I have seeded a row of data to my table by editing db/seed.rb file and executing rake db:seed command. Unknowingly, I put some wrong information in to that row. So I want to remove the previously added row of data. Is there any rake command for the same like rake db:rollback for rake db:migrate.
There are a couple of aspects to this:
1: You want to change the seed data when no other data is present in the database:
You should simply redo the rake db:seed after updating the seed.rb file. Make sure you have MyModel.delete_all before you try to add anything to that model.
2: You want to change the seed data, but there are other data added to the database
This is a bit harder. Often the simplest thing to do here is to manually change the data with either raw sql-statements, or with the use of tools like PhpPpAdmin, PhpMyAdmin etc.
Now, there is possiby one way to hack this together, and that would be to do some voodoo in the seed.rb file. So you could run rake db:seed deseed=true, then in your seed.rb:
if ENV['deseed']
#Do your deseeding action here
else
#Do your seeding here.
end
You could even get real crazy and do something like this:
deseed = ENV['desee']
#DANGER: Dirty hacks upcoming:
deseed? myModelCall = MyModel.method(:destroy_all): myModelCall = MyModel.method(:create)
myModelCall.call :user_id_or_whatevs => 23 #this creates or deletes a MyModel entity with the given parameters
#NOTE this might not work in all cases and I would not necessarily recommend doing this.
#<3uby
I had similar issues when I seeded my data. In fact, I ran the seed command twice and I couldn't find a way to revoke the second seed. However, I had to run rails db:reset command and then run the rails db:seed command again and that fixed the problem for me.
Related
The problem is the following:
I have db/seed.rb full of initial data.
One of migrations depends on data this seed provides.
I'm trying to deploy my app from empty db.
Result is:
RAILS_ENV=production rake db:migrate - fails due to lack of initial data
RAILS_ENV=production rake db:seed - fails due to pending migrations
I wanted to somehow tell rake to ignore pending migrations, but unable to do it so far.
UPDATE (due to additional experience)
Sometimes migrations and model code goes out of sync, so migrations are not being run.
To avoid this problem recently used redefining of model in migrations:
# reset all callbacks, hooks, etc for this model
class MyAwesomeModel < ActiveRecord::Base
end
class DoSomethingCool < ActiveRecord::Migration
def change
...
end
end
I am not very sure if this will help you. But I was looking for something and found this question. So it looks like this might help:
In RAILS_ROOT/config/environments/development.rb
Set the following setting to false:
# NOTE: original version is `:page_load`
config.active_record.migration_error = false
In my situation it now does not show the pending migration error anymore. Should work for rake tasks and console for the same environment as well.
Source in rails/rails
Rename the migration dependent on the data from:
20140730091353_migration_name.rb
to
.20140730091353_migration_name.rb
(add a dot at the start of the filename)
Then run rake db:seed (it will no longer complain on the pending migrations) and then rename back the migration.
If you have more migrations following after, you have to rename all of them or just move it temporary away.
Rails stores migration information in a table called schema_migrations.
You can add the version from your migration into that table to skip a specific migration.
The version is the number string which comes before the description in the file name.
[version]_Create_Awesome.rb
I had a similar issue. I commented out the add_column lines and ran the rake db:migrate commands and then removed the comment when I will need it for the testing or production environment.
There is no way unless you monkey patch the Rails code. I strongly advise you to fix your migrations instead.
A migration should not depend on the existence of some data in the database. It can depend on a previous migration, but of course absolutely not on the data on the db.
If you came across the "pending migrations" issue when trying to seed your data from within a running Rails application, you can simply call this directly which avoids the abort_if_pending_migrations check:
ActiveRecord::Tasks::DatabaseTasks.load_seed
See where seeds are actually called from within ActiveRecord:
https://github.com/rails/rails/blob/v6.0.3.2/activerecord/lib/active_record/railties/databases.rake#L331
and see the DatabaseTasks docs:
https://apidock.com/rails/v6.0.0/ActiveRecord/Tasks/DatabaseTasks
https://apidock.com/rails/v6.0.0/ActiveRecord/Tasks/DatabaseTasks/load_seed
I have a question regarding my migrations in rails.
Normally when i want to add a colum to a model for i dont make extra migrations but instead i perform this steps:
rake db:rollback
next i change the migration file in db/migrations and rerune:
rake db:migrate
The biggest problem is that when i do this i loose my data.
Previous i wrote migrations from the command line with for example
rake g migration Add_Column_House_to_Users house:string
The problem with this approach is that my db/migrations folder afterwards get very large and not very clear! I mean at the end i dont know wich variables the object has! Im not an expert in rails and would like to ask you how to keep the overview over the migrations!Thanks
Just a minor thought - I just use the file db/migrate/schema.rb to determine whats in the database as opposed to tracking through the migrations
You definitely shouldn't use db:rollback with a table with existing data.
I have a few production RonR apps with a ton of data and there are 100+ entries in the migrations table and adding new migrations to tweak tables is the rails way to do things. Not sure what you mean by lucid, but your schema and data model are going to change over time and that is ok and expected.
