I'm developing an app where the user can purchase digital maps, charts and so on. I'd like to wrap these in in-app-purchases. The thing is that I don't know beforehand how many charts there will be, as I'm getting them from another source from the net. There could be hundreds.
I have a server that periodically gets the charts from that source and stores them locally; there may appear new charts in the future or disappear existing ones. All this without manual intervention.
There are three distinct types of charts.
My first solution was to create three consumable items and let the user buy these; this was working fine but unfortunately Apple rejected it, since they require charts to be "non consumable".
But I'm quite at a loss how to implement what I want with the non-consumable type. If I create these three types as non-consumable, and the user buys one, he will get all the other charts in that group for free, since a non-consumable item can only be bought once.
The only solution I can think of is to create a non-consumable item for every single chart. But that's something I want to avoid at all costs: as it is now, the charts are periodically fetched from the remote source without any manual work on my side. I'd like to keep it that way. I don't want to manually create a new non consumable purchases every time a new chart appears.
Any ideas how to make this scalable?
I can't completely spell it out for you with code but you can handle this problem two ways:
Currency.
You do not sell non-consumable items such as maps. You sell currency. With that currency you purchase maps. The maps you feed dynamically whenever the user hits your store front. That way you only need to track a few purchase options.
The other option:
The company I worked for initially set this up very simply. Our app would launch and we would reach out for a php script that handed us back the app store IDs that we had sitting in it. At that point we'd verify them and use the valid returns. This option allowed us to change our in app purchases through iTunes Connect and then in the script and everything was great.
This is an older post, but I just had the same question and found out there is now a way to dynamically provide non-consumables by hosting the product identifier list on your own server:
Every product you sell in your app has a unique product identifier.
Your app uses these product identifiers to fetch information about
products from the App Store, such as pricing, and to submit payment
requests when users purchase those products. Your app can either read
its list of product identifiers from a file in its app bundle or fetch
them from your server.
If your app has a fixed list of products, such as an in-app purchase
to remove ads or enable functionality, embed the list in the app
bundle. If the list of product identifiers can change without your app
needing to be updated, such as a game that supports additional levels
or characters, have your app fetch the list from your server.
There’s no runtime mechanism to fetch a list of all products
configured in iTunes Connect for a particular app. You’re responsible
for managing your app’s list of products and providing that
information to your app. If you need to manage a large number of
products, consider using the bulk XML upload/download feature in
iTunes Connect.
Apple Developer In-App Purchasing Guide
I think your limit on items is something massive like 10,000 or so.
Pre-create a big number of items, add some code to check your website to see what your highest chart number is and make sure the users can only buy charts that you have.
The app downloads the chart names and corresponding product id from your server and then you're just buying a product.
Apple doesn't care if the actual product is already in the app and unlocked by the purchase, downloaded from their server or provided from your website.
Whether you have these purchased directly via IAP or through some kind of in-app "currency" you could simplify the amount of work you'd need to do in the future by using a naming system which would guarantee a unique map name for each item you want to sell. For example:
NSString *myMapName = [NSString stringWithFormat:#"%#%#%#%#", app_identifier, map_type, top_left_corner_location, scale];
This way if your server passes that information for a new map, there's a programmatic way to know what the IAP identifier should be— just make it the value of the string myMapName.
In the case where you use currency (which sounds easier than the alternative option, and is what lots of big apps out there seem to be doing) you just need to make a hash with some data in your map so that people can't guess the code you're storing in their keychain/plist and magically get all your maps without paying :)
In the case where you actually have individual IAPs for each map, sadly you do have to make an IAP for every possible map once. (But you can hire some kid to do that part for minimum wage, right? It's just data entry) They can be basic shells, though, with the actual info provided via your server as described above, once it's verified that the map has actually been purchased.
Hope this helps!
Related
Have any of you implemented something similar to the below scenario?
Consider an app which provides audiobooks:
The books are maintained dynamically from a web based UI by the authors.
The books become available for users of the iOS app, as in-app purchase items.
By default Apple guidelines suggests using non-consumable IAP, and adding continuously as many IAP items as many books we have. But this is not proper for us, as the authors won’t have access to iTunesConnect, so it cannot be dynamic, “self-serving”.
Therefore we are planning to create a set of generic "consumable" IAP items like “Book worth $0.99”, “Book worth $1.99”, and so on. Then in the app we’ll show the corresponding IAP item for the books as specified by the authors, when they added it to our system.
Of course we store the purchased items on the server side, so the user will always have access to the purchased items -- even if they access it later from another device.
Will Apple approve this implementation?
Does it fit with their IAP policy?
I’ve found some similar quite old topics in the forum but the answers were confusing.
Have you implemented something similar and get approval from Apple?
Apple has accepted our solution, as described in the question.
The point is, as highlighted correctly by #RomOne and #ge0rges that you need to provide the possibility to restore the items later.
As we are storing every purchase in our database, and our users are authenticated (they need to register and log in to purchase), we are able to provide them access to the purchased items forever, even when accessing the app from other device.
