I am using nusoap in my PHP application when calling a .net webservice.
The issue is, in some cases .net web service is taking more than actual time for some request, so I want to increase the time my SOAP call waits for the response.
Is there any function or any way that I can keep nusoap call waiting until I get a response from the webservice.
Thanks,
Rama
Nusoap default timeout is 30 secs.
Increase Response timeout to solve this problem.
// creates an instance of the SOAP client object
$client = new nusoap_client($create_url, true);
// creates a proxy so that WSDL methods can be accessed directly
$proxy = $client -> getProxy();
// Set timeouts, nusoap default is 30
$client->timeout = 0;
$client->response_timeout = 100;
Note : This settings also didn't work for some time. So i directly went to nusoap.php file and changed $response_timeout = 120. By default this value set to 30 secs.
It is solved now :)
References : Time out settings - Second reference
When you create the istance of the nusoap_client try
$client = new nusoap_client($$creat_url, true,false,false,false,false,0,300);
where all the false parameters default to false,
0 is the timeout and 300 is the response_timeout
Thanks
Related
I'm having a problem calling the API's method CompleteSale via eBay_Service .NET SDK (v967) since 2 weeks (02/10).
When the ERP tries to sends some updated information about one order, it receives this Exception:
the underlying connection was closed an unexpected error occurred on a send
so I haven't got a response from the API.
There are more than one strange things:
there are some batch in background, using the same .dll, and they
work fine;
after rebooting the server the first call to "CompleteSale" works fine;
after registering again the .dll via the "regsrv" command, it worked
fine for one day;
all operators that uses the ERP are connected to the server via
remote desktop and all of they notice the problem. Instead, if i
connect from my company's office, all works fine;
I've tried to increase the timeout to 360 sec (from 60 sec) and nothing changed.
The ERP is developed in progress (OpenGL) , so I can't fix with setting "KeepAlive" to "false", setting the certificate explicitly (Tsl1.1 | Tsl1.2) or making other interventions on .net side. I was wrong, it can be done from the source code of the SDK.
i've checked the Security Protocols on the api's servers discovering that the "SSL3" is not longer supported whereas the default value for the ServicePointManager.SecurityProtocol in .NET 2.0 is SSL3.
I've solved the problem by adding this hotfix at the "eBayXmlAPIInterfaceService" class in the SDK's source code:
//768 = Tsl1.1, 3070 = Tsl1.2
ServicePointManager.SecurityProtocol = (SecurityProtocolType)3072 |
(SecurityProtocolType)768;
HttpWebRequest http = (HttpWebRequest) WebRequest.Create(this.Url);
http.Method = "POST";
http.ContentType = "text/xml";
http.ContentLength = data.Length;
http.KeepAlive = false;
Probably Microsoft as released an hotfix to correct this problem but the server wesn't updated since 2015.
Moreover i've replicated the .net code in the ABL application in a program that we use to do get/post requestes:
DEF VAR w-tsl10 AS System.Net.SecurityProtocolType
w-tsl10 = CAST(System.Enum:ToObject(PROGRESS.Util.TypeHelper:GetType("System.Net.SecurityProtocolType":U), 192), System.Net.SecurityProtocolType).
ystem.Net.ServicePointManager:SecurityProtocol = w-tsl10.
link to the security protocol verifier: https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/index.html
I was working with betfair api and got this issue. After some research I found this
System.Net.ServicePointManager.Expect100Continue = true;
System.Net.ServicePointManager.SecurityProtocol = SecurityProtocolType.Tls | SecurityProtocolType.Tls11 | SecurityProtocolType.Tls12;
Strange behavior is happening when using signalR with IE 11. Scenario:
We have some dispatcher type functionality where the dispatcher does some actions, and the other user can see updates live (querying). The parameters that are sent come through fine and cause updates on the IE client side without having to open the developer console.
BUT the one method that does not work (performUpdate - to get the query results - this is a server > client call, not client > server > client) - never gets called. IT ONLY GETS CALLED WHEN THE DEVELOPER CONSOLE IS OPEN.
Here's what I've tried:
Why JavaScript only works after opening developer tools in IE once?
