I have 2 hosts running the same docker customized image. I have modified the image on host 1 and saved the image to a custom.tar. If I take that image and load it onto host 2 will it just update or should I remove the old docker image first?
There are 2 ways to do that with repository and without repository using load and save.
With repository below are the steps.
Log in on Docker Hub
Click on Create Repository.
Choose a name and a description for your repository and click
Create.
Log into the Docker Hub from the command line
docker login --username=yourhubusername --email=youremail#company.com
tag your image
docker tag <existing-image> <hub-user>/<repo-name>[:<tag>]
Push your image to the repository you created
docker push <hub-user>/<repo-name>:<tag>
Pull the image to host 2
docker pull <hub-user>/<repo-name>:<tag>
This will add the image to docker hub and available on internet and now you can pull this image to any system.
With this approach you can keep the same images with different tags on system. But if you don't need old images better to delete that to avoid junk.
Without docker hub.
This command will create tar bundle.
docker save [OPTIONS] IMAGE [IMAGE...]
example: docker save busybox > busybox.tar
Load an image from a tar archive or STDIN
docker load [OPTIONS]
example:docker load < busybox.tar.gz
Recommended: Docker hub or DTR approach easy to manage unless you have bandwidth issue in case your file is large.
Refer:
Docker Hub Repositories
Related
We have a private harbor registry that's insecure. We use docker client on a centos7 VM to push /pull images. We lost the docker client centos7 VM so have installed a new one. The issue I see is I log into the registry but when I do "docker image list" or "docker images" it doesn't show the images previously loaded. I'm not sure why?
[udmuser1#vtc-spk-auto10 ~]$ docker image list
REPOSITORY TAG IMAGE ID CREATED SIZE
If I do a docker load -i image on the new linux VM then docker push I do see the image when doing "docker image list" on the registry.
[udmuser1#vtc-spk-auto10 ~]$ docker image list
REPOSITORY TAG IMAGE ID CREATED SIZE
harbor01.ims.net/library/f5-fluentd v1.4.2 b96d9e18a71c 9 months ago 495 MB
I'm unclear why I don't see the images that were loaded by the previous linux VM.
Thanks for any input on this.
John
Your local Docker client would show you images that are part of its docker daemon in other words the images present on your client. You would need to setup synchronization if you want similar images on both the ends.
The container Registry is a place where you push/pull images to and from.
Your local Docker Client contains only the images that fulfil the criteria:
The image was pulled from a registry
The image was build (on that machine)
The container images you are not synchronized with your registry, you need to explicitly push and pull those images.
Your private repository and local machine are two different things. You can't get to the images in your private repository if you lose access to it.
To list all image repositories that contain at least one tagged image, run this curl command:
curl https://registry.io/v2/_catalog
{"repositories":["alpine","postgres"]}
If there are image repositories in a registry that don't possess a single tag, and instead only possess digests e.g. ubuntu#sha256:ac13c5d2, those will be omitted from the output. If a registry contained ubuntu#sha256:ac13c5d2, alpine:latest, and postgres:15.1, Output from /v2/_catalog would read as {"repositories":["alpine","postgres"]}.
Images can be obtained in a more granular and complete method through use of:
https://registry.io/v2/{image}/manifests/{digest} for images with digests
https://registry.io/v2/{image}/tags/list for images with tags
Usually according to docs In order to build a docker Image I need to follow these steps:
Create a Dockerfile for my application.
Run docker build . Dockerfile where the . is the context of my application
The using docker run run my image into a container.
Commit my image into a container
Then using docker push push the image into a container.
Though sometimes just launching the image into a container seems like a waste of time because I can tag my images using the parameter -t into the docker build command. So there's no need to commit a container as an image.
So is neseserily to commit a running container as an image?
You don't need to run and commit. docker commit allows you to create a new image from changes made on existing container.
You do need to build and tag your image in a way that will enable you to push it.
docker build -t [registry (defaults to docker hub)]/[your repository]:[image tag] [docker file context folder]
for example:
docker build -t my-repository/some-image:image-tag .
And then:
docker push my-repository/some-image:image-tag
This will build an image from a docker file found in the current folder (where you run the docker build command). The repository in this case is my-repository, the image name is some-image and it's tag is image-tag.
Also please note that you'll have to perform docker login with your credentials to docker hub before you are able to actually push the image.
You can also tag an existing image without rebuilding it. This is useful if you want to push an existing image to a different registry or if you want to create a different image tag. for example:
docker tag my-repository/some-image:image-tag localhost:5000/my-repository/some-image:image-tag
This will add a new tag to the image from the previous example. Note the registry part added (localhost:5000). If you call docker push on that tag (docker push localhost:5000/my-repository/some-image:image-tag) the image will be pushed to a registry found on localhost:5000 (of course you need the registry up and running before trying to push).
There's no need to do so. In order to prove that you can just tag the image and push it into the registry here's an example:
I made the following Dockerfile:
FROM alpine
RUN echo "Hello" > /usr/share/hello.txt
ENTRYPOINT cat /usr/share/hello.txt
Nothing special just generates a txt file and shows its content.
Then I can build my image using tags:
docker build . -t ddesyllas/dummy:201201241200 -t ddesyllas/dummy:201201241200
And then just push them to the registry:
$ docker push ddesyllas/dummy
The push refers to repository [docker.io/ddesyllas/dummy]
1aa99de3dbec: Pushed
6bc83681f1ba: Mounted from library/alpine
201908241504: digest: sha256:93e8407b1d52620aeadd769486ef1402b9e310018cae0972760f8c1a03377c94 size: 735
1aa99de3dbec: Layer already exists
6bc83681f1ba: Layer already exists
latest: digest: sha256:93e8407b1d52620aeadd769486ef1402b9e310018cae0972760f8c1a03377c94 size: 735
And as you can see from the output you can just build the tags and push it directly, good for your ci/cd pipeline. Though, generally speaking, you may need to launch the application into a container in order to do acceptance and other type of tests (eg. end-to-end tests).