We are also storing the associated in-app-purchase's ProductID from iTunesConnect, plus the userID, the price, and the date, to have a detailed register of all purchases.
Important: Apple has rejected our first solution, because they didn't understand how it works, and how a purchase can be restored.
The key to success was describing in detail how the system works and providing a test user access to our web admin site. This allowed the Apple reviewers to see the whole system.
Yeah in my point of view they will accept it. As long as you allow users to retrieve their purchases later on. Your system make me think about a virtual currency I have made where I had to make generic consumable that needed to be actually saved for the user. Apple approved it (and still does) because I was saving all purchases, even if it didn't fit perfectly with IAP policy ;)
The key here is to make sure these purchases are restorable, always. So make sure to store the "IDs" or however you identify the different item in a way that is associated directly to the Apple ID (not account, but Apple ID).
I want to offer my app free for a period and then charge to continue using it. I understand that the way to do this is to force the user to buy an In-App product after the free period. However, if I simply record the date that the user starts using the app in the standardUserDefaults and use this to calculate when the user must buy the upgrade the user could simply delete the app when the time arrives (I assume the sandbox is also deleted) and download the app again for another free period.
First question. Is my reasoning so far correct?
Second question. Is there any way of accessing the date that an app is first downloaded?
Assuming the answers to these questions are Yes and No I have come up with the following solution.
Upon downloading the app the user is first forced to "buy" free an In-App product which then will have the date it was added to the transaction queue. This In-App product would then be downloaded for any subsequent download and I could use the date of this product as my reference date.
As I can find no reference to this problem or solutions I really wanted confirmation that this was a sound way to proceed or if there was another more standard way of dealing with the problem.
Thank you
Silas
You are not allowed to limit you app for free for a limited period:
11.9 Apps containing content or services that expire after a limited time will be rejected, except for specific approved content (e.g.
films, television programs, music, books)
If you want to risk it, you could save the date (encrypted) in keychain to make it more persistent. Just so you know, user are able to access their keychain data if they iCloud keychain sharing and are on a Mac. So if they delete the correct key or rest there device your app will fall back to the free/trial mode.
This does not seem entirely consistent with:
Communicate the value of your products to your users. Users want to
know exactly what they’re going to buy. Combine information from the
App Store, such as product prices and descriptions, with additional
data from your server or the app bundle, such as images or demos of
your products. Let users interact with a product in a limited way
before buying it. For example, a game that gives the user the option
to buy new race cars can allow users to run a test lap with the new
car. Likewise, a drawing app that lets the user buy additional brushes
can give users the chance to draw with the new brush on a small
scratch pad and see the difference between brushes. This kind of
design provides users an opportunity to experience the product and be
convinced they want to purchase it.
https://developer.apple.com/library/ios/documentation/NetworkingInternet/Conceptual/StoreKitGuide/Chapters/ShowUI.html
One way of letting the user interact with a product feature in a limited way is to let them use it a few times before requiring that they pay to use the feature.
I have an App with 2 different Modes.I want each Mode to have it's own store for In-App purchases.I'm having a hard time find any policy information or info about having more than one In-App store inside the same App (that could be because it's not a problem at all).
If it's not okay to have "2" stores, would it be okay to have them be the same store and then just filter out the ones that shouldn't be available in that particular Mode?
Simply use the mode to select which of two different sets of in-app purchases are shown to the user. You are free to show or hide in-app purchases as you like, however be clear to the user about any previous purchases!
You can show what ever you want in your shop, but all users should be able in a way or another to buy the same product otherwise it can be seen as discrimination in some countries and it's illegal.
If the in-app purchases are clear functionalities of one mode and the user choses which mode he uses then I don't think there is a problem. But if you force assign a mode to a specific user without him knowing or being able to do anything about then you can have problems, especially if the functionalities are different.
And for example, I worked for some companies which use tiers for consumable (if you already purchased the cheap package, the more expensive one are shown) and this was a problem of discrimination. The solution was allowing any customer to contact support to get access to lower (or higher) tiers. Then even if it's not in the shop they have the possibility to buy the IAP if they want to.
Consider following example. Let's say we have an app in which professional writers write stories from a web based UI. And then these stories become available for user of the iOS app as in app purchase items.
As you may know we need to create in app purchase products in advance. But in our situations it means that for each of the story created by the writers we will have to create a new IAP product and wait for Apple to approve it.
To circumvent this, I am planning to create generic "consumable" products in IAP like story worth $1.99, story worth $2.99, so on, so forth. Then in the Application UI I will show the list of stories of created by the writers and show corresponding prices for the stories as specified by the authors when they created the story. Once the user taps on the buy button, I will show the purchase for the generic consumable product of the same price and complete the in app purchase process.
Now the question is will Apple approve of such implementation? Does it fit with their IAP policy? I am asking as I couldn't find a guideline for a workflow such as this.
Another approach to implement this is by implementing an in app credit/currency system, like games use. Where people buy credits/coins and then they purchase items with coins. This is a tried and tested approach but it doesn't fit in my analogy of the app, hence the question.