SignalR : Under IE9, messages can't be received by client until I hit F12 !!!!
SignalR client doesn't work inside AngularJs controller
Some code snippets
Dispatcher side
On dropdown change, we get the currently selected values and send updates across the wire. (This works fine).
$('#Selector').on('change', function(){
var variable = $('#SomeField').val();
...
liveBatchHub.server.updateParameters(variable, ....);
});
Server Side
When the dispatcher searches, we have some server side code that sends out notifications that a search has been ran, and to tell the client to pull results.
public void Update(string userId, Guid bId)
{
var context = GlobalHost.ConnectionManager.GetHubContext<LiveBatchViewHub>();
context.Clients.User(userId).performUpdate(bId);
}
Client side (viewer of live updates)
This never gets called unless developer tools is open
liveBatchHub.client.performUpdate = function (id) {
//perform update here
update(id);
};
Edit
A little more information which might be useful (I am not sure why it makes a difference) but this ONLY seems to happen when I am doing server > client calls. When the dispatcher is changing the search parameters, the update is client > server > client or dispatcher-client > server > viewer-client, which seems to work. After they click search, a service in the search pipeline calls the performUpdate server side (server > viewer-client). Not sure if this matters?
Edit 2 & Final Solution
Eyes bloodshot, I realize I left out one key part to this question: we are using angular as well on this page. Guess I've been staring at it too long and left this out - sorry. I awarded JDupont the answer because he was on the right track: caching. But not jQuery's ajax caching, angulars $http.
Just so no one else has to spend days / nights banging their heads against the desk, the final solution was to disable caching on ajax calls using angulars $http.
Taken from here:
myModule.config(['$httpProvider', function($httpProvider) {
//initialize get if not there
if (!$httpProvider.defaults.headers.get) {
$httpProvider.defaults.headers.get = {};
}
// Answer edited to include suggestions from comments
// because previous version of code introduced browser-related errors
//disable IE ajax request caching
$httpProvider.defaults.headers.get['If-Modified-Since'] = 'Mon, 26 Jul 1997 05:00:00 GMT';
// extra
$httpProvider.defaults.headers.get['Cache-Control'] = 'no-cache';
$httpProvider.defaults.headers.get['Pragma'] = 'no-cache';
}]);
I have experienced similar behavior in IE in the past. I may know of a solution to your problem.
IE caches some ajax requests by default. You may want to try turning this off globally. Check this out: How to prevent IE from caching Ajax with jQuery
Basically you would globally switch this off like this:
$.ajaxSetup({ cache: false });
or for a specific ajax request like this:
$.ajax({
cache: false,
//other options...
});
I had a similar issue with my GET requests caching. My update function would only fire off once unless dev tools was open. When it was open, no caching would occur.
If your code works properly with other browsers, So the problem can be from the SignalR's used transport method. They can be WebSocket, Server Sent Events, Forever Frame and Long Polling based on browser support.
The Forever Frame is for Internet Explorer only. You can see the Introduction to SignalR to know which transport method will be used in various cases (Note that you can't use any of them on each browser, for example, IE doesn't support Server Sent Events).
You can understand the transport method being used Inside a Hub just by looking at the request's QueryString which can be useful for logging:
Context.QueryString["transport"];
I think the issue comes from using Forever Frame by IE likely, since sometimes it causes SignalR to crash on Ajax calls. You can try to remove Forever Frame support in SignalR and force to use the remaining supported methods by the browser with the following code in client side:
$.connection.hub.start({ transport: ['webSockets', 'serverSentEvents', 'longPolling'] });
I showed some realities about SignalR and gave you some logging/trace tools to solve your problem. For more help, put additional details :)
Update:
Since your problem seems to be very strange and I've not enough vision around your code, So I propose you some instructions based on my experience wish to be useful:
Setup Browser Link in IDE suitable
checkout the Network tab request/response data during its process
Make sure you haven't used reserved names in your server/client side
(perhaps by renaming methods and variables)
Also I think that you need to use liveBatchHub.server.update(variable, ....); instead of liveBatchHub.server.updateParameters(variable, ....); in Dispatcher side to make server call since you should use server method name after server.
