I have a computation expression builder that builds up a value as you go, and has many custom operations. However, it does not allow for standard F# language constructs, and I'm having a lot of trouble figuring out how to add this support.
To give a stand-alone example, here's a dead-simple and fairly pointless computation expression that builds F# lists:
type Items<'a> = Items of 'a list
type ListBuilder() =
member x.Yield(()) = Items []
[<CustomOperation("add")>]
member x.Add(Items current, item:'a) =
Items [ yield! current; yield item ]
[<CustomOperation("addMany")>]
member x.AddMany(Items current, items: seq<'a>) =
Items [ yield! current; yield! items ]
let listBuilder = ListBuilder()
let build (Items items) = items
I can use this to build lists just fine:
let stuff =
listBuilder {
add 1
add 5
add 7
addMany [ 1..10 ]
add 42
}
|> build
However, this is a compiler error:
listBuilder {
let x = 5 * 39
add x
}
// This expression was expected to have type unit, but
// here has type int.
And so is this:
listBuilder {
for x = 1 to 50 do
add x
}
// This control construct may only be used if the computation expression builder
// defines a For method.
I've read all the documentation and examples I can find, but there's something I'm just not getting. Every .Bind() or .For() method signature I try just leads to more and more confusing compiler errors. Most of the examples I can find either build up a value as you go along, or allow for regular F# language constructs, but I haven't been able to find one that does both.
If someone could point me in the right direction by showing me how to take this example and add support in the builder for let bindings and for loops (at minimum - using, while and try/catch would be great, but I can probably figure those out if someone gets me started) then I'll be able to gratefully apply the lesson to my actual problem.
The best place to look is the spec. For example,
b {
let x = e
op x
}
gets translated to
T(let x = e in op x, [], fun v -> v, true)
=> T(op x, {x}, fun v -> let x = e in v, true)
=> [| op x, let x = e in b.Yield(x) |]{x}
=> b.Op(let x = e in in b.Yield(x), x)
So this shows where things have gone wrong, though it doesn't present an obvious solution. Clearly, Yield needs to be generalized since it needs to take arbitrary tuples (based on how many variables are in scope). Perhaps more subtly, it also shows that x is not in scope in the call to add (see that unbound x as the second argument to b.Op?). To allow your custom operators to use bound variables, their arguments need to have the [<ProjectionParameter>] attribute (and take functions from arbitrary variables as arguments), and you'll also need to set MaintainsVariableSpace to true if you want bound variables to be available to later operators. This will change the final translation to:
b.Op(let x = e in b.Yield(x), fun x -> x)
Building up from this, it seems that there's no way to avoid passing the set of bound values along to and from each operation (though I'd love to be proven wrong) - this will require you to add a Run method to strip those values back off at the end. Putting it all together, you'll get a builder which looks like this:
type ListBuilder() =
member x.Yield(vars) = Items [],vars
[<CustomOperation("add",MaintainsVariableSpace=true)>]
member x.Add((Items current,vars), [<ProjectionParameter>]f) =
Items (current # [f vars]),vars
[<CustomOperation("addMany",MaintainsVariableSpace=true)>]
member x.AddMany((Items current, vars), [<ProjectionParameter>]f) =
Items (current # f vars),vars
member x.Run(l,_) = l
The most complete examples I've seen are in §6.3.10 of the spec, especially this one:
/// Computations that can cooperatively yield by returning a continuation
type Eventually<'T> =
| Done of 'T
| NotYetDone of (unit -> Eventually<'T>)
[<CompilationRepresentation(CompilationRepresentationFlags.ModuleSuffix)>]
module Eventually =
/// The bind for the computations. Stitch 'k' on to the end of the computation.
/// Note combinators like this are usually written in the reverse way,
/// for example,
/// e |> bind k
let rec bind k e =
match e with
| Done x -> NotYetDone (fun () -> k x)
| NotYetDone work -> NotYetDone (fun () -> bind k (work()))
/// The return for the computations.
let result x = Done x
type OkOrException<'T> =
| Ok of 'T
| Exception of System.Exception
/// The catch for the computations. Stitch try/with throughout
/// the computation and return the overall result as an OkOrException.
let rec catch e =
match e with
| Done x -> result (Ok x)
| NotYetDone work ->
NotYetDone (fun () ->
let res = try Ok(work()) with | e -> Exception e
match res with
| Ok cont -> catch cont // note, a tailcall
| Exception e -> result (Exception e))
/// The delay operator.
let delay f = NotYetDone (fun () -> f())
/// The stepping action for the computations.
let step c =
match c with
| Done _ -> c
| NotYetDone f -> f ()
// The rest of the operations are boilerplate.
/// The tryFinally operator.
/// This is boilerplate in terms of "result", "catch" and "bind".
let tryFinally e compensation =
catch (e)
|> bind (fun res -> compensation();
match res with
| Ok v -> result v
| Exception e -> raise e)
/// The tryWith operator.
/// This is boilerplate in terms of "result", "catch" and "bind".
let tryWith e handler =
catch e
|> bind (function Ok v -> result v | Exception e -> handler e)
/// The whileLoop operator.
/// This is boilerplate in terms of "result" and "bind".
let rec whileLoop gd body =
if gd() then body |> bind (fun v -> whileLoop gd body)
else result ()
/// The sequential composition operator
/// This is boilerplate in terms of "result" and "bind".
let combine e1 e2 =
e1 |> bind (fun () -> e2)
/// The using operator.
let using (resource: #System.IDisposable) f =
tryFinally (f resource) (fun () -> resource.Dispose())
/// The forLoop operator.
