I invoked Maxima tex1 from within a batch script as follows:
maxima --very-quiet -r "tex1(solve(8*x^2+7*x+5));" | grep -v false > output.txt
and I got the output.txt as follows:
\left[ x=-{{\sqrt{111}\,i+7}\over{16}} , x={{\sqrt{111}\,i-7}\over{16}} \righ\
t]
that is not valid as a (La)TeX input file.
How to prevent Maxima tex1 from wrapping its output?
Sorry for the late reply.
Instead of
tex1(solve(8*x^2+7*x+5));
write:
?princ(tex1(solve(8*x^2+7*x+5)))$
The problem is that the string returned by tex1 is being printed by the display formatter (the same function which would print the string if you were using Maxima in an interactive session). The display formatter breaks strings at linel characters (default = 79) and inserts a backslash. Instead for your purposes you want to evade the display formatter entirely, so you print the string with ?princ (a Lisp function to just print the string) and terminate the input with "$" instead of ";" to tell Maxima not to call the display formatter.
Note that the hard-coded constant 70 in MYPRINC doesn't come into play here. MYPRINC is not called in the example given.
This is, unfortunately, hard coded into Maxima. A way to solve this problem is to edit the function myprinc located in the file maxima/src/mactex.lisp. There is a cond form that has a 70. written there, it should read linel instead of 70. If you recompile maxima after making this change then the following will work:
maxima --very-quiet -r "linel: 1000$ tex1(solve(8*x^2+7*x+5));" | grep -v false > output.txt
Anyway, I'll send a patch to the Maxima list ASAP so that future versions of the program won't have this shortcoming.
Related
I am trying to utilize a grep lookahead to get a value at the end of a line for a project I'm working on. The main issue I'm having is that I'm not sure how to use a shell variable in the grep lookahead syntax in cshell
Here's the gist of what I'm trying to do.
There will be a dogfile.txt with several lines listing the names of dogs in the format below
genericDog2033, pomeranian
genericDog2034, greatDane
genericDog2035, Doberman
I wanted a way of retrieving the breed of the dog after the comma on each line so I thought a grep lookahead might be a good way of doing it. The project I'm working on isn't so hard-coded however, so I have no way of knowing what genericDog number I am searching for. There will be a shell variable in a greater while loop which will have access to the dog name.
For example if I set the dogNumber variable to the first dog in the file like so:
set dogNumber = genericDog2033
I then try to access the value of dogNumber in the grep lookahead
set dogBreed = `cat File.txt | grep -oP '(?<=$dogNumber ,)[^ ]*'`
The problem with the line above is that I think grep is looking for the literal string "$dognumber ," in the file which obviously doesn't exist. Is there some sort of wrapper I can put around the shell variable so cshell knows that dogNumber is a variable? I'm also open to other methods of doing this. Any help would be appreciated, this is the literal last line of code I need to finish my project and I'm at my wits end.
Variable expansion only happens inside double quotes ("), and not single quotes ('):
% set var = 'hello'
% echo '$var'
$var
% echo "$var"
hello
Furthermore, you have an error in your regexp:
(?<=$dogNumber ,)[^ ]*
In your data, the space is after the comma, not before.
% set dogNumber = genericDog2033
% set dogBreed = `cat a | grep -oP "(?<=$dogNumber, )[^ ]*"`
% echo $dogBreed
pomeranian
The easiest way to debug this is to not use variables at all in the first place, and simply check if the grep works:
% grep -oP "(?<=genericDog2034 ,)[^ ].*" a
[no output]
Then first make the grep work with static data, add the variable to make that work, and then put it all together by assigning it to a variable.
I run a command that produce lots of lines in my terminal - the lines are floats.
I only want certain numbers to be output as a line in my terminal.
I know that I can pipe the results to egrep:
| egrep "(369|433|375|368)"
if I want only certain values to appear. But is it possible to only have lines that have a value within ± 50 of 350 (for example) to appear?
grep matches against string tokens, so you have to either:
figure out the right string match for the number range you want (e.g., for 300-400, you might do something like grep -E [34].., with appropriate additional context added to the expression and a number of additional .s equal to your floating-point precision)
convert the number strings to actual numbers in whatever programming language you prefer to use and filter them that way
I'd strongly encourage you to take the second option.