I'm basically trying to get the percentage of time a task is taking to display to the user on the screen in an overlay template.
I have a service that is calculating the process percentage:
def progressCalculation(requestsToSend, requestsSent, requestsFailed, progressPercentage) {
progressPercentage = 100 / requestsToSend * (requestsSent + requestsFailed)
progressPercentage = Math.round(progressPercentage * 1) / 1
MyController upCont = new MyController()
upCont.progress(progressReport.progressPercentage)
}
this continues to send progressReport.progressPercentage to the controller:
def progress(progressData) {
int statusToView = progressData
if (statusToView % 5==0) {
[statusToView: statusToView]
}
}
I have created a src/groovy file that is using websockets from here: https://github.com/vahidhedayati/grails-websocket-example/blob/master/README.md
My connection is working but I need to show the percentage on the view using the websocket which is working.
#OnMessage
public String handleMessage(String message) {
message = MyController.progressPercentage
String replyMessage = "echo "+message
return replyMessage
}
now what I'm trying to so here is return the progressPercentage value from the controller to the src/groovy file so that my view can continually updated with the latest property value whilst the task is completing.
MyController upCont = new MyController() seriously?
It is good idea to move the code that hosts and modifies progressPercentage variable to service layer and access it using service rather than controller.
myService.progressPercentage rather than MyController.progressPercentage
Also you must inject myService , not instantiate it as myService = new MyService(), services are singletons you can not instantiate them like this. They are managed by the spring container.
Actually if you do MyController upCont = new MyController()
and you try to access a property of upCont you will get this beautiful error message:
java.lang.IllegalStateException: No thread-bound request found: Are you referring to request attributes outside of an actual web request, or processing a request outside of the originally receiving thread? If you are actually operating within a web request and still receive this message, your code is probably running outside of DispatcherServlet/DispatcherPortlet: In this case, use RequestContextListener or RequestContextFilter to expose the current request.
I put those instructions together so if I can help you in any way do let me know.
Websockets require as much frontend work as backend. so to get back the data via websockets you need to expand on the java script as well as expand on the backend websocket sending that information to the java script.
So if you had a button on the frontend gsp that rather than was a typical
You can take a look at some of my plugins that already do this. There is a ping/pong that happens discretely in https://github.com/vahidhedayati/jssh which if user defines within taglib the websocket connection triggers a pong that frontend javascript receives and sends ping - and they continue doing this..
Here is another example which is what you probably need to use:
This is the result back from websocket
https://github.com/vahidhedayati/grails-jenkins-plugin/blob/master/grails-app/views/jen/_process.gsp#L411
which when recieved updates this span or div id:
https://github.com/vahidhedayati/grails-jenkins-plugin/blob/master/grails-app/views/jen/_process.gsp#L213
so you need to get your websocket to send it back in some json format that your frontend javascript picks up the json request and if it is of a certain convention to look for a value and update a div on the frontend.
There is a good video I have done on wschat which shows you updating frontend using websocket client/server. it may help you understand it better
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xagMYM9n3l0 or https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zAySkzNid3E
unsure which one it was in
E2A: it will need to be a service:
https://github.com/vahidhedayati/grails-wschat-plugin/blob/master/src/groovy/grails/plugin/wschat/WsChatEndpoint.groovy#L63 then the few lines ahead registers those services in the websocket endpoint. Now going back in the history of the code or if you follow onMessage to verifyAction - you will need to send something from frontend - or upon when a connection is made to then send a message to frontend https://github.com/vahidhedayati/grails-wschat-plugin/blob/75590bf10ea040c18548377dedc716fdab2aa820/src/groovy/grails/plugin/wschat/WsChatEndpoint.groovy#L148. You can use userSession to directly message the person making the socket connection. On webpage using javascript parse json and update div as mentioned above
In case of a system error from the GradesManagementService, the returned response object is null, but the response header includes the diagnostic information. What class do I use to get this information?