/// This is boilerplate in terms of "catch", "result" and "bind".
let forLoop (e:seq<_>) f =
let ie = e.GetEnumerator()
tryFinally (whileLoop (fun () -> ie.MoveNext())
(delay (fun () -> let v = ie.Current in f v)))
(fun () -> ie.Dispose())
// Give the mapping for F# computation expressions.
type EventuallyBuilder() =
member x.Bind(e,k) = Eventually.bind k e
member x.Return(v) = Eventually.result v
member x.ReturnFrom(v) = v
member x.Combine(e1,e2) = Eventually.combine e1 e2
member x.Delay(f) = Eventually.delay f
member x.Zero() = Eventually.result ()
member x.TryWith(e,handler) = Eventually.tryWith e handler
member x.TryFinally(e,compensation) = Eventually.tryFinally e compensation
member x.For(e:seq<_>,f) = Eventually.forLoop e f
member x.Using(resource,e) = Eventually.using resource e
The tutorial at "F# for fun and profit" is first class in this regard.
http://fsharpforfunandprofit.com/posts/computation-expressions-intro/
Following a similar struggle to Joel's (and not finding §6.3.10 of the spec that helpful) my issue with getting the For construct to generate a list came down to getting types to line up properly (no special attributes required). In particular I was slow to realise that For would build a list of lists, and therefore need flattening, despite the best efforts of the compiler to put me right. Examples that I found on the web were always wrappers around seq{}, using the yield keyword, repeated use of which invokes a call to Combine, which does the flattening. In case a concrete example helps, the following excerpt uses for to build a list of integers - my ultimate aim being to create lists of components for rendering in a GUI (with some additional laziness thrown in). Also In depth talk on CE here which elaborates on kvb's points above.
module scratch
type Dispatcher = unit -> unit
type viewElement = int
type lazyViews = Lazy<list<viewElement>>
type ViewElementsBuilder() =
member x.Return(views: lazyViews) : list<viewElement> = views.Value
member x.Yield(v: viewElement) : list<viewElement> = [v]
member x.ReturnFrom(viewElements: list<viewElement>) = viewElements
member x.Zero() = list<viewElement>.Empty
member x.Combine(listA:list<viewElement>, listB: list<viewElement>) = List.concat [listA; listB]
member x.Delay(f) = f()
member x.For(coll:seq<'a>, forBody: 'a -> list<viewElement>) : list<viewElement> =
// seq {for v in coll do yield! f v} |> List.ofSeq
Seq.map forBody coll |> Seq.collect id |> List.ofSeq
let ve = new ViewElementsBuilder()
let makeComponent(m: int, dispatch: Dispatcher) : viewElement = m
let makeComponents() : list<viewElement> = [77; 33]
let makeViewElements() : list<viewElement> =
let model = {| Scores = [33;23;22;43;] |> Seq.ofList; Trainer = "John" |}
let d:Dispatcher = fun() -> () // Does nothing here, but will be used to raise messages from UI
ve {
for score in model.Scores do
yield makeComponent (score, d)
yield makeComponent (score * 100 / 50 , d)
if model.Trainer = "John" then
return lazy
[ makeComponent (12, d)
makeComponent (13, d)
]
else
return lazy
[ makeComponent (14, d)
makeComponent (15, d)
]
yield makeComponent (33, d)
return! makeComponents()
}
I have written a function that takes an array as input and returns an array of equal size as output. For example:
myFunc [| "apple"; "orange"; "banana" |]
> val it : (string * string) [] =
[|("red", "sphere"); ("orange", "sphere"); ("yellow", "oblong")|]
Now I want to assign the results via a let binding. For example:
let [|
( appleColor, appleShape );
( orangeColor, orangeShape );
( bananaColor, bananaShape )
|] =
myFunc [| "apple"; "orange"; "banana" |]
Which works great...
> val orangeShape : string = "sphere"
> val orangeColor : string = "orange"
> val bananaShape : string = "oblong"
> val bananaColor : string = "yellow"
> val appleShape : string = "sphere"
> val appleColor : string = "red"
...except it produces a warning:
warning FS0025: Incomplete pattern matches on this expression. For example, the value '[|_; _; _; _|]' may indicate a case not covered by the pattern(s).
The source and reason for the warning has already been covered, I'm just looking for a succinct work-around. This function call occurs near the top of my function, and I don't like the idea of putting the entire function body inside a match:
let otherFunc =
match myFunc [| "apple"; "orange"; "banana" |] with
| [|
( appleColor, appleShape );
( orangeColor, orangeShape );
( bananaColor, bananaShape )
|] ->
// ... the rest of my function logic
| _ -> failwith "Something impossible just happened!"
That just smells bad. I don't like the idea of ignoring the warning either - goes against my better judgment. Are there any other options open to me, or do I just need to find a different approach entirely?
One possibility if you expect this kind of calling pattern to be frequent is to make wrappers that act on the sizes of tuples you expect, e.g.
myFunc3 (in1,in2,in3) =
match myFunc [|in1;in2;in3|] with
[|out1;out2;out3|] -> out1, out2, out3
_ -> failwith "Internal error"
etc. But all it does is move the ugly code to a standard place, and writing out the wrappers will be inconvenient.
I don't think there's any better option with this API, because there's no way to tell the compiler that myFunc always returns the same number of elements it is passed.
Another option might be to replace myFunc with an IDisposable class:
type MyClass() =
let expensiveResource = ...
member this.MyFunc(v) = ...calculate something with v using expensiveResource
interface IDisposable with
override this.Dispose() = // cleanup resource
and then use it in a block like
use myClass = new MyClass()
let appleColor, appleShape = myClass.MyFunc(apple)
...