I would go with awk here:
./yourProgram | awk '$1>250 && $1<350'
e.g.
echo -e "12.3\n342.678\n287.99999" | awk '$1>250 && $1<350'
342.678
287.99999
I want to make use of Maxima as the backend to solve some computations used in my LaTeX input file.
I did the following steps.
Step 1
Download and install Maxima.
Step 2
Create a batch file named cas.bat (for example) as follows.
rem cas.bat
echo off
set PATH=%PATH%;"C:\Program Files (x86)\Maxima-5.31.2\bin"
maxima --very-quiet -r %1 > solution.tex
Save the batch in the same directory in which your input file below exists. It is just for the sake of simplicity.
Step 3
Create the input file named main.tex (for example) as follows.
% main.tex
\documentclass[preview,border=12pt,12pt]{standalone}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\def\f(#1){(#1)^2-5*(#1)+6}
\begin{document}
\section{Problem}
Evaluate $\f(x)$ for $x=\frac 1 2$.
\section{Solution}
\immediate\write18{cas "x: 1/2;tex(\f(x));"}
\input{solution}
\end{document}
Step 4
Compile the input file with pdflatex -shell-escape main and you will get a nice output as follows.
!
Step 5
Done.
Questions
Apparently the output of Maxima is as follows. I don't know how to make it cleaner.
solution.tex
1
-
2
$${{15}\over{4}}$$
false
Now, my question are
how to remove such texts?
how to obtain just \frac{15}{4} without $$...$$?
(1) To suppress output, terminate input expressions with dollar sign (i.e. $) instead of semicolon (i.e. ;).
(2) To get just the TeX-ified expression sans the environment delimiters (i.e. $$), call tex1 instead of tex. Note that tex1 returns a string, which you have to print yourself (while tex prints it for you).
Combining these ideas with the stuff you showed, I think your program could look like this:
"x: 1/2$ print(tex1(\f(x)))$"
I think you might find the Maxima mailing list helpful. I'm pretty sure there have been several attempts to create a system such as the one you describe. You can also look at the documentation.
I couldn't find any way to completely clean up Maxima's output within Maxima itself. It always echoes the input line, and always writes some whitespace after the output. The following is an example of a perl script that accomplishes the cleanup.
#!/usr/bin/perl
use strict;
my $var = $ARGV[0];
my $expr = $ARGV[1];
sub do_maxima_to_tex {
my $m = shift;
my $c = "maxima --batch-string='exptdispflag:false; print(tex1($m))\$'";
my $e = `$c`;
my #x = split(/\(%i\d+\)/,$e); # output contains stuff like (%i1)
my $f = pop #x; # remove everything before the echo of the last input
while ($f=~/\A /) {$f=~s/\A .*\n//} # remove echo of input, which may be more than one line
$f =~ s/\\\n//g; # maxima breaks latex tokens in the middle at end of line; fix this
$f =~ s/\n/ /g; # if multiple lines, get it into one line
$f =~ s/\s+\Z//; # get rid of final whitespace
return $f;
}
my $e1 = do_maxima_to_tex("diff($expr,$var,1)");
my $e2 = do_maxima_to_tex("diff($expr,$var,2)");
print <<TEX;
The first derivative is \$$e1\$. Differentiating a second time,
we get \$$e2\$.
TEX
If you name this script a.pl, then doing
a.pl z 3*z^4
outputs this:
The first derivative is $12\,z^3$. Differentiating a second time,
we get $36\,z^2$.
For the OP's application, a script like this one could be what is invoked by the write18 in the latex file.
If you really want to use LaTeX then the maxiplot package is the answer. It provides a maxima environment inside of which you enter Maxima commands. When you process your LaTeX file a Maxima batch file is generated. Process this file with Maxima and process your LaTeX file again to typeset the equations generated by Maxima.
If you would rather have 2D math input with live typesetting then use TeXmacs. It is a cross-platform document authoring environment (a word processor on steroids if you like) that includes plugins for Maxima, Mathematica and many more scientific computing tools. If you need to or are not satisfied with the typesetting, you can export your document to LaTeX.
I know this is a very old post. Excellent answers for the question asked by OP. I was using --very-quiet -r options on the command line for a long time like OP, but in maxima version 5.43.2 they behave differently. See maxima command line v5.43 is behaving differently than v5.41. I am answering this question with a cross reference because when incorporating these answers in your solutions, make sure the changes in behavior of those command line flags are also incorporated.
