I am working on this project where I wish to classify the general mood of a Twitter user from his recent tweets. Since the tweets can belong to a huge variety of domains how should I go about it ?
I could use the Naive Bayes algorithm (like here: http://phpir.com/bayesian-opinion-mining) but since the tweets can belong to a large variety of domains, I am not sure if this will be very accurate.
The other option is using maybe sentiment dictionaries like SentiWordNet or here. Would this be a better approach, I don't know.
Also where can I get data to train my classifier if I plan to use the Naive Bayes or some other algorithm ?
Just to add here, I am primarily coding in PHP.
It appears you could use SentiWordNet as the classifier data if you are focused on a word-by-word approach. It is how simple Bayesian spam filters works; it focuses on each word.
The advantage here is that while many of the words in SentiWordNet have multiple meanings, each with different positive/objective/negative scores, you could experiment with using the scores of the other words in the tweet to narrow in on the most appropriate meaning for each multi-meaning word, which could give you a more accurate score for each word and for the overall tweet.
Related
I'm new to the ML/NLP field so my question is what technology would be most appropriate to achieve the following goal:
We have a short sentence - "Where to go for dinner?" or "What's your favorite bar?" or "What's your favorite cheap bar?"
Is there a technology that would enable me to train it providing the following data sets:
"Where to go for dinner?" -> Dinner
"What's your favorite bar?" -> Bar
"What's your favorite cheap restaurant?" -> Cheap, Restaurant
so that next time we have a similar question about an unknown activity, say, "What is your favorite expensive [whatever]" it would be able to extract "expensive" and [whatever]?
The goal is if we can train it with hundreds of variations(or thousands) of the question asked and relevant output data expected, so that it can work with everyday language.
I know how to make it even without NLP/ML if we have a dictionary of expected terms like Bar, Restaurant, Pool, etc., but we also want it to work with unknown terms.
I've seen examples with Rake and Scikit-learn for classification of "things", but I'm not sure how would I feed text into those and all those examples had predefined outputs for training.
I've also tried Google's NLP API, Amazon Lex and Wit to see how good they are at extracting entities, but the results are disappointing to say the least.
Reading about summarization techniques, I'm left with the impression it won't work with small, single-sentence texts, so I haven't delved into it.
As #polm23 mentioned for simple stuff you can use the POS tagging to do the extraction. The services you mentioned like LUIS, Dialog flow etc. , uses what is called Natural Language Understanding. They make uses of intents & entities(detailed explanation with examples you can find here). If you are concerned that your data is going online or sometimes you have to go offline, you always go for RASA.
Things you can do with RASA:
Entity extraction and sentence classification. Mention which particular term to be extracted from the sentence by tagging the word position with a variety of sentence. So if any different word comes other than what you had given in the training set it will be detected.
Uses rule-based learning and also keras LSTM for detection.
One downside when comparing with the online services is that you have to manually tag the position numbers in the JSON file for training as opposed to the click and tag features in the online services.
You can find the tutorial here.
I am having pain in my leg.
Eg I have trained RASA with a variety of sentences for identifying body part and symptom (I have limited to 2 entities only, you can add more), then when an unknown sentence (like the one above) appears it will correctly identify "pain" as "symptom" and "leg" as "body part".
Hope this answers your question!
Since "hundreds to thousands" sound like you have very little data for training a model from scratch. You might want to consider training (technically fine-tuning) a DialogFlow Agent to match sentences ("Where to go for dinner?") to intents ("Dinner"), then integrating via API calls.
Alternatively, you can invest time in fine-tuning a small pre-trained model like "Distilled BERT classifier" from "HuggingFace" as you won't need the 100s of thousands to billions of data samples required to train a production-worthy model. This can also be assessed offline and will equip you to solve other NLP problems in the future without much low-level understanding of the underlying statistics.
I am trying to generate a Python program that determines if a website is harmful (porn etc.).
First, I made a Python web scraping program that counts the number of occurrences for each word.
result for harmful websites
It's a key value dictionary like
{ word : [ # occurrences in harmful websites, # of websites that contain these words] }.
Now I want my program to analyze the words from any websites to check if the website is safe or not. But I don't know which methods will suit to my data.