Adapting #Ganesh's answer, here's a primitive way to approach the problem:
let Tuple2Map f (u, v)
= (f u, f v)
let Tuple3Map f (u, v, w)
= (f u, f v, f w)
let Tuple4Map f (u, v, w, x)
= (f u, f v, f w, f x)
Example:
let Square x = x * x
let (a,b) = Tuple2Map Square (4,6)
// Output:
// val b : int = 36
// val a : int = 16
But I guess something even more primitive would be this:
let Square x = x * x
let (a,b) = (Square 4, Square 6)
And if the function name is too long, e.g.
// Really wordy way to assign to (a,b)
let FunctionWithLotsOfInput w x y z = w * x * y * z
let (a,b) =
(FunctionWithLotsOfInput input1 input2 input3 input4A,
FunctionWithLotsOfInput input1 input2 input3 input4B)
We can define temporary function
let FunctionWithLotsOfInput w x y z = w * x * y * z
// Partially applied function, temporary function
let (a,b) =
let f = (FunctionWithLotsOfInput input1 input2 input3)
(f input4A, f input4B)
I feel silly for even asking this because it seems so trivial but my brain is failing me. If I had the following:
let a, b, c = 1, 1, 1
Is there an eligant way to determine if a, b, and c all hold the same value. Something like:
let result = (a = b = c)
This fails because the expression a = b returns true and the next expression results in true = c and complains that it was expecting int, not bool. The only thing I can think of is:
a = b && a = c && b = c
which won't work when I want to add more variables.
Really what I'm trying to do is this:
let same (x: string * string * string) =
match x with
| (a, a, a) -> true
| _ -> false
I was hoping that I could match all the elements into one element and if they were different it would move on, but it says on the second element in the match that it has already been bound.
To check if every value in a list is the same:
let rec same = function
| x::y::_ when x <> y -> false
| _::xs -> same xs
| [] -> true
Usage
let a, b, c = 1, 1, 1
same [a; b; c] //true
let same (a, b, c) = a = b && b = c
I would try to use the forall function in order to determine if all of the numbers are same.
let list = [a; b; c;];;
List.forall (fun n -> n = a) list;;
val it : bool = true
This solution produces exactly the required syntax. Surprisingly to myself, is fairly fast. Also, is seems to be a good example of using monads, also known as Computation Expressions.
// Generic
let inline mOp1<'a> op sample x = op sample x, sample
let inline mOp2<'a> op1 op2 (b, sample) x = op1 b (op2 sample x), sample
// Implementation for (=) and (&&)
let (==) = mOp1 (=)
let (&=) = mOp2 (&&) (=)
// Use
let ret1 = a == b &= c &= d &= e |> fst
How it works
The approach is a very simplified State monad. The monadic type is a tuple of (bool, 'T). The first component is the boolean value of ongoing calculation, and the second is the sample value to compare with.
(==) would initialize the monad, similar to Delay operator.
(&=) is used for all subsequent comparisons. It is similar to Bind operator.
We don't need Return because fst would serve pretty fine.
mOp1 and mOp2 are abstractions over the logical operations. These allow defining your own operators. Here are examples of or-equal and and-greater-than:
let (|=) = mOp2 (||) (=)
let (.>) = mOp1 (>)
let (&>) = mOp2 (&&) (>)
// Use
let ret2 = a == b |= c |= d |= e |> fst // if any of b,c,d,e equals to a
let ret3 = 5 .> 3 &> 4 |> fst // true: 5>3 && 5>4
let ret4 = 5 .> 3 &> 8 &> 4 |> fst // false
Performance
I really enjoyed the beautiful solution by #ildjarn, but constructing List is quite slow, so my primary goal was performance.
Running a chain of 8 comparisons, 10 million times:
04972ms a=b && a=с && ...
23138ms List-based
12367ms monadic
As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, visit the help center for guidance.
Closed 10 years ago.
There are already two questions about F#/functional snippets.
However what I'm looking for here are useful snippets, little 'helper' functions that are reusable. Or obscure but nifty patterns that you can never quite remember.
Something like:
open System.IO
let rec visitor dir filter=
seq { yield! Directory.GetFiles(dir, filter)
for subdir in Directory.GetDirectories(dir) do
yield! visitor subdir filter}
I'd like to make this a kind of handy reference page. As such there will be no right answer, but hopefully lots of good ones.
EDIT Tomas Petricek has created a site specifically for F# snippets http://fssnip.net/.
Perl style regex matching
let (=~) input pattern =
System.Text.RegularExpressions.Regex.IsMatch(input, pattern)
It lets you match text using let test = "monkey" =~ "monk.+" notation.
Infix Operator
I got this from http://sandersn.com/blog//index.php/2009/10/22/infix-function-trick-for-f go to that page for more details.
If you know Haskell, you might find yourself missing infix sugar in F#:
// standard Haskell call has function first, then args just like F#. So obviously
// here there is a function that takes two strings: string -> string -> string
startsWith "kevin" "k"
//Haskell infix operator via backQuotes. Sometimes makes a function read better.
"kevin" `startsWith` "K"
While F# doesn't have a true 'infix' operator, the same thing can be accomplished almost as elegantly via a pipeline and a 'backpipeline' (who knew of such a thing??)
// F# 'infix' trick via pipelines
"kevin" |> startsWith <| "K"
Multi-Line Strings
This is pretty trivial, but it seems to be a feature of F# strings that is not widely known.
let sql = "select a,b,c \
from table \
where a = 1"
This produces:
val sql : string = "select a,b,c from table where a = 1"
When the F# compiler sees a back-slash followed by a carriage return inside a string literal, it will remove everything from the back-slash to the first non-space character on the next line. This allows you to have multi-line string literals that line up, without using a bunch of string concatenation.
