://github.com/AnthonyCaliendo/action_mailer_callbacks.git
I don't really use the plugin's main features, but it does provide the nice functionality of being able to figure out which method was used to send an email.
2) Now you can put some methods in your test_helper.rb like this:
def assert_sent(method_name)
assert sent_num_times(method_name) > 0
end
def assert_not_sent(method_name)
assert sent_num_times(method_name) == 0
end
def assert_sent_once(method_name)
assert sent_num_times(method_name) == 1
end
def sent_num_times(method_name)
count = 0
#emails.each do |email|
count += 1 if method_name == email.instance_variable_get("#method_name")
end
count
end
3) Now you can write sweet tests like this:
require 'test_helper'
class MailingTest < ActionController::IntegrationTest
def setup
#emails = ActionMailer::Base.deliveries
#emails.clear
end
test "should send a mailing" do
assert_difference "Mailing.count", 1 do
feeds(:feed1).generate_mailing
end
assert_sent_once "broadcast"
assert_not_sent "failed_mailing"
end
end
Here "broadcast" and "mailing_failed" are the names of the methods in my ActionMailer::Base class. These are the ones you normally use by calling Mailer.deliver_broadcast(some_data) or Mailer.deliver_failed_mailing(some_data) etc. That's it!
I would like to implement the method User.calculate_hashed_password. I'm trying to use the Shoulda testing library which works with Rails's built-in testing tools, so an answer related to Test::Unit would be just as good as one related to Shoulda (I think).
I'm trying to figure out what I need to test and how I should test it. My initial idea is to do something like...
class UserTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase
should 'Return a hashed password'
assert_not_nil User.calculate_hashed_password
end
end
Is this the right way to do it?
You don't need to test that the method exists, just that the method behaves correctly. Say something like this:
class UserTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase
setup do
#user = User.new
end
should 'Calculate the hashed password correctly'
#user.password = "password"
#user.hashed_password = "xxxxx" # Manually calculate it
end
end
(I don't use shoulda, so excuse any glaring syntax errors.)
That test will fail if the method doesn't exist.
I agree with Otto; but as dylanfm noted, I use #respond_to to test for associations in RSpec.
it "should know about associated Projects" do
#user.should respond_to(:projects)
end
Maybe use respond_to?
You should check out Object#respond_to? and Object#try in newer versions of Rails. If you're new to testing in general, definitely read through this excellent guide on testing in Rails.