The key thing here is your training data. You need some sort of supervised learning technique where your training data consists of website's data itself (text document) and its label (harmful or safe).
You can certainly use the RNN but there also other natural language processing techniques and much faster ones.
Typically, you should use a proper vectorizer on your training data (think of each site page as a text document), for example tf-idf (but also other possibilities; if you use Python I would strongly suggest scikit that provides lots of useful machine learning techniques and mentioned sklearn.TfidfVectorizer is already within). The point is to vectorize your text document in enhanced way. Imagine for example the English word the how many times it typically exists in text? You need to think of biases such as these.
Once your training data is vectorized you can use for example stochastic gradient descent classifier and see how it performs on your test data (in machine learning terminology the test data means to simply take some new data example and test what your ML program outputs).
In either case you will need to experiment with above options. There are many nuances and you need to test your data and see where you achieve the best results (depending on ML algorithm settings, type of vectorizer, used ML technique itself and so on). For example Support Vector Machines are great choice when it comes to binary classifiers too. You may wanna play with that too and see if it performs better than SGD.
In any case, remember that you will need to obtain quality training data with labels (harmful vs. safe) and find the best fitting classifier. On your journey to find the best one you may also wanna use cross validation to determine how well your classifier behaves. Again, already contained in scikit-learn.
N.B. Don't forget about valid cases. For example there may be a completely safe online magazine where it only mentions the harmful topic in some article; it doesn't mean the website itself is harmful though.
Edit: As I think of it, if you don't have any experience with ML at all it could be useful to take any online course because despite the knowledge of API and libraries you will still need to know what it does and the math behind the curtain (at least roughly).
What you are trying to do is called sentiment classification and is usually done with recurrent neural networks (RNNs) or Long short-term memory networks (LSTMs). This is not an easy topic to start with machine learning. If you are new you should have a look into linear/logistic regression, SVMs and basic neural networks (MLPs) first. Otherwise it will be hard to understand what is going on.
That said: there are many libraries out there for constructing neural networks. Probably easiest to use is keras. While this library simplifies a lot of things immensely, it isn't just a magic box that makes gold from trash. You need to understand what happens under the hood to get good results. Here is an example of how you can perform sentiment classification on the IMDB dataset (basically determine whether a movie review is positive or not) with keras.
For people who have no experience in NLP or ML, I recommend using TFIDF vectorizer instead of using deep learning libraries. In short, it converts sentences to vector, taking each word in vocabulary to one dimension (degree is occurrence).
Then, you can calculate cosine similarity to resulting vector.
To improve performance, use stemming / lemmatizing / stopwords supported in NLTK libraires.
Currenlty what we do, check the user discussion based on some keywords on social media. As per the keywords detection we identify that this can be rumour.
Approach to automate the process:
Keyword based : verifying the conversation for 1-2 gram based keywords. If keyword present, marking it as suspected conversation
Classifier based approach : Training the classifier with some prelabeled suspected conversations. Which ever being classified with >50% probability, marked as suspected.
For 2nd approach I am thinking of naive bayes classifier, and identifying the result with precision, recall, F measure value using scikit learn.
Is there any better approach to this? Or some model which can be combination of both approach?
There's no reason that the two approaches would be mutually exclusive. If you are going to be identifying keywords anyway, then you could easily extract a feature for machine-learning. And if you are doing machine-learning, you might as well include features that capture what you know about the keywords you have identified.
Is there a reason that you have chosen a Naive Bayes model? You may want to try a number of models to compare their performance. Your statement about 'identifying the result with precision, recall, F-measure' makes it seem like you don't understand how you make predictions with a machine-learning model. Those three metrics are the result of comparing a model's predictions with 'gold-standard' labels on a number of texts. I would recommend reading through an introduction to machine-learning. If you have already decided that you want to use scikit-learn, then perhaps you could work through their tutorial here. Another python library worth looking into is nltk, which has a free companion book here.
If python is not your preferred language, then there are lots of other options, too. For example, weka is a well-known tool written in java. It has a very user-friendly graphical interface for the basic functions, but it is not difficult to use from the command line as well.
Good luck!
So I have a data set which consists of tweets from various news organizations. I've loaded it into RapidMiner, tokenized it, and produced some n-grams of it. Now I want to be able to have RapidMiner automatically classify my data into various categories based on the topic of the tweets.
