I have an iFrame on my website that pops up and will play a video. The iframe source location is:
http://www.fivepointsusa.com/video.php?id=1&v=3_2.flv
The like button WILL pick this link up properly. However its a pretty bland page as it's designed to be inside a specified sized iframe.
The link that i WANT to show is:
http://www.fivepointsusa.com/bio.php?id=1#!prettyPhoto/0/
That link will bring the user to my bio page, open the iFrame and start the video. When I get my script to insert the correct address into the
However when i click the Like button, it drops off the #!prettyPhoto/0/ part. This is the most important part of the link...
How can i get the rest of the URL to show?
You can't. Web browsers are not supposed to transfer the fragment (the part after the '#') when requesting a resource from a server, so that part gets dropped. You can get around this by putting the '!prettyPhoto/0/' part in a URL parameter, e.g. '?id=1&path=prettyPhoto/0/' (make sure to URL encode the parameters).
Related
I was surfing on youtube and I realized something.
When I hover mouse on a video, then the url will be changed.
Interestingly, this happens in some browsers.What's the matter? Why does string start with &? https://www.youtube.com/?&ab_channel=NASA
What is the benefit to change the URL?
Interestingly, this happens in some browsers.
Different browser different support, a what you see is what you get is a standard we all want and must write our scripts specific to each browser if a feature requires it. In this case the new feature may not be widely supported or their coding wasn't compliant enough to give you this exact result each browser.
What's the matter?
No problem here, the URL is a tiny-bit broken but won't impact site performance unless you happen to error out the server and crash the entire network.
Why does string start with ?& https://www.youtube.com/?&ab_channel=NASA
What is the benefit to change the URL?
A URL alone has no parameters passed to it, so youtube.com. When a parameter is passed through the site on its HTTPS request will check these and determine what it is you want. So the response will return NASA cause ab_channel included it.
Because ? has nothing after it like ?video=asd89sa982 it's treated as undefined and serves no value or importance.
YouTube can fix it if they desire with script adjustment.
the URLs works in a way that when the site has started or reloaded, It's going to check for any element that has a href which has a link that has either https://www.youtube.com/watch?v= or https://youtu.be/ basically a YouTube video and then save those links, when one of them i hovered over, It's tell which. This works fine but one downside that I'm currently facing is that new links that are added in after the site has already started or reloaded won't be counted and therefore when I hover them it won't show the links, I'm reffering to comments; for-example if I make a comment that has a link to a video, after i post that comments and hover over that link I posted, It won't show the link. I could make a function which reloads every like 5 seconds but this doesn't seem to be a good idea. Plus what I'm actually working on, realoding every time won't be good.
I have a website with a default home page of index.html, let's call the website: www.brianbauer.com ( that is my name BTW).
www.brianbauer.com operates something like a "treasure hunt". by clicking on various hot-spots on each HTML page access via brianbauer.com, you get redirected to the next html page. this continues for some period of user-clicks. One of the ideas is that on each visit, it is not obvious how the user reached a specific webpage. all they know is that they kept clicking and ended up at some final HTML page. but every click that brings up a new HTML page, still shows "http://www.brianbauer.com" in the Address bar. This is a game, nothing "wrong" going on here.
1. All of the HTML pages are owned by me, and I authored them all.
2. No illegal or unscruptulous activty of any kind going on.
3. all HTML pages in scope are under the root domain of brianbauer.com
the idea is that as users look at pictures and read a narrative, they make choices. a typical webpage might have 4 choices. depending on your choice, the next HTML page you see is determined.
I have created site maps that are basically decision trees.
think of it like a digital corn-maze. It's important that the full URL path to the current HTML page that they are looking at is masked, and should only show "www.brianbauer.com". it is true that someone more sophisticated could look at sourcecode, record their screen, keep notes, etc. but the mask will accomplish 90% of my goal.
as for being able to bookmark a certain webpage that they have "discovered"? the whole point is that they should not be able to....
I am NOT trying to mask my domain, that is easy. I am trying to simply maske what appears in the Address bar as users hit HTML pages which are children of that domain.
Thank you for the help.
Brian
There is something called CNAME cloak it might be one option.
Another option could be using ajax and replace content of the page.
I have a question that
Point> I don't want to know generally function of modal, but like Pinterest
Question core > 1. Can i change the URL when i use ajax without "reloading"
Work flow >
1) On Pinterest, i click on a image
2) A modal window opens up, but the URL of the page also changes without "reloading"
even though it use ajax
I've known that when i using a modal function, it dosen't change the URL on the page,
but not on Pinterest
URL change e.x) rootURL -> otherURL
3) I click the background of the modal, the URL of the page also changes without "reloading"
and modal windows closed
URL change e.x) otherURL -> rootURL
So, If you have some solution or information, please let me know that.
Also I have red related question answers, but it's not enough. and don't want to get information obout HTML5 API cause i'm not going to provide HTML5 service
How can I duplicate Pinterest website's modal effect?
Pinterest like ajax loading
Changing the Url without a HTML call
Manage in the same url the Full HTML document and a JSON object (or a partial HTML response)
you can do like this http://mazzimo-in-london-eng.blogspot.com/2013/01/the-pinterest-url-sorcery-how-pinterest.html
I couldn't find an answer to this on the web. I have a site, where I try to avoid hard refreshes as much as possible. It's a sequences of photos, and upon a user click of a central div, a little page (a RoR partial) loads within that div with a new photo in it.
The user keeps clicking, the photo keeps changing, and the URL of the page never changes. The title of the photo does change though. And so I want the web crawlers to see this...
Is there any advantage to having a hard refresh or not in this scenario? Will the Web Crawlers see the title of the photo in the div, and index my home page? Or at least the url of the inner div?
I hope this makes sense! Thanks!
It all depends on what you mean by a hard refresh. If all of the pictures, and their related data (title etc.) are loaded when the page first loads, and the click is just a javascript event that changes the css a bit to display the next picture then that has no negative effect on SEO. If clicking that link makes an ajax request back to your server to retrieve the image, then it will never get picked up by the search engine web crawler, and will not contribute to SEO.
If you aren't sure if this click is an ajax request, or just a css change, you can look at your html source to figure it out. If all your image tags are in your html source then it's not making an ajax request. If you only see one (or zero) then it is making an ajax request.
If the page title would never change, then there's no benefit. But if you're loading a new image, the page title should change for optimal SEO.
There's a workaround, though. Just make it to where you can access the images specifically with a static page and make sure Google spiders it. You can keep the normal page flow as-is using this method.
Edit: I should add that I had a site that got 60% of it's traffic from Google Image searches, so I'd say you'd definitely want them indexed separately.
I have a pager on a table using ajax and I would like each such request also to change the browser's url, so when I hit refresh button I won't skip back to first page. I was fighting the Url parameter of AjaxOptions, but it keeps winning over me. Please help.
Trim
You can safely change the URL past the hash mark without redirecting the page. However, the user can (in most browsers) navigate through these changes with the Back and Forwards buttons. This technique is usually called "history."
Because the technique is difficult to get working in all browsers, you'll want to use a framework. Take a look at http://www.mikage.to/jquery/jquery_history.html.
I can also recommend ExtJS's history stuff too. Take a look at this example:
http://www.extjs.com/deploy/dev/examples/history/history.html#main-tabs:tab2
Again, notice that not only does the URL change when the user does stuff, but changing the URL (via Back and Forward) also affects the page. This is good, awesome even, but means it must be done very carefully.
There is not really a quick and easy way to do this, here is an article on the topic. The problem is that not only does the Ajax have to generate the URLs, it also has to take those URLs into account when loading the page to get the appropriate content.