I have a robot file (calc_check.robot) in which each test case has separate documentation.
*** Settings ***
Documentation
... The test cases are designed to test the calculator .
Library ../../Library/AddNumbers
*** Test Cases ***
Calc_check_test Testcase01_a
[Documentation]
... Verify that two numbers are added or not
[Tags] add calculator
${addition}= Add numbers 10 20
Calc_check_test Testcase01_b
[Documentation]
... Verify that two numbers are added or not with negative sign
[Tags] add calculator
${addition}= Add numbers 10 -20
When i try to generate documentation for that robot file using the rst file (call_check.rst) i'm getting complete test case along with documentation as well, but i need only "[Documentation]" part only.
calc_check
======================================
.. robot-settings::
:source:/Users/sphinx/calc_check.robot
.. robot-tests::
:source:/Users/sphinx/calc_check.robot
I want documentation (i.e., only [Documentation] part of test case) from two test cases excluding the test case code.
Please tell me how to generate only the documentation part of it.
Robot provides documentation generation libraries called libdoc:
https://robot-framework.readthedocs.io/en/2.9.2/_modules/robot/libdoc.html
Problem is that it generates only for libraries and resources files (those without ***Testcase*** part).
If you need to generate docs from test suites, I would recommand to temporary change TestSuite into Resource file (change section to Keywords) and run libdoc for such file:
python -m robot.libdoc <path to res/lib> <list/show>
Related
I have setup Jenkins to run pylint on all python source files and all the log files are generated (apparently correctly) into a sub-directory as follows:
Source\pylint_logs\pylint1.log, pylint2.log, ..., pylint75.log
I have included a --msg-template definition based on the instructions on my Jenkins Configure page: Post-build Actions->Record compiler warnings and static analysis results->Static Analysis Tools. The template is shown as:
msg-template={path}:{line}: [{msg_id}, {obj}] {msg} ({symbol})
An example of one of the log files being generated by Jenkins/pylint is as follows:
************* Module FigureView
myapp\Views\FigureView.py:1: [C0103, ] Module name "FigureView" doesn't conform to snake_case naming style (invalid-name)
myapp\Views\FigureView.py:30: [C0103, FigureView.__init__] Attribute name "ax" doesn't conform to snake_case naming style (invalid-name)
------------------------------------------------------------------
Your code has been rated at 8.57/10 (previous run: 8.57/10, +0.00)
For the PyLint Report File Pattern, I have: Source/pylint_logs/pylint*.log
It appears that PyLint Warnings is parsing the files because the console output looks like this:
[PyLint] Searching for all files in 'D:\Jenkins\workspace\PROJECT' that match the pattern 'Source/pylint_logs/pylint*.log'
[PyLint] -> found 75 files
[PyLint] Successfully parsed file D:\Jenkins\workspace\PROJECT\Source\pylint_logs\pylint1.log
[PyLint] -> found 0 issues (skipped 0 duplicates)
[PyLint] Successfully parsed file D:\Jenkins\workspace\PROJECT\Source\pylint_logs\pylint10.log
[PyLint] -> found 0 issues (skipped 0 duplicates)
This repeats for all 75 files, even though there are plenty of issues in the log files.
What is odd, is that when I was first prototyping the use of Jenkins on this project, I set it up to just run pylint on a single file. I ran across another StackOverflow post that showed a msg-template that allowed me to get it working (unable to get pylint output to populate the violations graph). I even got the graph to show up for the PyLint Warnings Trend. I used the following definition per the post:
msg-template={path}:{line}: [{msg_id}({symbol}), {obj}] {msg}
Note that this format is slightly different from the one recommended by my Jenkins page (shown earlier). Even though this worked for a single file, neither template now seems to work for multiple files, or else there is something other than the template causing the problem. My graph has flat-lined, and I always get 0 issues reported.
I have had trouble finding useful documentation on the Jenkins PyLint Warnings tool. Does anyone have any ideas or pointers to documentation I can research further? Thanks much!