I have a file where I want to grep for lines that start with either -rwx or drwx AND end in any number.
I've got this, but it isnt quite right. Any ideas?
grep [^.rwx]*[0-9] usrLog.txt
The tricky part is a regex that includes a dash as one of the valid characters in a character class. The dash has to come immediately after the start for a (normal) character class and immediately after the caret for a negated character class. If you need a close square bracket too, then you need the close square bracket followed by the dash. Mercifully, you only need dash, hence the notation chosen.
grep '^[-d]rwx.*[0-9]$' "$#"
See: Regular Expressions and grep for POSIX-standard details.
It looks like you were on the right track... The ^ character matches beginning-of-line, and $ matches end-of-line. Jonathan's pattern will work for you... just wanted to give you the explanation behind it
It should be noted that not only will the caret (^) behave differently within the brackets, it will have the opposite result of placing it outside of the brackets. Placing the caret where you have it will search for all strings NOT beginning with the content you placed within the brackets. You also would want to place a period before the asterisk in between your brackets as with grep, it also acts as a "wildcard".
grep ^[.rwx].*[0-9]$
This should work for you, I noticed that some posters used a character class in their expressions which is an effective method as well, but you were not using any in your original expression so I am trying to get one as close to yours as possible explaining every minor change along the way so that it is better understood. How can we learn otherwise?
You probably want egrep. Try:
egrep '^[d-]rwx.*[0-9]$' usrLog.txt
are you parsing output of ls -l?
If you are, and you just want to get the file name
find . -iname "*[0-9]"
If you have no choice because usrLog.txt is created by something/someone else and you absolutely must use this file, other options include
awk '/^[-d].*[0-9]$/' file
Ruby(1.9+)
ruby -ne 'print if /^[-d].*[0-9]$/' file
Bash
while read -r line ; do case $line in [-d]*[0-9] ) echo $line; esac; done < file
Many answers provided for this question. Just wanted to add one more which uses bashism-
#! /bin/bash
while read -r || [[ -n "$REPLY" ]]; do
[[ "$REPLY" =~ ^(-rwx|drwx).*[[:digit:]]+$ ]] && echo "Got one -> $REPLY"
done <"$1"
#kurumi answer for bash, which uses case is also correct but it will not read last line of file if there is no newline sequence at the end(Just save the file without pressing 'Enter/Return' at the last line).
I am using TeXnicCenter to edit a LaTeX document.
I now want to remove a certain tag (say, emph{blabla}} which occurs multiple times in my document , but not tag's content (so in this example, I want to remove all emphasization).
What is the easiest way to do so?
May also be using another program easily available on Windows 7.
Edit: In response to regex suggestions, it is important that it can deal with nested tags.
Edit 2: I really want to remove the tag from the text file, not just disable it.
Using a regular expression do something like s/\\emph\{([^\}]*)\}/\1/g. If you are not familiar with regular expressions this says:
s -- replace
/ -- begin match section
\\emph\{ -- match \emph{
( -- begin capture
[^\}]* -- match any characters except (meaning up until) a close brace because:
[] a group of characters
^ means not or "everything except"
\} -- the close brace
and * means 0 or more times
) -- end capture, because this is the first (in this case only) capture, it is number 1
\} -- match end brace
/ -- begin replace section
\1 -- replace with captured section number 1
/ -- end regular expression, begin extra flags
g -- global flag, meaning do this every time the match is found not just the first time
This is with Perl syntax, as that is what I am familiar with. The following perl "one-liners" will accomplish two tasks
perl -pe 's/\\emph\{([^\}]*)\}/\1/g' filename will "test" printing the file to the command line
perl -pi -e 's/\\emph\{([^\}]*)\}/\1/g' filename will change the file in place.
Similar commands may be available in your editor, but if not this will (should) work.
Crowley should have added this as an answer, but I will do that for him, if you replace all \emph{ with { you should be able to do this without disturbing the other content. It will still be in braces, but unless you have done some odd stuff it shouldn't matter.
The regex would be a simple s/\\emph\{/\{/g but the search and replace in your editor will do that one too.
Edit: Sorry, used the wrong brace in the regex, fixed now.
\renewcommand{\emph}[1]{#1}
any reasonably advanced editor should let you do a search/replace using regular expressions, replacing emph{bla} by bla etc.