Blackberry File (Webworks) - blackberry

I'm trying (Very simply) to get a file list of the camera directory using webworks.
The code I'm trying is as follows:
function displayPhotos(id) {
try {
var Dir, path, items;
if ((window.blackberry === undefined) || (blackberry.io === undefined) || (blackberry.io.file === undefined)) {
appendContent("photoDetails", "<p><i><b>blackberry.io.file</b> object not found (likely cause is WebWorks APIs are not supported by this user agent).</i></p>");
debug.log("displayPhotos", "blackberry.io.file object is undefined.", debug.error);
return false;
}
Dir = blackberry.io.dir;
path = "";
path = "file:///Device/home/user/camera"";
items = Dir.listFiles(path);
console.log(items);
//setContent(id, formatAsHTML(path, items));
}
catch(e) {
console.log("displayPhotos", e, debug.exception);
}
}
All I get back is error 1004 - I assume this is permissions based, but I fail to believe I can't get a READ on the camera fails - any one know anything?
Cheers!

Well I figured it out, hope this helps anyine getting the dreaded blackberry webworks error 1004.
You need to change device in the path to store. That's it really. This example works:
function displayPhotos(myFolder) {
try {
var Dir, path, items;
Dir = blackberry.io.dir;
path = "";
if (myFolder != undefined){
path = myFolder;
} else {
path = "file:///store/home/user/pictures";
//file:///store/home/user/camera
}
items = Dir.listFiles(path);
return items;
}
catch(e) {
console.log("displayPhotos", e, debug.exception);
}
}
function displayFiles(myFolder) {
try {
console.log("displayFiles", "in " + myFolder);
return displayPhotos(myFolder);
}
catch(e) {
console.log("displayFiles", e, debug.exception);
}
}
You can call it like so:
displayFiles();
Or specify a folder like so:
displayFiles("file:///store/home/user/camera");
Returns an array of filenames.
Hope this helps someone!

Related

IOS 10.3.1 cordova based App crashes when trying to write to IndexedDB

I'm developing a cordova-based multi-platform web-app using sapui5 framework v1.44 and indexedDB for storing data.The app was working fine untill last ios update, 10.3.1, now it crashes when trying to write to indexedDB. I'm using put method for updating data and i did a clean install of the app. The code frame where i try to write to indexedDB is this:
writeToIDB: function (objStoreName, result, success, error) {
//Asynchronous function
var defer = Q.defer();
var res = [];
if (!!result && Array.isArray(result)) {
res = result;
} else if (!!result && result.hasOwnProperty("results") && Array.isArray(result.results)) {
res = result.results;
} else if (!!result && typeof result === 'object') {
res.push(result);
}
if (res.length >= 0) {
if (window.myDB) {
if (!window.myDB.objectStoreNames.contains(objStoreName)) {
console.log("ObjectStore for " + objStoreName + " doesn't exist");
if (error) {
error("ko")
} else {
defer.reject("ko");
}
} else {
var oTransaction = window.myDB.transaction([objStoreName], "readwrite");
var oDataStore = oTransaction.objectStore(objStoreName);
oTransaction.oncomplete = function (event) {
console.log("Transaction completed: database modification for " + objStoreName + " finished.");
if (success) {
success();
} else {
defer.resolve("ok");
}
};
oTransaction.onerror = function (event) {
console.log("Transaction for " + objStoreName + " not opened due to error. Check for duplicate items or missing properties!");
console.log(event.target.error);
if (error) {
error("ko")
} else {
defer.reject("ko");
}
};
var oRecord = {};
for (var i = 0; i < res.length; i++) {
oRecord = res[i];
oDataStore.put(oRecord);
}
}
} else {
this.createIDB().then(
function (resCreate) {
console.log("DB Created successfully");
if (!window.myDB.objectStoreNames.contains(objStoreName)) {
console.log("ObjectStore for " + objStoreName + " doesn't exist");
if (error) {
error("ko")
} else {
defer.reject("ko");
}
} else {
var oTransaction = window.myDB.transaction([objStoreName], "readwrite");
var oDataStore = oTransaction.objectStore(objStoreName);
oTransaction.oncomplete = function (event) {
console.log("Transaction completed: database modification for " + objStoreName + " finished.");
if (success) {
success();
} else {
defer.resolve("ok");
}
};
oTransaction.onerror = function (event) {
console.log("Transaction for " + objStoreName + " not opened due to error. Check for duplicate items or missing properties!");
console.log(event.target.error);
if (error) {
error("ko")
} else {
defer.reject("ko");
}
};
var oRecord = {};
for (var i = 0; i < res.length; i++) {
oRecord = res[i];
oDataStore.put(oRecord);
}
}
}.bind(this),
function (err) {
console.log("DB Creation failed");
if (error) {
error("ko")
} else {
defer.reject("ko");
}
}.bind(this)
);
}
} else {
if (error) {
error("ko")
} else {
defer.reject("ko");
}
}
if (typeof success === 'undefined' && typeof error === 'undefined') {
return defer.promise;
}
},
P.S.I have omitted parts of the code.
This was working fine with the previous version of ios, i think i had installed the 10.2.1, now it simply crashes after calling the put method. I tried upgrading now ios to the beta of 10.3.2 but the result is the same. Anyone else noticed this or have any idea of how to resolve this problem?
Thanks
K
UPDATE
I've found the issue: the complex dataTypes. Since IndexedDB supports saving and retrieving complex dataTypes, i had some properties which were arrays or objects that i used to save in some of my ObjectStores. This is definitely a big problem for me because the only workaround i can think for this is to stingify the complex fields but since i work with a lot of data this would create a big performance issue. I hope the ios developer team will find a solution for this soon enough
Are you sure every key in the res[] array is a valid key? There is a closed bug here:
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=170000
It looks if you pass in an invalid key it will cause webkit to crash.
This fix for this will likely be contained in the next public release of iOS.
To determine what a valid key is see this section of the W3.org spec:
3.1.3 Keys
In order to efficiently retrieve records stored in an indexed database, each record is organized according to its key. A value is said to be a valid key if it is one of the following ECMAScript [ECMA-262] types: Number primitive value, String primitive value, Date object, or Array object. An Array is only a valid key if every item in the array is defined and is a valid key (i.e. sparse arrays can not be valid keys) and if the Array doesn't directly or indirectly contain itself. Any non-numeric properties on an Array are ignored, and thus do not affect whether the Array is a valid key. If the value is of type Number, it is only a valid key if it is not NaN. If the value is of type Date it is only a valid key if its [[PrimitiveValue]] internal property, as defined by [ECMA-262], is not NaN. Conforming user agents must support all valid keys as keys.
This was taken from here:
https://www.w3.org/TR/IndexedDB/#key-construct
Not sure if it's the same issue, but I had a crash on iOS 10.3 that I didnt get in any other browser. Using Dexie wrapper for indexedDB, I did a get all records from table search:
db.table.toArray(function (results) {
// process...
})
and got flames from Xcode to what looked like a threading issue in WebKit so I just added setTimeout( ... ,1) and that hacked around the problem for me.