Generic memoization, courtesy of the man himself
let memoize f =
let cache = System.Collections.Generic.Dictionary<_,_>(HashIdentity.Structural)
fun x ->
let ok, res = cache.TryGetValue(x)
if ok then res
else let res = f x
cache.[x] <- res
res
Using this, you could do a cached reader like so:
let cachedReader = memoize reader
Simple read-write to text files
These are trivial, but make file access pipeable:
open System.IO
let fileread f = File.ReadAllText(f)
let filewrite f s = File.WriteAllText(f, s)
let filereadlines f = File.ReadAllLines(f)
let filewritelines f ar = File.WriteAllLines(f, ar)
So
let replace f (r:string) (s:string) = s.Replace(f, r)
"C:\\Test.txt" |>
fileread |>
replace "teh" "the" |>
filewrite "C:\\Test.txt"
And combining that with the visitor quoted in the question:
let filereplace find repl path =
path |> fileread |> replace find repl |> filewrite path
let recurseReplace root filter find repl =
visitor root filter |> Seq.iter (filereplace find repl)
Update Slight improvement if you want to be able to read 'locked' files (e.g. csv files which are already open in Excel...):
let safereadall f =
use fs = new FileStream(f, FileMode.Open, FileAccess.Read, FileShare.ReadWrite)
use sr = new StreamReader(fs, System.Text.Encoding.Default)
sr.ReadToEnd()
let split sep (s:string) = System.Text.RegularExpressions.Regex.Split(s, sep)
let fileread f = safereadall f
let filereadlines f = f |> safereadall |> split System.Environment.NewLine
For performance intensive stuff where you need to check for null
let inline isNull o = System.Object.ReferenceEquals(o, null)
if isNull o then ... else ...
Is about 20x faster then
if o = null then ... else ...
Active Patterns, aka "Banana Splits", are a very handy construct that let one match against multiple regular expression patterns. This is much like AWK, but without the high performance of DFA's because the patterns are matched in sequence until one succeeds.
#light
open System
open System.Text.RegularExpressions
let (|Test|_|) pat s =
if (new Regex(pat)).IsMatch(s)
then Some()
else None
let (|Match|_|) pat s =
let opt = RegexOptions.None
let re = new Regex(pat,opt)
let m = re.Match(s)
if m.Success
then Some(m.Groups)
else None
Some examples of use:
let HasIndefiniteArticle = function
| Test "(?: |^)(a|an)(?: |$)" _ -> true
| _ -> false
type Ast =
| IntVal of string * int
| StringVal of string * string
| LineNo of int
| Goto of int
let Parse = function
| Match "^LET\s+([A-Z])\s*=\s*(\d+)$" g ->
IntVal( g.[1].Value, Int32.Parse(g.[2].Value) )
| Match "^LET\s+([A-Z]\$)\s*=\s*(.*)$" g ->
StringVal( g.[1].Value, g.[2].Value )
| Match "^(\d+)\s*:$" g ->
LineNo( Int32.Parse(g.[1].Value) )
| Match "^GOTO \s*(\d+)$" g ->
Goto( Int32.Parse(g.[1].Value) )
| s -> failwithf "Unexpected statement: %s" s
Maybe monad
type maybeBuilder() =
member this.Bind(v, f) =
match v with
| None -> None
| Some(x) -> f x
member this.Delay(f) = f()
member this.Return(v) = Some v
let maybe = maybeBuilder()
Here's a brief intro to monads for the uninitiated.
Option-coalescing operators
I wanted a version of the defaultArg function that had a syntax closer to the C# null-coalescing operator, ??. This lets me get the value from an Option while providing a default value, using a very concise syntax.
/// Option-coalescing operator - this is like the C# ?? operator, but works with
/// the Option type.
/// Warning: Unlike the C# ?? operator, the second parameter will always be
/// evaluated.
/// Example: let foo = someOption |? default
let inline (|?) value defaultValue =
defaultArg value defaultValue
/// Option-coalescing operator with delayed evaluation. The other version of
/// this operator always evaluates the default value expression. If you only
/// want to create the default value when needed, use this operator and pass
/// in a function that creates the default.
/// Example: let foo = someOption |?! (fun () -> new Default())
let inline (|?!) value f =
match value with Some x -> x | None -> f()
'Unitize' a function which doesn't handle units
Using the FloatWithMeasure function http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee806527(VS.100).aspx.
let unitize (f:float -> float) (v:float<'u>) =
LanguagePrimitives.FloatWithMeasure<'u> (f (float v))
Example:
[<Measure>] type m
[<Measure>] type kg
let unitize (f:float -> float) (v:float<'u>) =
LanguagePrimitives.FloatWithMeasure<'u> (f (float v))
//this function doesn't take units
let badinc a = a + 1.
//this one does!
let goodinc v = unitize badinc v
goodinc 3.<m>
goodinc 3.<kg>
OLD version:
let unitize (f:float -> float) (v:float<'u>) =
let unit = box 1. :?> float<'u>
unit * (f (v/unit))
Kudos to kvb
Scale/Ratio function builder
Again, trivial, but handy.
//returns a function which will convert from a1-a2 range to b1-b2 range
let scale (a1:float<'u>, a2:float<'u>) (b1:float<'v>,b2:float<'v>) =
let m = (b2 - b1)/(a2 - a1) //gradient of line (evaluated once only..)