I'm pretty sure RapidMiner can do this, but according to the research I've done into it, I need a training data set to be able to show RapidMiner how I want things classified. So I need a training data set, though given the categories I wanted to classify things into, I might have to create my own.
So my questions are these:
1) Is there a training data set for twitter data that focuses more on the topic of the tweet as opposed to a sentiment analysis publicly available?
2) If there isn't one publicly available, how can I create my own? My idea to do it was to go through the tweets themselves and associate the tokens and n-grams with the categories I want. Some concerns I have with that are that I won't be able to manually classify enough tweets to create a training data set comprehensive enough so that I can get a good accuracy rate for the automatic classifier.
3) Any general advice for topical classification of text data would be great. This is the first time that I've done a project like this, and I'm sure there are things I could improve on. :)
There may be training corpora that work for you, but you need to say what your topic or categories are to identify it. The fact that this is Twitter may be relevant, but the data source is likely to be much less relevant to the classification accuracy you will achieve than the topic is. So if you take the infamous 20 newsgroups data set this is likely to work on Twitter as well, but only if the categories you are after are the 20 categories from that data set. If you want to classify cats vs dogs or Android vs iPhone you need to find a data set for that.
In most cases you will have to create initial labels manually, which is, as you say, a lot of work. One workaround might be to start with something simpler like a keyword search to create subsets of your tweets for which you know they deal with a particular category. Then you create the model on top of that and hope that it generalizes to identify the same categories even though the original keywords do not occur.
Alternatively, depending on your application (and if you actually want to build an applicaion), you may as well start with only a small data set and accept that you have poor classification. Then you generate classifications, show them to the users of your apps, and collect some form of explicit or implicit feedback on the classification (e.g. users can flag tweets as incorrectly classified). This way you improve your training corpus and periodically update your model.
Finally, if you do not know what your topics are and you want RapidMiner to identify the topics, you may want to try clustering as opposed to classification. Just create a few clusters and look at the top words for each cluster. They may well be quite dissimilar and describe what the respective clusters are about.
I believe your third question may be a bit broad for stackoverflow and is probably better answered by a text book.
I am new to clustering, just implemented a couple of algorithms before.
I need to cluster tweets according to their similarity.
One way is to use only hash tags, but I don't think it would be that informative. So complete tweets should be analyzed.
Moreover I was searching the web for the algorithms for clustering feeds.
One I encountered is TF-IDF. I want to know are there better algorithms which can be implemented in few hours and are better than TF-IDF.Also I would be intersetd in some informatics source about the clustering of twitter feeds.
PS: No. of tweets : 10^5
As Anony Mousse pointed out in his comment above, TF/IDF is only a normalization measure to make sure words that are overly popular among all documents don't gain too much important.
For data preparation, I'd recommend reading this and the second part of it too (linked via the above link), if you haven't already done so. It is very important to get a vector of numbers from each tweet. In general, in machine learning, it is important to get a feature vector because that way, you can apply mathematical algorithms to your data then.
Now that you have a feature vector for each tweet in your collection, things get a bit simple. There are two clustering algorithms that come to my mind that you can whip up in a couple of hours each, with maybe extensive testing taking a weekend.
K-Means Clustering
Hierarchical Clustering With Single Linkage
With 100,000 tweets only, you should actually be able to implement these algorithms on a single computer (i.e. this is not big data -- no need for cluster computing), using your favorite language (C++, Java, Python, MATLAB, etc.). Personally, I think it's easier to implement K-Means Clustering (which I have done before) compared to Hierarchical Clustering (which I have also done before).
EDIT: Please follow the below comments only if you have labeled training data, i.e. you have tweets say, with labeled sentiments (happy-user, ok-ok, bad product, angry-user, abusive-user) and the question you want to answer is: Given a new tweet, what is it's sentiment?
Here is one very good resource you should look at, to get a better understanding of K-Nearest Neighbors:
Laszlo Kozma's Slides
In general, for the other two algorithms, there are ample resources, with Wikipedia articles the best way to start. Personally, I feel K-Nearest Neighbors (shorthand k-NN) is the easiest of the three to implement and will give you quick results.