I have three apps that I want to run with the rails server at the same time, and I also want the option to kill all the servers from one location.
I don't have much experience with Bash so I'm not sure what command I would use to launch the server for a specific app. Since the script won't be in the app directory plain rails s won't work.
From there, I suppose if I can gather the PIDs of the processes the three servers are running on, I can have the script prompt for user input and whenever something is entered kill the three processes. I'm just unsure of how to get the PIDs.
Additionally, each app has a few environment variables that I wanted to have different values than those assigned in the apps config files. Previously, I was using export var=value before rails s, but I'm not sure how to guarantee each separate process is getting the right variables.
Any help is much appreciated!
The Script
You could try something like the following:
#!/bin/bash
case "$1" in
start)
pushd app/directory
(export FOO=bar; rails s ...; echo $! > pid1)
(export FOO=bar; rails s ...; echo $! > pid2)
(export FOO=bar; rails s ...; echo $! > pid3)
popd
;;
stop)
kill $(cat pid1)
kill $(cat pid2)
kill $(cat pid3)
rm pid1 pid2 pid3
;;
*)
echo "Usage: $0 {start|stop}"
exit 1
;;
esac
exit 0
Save this script into a file such as script.sh and chmod +x script.sh. You'd start the servers with a ./script.sh start, and you can kill them all with a ./script.sh stop. You'll need to fill in all the details in the three lines that startup the servers.
Explanation
First is the pushd: this will change the directory to where your apps live. The popd after the three startup lines will return you back to the location where the script lives. The parentheses around the (export blah blah) create a subshell so the environment variables that you set inside the parentheses, via export, shouldn't exist outside of the parentheses. Additionally, if your three apps live in different directories, you could put a cd inside each of the three parantheses to move to the app's directory before the rails s. The lines would then look something like: export FOO=bar; cd app1/directory; rails s ...; echo $! > pid1. Don't forget that semicolon after the cd command! In this case, you can also remove the pushd and popd lines.
In Bash, $! is the process ID of the last command. We echo that and redirect (with >) to a file called pid1 (or pid2 or pid3). Later, when we want to kill the servers, we run kill $(cat pid1). The $(...) runs a command and returns the output inline. Since the pid files only contain the process ID, cat pid1 will just return the process ID number, which is then passed to kill. We also delete the pid files after we've killed the servers.
Disclaimer
This script could use some more work in terms of error checking and configuration, and I haven't tested it, but it should work. At the very least, it should give you a good starting point for writing your own script.
Additional Info
My favorite bash resource is the Advanced Bash-Scripting Guide. Bash is actually a fairly powerful language with some neat features. I definitely recommend learning how bash works!
Why don't you try capistrano, framework for executing commands in parallel on multiple remote machines, via SSH. Its has lots of recipes to do this.
You are probably better off setting up pow.cx, which would run each server as it's needed, rather than having to spin up and shut down servers manually.
You could use Foreman to run, monitor, and manage your processes.
I realize I'm late to the party here, but after searching the internet for a good solution to this (and finding this page but few others and none with a full solution) and after trying unsuccessfully to get prax working, I decided to write my own solution to this problem and give it back to the community!
Check out my rdev bash script gist - a bash script you put in your ~/bin directory. This will create a new tab in gnome-terminal for each rails app with the app name and port in the tab's title. It verifies the app launched successfully by checking the port is in use and the process is actually running. It also verifies the rails app shutdown is successful by ensuring the port is no longer in use and the process is no longer running.
Setup is super easy, just change these two config values:
# collection of rails apps you want to start in development (should match directory name of rails project)
# note: the first app in the collection will receive port 3000, the second 3001 and so on
#
rails_apps=(app1 app2 app3 etc)
#
# The root directory of your rails projects (~/ is assumed, do not include)
#
projects_root="ruby/projects/root/path"
With this script you can start all your rails apps in one command or stop them all and you can stop, start and restart individual rails apps as well. While the OP requested 3 apps run, this will allow you to run as many as you need with port being assigned in order starting with 3000 for the first app in the list. Each app is started using the proper ruby version thanks to chruby and the .env is sourced on the way up so your app will have everything it needs. Once you are done developing just rdev stop and all your rails apps will be killed and the terminal windows closed.
# Usage Examples:
#
# Show Help
# ~/> rdev
# Usage: rdev {start|stop|restart} [app port]
#
# start all rails apps
# ~/> rdev start
#
# start a single rails app
# ~/> rdev start app port
#
# stop all rails apps
# ~/> rdev stop
#
# stop a single rails app
# ~/> rdev stop app port
#
# restart a single rails app
# ~/> rdev restart app port
For the record, all testing was done on Ubuntu 18.04. This script requires: bash, chruby, gnome-terminal, lsof and takes advantage of the BASH_POST_RC trick.
Related
For each of my projects, I have configured a docker development environment consisting of several containers. I often switch between projects. That requires stopping one set of containers and starting another. I currently do it like this:
$ cd project1
$ docker-compose stop
$ cd ../project2
$ docker-compose up -d
So I need to remember which application is currently running, cd into the directory where its docker-compose.yml is, stop it, then remember what other project I want to run, cd there and start it.