Use OS.File to test if path is locked?

With OS.File I am able to open a file with lock on it:
let options = {
winShare: 0 // Exclusive lock on Windows
};
if (OS.Constants.libc.O_EXLOCK) {
// Exclusive lock on *nix
options.unixFlags = OS.Constants.libc.O_EXLOCK;
}
let file = yield OS.File.open(..., options);
Is it possible to test if the path is locked though. I'm looking for alternative to nsiToolkitProfile.lockProfile
This is copy paste to scratchpad code. The top block uses nsitoolkitprofile to test if locked. And it works fine. The second part uses OS.File.open and it always throws error.
Cu.import('resource://gre/modules/osfile.jsm');
Cu.import('resource://gre/modules/FileUtils.jsm');
var tps = Cc['#mozilla.org/toolkit/profile-service;1'].createInstance(Ci.nsIToolkitProfileService); //toolkitProfileService
var folderOfProfile = 'k46wtieb.clean'; //folder names of relative profiles found here: %APPDATA%\Mozilla\Firefox\Profiles
var rootPathDefault = FileUtils.getFile('DefProfRt', []).path;
var localPathDefault = FileUtils.getFile('DefProfLRt', []).path;
var aDirect = new FileUtils.File(OS.Path.join(rootPathDefault, folderOfProfile));
var aTemp = new FileUtils.File(OS.Path.join(localPathDefault, folderOfProfile));
try {
var locker = tps.lockProfilePath(aDirect, aTemp)
Services.ww.activeWindow.alert('NOT open');
locker.unlock();
} catch (ex) {
if (ex.result == Cr.NS_ERROR_FILE_ACCESS_DENIED) {
Services.ww.activeWindow.alert('its in use');
} else {
throw ex;
}
}
var promise = OS.File.open(aDirect.path)
promise.then(
function(aVal) {
Services.ww.activeWindow.alert('promise success, aVal = ' + aVal);
aVal.close();
},
function(aReason) {
Services.ww.activeWindow.alert('promise rejected, aReason = ' + uneval(aReason));
}
)
The promise is always rejected with aReason.becauseAccessDenied every time :(
Just try to open it... If you cannot because of permissions, then the file is probably locked in another location.