(fun a -> b1 + m * (a - a1))
Example:
[<Measure>] type m
[<Measure>] type px
let screenSize = (0.<px>, 300.<px>)
let displayRange = (100.<m>, 200.<m>)
let scaleToScreen = scale displayRange screenSize
scaleToScreen 120.<m> //-> 60.<px>
Transposing a list (seen on Jomo Fisher's blog)
///Given list of 'rows', returns list of 'columns'
let rec transpose lst =
match lst with
| (_::_)::_ -> List.map List.head lst :: transpose (List.map List.tail lst)
| _ -> []
transpose [[1;2;3];[4;5;6];[7;8;9]] // returns [[1;4;7];[2;5;8];[3;6;9]]
And here is a tail-recursive version which (from my sketchy profiling) is mildly slower, but has the advantage of not throwing a stack overflow when the inner lists are longer than 10000 elements (on my machine):
let transposeTR lst =
let rec inner acc lst =
match lst with
| (_::_)::_ -> inner (List.map List.head lst :: acc) (List.map List.tail lst)
| _ -> List.rev acc
inner [] lst
If I was clever, I'd try and parallelise it with async...
F# Map <-> C# Dictionary
(I know, I know, System.Collections.Generic.Dictionary isn't really a 'C#' dictionary)
C# to F#
(dic :> seq<_>) //cast to seq of KeyValuePair
|> Seq.map (|KeyValue|) //convert KeyValuePairs to tuples
|> Map.ofSeq //convert to Map
(From Brian, here, with improvement proposed by Mauricio in comment below. (|KeyValue|) is an active pattern for matching KeyValuePair - from FSharp.Core - equivalent to (fun kvp -> kvp.Key, kvp.Value))
Interesting alternative
To get all of the immutable goodness, but with the O(1) lookup speed of Dictionary, you can use the dict operator, which returns an immutable IDictionary (see this question).
I currently can't see a way to directly convert a Dictionary using this method, other than
(dic :> seq<_>) //cast to seq of KeyValuePair
|> (fun kvp -> kvp.Key, kvp.Value) //convert KeyValuePairs to tuples
|> dict //convert to immutable IDictionary
F# to C#
let dic = Dictionary()
map |> Map.iter (fun k t -> dic.Add(k, t))
dic
What is weird here is that FSI will report the type as (for example):
val it : Dictionary<string,int> = dict [("a",1);("b",2)]
but if you feed dict [("a",1);("b",2)] back in, FSI reports
IDictionary<string,int> = seq[[a,1] {Key = "a"; Value = 1; } ...
Tree-sort / Flatten a tree into a list
I have the following binary tree:
___ 77 _
/ \
______ 47 __ 99
/ \
21 _ 54
\ / \
43 53 74
/
39
/
32
Which is represented as follows:
type 'a tree =
| Node of 'a tree * 'a * 'a tree
| Nil
let myTree =
Node
(Node
(Node (Nil,21,Node (Node (Node (Nil,32,Nil),39,Nil),43,Nil)),47,
Node (Node (Nil,53,Nil),54,Node (Nil,74,Nil))),77,Node (Nil,99,Nil))
A straightforward method to flatten the tree is:
let rec flatten = function
| Nil -> []
| Node(l, a, r) -> flatten l # a::flatten r
This isn't tail-recursive, and I believe the # operator causes it to be O(n log n) or O(n^2) with unbalanced binary trees. With a little tweaking, I came up with this tail-recursive O(n) version:
let flatten2 t =
let rec loop acc c = function
| Nil -> c acc
| Node(l, a, r) ->
loop acc (fun acc' -> loop (a::acc') c l) r
loop [] (fun x -> x) t
Here's the output in fsi:
> flatten2 myTree;;
val it : int list = [21; 32; 39; 43; 47; 53; 54; 74; 77; 99]
LINQ-to-XML helpers
namespace System.Xml.Linq
// hide warning about op_Explicit
#nowarn "77"
[<AutoOpen>]
module XmlUtils =
/// Converts a string to an XName.
let xn = XName.op_Implicit
/// Converts a string to an XNamespace.
let xmlns = XNamespace.op_Implicit
/// Gets the string value of any XObject subclass that has a Value property.
let inline xstr (x : ^a when ^a :> XObject) =
(^a : (member get_Value : unit -> string) x)
/// Gets a strongly-typed value from any XObject subclass, provided that
/// an explicit conversion to the output type has been defined.
/// (Many explicit conversions are defined on XElement and XAttribute)
/// Example: let value:int = xval foo
let inline xval (x : ^a when ^a :> XObject) : ^b =
((^a or ^b) : (static member op_Explicit : ^a -> ^b) x)
/// Dynamic lookup operator for getting an attribute value from an XElement.
/// Returns a string option, set to None if the attribute was not present.
/// Example: let value = foo?href
/// Example with default: let value = defaultArg foo?Name "<Unknown>"
let (?) (el:XElement) (name:string) =
match el.Attribute(xn name) with
| null -> None
| att -> Some(att.Value)
/// Dynamic operator for setting an attribute on an XElement.
/// Example: foo?href <- "http://www.foo.com/"
let (?<-) (el:XElement) (name:string) (value:obj) =
el.SetAttributeValue(xn name, value)
OK, this has nothing to do with snippets, but I keep forgetting this:
If you are in the interactive window, you hit F7 to jump back to the code window (without deselecting the code which you just ran...)
Going from code window to F# window (and also to open the F# window) is Ctrl Alt F
(unless CodeRush has stolen your bindings...)
Weighted sum of arrays
Calculating a weighted [n-array] sum of a [k-array of n-arrays] of numbers, based on a [k-array] of weights
(Copied from this question, and kvb's answer)
Given these arrays
let weights = [|0.6;0.3;0.1|]
let arrs = [| [|0.0453;0.065345;0.07566;1.562;356.6|] ;
[|0.0873;0.075565;0.07666;1.562222;3.66|] ;
[|0.06753;0.075675;0.04566;1.452;3.4556|] |]
We want a weighted sum (by column), given that both dimensions of the arrays can be variable.
Array.map2 (fun w -> Array.map ((*) w)) weights arrs
|> Array.reduce (Array.map2 (+))
First line: Partial application of the first Array.map2 function to weights yields a new function (Array.map ((*) weight) which is applied (for each weight) to each array in arr.
