I have a rule that in a previous transition sets a default value for the System.AssignedTo.
Now when the state changes, i want to override that value to a different user.
DEFAULT doesn't work, because there is already a value in there. I can't seem to override that value. Anyone know how that is done? I've tried empty then default.. but that field is also REQUIRED so empty throws an error. Regardless that doesn't work either.
In your rule, try a COPY from Value with the value text being a typed name. Or, DEFAULT from currentuser when editing the Work Item Template in VS (if that all makes sense).
Related
Can you please tell me how can I pass data from initialValue (line #187) to (line #217)?
I need to do a check, and for this, I need to get the index of the current object I'm accessing and the main data set (that is, initialValue).
I used this example - https://ant.design/components/form/#components-form-demo-dynamic-form-items-complex
The problem is that I don't know how to get the original dataset from the .
The idea is this: The user can change the name/description of the fields only for the newly created objects that they added through the button (as in the example), but for those fields that were immediately created from the data set - they cannot, that is, they have should be on.
Tell me, please, how can I do this?
I haven't been able to solve the problem for over an hour now.
I need to somehow assign a custom ID (from a dataset) for each form.
And then pass the information of this field to the validator. If it has id != null => the field becomes disabled.
But damn, how to do it.... 🙁
My top-level component includes a settings dialog that includes the user's credentials. When a change is made in that dialog and the dialog is dismissed (state is changed to dialogOpen=false), I want to force a new fetch from the server since the credentials may have changed. In Relay classic, the top-level component includes a Relay.RootContainer and so I just passed forceFetch=true to that RootContainer. In Relay modern, my top-level component includes a QueryRenderer. So how do I force the refetch in this case?
I found this issue, https://github.com/facebook/relay/issues/1684, which seems to indicate that the QueryRenderer always refetches, but this doesn't seem to be the case in my testing. At least, I'm not seeing my fetchQuery get called after the state change/refresh when the settings dialog is closed. I think I'm probably not completely understanding the statements in that issue.
Can anyone clarify?
OK, I think I figured out my disconnect here. In checking the source for QueryRenderer (don't know why I didn't do this in the first place), I saw that a fetch will occur if props.variables changes. So I just defined a boolean instance variable called refetch and flip its value when my dialog is dismissed:
<QueryRenderer
environment={environment}
query={query}
variables={{refetch: this.refetch}}
Since this doesn't seem to well documented, I'll mention here that QueryRenderer will re-fetch when any of the following conditions is true:
current query parameter is not equal to the previous query parameter.
current environment parameter is not equal to the previous environment parameter.
current variables parameter is not equal to the previous variables parameter.
You can use the retry function that's passed to QueryRenderer's render.
<QueryRenderer
environment={environment}
query={graphql`
query MyQuery($exampleUserId: String!) {
user(userId: $exampleUserId) {
favoriteIceCream
}
}
`}
render={({ error, props, retry }) => {
// Here, you could call `retry()` to refetch data
// or pass it as a prop to a child component.
return (
<IceCreamSelectionView refetchData={retry} user={props.user} />
)
}} />
I've an array of objects containing title and salary which is used in typeahead directive.
I display department name and get entire object as value.
If none of the options match, I want user entered string to be converted to object still. Is there any way to update that?
This answer is pretty late, but I would just use ng-blur (to trap the end of the users input) along with a variable bound to typeahead-no-results. Then test if the variable is true in the method bound to ng-blur, and, if so, make an object out of the String supplied by the user and push it to your data source. Simple example found here.
I am using SWFAddress in actionscript 3 to control urls for navigation and controls, and while I am able to target and change specific parameters, I feel like I am missing a cleaner and more consistent way of handling it, perhaps even a feature or method I am not aware of.
Say I have a url and I want to change just the second param of def to xyz.
http://localhost/some-page/#/?param1=abc¶m2=def¶m3=ghi changed to
http://localhost/some-page/#/?param1=abc¶m2=xyz¶m3=ghi
I currently am doing:
if (SWFAddress.getParameterNames().indexOf("param2") >= 0) {
SWFAddress.setValue(SWFAddress.getPath() + "?"
+ SWFAddress.getQueryString().replace("param2=" + SWFAddress.getParameter("param2"), "param2=xyz"))
Essentially, checking if the param exists, checking what its current value is, then recreating the whole url using base, '?", and query, making sure I replace the the parameter and the parameter's value, making sure I don't miss the equal sign. This get's sloppy, and is error prone if the param exists but is not set to anything, or whether or not there is an equal sign, and a host of other pitfalls.
So, I can not just tell SWFAddress to update that one parameter in the url? A theoretical function of SWFAddress.setParam("param2, "xyz").
Has anyone coded their own method to micro-manipulate SWFAddress and the url, beyond the single function they supply you with of setValue(val:String)?
I think the short answer is no. According to the documentation there is no setParameter to go with the getParameter method. Looking at the code, it seems that the URL is not cached as a property in the class and therefore cannot be manipulated other than via the setValue method which, of course, updates the URL in the browser.
Presumably you're already parsing the URL in your onChange event so you can use the values to set your application state? If so, you shouldn't need to do so again when you come to rebuild the URL prior to updating it from Flash. If you store the deep-link properties on a Model class somewhere you can handle the defaulting, updating, and error checking without needing to resort to String manipulation. You would then rebuild the URL using those properties, a process you could abstract into a method in your Model class if required.
You should also note that the following line is not particularly robust since it will return true for properties such as param22 and sparam2:
if (SWFAddress.getParameterNames().indexOf("param2") >= 0) { }
I have a select multiple on my page. The user can add elements to the list and remove them selecting one or more.
When I get the select's value through params.selectName, I receive only the selected ones. I
understand that this is the default behavior, but I need all of them, not only selected elements.
I don't really want to select all elements each time I send data to server. Does anyone have a better solution? Thanks.
The approach taken by the <g:checkBox> tag is to create a hidden field with the same name as the checkbox but with an underscore prepended. You could use a similar trick here, i.e. whenever you add a new <option> to the <select> you also add a hidden field named (say) selectName_options with the same value. Then in the controller you can take the difference between params.list('selectName') and params.list('selectName_options') to get the un-selected options from the list.
This is a bit of a complex solution to what should be a simple problem, but in my current project we just had the same problem and solved it as #cdeszaq describes.
Assuming an object of class Foo with a collection (bars) of Bar items, where each Bar has a String name and outputs it as its toString() representation, we do this in the FooController:
def removedItems = fooInstance.bars.findAll {
!params.bars.collect { it.key }.contains(it.name)
}
if(removedItems){
removedItems.each {
fooInstance.removeFromBars(it)
}
}