Common way to execute a stored proc from both ColdFusion and Railo

I think I've gotten the most simplest scenario built. I just want to pass it by everyone for a sanity check. Here's the idea:
GetErrorCodes.cfm does the following:
<cfscript>
response = new ErrorCodes().WhereXXX(); // ACF or Railo, doesn't matter
</cfscript>
ErrorCodes.cfc:
function WhereXXX() {
return new sproc().exec('app.GetErrorCodes'); // All my functions will do this instead of executing the sproc themselves.
}
sproc.cfc:
component {
function exec(procedure) {
local.result = {};
if (server.ColdFusion.productname == 'Railo') {
return new Railo().exec(arguments.procedure); // Has to be outside of sproc.cfc because ColdFusion throws a syntax error otherwise.
}
local.svc = new storedProc();
local.svc.setProcedure(arguments.procedure);
local.svc.addProcResult(name='qry');
try {
local.obj = local.svc.execute();
local.result.Prefix = local.obj.getPrefix();
local.result.qry = local.obj.getProcResultSets().qry;
} catch(any Exception) {
request.msg = Exception.Detail;
}
return local.result;
}
Railo.cfc:
component {
function exec(procedure) {
local.result = {};
try {
storedproc procedure=arguments.procedure result="local.result.Prefix" returncode="yes" {
procresult name="local.result.qry";
}
} catch(any Exception) {
request.msg = Exception.Message;
}
return local.result;
}
}
So I've been working on this all day, but tell me, is this a sane way to keep the source code the same if it's to be run on either a ColdFusion server or a Railo server?
Um... just use <cfstoredproc> instead of trying to use two different CFScript approaches that are mutually exclusive to each other of the CFML platforms.

Why am I getting this error in a basic Rails+Ember app?

I am trying to do a simple CRUD app using Ember + Rails and I'm getting the following error when trying to go to the /workouts route.
Error while loading route: TypeError {} ember.js?body=1:415
Uncaught TypeError: Object function () {
if (!wasApplied) {
Class.proto(); // prepare prototype...
}
o_defineProperty(this, GUID_KEY, undefinedDescriptor);
o_defineProperty(this, '_super', undefinedDescriptor);
var m = meta(this), proto = m.proto;
m.proto = this;
if (initMixins) {
// capture locally so we can clear the closed over variable
var mixins = initMixins;
initMixins = null;
this.reopen.apply(this, mixins);
}
if (initProperties) {
// capture locally so we can clear the closed over variable
var props = initProperties;
initProperties = null;
var concatenatedProperties = this.concatenatedProperties;
for (var i = 0, l = props.length; i < l; i++) {
var properties = props[i];
Ember.assert("Ember.Object.create no longer supports mixing in other definitions, use createWithMixins instead.", !(properties instanceof Ember.Mixin));
for (var keyName in properties) {
if (!properties.hasOwnProperty(keyName)) { continue; }
var value = properties[keyName],
IS_BINDING = Ember.IS_BINDING;
if (IS_BINDING.test(keyName)) {
var bindings = m.bindings;
if (!bindings) {
bindings = m.bindings = {};
} else if (!m.hasOwnProperty('bindings')) {
bindings = m.bindings = o_create(m.bindings);
}
bindings[keyName] = value;
}
var desc = m.descs[keyName];
Ember.assert("Ember.Object.create no longer supports defining computed properties.", !(value instanceof Ember.ComputedProperty));
Ember.assert("Ember.Object.create no longer supports defining methods that call _super.", !(typeof value === 'function' && value.toString().indexOf('._super') !== -1));
Ember.assert("`actions` must be provided at extend time, not at create time, when Ember.ActionHandler is used (i.e. views, controllers & routes).", !((keyName === 'actions') && Ember.ActionHandler.detect(this)));
if (concatenatedProperties && indexOf(concatenatedProperties, keyName) >= 0) {
var baseValue = this[keyName];
if (baseValue) {
if ('function' === typeof baseValue.concat) {
value = baseValue.concat(value);
} else {
value = Ember.makeArray(baseValue).concat(value);
}
} else {
value = Ember.makeArray(value);
}
}
if (desc) {
desc.set(this, keyName, value);
} else {
if (typeof this.setUnknownProperty === 'function' && !(keyName in this)) {
this.setUnknownProperty(keyName, value);
} else if (MANDATORY_SETTER) {
Ember.defineProperty(this, keyName, null, value); // setup mandatory setter
} else {
this[keyName] = value;
}
}
}
}
}
finishPartial(this, m);
this.init.apply(this, arguments);
m.proto = proto;
finishChains(this);
sendEvent(this, "init");
} has no method 'find'
My code is located here: https://github.com/ecl1pse/ember-workouts
What am I doing wrong?
Edit: Upon further investigation I believe the culprit is
EmberWorkouts.WorkoutsRoute = Ember.Route.extend(
model: -> EmberWorkouts.Workout.find()
This doesn't actually return anything. How do I debug from there?
If I replace that with this
EmberWorkouts.WorkoutsRoute = Ember.Route.extend
model: -> [{title: 'hi'}, {title: 'damn'}]
The view actually renders content.
How do I get the model to collect from Rails properly?
Ember Data's interface has changed a little with the current release:
You can clear out the store.js file entirely. Ember Data will automatically set up a data store for you using the REST Adapter (unless you tell it otherwise).
Use model: -> #store.find('workout') instead.
I tested this with your app and it works.
If you haven't read through the Ember Data Guide in the last week or two (it's changed a lot), I would spend a few minutes on it.
The fix for this error (as of ember-data 1.0.0.beta.6) for me was to make sure that the JSON returned from the server included an "id" field for each model, BUT not to explicitly declare the id when setting up the Ember DS.Model.
jbuilder template:
json.scans do
json.array! #scans do |scan|
json.id scan.id # This prop has to be there
json.name scan.name
end
end
Ember model:
EmberApp.Scan = DS.Model.extend(
// Don't include the id prop here
name: DS.attr("string")
)

