Delphi 2007 on windows 7 just does nothing on the saveDialog.Execute call. I have seen another person mention this a few weeks back but it was with Borland c++.
See the thread "TOpenDialog.Execute not working " on embarcadero newsgroups.
Problem there was resolved by deleting the executable name from
"HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Image File Execution Options"
I got the same problem (savedialog not working) in windows XP.
After lots of unsuccessful attempts according to the voluminous exchanges in the embarcadero group you mention (https://forums.embarcadero.com/thread.jspa?messageID=196950&tstart=0#196950).
I found what the reason was : the initial file dir and filename of the Savedialog12 were bad, contradicting each other, the filename containing the fullpath of the last file I had opened (I had thought it was smart to prepare the saving of the file I had opened last; unfortunately what I had put in the initialdir was equal to what I had put in the filename !)
The problem was already solved by clearing both fields of the save dialog.
Further, my initial goal to prepare the saving was reached by putting valid values in the involved fields :
SaveDialog1.FileName:=ExtractFileName(Opendialog1.Filename);
SaveDialog1.InitialFileDir:=ExtractFilePath(Opendialog1.Filename);
Related
I have an old .BAS file that I'm trying to view and for which I'm running into some problems. Searching online seems to indicate that I should be able to just open it in NOTEPAD.EXE or similar, but doing so gives me gibberish, like this:
þ*©¿TÜ…7[/C̸yõ»€¹Ù<Ñ~Æ-$Ì™}³nFuJ,ÖYòÎg)ʇŒ~Š¯DËðïþSnhœJN
‰=É™2+df”c).vX»[šû'Û9¹8%ñx5m#8úV4ÊBº)Eª;Iú¹ó‹|àÆ„72#Ž§i§Ë #îÑ?
í‘ú™ÞMÖæÕjYе‘_¢y<…7i$°Ò.ÃÅR×ÒTÒç_yÄÐ
}+d&jQ *YòÎg)ʇŒ~Š¯DË?úŽ©Ž5\šm€S{ÔÍo—#ìôÔ”ÜÍѱ]ʵ¬0wêÂLª¡öm#Å„Ws雦 X
Ô¶æ¯÷¦É®jÛ ¼§
”n ŸëÆf¿´ó½4ÂäÌ3§Œ®
I know the file is sound, because I can open it in GW-BASIC. However, list does not seem to work to view the file, and trying to save the file in ASCII format from within GW-BASIC, didn't work either. Both just gave me an "Illegal function call" error:
GW-BASIC 3.22
(C) Copyright Microsoft 1983,1984,1986,1987
60300 Bytes free
Ok
LOAD"Pwrharm
Ok
LIST
Illegal function call
Ok
SAVE "Pwrharm2",A
Illegal function call
Ok
RUN
[Program runs successfully]
Then again, the run command works just fine. What am I doing wrong?
You're not doing anything wrong; the file was originally saved in GWBASIC with the ,P option. There is a 'hack' to unprotect it, described at https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.os.msdos.misc/PA9sve0eKAk - basically, you create a file (call it UNPROT.BAS) containing only the characters 0xff 0x1a, then load the protected file, then load UNPROT.BAS, and you should then be able to list and save the program.
If you can't LIST or EDIT a GW-BASIC .BAS file that you LOADed from disk, it means that the file was originally SAVEd in protected format via SAVE filespec, P.
The 1988 "Handbook of BASIC - third edition" by David I. Schneider describes it as follows:
A program that has been SAVEd in protected format can be unprotected with the following technique.
(a) Create a file called RECOVER.BAS with the following program.
10 OPEN "RECOVER.BAS" FOR OUTPUT AS #1
20 PRINT #1, CHR$(255);
30 CLOSE #1
(b) LOAD the protected program into memory.
(c) Enter LOAD "RECOVER.BAS"
The formerly protected program will now be in memory and can be LISTed or EDITed, and reSAVEd in an unprotected format. This technique appears to work with most versions of BASIC. I have used it successfully with IBM PC BASIC, Compaq BASIC, and several versions of GW-BASIC. LOADing the file RECOVER.BAS will also restore a program after a NEW command has been executed.