I have to take a Docker image from a vendor site and then push the image into the private repository (Artifactory). This way the CI/CD pipeline can retrieve the image from the private repository and deploy the image.
What is the best way to achieve it, do I need to recreate the image?
steps:
take a pull of the base docker image from vendor.
create new folder for your new docker image.
create a Dockerfile.
write your base docker image.
do the changes inside this folder.
build new docker image using cmd.
push the image into docker hub.
refer this (not exactly according to your need, but this helps): https://www.howtoforge.com/tutorial/how-to-create-docker-images-with-dockerfile/
for cmd and Dockerfile changes, refer docker office doc site
I believe its a tar or zip file that they have given you by docker save and docker export.
You can perform below operations.
1. Perform docker load < file.tar - You will get the image name that's loaded. Note down the name.
1. Download the tar or zip file to your local.
2. Perform cat file.tar | docker import image_name_that_you_noted_above
3. You are good to use the image now. tag it to your repo and push, or directly run using docker run
While trying to build a service on docker-machine i got an error of "image doesn't exist" on that docker-machine manager node. As I checked the docker images command on the manager node, no image was there as expected. But on the root docker side I have those images. I want to access these images on the manager node. I've read few articles where it was mentioned that, maybe I've to upload that image on the docker hub then pull it from that hub. But I want to access it locally. Is there any way to do this as I'm newbie to docker.
This is the command what I tried on my manager machine:
docker#manager:~$ docker service create --name "api-client" -p 4200:4200 api_client
This is my docker images output:
REPOSITORY TAG IMAGE ID CREATED SIZE
api_client latest 097b19c4deb8 27 hours ago 1.15GB
But on my docker#manager terminal, my docker image folder is empty.
The problem is that there is no repository to hold the image. The repository needs to be pulled from to a repository to each node in the Swarm before it can execute. In general you need to do the following:
Setup a repository, if you want a local repository there is a guide here, but it will be some hassle to get it up and running i and "insecure http" version. An easier way is to get yourself a free docker hub account and put your image there.
Tag your local image with the repository name. Howto is shown in the guide above.
docker tag <local image> <repository>/<image:tag>
Login to the repository (if in cloud) and push your image to the repository
docker login
docker push <repository>/<image>:<tag>
To run the image (your command)
docker service create --name "api-client" -p 4200:4200 <repository>/<image>:<tag>
Your can also try to pull an image into the local cache of a node using
docker pull <repository>/<image>:<tag>
I'm wondering where Docker's images are exactly stored to in my local host machine.
Can I share my Docker-Image without using the Docker-Hub or a Dockerfile but the 'real' Docker-Image? And what is exactly happening when I 'push' my Docker-Image to Docker-Hub?
Docker images are stored as filesystem layers. Every command in the Dockerfile creates a layer. You can also create layers by using docker commit from the command line after making some changes (via docker run probably).
These layers are stored by default under /var/lib/docker. While you could (theoretically) cherry pick files from there and install it in a different docker server, is probably a bad idea to play with the internal representation used by Docker.
When you push your image, these layers are sent to the registry (the docker hub registry, by default… unless you tag your image with another registry prefix) and stored there. When pulling, the layer id is used to check if you already have the layer locally or it needs to be downloaded. You can use docker history to peek at which layers (other images) are used (and, to some extent, which command created the layer).
As for options to share an image without pushing to the docker hub registry, your best options are:
docker save an image or docker export a container. This will output a tar file to standard output, so you will like to do something like docker save 'dockerizeit/agent' > dk.agent.latest.tar. Then you can use docker load or docker import in a different host.
Host your own private registry. - Outdated, see comments See the docker registry image. We have built an s3 backed registry which you can start and stop as needed (all state is kept on the s3 bucket of your choice) which is trivial to setup. This is also an interesting way of watching what happens when pushing to a registry
Use another registry like quay.io (I haven't personally tried it), although whatever concerns you have with the docker hub will probably apply here too.
Based on this blog, one could share a docker image without a docker registry by executing:
docker save --output latestversion-1.0.0.tar dockerregistry/latestversion:1.0.0
Once this command has been completed, one could copy the image to a server and import it as follows:
docker load --input latestversion-1.0.0.tar
Sending a docker image to a remote server can be done in 3 simple steps:
Locally, save docker image as a .tar:
docker save -o <path for created tar file> <image name>
Locally, use scp to transfer .tar to remote
On remote server, load image into docker:
docker load -i <path to docker image tar file>
[Update]
More recently, there is Amazon AWS ECR (Elastic Container Registry), which provides a Docker image registry to which you can control access by means of the AWS IAM access management service. ECR can also run a CVE (vulnerabilities) check on your image when you push it.
Once you create your ECR, and obtain the "URL" you can push and pull as required, subject to the permissions you create: hence making it private or public as you wish.
Pricing is by amount of data stored, and data transfer costs.
https://aws.amazon.com/ecr/
[Original answer]
If you do not want to use the Docker Hub itself, you can host your own Docker repository under Artifactory by JFrog:
https://www.jfrog.com/confluence/display/RTF/Docker+Repositories
which will then run on your own server(s).
Other hosting suppliers are available, eg CoreOS:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/10/30/coreos_enterprise_registry/
which bought quay.io