How to open the page in browser at the time of uninstalling the firefox addon

I want to open the link when the user uninstalls the addon, so for this what i have to code and under which event.
If anybody know about this then please help me out.
Currently this is what I am doing at the time of uninstall. But gBrowser.addTab(Website + 'uninstalled=true&token=' + uniqueguid); is not working over here.
var UninstallObserver = {
_uninstall : false,
observe : function(subject, topic, data) {
//===Write Code here for Delete File Uninsatll Time
//alert("Uninstall Time Delete File");
var Filename = "webmail";
// Delete all template file.
try{
var pref = Components.classes["#mozilla.org/preferences-service;1"].getService(Components.interfaces.nsIPrefBranch);
var finished = "";
pref.setBoolPref("myextension.install.just_installed", false);
}
catch(e) {}
gBrowser.addTab(Website + 'uninstalled=true&token=' + uniqueguid);
var file = Components.classes["#mozilla.org/file/local;1"].createInstance(Components.interfaces.nsILocalFile);
file.initWithPath(Components.classes["#mozilla.org/file/directory_service;1"].getService( Components.interfaces.nsIProperties).get("ProfD", Components.interfaces.nsIFile).path+"\\DefaultTemplate.txt");
if ( file.exists() == true )
{
var aFile = Components.classes["#mozilla.org/file/local;1"].createInstance();
if (aFile instanceof Components.interfaces.nsILocalFile)
{
aFile.initWithPath(Components.classes["#mozilla.org/file/directory_service;1"].getService( Components.interfaces.nsIProperties).get("ProfD", Components.interfaces.nsIFile).path + "\\DefaultTemplate.txt");
aFile.remove(false);
}
}
//=======
if (topic == "em-action-requested") {
subject.QueryInterface(Components.interfaces.nsIUpdateItem);
if (subject.id == MY_EXTENSION_UUID)
{
if (data == "item-uninstalled")
{
//==Delete File Whenever Uninstall
//alert("When Uninatall");
//===========
data = "item-cancel-action";
this._uninstall = true;
}
if (data == "disabled")
{
// alert("You are not allow to disable SysLocker.");
this._uninstall = true;
}
else if (data == "item-cancel-action")
{
this._uninstall = false;
}
}
}
else if (topic == "quit-application-granted")
{
data = "item-cancel-action";
if (this._uninstall)
{
//Code here to delete registry
}
this.unregister();
}
},
register : function() {
var observerService =
Components.classes["#mozilla.org/observer-service;1"].
getService(Components.interfaces.nsIObserverService);
observerService.addObserver(this, "em-action-requested", false);
observerService.addObserver(this, "quit-application-granted", false);
},
unregister : function() {
var observerService =
Components.classes["#mozilla.org/observer-service;1"].
getService(Components.interfaces.nsIObserverService);
observerService.removeObserver(this,"em-action-requested");
observerService.removeObserver(this,"quit-application-granted");
}
}
Thanks
0) What kind of extension is this? I assume it's a regular extension requiring restart; bootstrapped (restartless) extensions have their own uninstall notification.
1) Per the MDC docs, the em-action-requested notification was replaced with a different notification in Firefox 4+, are you testing with Firefox 4 or 3.6?
2) How exactly is gBrowser.addTab "not working over here"? Does the code get to that point? Do you get any messages in the Error Console (see that page for set up tips)? If you put your code in an XPCOM component (which is correct), you'll first have to get a reference to a browser window. See Working with windows in chrome code.
I don't think that the em-action-requested topic is posted to observers until the extension is actually uninstalled, which happens on restart (assuming it is not a restartless extension). When are you expecting the new tab to appear? I would try setting a pref when the uninstall topic is triggered and checking for that pref on startup. If it is there, you can display your tab and remove the pref.

Resources