In a mozille extension I run:
SecSess.Logger.info("ctypes test");
Components.utils.import("resource://gre/modules/ctypes.jsm");
SecSess.Logger.info("1");
this.lib = ctypes.open("libcrypto.so");
SecSess.Logger.info("2");
var a = new Uint8Array(1<<10);
SecSess.Logger.info("3");
var ptr = new ctypes.uint8_t.ptr(a.buffer);
SecSess.Logger.info("4");
Why this ugly logging after each step you might ask? Well this code fails without showing me an error. (or at least I can't find the error message)
This is printed:
ctypes test
1
2
3
So the 5th log message is never printed which means the following statement never completes:
var ptr = new ctypes.uint8_t.ptr(a.buffer);
This is a simplified version of some old code I have to work with and which I also found online as being valid. However it doesn't work. This add-on wasn't developped using the new SDK with jpm. Quite frankly I don't know how and when it was developped but I need to run some tests on it. It comes with a few source files ordered in a components and a modules directory and a chrome.manifest and install.rdf in the root. I copied these files to the extension directory of Mozilla in order for it to work. The extension executes but there seems to be a problem with ctypes. Aren't ctypes fully supported anymore or are these old style add-on no longer valid for the modern Firefox?
Regards,
Roel
I think they landed a a patch to disallow making a pointer from buffers. I'll double check.
Edit:
Ah per this: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/js-ctypes/Using_js-ctypes/Working_with_ArrayBuffers, you don't have to wrap it with a ctypes.uint8_t.ptr just pass it like a.buffer to wherever you need it. :)
I have a Delphi5 application which exports a file (.pdf) and a very small metadata file to a network location. The intention is that these 2 files should be processed, and then removed, by a polling .NET application.
My approach is to
Write the metadata file with the extension '.part'
Generate the .pdf
Rename the .part file to .dat
The .NET process is looking for files with the extension '.dat' only, so I would expect there to be no conflict between the 2 reader/writers. However, the .NET process is occasionally logging the following error ...
System.IO.IOException: The process cannot access the file '\\server\Path\FileName.dat' because it is being used by another process.
(I say occasionally - we are currently testing, so when volumes increase this may become much more of an issue)
The Delphi code looks like this :
AssignFile(FTextFile, Format('%s\%s.part', [DMSPath, FullFileName]));
try
try
ReWrite(FTextFile);
Writeln(FTextFile, MetaDataString);
finally
CloseFile(FTextFile);
end;
except
raise ELogFileException.Create( LOGFILEWRITEFAILURE );
end;
Then there is a separate method which performs the following lines of code
if FindFirst(Format('%s\*.part',[DMSPath]), faAnyFile, SearchRec) = 0 then begin
repeat
OldName := Format('%s\%s',[DMSPath, SearchRec.Name]);
NewName := Format('%s\%s',[DMSPath, ChangeFileExt(SearchRec.Name, '.dat')]);
RenameFile(OldName, NewName);
until FindNext(SearchRec) <> 0;
FindClose(SearchRec);
end;
I cannot see anything inherently wrong with this code and we have a couple of remedies in mind, but I have 2 questions
Should I try a different technique to more reliably protect the '.dat' file until it is fully ready
What circumstances could be causing this?
So far there has been one suggested cause - Antivirus software.
Any suggestions as to how the file might be produced differently? Note that my application is Delphi5; I wondered if there was a newer, more 'atomic' version of the 'MoveFileA' WinApi call I could use.
In the past, we had a problem with file being locked like that. Investigation pointed to Windows' Prefetch. The file being affected were not on a network directory though.
As far as I know, Prefetch only work on process startup and/or while booting (Controlled by a registry key), so it might not apply to your current situation.
You can check the "C:\"Windows"\Prefetch\" directory. If prefetch is active, it should contains multiple *.pf files. If there is one with your executable filename, it might be worth investigating.
Personally speaking, because there are multiple files involved, I'd create a separate lock file (eg, myfile.lck) that you write first. If the polling app sees it in the folder, then it stops looking for other files. Once that file is gone, then it dives deeper. I don't know if this would solve the problem you're encountering or not, but I'd give it a try. (Files with .dat extensions are frequently created by malicious evildoers, so they can raise spurious issues through other sources, like AV software. A lock file with 0 bytes in it is generally harmless and disregarded.)
One of my users at a large university (with, I imagine, the aggressive security settings that university IT departments general have on their computers) is getting an empty string returned by Windows XP for CSIDL_COMMON_APPDATA or CSIDL_PERSONAL. (I'm not sure which of these is returning the empty string, because I haven't yet examined his computer to see how he's installed the software, but I'm pretty sure it's the COMMON_APPDATA...)
Has anyone encountered this or have suggestions on how to deal with this?