Here is my code:
GradesManagementServiceV10 port = service.getGradesManagementServiceV10();
GetGradeValuesByOrgUnitRequest r = new GetGradeValuesByOrgUnitRequest(); GetGradeValuesByOrgUnitResponse resp = new GetGradeValuesByOrgUnitResponse(); WSBindingProvider bp = (WSBindingProvider)port; bp.setOutboundHeaders( Headers.create(formatSOAPHeader())); ((BindingProvider)port).getRequestContext().put(BindingProvider.ENDPOINT_ADDRESS_PROPERTY, getUrl());
resp = port.getGradeValuesByOrgUnit(r); // the response is null. <------ How do I see what the error is?
In your service object (in the above code snippet that would be port, the object of the Web service proxy class GradesManagementServiceV10), ResponseHeader property would contain such information (this property's type is ResponseHeaderInfo).
If you are doing new development with Desire2Learn I would also suggest that you look at the Valence REST/JSON API. New features and new API calls are going to show up in that system http://docs.valence.desire2learn.com/ (it is always deployed, the docs are open, etc.)
I have a need to store files on Amazon AWS S3, but in order to isolate the user from the AWS authentication I want to go via an ASP page on my site, which the user will be logged into. So:
The application sends the file using the Delphi Indy library TidHTTP.Put (FileStream) routine to the ASP page, along with some authentication stuff (mine, not AWS) on the querystring.
The ASP page checks the auth details and then if OK stores the file on S3 using my Amazon account.
Problem I have is: how do I access the data coming in from the Indy PUT using JScript in the ASP page and pass it on to S3. I'm OK with AWS signing, etc, it's just the nuts and bolts of connecting the two bits (the incoming request and the outgoing AWS request) ...
TIA
R
A HTTP PUT will store the file at the given location in the HTTP header - it "requests that the enclosed entity be stored under the supplied Request-URI".
The disadvantage with the PUT method is that if you are on a shared hosting environment it may not be available to you.
So if the web server supports PUT, the file should be available at the given location in the the (virtual) file system. The PUT request will be handled by the server and not ASP:
In the case of PUT, the web server
handles the request itself: there is
no room for a CGI or ASP application
to step in.
The only way for your application to
capture a PUT is to operate on the
low-level, ISAPI filter level
http://www.15seconds.com/issue/981120.htm
Are you sure you need PUT and can not use a POST, which will send the file to a URL where your ASP script can read it from the request stream?
OK, Ive got a bit further with this. Code at the ASP end is:
var PostedDataSize = Request.TotalBytes ;
var PostedData = Request.BinaryRead (PostedDataSize) ;
var PostedDataStream = Server.CreateObject ("ADODB.Stream") ;
PostedDataStream.Open ;
PostedDataStream.Type = 1 ; // binary
PostedDataStream.Write (PostedData) ;
Response.Write ("PostedDataStream.Size = " + PostedDataStream.Size + "<br>") ;
var XML = AmazonAWSPUTRequest (BucketName, AWSDestinationFileID, PostedDataStream) ;
.....
function AmazonAWSPUTRequest (Bucket, Filename, InputStream)
{
....
XMLHttp.open ("PUT", URL + FRequest, false) ;
XMLHttp.setRequestHeader (....
XMLHttp.setRequestHeader (....
...
Response.Write ("InputStream.Size = " + InputStream.Size + "<br>") ;
XMLHttp.send (InputStream) ;
So I use BinaryRead, write it to a binary stream. If I write out the size of the stream I get the size of the file I POST'ed from my application, so I reckon the data is in there somewhere. I then call a routine (with the stream as a parameter) which sets up the AWS authentication/signing and does a PUT.
The AWS call returns no errors and a file of the correct name is created in the right place, but it has a size of zero! InputStream.Size has a value the same as the stream parameter passed to the routine - i.e. the size of the original file.
Any ideas?
POSTSCRIPT. Found the problem. It's caught me a few times with streams, this one. When you write data to a stream, don't forget to reset the stream position back to zero before trying to read from the stream again. I.e. just before the line:
XMLHttp.send (InputStream) ;
I needed to add:
InputStream.Position = 0 ;
My thanks for the interest and suggestions.