Is there a better way? Like a utility that remembers which multicontainer applications I have, can stop the currently running one and run another one without manual cding and docker-composeing?
(By the way, what's the correct term for a set of containers hosting parts of a single application?)
Hope docker-compose-ui will help you in managing applications.
I think the real problem here is this:
That requires stopping one set of containers and starting another.
You shouldn't need to stop one project to start another.
Instead of mapping to the same host ports I would not map any ports at all. Then use a script to lookup the IP of the container, and connect directly to that:
#!/bin/bash
cip=$(docker inspect -f '{{range $key, $value := .NetworkSettings.Networks}} {{ $value.IPAddress}} {{end}}' $1)
This will look up the container ip. Combine that with a command to open the url:
url=http://cip:8080/
xdg-open $url || open $url
All together this will let you run the application without having to map any host ports. When host ports don't exist, you don't have to stop other projects.
If you are ruby proven a bit, you can use scaffolding for this.
A barebone example using thread ( to start different docker-compose session without one process and then stop them all together )
require 'docker-compose'
threads = []
project_paths = %w(/project/path1 /project/path2 /project/path3 /project/path)
project_paths.each do |path|
threads.push Docker::Compose::Session.new(dir:compose_base_path1)
end
begin
threads.each do |thread|
thread.join
end
rescue SystemExit, Interrupt
threads.each do |thread|
thread.kill
end
rescue Exception => e
handle_exception e
end
source
It uses
docker-compose gem
threads
Just set project_paths to the folders of your projects. And if you want to end them all, use CTRL+c
You can of course go beyond that, using a daemon and try to start / stop some of them giving "names" and such, but i guess as a starting point for scaffolding, that should be enaugh
I'm trying to run a C++ executable in my Rails app that is place in a folder called "algo", like this:
result = `cd algo && ./my_main #{str} -1 -1 #{id}`
In development works flawlessly but in production in the cloud does not run
Consider that:
1) In the cloud, that is a virtual machine, i run the same executable without problems in the console terminal navigate through the Rails application folders, it only fails when i try to run it from the Rails application
2)
Rails.logger.info result
Returns nothing
3)
Rails.logger.info `pwd`
Does return the current folder of the proyect
4)
Rails.logger.info $?
Only returns: pid 35314 exit 127
5)
Rails.logger.info File.exist?("algo/my_main")
Returns true
6)
In the config/environments/production.rb the log level is config.log_level = :info
7)
In the log/production.log does not appear any error like you will see in development in the terminal
8)
I also try to use other commands like: system(), exec(), %x() with the same result
9)
Finally, i run sudo chmod -R 777 in the virtual machine, in the main folder before the Rails folder app, i think that is implicit in the point 1, but for clarify
You should always use absolute paths for any code that will be executed by a script. The PATH variable may be different for the user executing the script than it is for the user that you use, and its much better to be 100% precise about the file path you want than to rely on PATH.
Along the same lines, make sure the user that runs the Rails server have execute permissions on the script. If in doubt, login as that user and attempt to execute the script.
You also need to escape both str and id for security reasons. Even if these variables are not currently derived in any way from submitted parameters, there's always a possibility that whatever function contains this code might be executed with user-submitted variables at some point. Basically, its better to be safe than sorry, because this is the kind of security hole that could allow anyone on the Internet to execute arbitrary code on your server.
Can I invoke "rake jobs:work" automatically after running "rails s" in console?
Currently, after running rails s in cmd I will also run rake jobs:work in the other console, what i want to happen is After running "rails s" the jobs:work will automatically start.
The right way to go about this would be to use a process manager, like Invoker or Foreman. There is ample documentation on the links, but it boils down to the following steps:
Install the software
Create a configuration file where you declare what processes do you intend to run. Both support Procfile style declaration.
Use the command line client to start the process manager.
Based on my personal experience, I highly recommend Invoker, it goes beyond just a process manager, and packs in a few more handy features, like support for .dev local domain.
One you can do is simply:
rails server & rake jobs:work
It'll run rails server as background job, which you can get back to foreground with fg. It can be annoying that you'll get output from both processes mixed.
I'm not sure what are your needs and what you expect but maybe it would be good for you to use screen (or tmux) to run them in parallel and be able to switch between.
You can do your own .screenrc script which will run the server and any other commands when automatically for you.
There is a little problem that if you run the server from it and you close it (ctrl+c) than you'll loose it's screen window. Fortunately there is a solution for that as well (worked-out on the SO as well - you can read more about it here)
So, I use some helper script for that .run_screen (don't forget to chmod +x it):
#!/bin/bash
/bin/bash -i <<<"$*; exec </dev/tty"
Than I have .screenrc_rails file:
#shell -${SHELL}
caption always "%n(%t) %= %{b}#%H[%l] : %{r}%c:%s"
termcapinfo xterm ti#:te#
termcap xterm 'AF=\E[3%dm:AB=\E[4%dm'
terminfo xterm 'AF=\E[3%p1%dm:AB=\E[4%p1%dm'
startup_message off
screen -t server 2 ${HOME}/.run_screen rails s
screen -t spork 3 ${HOME}/.run_screen bundle exec spork
screen -t dev_log 4 ${HOME}/.run_screen tail -f ./log/development.log
screen -t test_log 5 ${HOME}/.run_screen tail -f ./log/test.log
screen -t bash 0
screen -t bash 1
And an alias ( screenr(ails) ) defined at .bash_profile:
alias screenr='screen -c ~/.screenrc_rails'
If you don't know screen than start from ctrl+a, ". ctrl+a, ? will give you some help.