Here's the Delphi code I'm using to retrieve the value:
Function GetSpecialFolder( FolderID: Integer):String;
var
PIDL: PItemIDList;
Path: array[0..MAX_PATH] of Char;
begin
SHGetSpecialFolderLocation(Application.Handle, FolderID, PIDL);
SHGetPathFromIDList(PIDL, Path);
Result := Path;
end; { GetSpecialFolder }
ShowMessage(GetSpecialFolder(CSIDL_COMMON_APPDATA)); <--- This is an empty string
Edit:
Figuring out this API made me feel like I was chasing my tail - I went in circles trying to find the right call. This method and others similar to it are said to be deprecated by Microsoft (as well as by a earlier poster to this question (#TLama?) who subsequently deleted the post.) But, it seems like most of us, including me, regularly and safely ignore that status.
In my searches, I found a good answer here on SO from some time ago, including sample code for the non-deprecated way of doing this: what causes this error 'Unable to write to application file.ini'.
If you want to find out why an API call is failing you need to check the return values. That's what is missing in this code.
You need to treat each function on its own merits. Read the documentation on MSDN. In the case of SHGetSpecialFolderLocation, the return value is an HRESULT. For SHGetPathFromIDList you get back a BOOL. If that is FALSE then the call failed.
The likely culprit here is SHGetSpecialFolderLocation, the code that receives the CSIDL, but you must check for errors whenever you call Windows API functions.
Taking a look at the documentation for CSIDL we see this:
CSIDL_COMMON_APPDATA
Version 5.0. The file system directory that contains application data for all users. A typical path is C:\Documents and Settings\All
Users\Application Data. This folder is used for application data that
is not user specific. For example, an application can store a
spell-check dictionary, a database of clip art, or a log file in the
CSIDL_COMMON_APPDATA folder. This information will not roam and is
available to anyone using the computer.
If the machine has a shell version lower than 5.0, then this CSIDL value is not supported. That's the only documented failure mode for this CSIDL value. I don't think that applies to your situation, so you'll just have to see what the HRESULT status code has to say.
I am debugging a DirectShow filter I created with the DSPACK code library using Delphi 6 Pro. When a breakpoint I set is hit in one particular unit named BaseClass.pas, and I begin tracing, the Execution Point jumps to strange places in the source code. This usually indicates that the source code being traced does not match the source code that was compiled into one of the packages being used by the Delphi application. Oddly enough it is only the BaseClass unit since I have traced other units belonging to the DSPACK code library and they do not exhibit this problem. I am not using run-time packages.
I scanned my disk and found only one copy of BaseClass.dcu with a modification date equal to the last time I built the program. I have not modified the source for that unit or any other belonging to DSPACK. Since my Filter is part of the main application this indicates that BaseClass.pas would be subject to a dual use situation since it is used to build the DSPACK component package (dpk), and is also referenced by my main application directly via the TBCSource object my Filter descends from. Note, I did try adding the unit PAS file directly to my Project but that didn't fix anything.
I also went back and re-opened each of the DSPACK package files and did a full re-build. None of this helped. Is there something else I can try to get the source synchronized with the compiled image of the BaseClass unit? Or is a different problem altogether and if so, what is it and how can I fix it?
Sometimes this happens when code is copied/pasted from web pages or other sources, and the lines don't end with CR/LF pairs (#13#10 or 0x0D0A, standard for Windows) but end in only LF (#10 or 0x0A, typically the line ending in *nix systems) or CR (#13 or 0x0D, typical with Mac OSX/iOS). The incorrect line terminators confuse the debugger - this has been an issue for the past several Delphi versions.
You can sometimes fix this by opening the source file using a text editor like Notepad, making a small meaningless change (insert and then delete a blank line, for instance), and then save the file.
I had same problem and made a similar utility. Fixed it.
Basically, just this:
procedure adjustCRLF(filename : String);
var
strList : TStringList;
begin
strList := TStringList.Create;
try
strList.LoadFromFile(filename);
strList.Text := AdjustLineBreaks(strList.Text);
strList.SaveToFile(filename);
finally
strList.Free;
end;
end;
There is another way this can happen: if the IDE erroneously opens another source file with the same name (but different, such as an earlier version) then all the debug points will be incorrect, and the debugger will even allow you to step through the incorrect file.
I've seen Delphi 7 do this once.
Make sure that when you rebuild it, that in the compiler options for your project that you have "Debug Information" turned on. In fact, most of the options under Debugging should be set in your project's Compiler options.
Also, if you haven't already, restart Delphi.