One tip. The migrations are great, but they are just the beginning, you can include complex logic as needed to fix your existing data (like so)
Changing data in existing table:
def up
add_column :rsvps, :column_name_id, :integer
update_data
end
def update_data
rsvps = Rsvp.where("other_column is not null")
rsvps.each do |rsvp|
invite = Blah.find(rsvp.example_id)
...
rsvp.save
end
end
Another tip: backup your production database often (should do this anyway), but use it to test all of your migrations before deploying. I run scripts like this all the time for local testing:
mysql -u root -ppassword
drop database mydatabase_dev;
create database mydatabase_dev;
use mydatabase_dev;
source /var/www/bak/mydatabase_backup_2013-10-04-16.28.06.sql
exit
rake db:migrate
I have an application that requires a sequence to be present in the database. I have a migration that does the following:
class CreateSequence < ActiveRecord::Migration
def self.up
execute "CREATE SEQUENCE sequence"
end
def self.down
execute "DROP SEQUENCE sequence"
end
end
This does not modify the schema.rb and thus breaks rake db:setup. How can I force the schema to include the sequence?
Note: The sequence exists after running rake db:migrate.
Rails Migrations because they aim toward a schema of tables and fields, instead of a complete database representation including stored procedures, functions, seed data.
When you run rake db:setup, this will create the db, load the schema and then load the seed data.
A few solutions for you to consider:
Choice 1: create your own rake task that does these migrations independent of the Rails Migration up/down. Rails Migrations are just normal classes, and you can make use of them however you like. For example:
rake db:create_sequence
Choice 2: run your specific migration after you load the schema like this:
rake db:setup
rake db:migrate:up VERSION=20080906120000
Choice 3: create your sequence as seed data, because it's essentially providing data (rather than altering the schema).
db/seeds.rb
Choice 4 and my personal preference: run the migrations up to a known good point, including your sequence, and save that blank database. Change rake db:setup to clone that blank database. This is a bit trickier and it sacrifices some capabilities - having all migrations be reversible, having migrations work on top of multiple database vendors, etc. In my experience these are fine tradeoffs. For example:
rake db:fresh #=> clones the blank database, which you store in version control
All the above suggestions are good. however, I think I found a better solution. basically in your development.rb put
config.active_record.schema_format = :sql
For more info see my answer to this issue -
rake test not copying development postgres db with sequences
Check out the pg_sequencer gem. It manages Pg sequences for you as you wish. The one flaw that I can see right now is that it doesn't play nicely with db/schema.rb -- Rails will generate a CREATE SEQUENCE for your tables with a serial field, and pg_sequencer will also generate a sequence itself. (Working to fix that.)
My Environment -> Ruby 1.9.2 and Rails v3.0.5
I noted a strange pattern in rake db:reset. According to rails source code, rake db:reset will => db:drop, db:create and db:migrate. https://github.com/rails/rails/blob/v3.0.5/activerecord/lib/active_record/railties/databases.rake#L159
Setup: One of my migration files have Model.create statements to populate some data (Forgive me, I'm not the one who had put data-filling-code in those migrations :) ..)
Case 1: When I do the steps manually, i mean drop, create, and migrate, one by one - those statements fill data in the table.
Case 2: When I do just rake db:reset, schema is set properly. but the data is not entering the db. Does db:reset skip create/update statements.. I have tried this several times to make sure that I have no faults in the steps I do. I still get this behavior.
what is going wrong here... ?
I think you're reading the wrong line in the source. As I read it:
db:migrate:reset # => [:drop, :create, :migrate]
db:reset # => [:drop, :setup]
So db:reset just create the tables and sets the migrations as if they had been run, without actually running them. db:migrate:reset actually runs each migration.
I had the same problem before but I was running 3.0.3, and it turns out, somehow I manage to mess up the migrations by change the migrations files and not running the migrations(forgot about it or something)...I'll start by checking those files
If I have the following code defined inside db/seeds.rb,
default_car=Car.create({:name=>'TOYOTA'})
User.create({:username=>'default_user', car_id=>default_car.id})
I know the default_car and the user instances will be stored into Database when I run "rake db:seed".
My question is, if I run 'rake db:seed' again, again and again(multiple times), will the same instances be stored to database with multiple copies or it only save the instance once into database no matter how many times I run rake db:seed?
Better solution:
default_car = Car.find_or_create_by_name 'TOYOTA'
user = User.find_or_create_by_username 'default_user'
user.car = default_car
user.save
That way you can run "rake db:seed" multiple times without having to drop the database manually every time.
This is a limitation of having a single seed file. I was finding this frustrating as the application grows you often want to add new seed data so you end up either doing what Pascal suggests or creating either migrations with data in them or rake tasks to load the seeds. To get round this I knocked up seedbank. So I combine this with Pascals approach so I can re-run the seeds but can also target specific ones if I want to.
depends on your models if you allow duplicate values. if you don't it will throw an error. what you do is to clear your db first before running seed via rake db:resetdb