Second line: Array.reduce is like fold, except it starts on the second value and uses the first as the initial 'state'. In this case each value is a 'line' of our array of arrays. So applying an Array.map2 (+) on the first two lines means that we sum the first two arrays, which leaves us with a new array, which we then (Array.reduce) sum again onto the next (in this case last) array.
Result:
[|0.060123; 0.069444; 0.07296; 1.5510666; 215.40356|]
Performance testing
(Found here and updated for latest release of F#)
open System
open System.Diagnostics
module PerformanceTesting =
let Time func =
let stopwatch = new Stopwatch()
stopwatch.Start()
func()
stopwatch.Stop()
stopwatch.Elapsed.TotalMilliseconds
let GetAverageTime timesToRun func =
Seq.initInfinite (fun _ -> (Time func))
|> Seq.take timesToRun
|> Seq.average
let TimeOperation timesToRun =
GC.Collect()
GetAverageTime timesToRun
let TimeOperations funcsWithName =
let randomizer = new Random(int DateTime.Now.Ticks)
funcsWithName
|> Seq.sortBy (fun _ -> randomizer.Next())
|> Seq.map (fun (name, func) -> name, (TimeOperation 100000 func))
let TimeOperationsAFewTimes funcsWithName =
Seq.initInfinite (fun _ -> (TimeOperations funcsWithName))
|> Seq.take 50
|> Seq.concat
|> Seq.groupBy fst
|> Seq.map (fun (name, individualResults) -> name, (individualResults |> Seq.map snd |> Seq.average))
DataSetExtensions for F#, DataReaders
System.Data.DataSetExtensions.dll adds the ability to treat a DataTable as an IEnumerable<DataRow> as well as unboxing the values of individual cells in a way that gracefully handles DBNull by supporting System.Nullable. For example, in C# we can get the value of an integer column that contains nulls, and specify that DBNull should default to zero with a very concise syntax:
var total = myDataTable.AsEnumerable()
.Select(row => row.Field<int?>("MyColumn") ?? 0)
.Sum();
There are two areas where DataSetExtensions are lacking, however. First, it doesn't support IDataReader and second, it doesn't support the F# option type. The following code does both - it allows an IDataReader to be treated as a seq<IDataRecord>, and it can unbox values from either a reader or a dataset, with support for F# options or System.Nullable. Combined with the option-coalescing operator in another answer, this allows for code such as the following when working with a DataReader:
let total =
myReader.AsSeq
|> Seq.map (fun row -> row.Field<int option>("MyColumn") |? 0)
|> Seq.sum
Perhaps a more idiomatic F# way of ignoring database nulls would be...
let total =
myReader.AsSeq
|> Seq.choose (fun row -> row.Field<int option>("MyColumn"))
|> Seq.sum
Further, the extension methods defined below are usable from both F# and from C#/VB.
open System
open System.Data
open System.Reflection
open System.Runtime.CompilerServices
open Microsoft.FSharp.Collections
/// Ported from System.Data.DatasetExtensions.dll to add support for the Option type.
[<AbstractClass; Sealed>]
type private UnboxT<'a> private () =
// This class generates a converter function based on the desired output type,
// and then re-uses the converter function forever. Because the class itself is generic,
// different output types get different cached converter functions.
static let referenceField (value:obj) =
if value = null || DBNull.Value.Equals(value) then
Unchecked.defaultof<'a>
else
unbox value
static let valueField (value:obj) =
if value = null || DBNull.Value.Equals(value) then
raise <| InvalidCastException("Null cannot be converted to " + typeof<'a>.Name)
else
unbox value
static let makeConverter (target:Type) methodName =
Delegate.CreateDelegate(typeof<Converter<obj,'a>>,
typeof<UnboxT<'a>>
.GetMethod(methodName, BindingFlags.NonPublic ||| BindingFlags.Static)
.MakeGenericMethod([| target.GetGenericArguments().[0] |]))
|> unbox<Converter<obj,'a>>
|> FSharpFunc.FromConverter
static let unboxFn =
let theType = typeof<'a>
if theType.IsGenericType && not theType.IsGenericTypeDefinition then
let genericType = theType.GetGenericTypeDefinition()
if typedefof<Nullable<_>> = genericType then
makeConverter theType "NullableField"
elif typedefof<option<_>> = genericType then
makeConverter theType "OptionField"
else
invalidOp "The only generic types supported are Option<T> and Nullable<T>."
elif theType.IsValueType then
valueField
else
referenceField
static member private NullableField<'b when 'b : struct and 'b :> ValueType and 'b:(new:unit -> 'b)> (value:obj) =
if value = null || DBNull.Value.Equals(value) then
Nullable<_>()
else
Nullable<_>(unbox<'b> value)
static member private OptionField<'b> (value:obj) =
if value = null || DBNull.Value.Equals(value) then
None
else
Some(unbox<'b> value)
static member inline Unbox =
unboxFn
/// F# data-related extension methods.
[<AutoOpen>]
module FsDataEx =
type System.Data.IDataReader with
/// Exposes a reader's current result set as seq<IDataRecord>.
/// Reader is closed when sequence is fully enumerated.
member this.AsSeq =
seq { use reader = this
while reader.Read() do yield reader :> IDataRecord }
/// Exposes all result sets in a reader as seq<seq<IDataRecord>>.
/// Reader is closed when sequence is fully enumerated.
member this.AsMultiSeq =
let rowSeq (reader:IDataReader) =
seq { while reader.Read() do yield reader :> IDataRecord }
seq {
use reader = this
yield rowSeq reader
while reader.NextResult() do
yield rowSeq reader
}
/// Populates a new DataSet with the contents of the reader. Closes the reader after completion.
member this.ToDataSet () =
use reader = this
let dataSet = new DataSet(RemotingFormat=SerializationFormat.Binary, EnforceConstraints=false)
dataSet.Load(reader, LoadOption.OverwriteChanges, [| "" |])
dataSet
type System.Data.IDataRecord with
/// Gets a value from the record by name.