What you want to achieve is perfectly feasible, the only thing is your purchasable content has to be dynamic. You will have to download the product IDs from a server rather than having them hardcoded in your app.
To refer to your example, I can imagine a table view being fed with a list of objects that would have the SKProduct ID stored on them. You would have to do this because, at the time of writing, you can't retrieve all the available product IDs for your app from Apple servers. I know it's a pain in the ass they didn't implement this feature but to be honest, if they haven't already I don't think they will ever do.
This is the method I'm referring to: initWithProductIdentifiers
You provide it with a NSSet with all the identifiers you want to retrieve, but if you provide an empty set or a nil, it doesn't reply with all the existing. You can file a bug with a Apple if you feel this doesn't work as it should. Please check this SO answer if you still have any doubts: link
Another important thing to note is, you will have to upload your products manually. Apple doesn't expose any API in order to have the process automated. This means, every time a writer uploaded something to your server, you would have to log in into iTunes connect and create a product. Plus, you would be limited to 10,000 products because that's the maximum amount of different products you can register with Apple. I'd also recommend you to have a quick read to the iTunes Connect guide, which has some important information like the one I just mentioned: iTunes Connect
Regarding 3rd party frameworks, like the aforementioned UrbanAirship, they will just save you from having to implement receipt validation on your servers. Apart from that, I don't see any major advantages.
Said this, I'd recommend you to reconsider your business model. Is it really worth it all the hassle of uploading the products one per one? Or is it better to go the subscription way, in which your users pay a fixed amount of money for downloading a number of articles per month. You could have different tiers, like, basic, premium (unlimited downloads) an so on and control the delivery of the articles from your servers. That's up to you, but for me the answer is pretty clear.
Pritam
For delivery dynamic content you should be using a Subscription, not a consumable. Using a subscription solves your problem by allowing you to charge for each update AND distribute new content at the same time.
You can looking into 3rd party services like UrbanAirship that will significantly reduce the amount of time you spend trying to dynamically deliver your content, track subscriptions and expirations, etc.
I have a very strait forward question (and yes I've looked though apple documentation to see if this has an answer but no luck... I may have accidentally missed it though)
Here's my plan:
The problem I've been trying to find a workaround for is that if the admin would ever want to add a product, he would have to log into iTunes connect to add it and also add it in a custom control panel. We, obviously, don't want to make him suffer that so I've been looking for a solution but I need you guys to tell me if it's allowed by apple. Basically I will take over most of the product handling on our servers and will only go to apple with the transactions. This means that apple will not have an in-app purchase set up for ALL the products... only one for each length of subscription (1 month, 3 month... etc) and a few consumable in-app purchases for the various prices of the issues/singles
Side note: I will be selling monthly issues that contain multiple singles for each day of the month. The user will be able to download a full month or a single day at a time if they like.
DEFINITION OF CONSUMABLE PURCHASE - products must be purchased each time the user needs that item. For example, one-time services are commonly implemented as consumable products.
So I will store all the information in our server about the products and if someone chooses to buy a single month's issue that was set to 4.99 (on our server, not apples) then the app will run the in-app purchase with apple that is listed for the 4.99 tier. Whenever a person opens the app for the first time, their app will send some information to our server and they will have a row set aside for them where all the information about their purchases will be recorded so that they can restore them if they switch over to another device.
If you guys think i'm safe in doing this, please let me know so that I can proceed. Also, if this method helps anyone, feel free to use it!
Thanks,
Matt
I think your restore process might be flawed. You talk about the app sending some information up to your server, but what is that information? There is no reliable way to uniquely identify a user across different devices.
If you want to continue on this path you'll want to make sure that your recovery and failover process is very solid. Try out every imaginable scenario. From an app store submission point of view, you'll want to consider a token/coin-based approach. Of course, Apple's guidelines are fairly loose and subject to change so it's always possible you'll get rejected, but tokens are certainly more solid than simply using the same generic in-app purchase.
In a token system, you would set up in-app purchases for different numbers of tokens that the user can purchase as a sort-of virtual currency only valid within your application. Then users can spend these tokens on any items that you dynamically create.
Server-side this means you'll need some way to store how many tokens a user currently has and a way to uniquely identify a user across devices, which is a fairly uncertain proposition. Instead of storing the number of tokens each user has, you could implement some sort of hashing algorithm that generates a hash from an in-app purchase receipt and then sends it up to your server. If the app crashes or the network dies after purchase but before sending your hashes up, next time they open the app you can recalculate all of the hashes, send 'em up, and if the server doesn't recognize a hash it just adds it to the database. Then if a user wants to restore their purchases you simply recalculate the hashes on the device using the in-app purchase receipts you'll receive and then send them up to your server and ask the server to figure out for each of those hashes, how many tokens the user has left. You could think of it like a gift card system, where each hash is one gift card.
Again, app store rules change and if apple thinks you're trying to game the system and not provide a useful experience they have the right to reject you. It could be worthwhile to open a Developer Technical Support request and see if an apple engineer can provide you with a better solution or tell you if the reviewers are likely to accept your application.