I hope you'll enjoy it.
is it possible to reload $PATH from a chef recipe?
Im intrsted in the response about process signals given in the following thread:
How to have Chef reload global PATH
I dont understand very well that example that the omribahumi user gives.
I would like a clearer example with chef-client / recipe to understand,
with that he explains, seems it is possible with that workaround.
Thanks.
Well I see two reasons for this request:
add something to the path for immediate execution => easy, just update the ENV['PATH'] variable within the chef run.
Extend the PATH system wide to include something just installed.
For the 2, you may update /etc/environment file (for ubuntu) or add a file to /etc/profiled.d (better idea to keep control over it),
But obviously the new PATH variable won't be available to actually running processes (including your actual shell), it will work for process launched after the file update.
To explain a little more the link you gave what is done is:
create a file with export commands to set env variables
echo 'export MYVAR="my value"' > ~/my_environment
create a bash function loading env vars from a file
function reload_environment { source ~/my_environment; }
set a trap in bash to do something on a signal, here run the function when bash receive SIGHUP
trap reload_environment SIGHUP
Launch the function for a first sourcing of the env file, there's two way:
easy one: launch the function
reload_environment
complex one: Get the pid of your actual shell and send it a SIGHUP signal
kill -HUP `echo $$`
All of this is only for the current shell until you set this in your .bash_rc
Not exactly what you were asking for indeed, but I hope you'll understand there's no way to update context of an already running process.
The best you can do is: update the PATH with whatever method you wish (something in /etc/profile.d for exemple) and execute a wall (if chef run as root) to tell users to reload their envs
echo 'reload your shell env by executing: source /etc/profile' | wall
Once again, it could work for humans, not for other process already running, those will have to be restarted.
I'm having a weird issue with a start-up script which runs a Sinatra script using the shell's "daemon" function. The problem is that when I run the command at the command line, I get output to STDOUT. If I run the command at the command line exactly as it is in the script -- less the daemon part -- the output is correctly redirected to the output file. However, when the startup script runs it (see below), I get stuff to the STDERR log but not to the STDOUT log.
The relevant lines of the script:
#!/bin/sh
# (which is and has been a symlink to /bin/bash
# Source function library.
. /etc/init.d/functions
# Set Some Variables
RUNAS="joeuser"
PID=/var/run/myapp.pid
LOG="/var/log/myapp/app-out.log"
ERR_LOG="/var/log/myapp/app-err.log"
APPLICATION_COMMAND="RAILS_ENV=production ruby /opt/myapp/lib/daemons/my-sinatra-app.rb -p 8002 2>>${ERR_LOG} >>${LOG} &"
# Snip a bunch. This is the applicable line from the "start" case:
daemon --user $RUNAS --pidfile $PID $APPLICATION_COMMAND &> /dev/null
Now, the funky parts:
The error log is written to correctly via the redirect of STDERR.
If I reverse the order of the >> and the 2>> (I'm grasping at straws, here!), the behavior does not change: I still get STDERR logged correctly and STDOUT is empty.
If the output log doesn't exist, the STDOUT redirect creates the file. But, the file remains 0-length.
This used to work. The log directory is maintained by log-rotate. All of the more-recent 'out' logs are 0-length. The older ones are not. It seems like it stopped working some time in April. The ruby code didn't change at any time near then; neither did the startup script.
We're running three different services in this way. Two of them are ruby daemons (one uses sinatra, one does not) and the other is a background java process. This is occurring for BOTH of the ruby processes but is not happening on the java process. Maybe something changed in Ruby?
FTR, we've got ruby 1.8.5 and RHEL 5.4.
I've done some more probing. The daemon function does a bunch of stuff, but the meat of the matter is that it runs the program using runuser. The command essentially looks like this:
runuser -s /bin/bash - joeuser -c "ulimit -S -c 0 >/dev/null 2>&1 ; RAILS_ENV=production ruby /opt/myapp/lib/daemons/my-sinatra-app.rb -p 8002 '</dev/null' '>>/var/log/myapp/app-out.log' '2>>/var/log/myapp/app-err.log' '&'"
When I run exactly that at the command line (both with and without the single-ticks that got added somewhere along the line), I get the exact same screwy behavior w.r.t. the output log. So, it seems to me that this is an issue of how ruby (?) interacts with runuser?
Too long to put in a comment :-)
change the shebang to add #!/bin/sh -x and verify that everything is expanded according to your expectations. Also, when executing from terminal, your .bashrc file is sourced, when executing from script, it is not; might be something in you're environment that differ. One way to find out is to do env from terminal and from script and diff the output
env > env_terminal
env > env_script
diff env_terminal env_script
Happy hunting...