/// DBNull and null are returned as the default value for the type.
/// Supports both nullable and option types.
member this.Field<'a> (fieldName:string) =
this.[fieldName] |> UnboxT<'a>.Unbox
/// Gets a value from the record by column index.
/// DBNull and null are returned as the default value for the type.
/// Supports both nullable and option types.
member this.Field<'a> (ordinal:int) =
this.GetValue(ordinal) |> UnboxT<'a>.Unbox
type System.Data.DataRow with
/// Identical to the Field method from DatasetExtensions, but supports the F# Option type.
member this.Field2<'a> (columnName:string) =
this.[columnName] |> UnboxT<'a>.Unbox
/// Identical to the Field method from DatasetExtensions, but supports the F# Option type.
member this.Field2<'a> (columnIndex:int) =
this.[columnIndex] |> UnboxT<'a>.Unbox
/// Identical to the Field method from DatasetExtensions, but supports the F# Option type.
member this.Field2<'a> (column:DataColumn) =
this.[column] |> UnboxT<'a>.Unbox
/// Identical to the Field method from DatasetExtensions, but supports the F# Option type.
member this.Field2<'a> (columnName:string, version:DataRowVersion) =
this.[columnName, version] |> UnboxT<'a>.Unbox
/// Identical to the Field method from DatasetExtensions, but supports the F# Option type.
member this.Field2<'a> (columnIndex:int, version:DataRowVersion) =
this.[columnIndex, version] |> UnboxT<'a>.Unbox
/// Identical to the Field method from DatasetExtensions, but supports the F# Option type.
member this.Field2<'a> (column:DataColumn, version:DataRowVersion) =
this.[column, version] |> UnboxT<'a>.Unbox
/// C# data-related extension methods.
[<Extension; AbstractClass; Sealed>]
type CsDataEx private () =
/// Populates a new DataSet with the contents of the reader. Closes the reader after completion.
[<Extension>]
static member ToDataSet(this:IDataReader) =
this.ToDataSet()
/// Exposes a reader's current result set as IEnumerable{IDataRecord}.
/// Reader is closed when sequence is fully enumerated.
[<Extension>]
static member AsEnumerable(this:IDataReader) =
this.AsSeq
/// Exposes all result sets in a reader as IEnumerable{IEnumerable{IDataRecord}}.
/// Reader is closed when sequence is fully enumerated.
[<Extension>]
static member AsMultipleEnumerable(this:IDataReader) =
this.AsMultiSeq
/// Gets a value from the record by name.
/// DBNull and null are returned as the default value for the type.
/// Supports both nullable and option types.
[<Extension>]
static member Field<'T> (this:IDataRecord, fieldName:string) =
this.Field<'T>(fieldName)
/// Gets a value from the record by column index.
/// DBNull and null are returned as the default value for the type.
/// Supports both nullable and option types.
[<Extension>]
static member Field<'T> (this:IDataRecord, ordinal:int) =
this.Field<'T>(ordinal)
Handling arguments in a command line application:
//We assume that the actual meat is already defined in function
// DoStuff (string -> string -> string -> unit)
let defaultOutOption = "N"
let defaultUsageOption = "Y"
let usage =
"Scans a folder for and outputs results.\n" +
"Usage:\n\t MyApplication.exe FolderPath [IncludeSubfolders (Y/N) : default=" +
defaultUsageOption + "] [OutputToFile (Y/N): default=" + defaultOutOption + "]"
let HandlArgs arr =
match arr with
| [|d;u;o|] -> DoStuff d u o
| [|d;u|] -> DoStuff d u defaultOutOption
| [|d|] -> DoStuff d defaultUsageOption defaultOutOption
| _ ->
printf "%s" usage
Console.ReadLine() |> ignore
[<EntryPoint>]
let main (args : string array) =
args |> HandlArgs
0
(I had a vague memory of this technique being inspired by Robert Pickering, but can't find a reference now)
A handy cache function that keeps up to max (key,reader(key)) in a dictionary and use a SortedList to track the MRU keys
let Cache (reader: 'key -> 'value) max =
let cache = new Dictionary<'key,LinkedListNode<'key * 'value>>()
let keys = new LinkedList<'key * 'value>()
fun (key : 'key) -> (
let found, value = cache.TryGetValue key
match found with
|true ->
keys.Remove value
keys.AddFirst value |> ignore
(snd value.Value)
|false ->
let newValue = key,reader key
let node = keys.AddFirst newValue
cache.[key] <- node
if (keys.Count > max) then
let lastNode = keys.Last
cache.Remove (fst lastNode.Value) |> ignore
keys.RemoveLast() |> ignore
(snd newValue))
Creating XElements
Nothing amazing, but I keep getting caught out by the implicit conversion of XNames:
#r "System.Xml.Linq.dll"
open System.Xml.Linq
//No! ("type string not compatible with XName")
//let el = new XElement("MyElement", "text")
//better
let xn s = XName.op_Implicit s
let el = new XElement(xn "MyElement", "text")
//or even
let xEl s o = new XElement(xn s, o)
let el = xEl "MyElement" "text"
Pairwise and pairs
I always expect Seq.pairwise to give me [(1,2);(3;4)] and not [(1,2);(2,3);(3,4)]. Given that neither exist in List, and that I needed both, here's the code for future reference. I think they're tail recursive.
//converts to 'windowed tuples' ([1;2;3;4;5] -> [(1,2);(2,3);(3,4);(4,5)])
let pairwise lst =
let rec loop prev rem acc =
match rem with
| hd::tl -> loop hd tl ((prev,hd)::acc)
| _ -> List.rev acc
loop (List.head lst) (List.tail lst) []
//converts to 'paged tuples' ([1;2;3;4;5;6] -> [(1,2);(3,4);(5,6)])
let pairs lst =
let rec loop rem acc =
match rem with
| l::r::tl -> loop tl ((l,r)::acc)
| l::[] -> failwith "odd-numbered list"
| _ -> List.rev acc
loop lst []
Naive CSV reader (i.e., won't handle anything nasty)
(Using filereadlines and List.transpose from other answers here)
///Given a file path, returns a List of row lists
let ReadCSV =
filereadlines
>> Array.map ( fun line -> line.Split([|',';';'|]) |> List.ofArray )
>> Array.toList
///takes list of col ids and list of rows,
/// returns array of columns (in requested order)
let GetColumns cols rows =
//Create filter
let pick cols (row:list<'a>) = List.map (fun i -> row.[i]) cols
rows
|> transpose //change list of rows to list of columns
|> pick cols //pick out the columns we want
|> Array.ofList //an array output is easier to index for user
Example
"C:\MySampleCSV"
|> ReadCSV
|> List.tail //skip header line
|> GetColumns [0;3;1] //reorder columns as well, if needs be.
Date Range
simple but useful list of dates between fromDate and toDate
let getDateRange fromDate toDate =
let rec dates (fromDate:System.DateTime) (toDate:System.DateTime) =
seq {
if fromDate <= toDate then
yield fromDate
yield! dates (fromDate.AddDays(1.0)) toDate
}
dates fromDate toDate
|> List.ofSeq
toggle code to sql
More trivial than most on this list, but handy nonetheless:
I'm always taking sql in and out of code to move it to a sql environment during development. Example:
let sql = "select a,b,c "
+ "from table "
+ "where a = 1"
needs to be 'stripped' to:
select a,b,c
from table
where a = 1
keeping the formatting. It's a pain to strip out the code symbols for the sql editor, then put them back again by hand when I've got the sql worked out. These two functions toggle the sql back and forth from code to stripped:
// reads the file with the code quoted sql, strips code symbols, dumps to FSI
let stripForSql fileName =
File.ReadAllText(fileName)
|> (fun s -> Regex.Replace(s, "\+(\s*)\"", ""))
|> (fun s -> s.Replace("\"", ""))
|> (fun s -> Regex.Replace(s, ";$", "")) // end of line semicolons
|> (fun s -> Regex.Replace(s, "//.+", "")) // get rid of any comments
|> (fun s -> printfn "%s" s)
then when you are ready to put it back into your code source file:
let prepFromSql fileName =
File.ReadAllText(fileName)
|> (fun s -> Regex.Replace(s, #"\r\n", " \"\r\n+\"")) // matches newline
|> (fun s -> Regex.Replace(s, #"\A", " \""))
|> (fun s -> Regex.Replace(s, #"\z", " \""))
|> (fun s -> printfn "%s" s)
I'd love to get rid of the input file but can't even begin to grok how to make that happen. anyone?
edit:
I figured out how to eliminate the requirement of a file for these functions by adding a windows forms dialog input/output. Too much code to show, but for those who would like to do such a thing, that's how I solved it.
Pascal's Triangle (hey, someone might find it useful)
So we want to create a something like this:
1
1 1
1 2 1
1 3 3 1
1 4 6 4 1
Easy enough:
let rec next = function
| [] -> []
| x::y::xs -> (x + y)::next (y::xs)
| x::xs -> x::next xs
let pascal n =
seq { 1 .. n }
|> List.scan (fun acc _ -> next (0::acc) ) [1]
The next function returns a new list where each item[i] = item[i] + item[i + 1].
Here's the output in fsi:
> pascal 10 |> Seq.iter (printfn "%A");;
[1]
[1; 1]
[1; 2; 1]
[1; 3; 3; 1]
[1; 4; 6; 4; 1]
[1; 5; 10; 10; 5; 1]
[1; 6; 15; 20; 15; 6; 1]
[1; 7; 21; 35; 35; 21; 7; 1]
[1; 8; 28; 56; 70; 56; 28; 8; 1]
[1; 9; 36; 84; 126; 126; 84; 36; 9; 1]
[1; 10; 45; 120; 210; 252; 210; 120; 45; 10; 1]
For the adventurous, here's a tail-recursive version:
let rec next2 cont = function
| [] -> cont []
| x::y::xs -> next2 (fun l -> cont <| (x + y)::l ) <| y::xs
| x::xs -> next2 (fun l -> cont <| x::l ) <| xs
let pascal2 n =
set { 1 .. n }
|> Seq.scan (fun acc _ -> next2 id <| 0::acc)) [1]
Flatten a List
if you have something like this:
let listList = [[1;2;3;];[4;5;6]]
and want to 'flatten' it down to a singe list so the result is like this:
[1;2;3;4;5;6]
it can be done thusly:
let flatten (l: 'a list list) =
seq {
yield List.head (List.head l)
for a in l do yield! (Seq.skip 1 a)
}
|> List.ofSeq
List comprehensions for float
This [23.0 .. 1.0 .. 40.0] was marked as deprecated a few versions backed.
But apparently, this works:
let dl = 9.5 / 11.
let min = 21.5 + dl
let max = 40.5 - dl
let a = [ for z in min .. dl .. max -> z ]
let b = a.Length
(BTW, there's a floating point gotcha in there. Discovered at fssnip - the other place for F# snippets)
Parallel map
let pmap f s =
seq { for a in s -> async { return f s } }
|> Async.Parallel
|> Async.Run