Ensure pass output-format parameter in pylint command. Example:
pylint --exit-zero --output-format=parseable module1 module2 > pylint.report
you have to set the Pylint's option --message-template in .pylintrc as
msg-template={path}: {line}: [{msg_id} ({symbol}), {obj}] {msg}
output-format=text
I'm trying to separate out some code from drake/automotive/automotive_demo.cc. As a first step, I'm trying to copy automotive_demo.cc and automotive_demo.py into differently named files (test.cc and test.py) and then running bazel run automotive:test -- --num_simple_cars=1. I modified automotive/BUILD.bazel and test.py to take into account the new dependencies.
The problem is that after I bazel run, the simulator window opens but no car gets rendered. Eventually it just crashes with the following errors:
[lcm-spy] ClassDiscoverer: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: apple/laf/AquaPopupMenuUI
[lcm-spy] jar: ../com_jidesoft_jide_oss/jide-oss-2.9.7.jar
[lcm-spy] class: com/jidesoft/plaf/aqua/AquaJidePopupMenuUI.class
...
[drake_visualizer] Qt WebEngine seems to be initialized from a plugin. Please set Qt::AA_ShareOpenGLContexts using QCoreApplication::setAttribute before constructing QGuiApplication.
...
[lcm-spy] LCM: Disabling IPV6 support
[lcm-spy] LCM: TTL set to zero, traffic will not leave localhost.
[lcm-spy] java.net.SocketException: Can't assign requested address
Here is an (unresolved) Github issue that points to the problem being that test is a "custom plug-in". But if automotive_demo can work, surely there's a way to reproduce that behavior for test? I also tried grepping for QGuiApplication and only found a series of binary files, so I didn't know how to follow the error message's suggestion.
when trying out your steps on Mac I unfortunately cannot reproduce your specific errors. I do not think that having test as a target name should cause problems (at least I did not experience issues).
Could you please make sure:
You're able to run bazel run automotive:demo -- --num_simple_car=1?
After having renamed automotive_demo.* to test.*, in your BAZEL.build, test.py files the following are mapped correctly: demo -> test and automotive_demo -> test_cc (or whatever unique name you choose)?
i want to generate the edoc file for one erlang module, here is my code http://ideone.com/TFktht,
I want oder the export api interface, but i can not success.
generate_log_statistics/4 Analyse the log files and draw graph.
prepare_sipp_cmd/3 Shows SIPp online help documentation of what config parameters there are.
prepare_systeminfo_filenames/1 Prepare the log files according which blades you want to monitor.
run_scenario/6 Run the SIPp scenario.
start_collect_system_infos/1 Start collecting the logs.
stop_collect_system_infos/1 Stop collecting the logs.
These exported api in edoc are not odered.
I want:
prepare_sipp_cmd/3
prepare_systeminfo_filenames/1
start_collect_system_infos/1
run_scenario/6
start_collect_system_infos/1
generate_log_statistics/4
To order functions
Put this in your rebar.config:
{edoc_opts, [{sort_functions, true}]}.
Or you can generate single doc files with something like:
edoc:file("src/foo.erl", [{dir, "doc"}, {sort_functions, true}]).
"doc" being the output directory.
To achieve specific order
Turn off function sorting, as above, but with {sort_functions, false} and order the functions in your source as required.
When running QTest in Qt Creator with terminal setting disabled, the output pane display links to the test line failing, ie:
FAIL! : MidiTest::testMTCWriter() Compared values are not the same
Actual (tcCount): 1
Expected (2) : 2
Loc: [../../Joker/tests/AutoTest/MidiTest.cpp(271)]
Is it possible to make such link? For example I configured doxygen as an external tool and I'd like to produce the same output for documentation errors.
I am trying to run xUnit tests (from an F# module, if it makes any difference) using TestDriven.NET, but whatever I do I get this error:
It looks like you're trying to execute an xUnit.net unit test.
For xUnit 1.5 or above (recommended):
Please ensure that the directory containing your 'xunit.dll' reference also contains xUnit's
test runner files ('xunit.dll.tdnet', 'xunit.runner.tdnet.dll' etc.)
For earlier versions:
You need to install support for TestDriven.Net using xUnit's 'xunit.installer.exe' application.
You can find xUnit.net downloads and support here:
http://www.codeplex.com/xunit
I tried following the suggestions, i.e. I copied the files
xunit.dll.tdnet
xunit.extensions.dll
xunit.gui.clr4.exe
xunit.runner.tdnet.dll
xunit.runner.utility.dll
xunit.runner.utility.xml
xunit.xml
to the folder with xunit.dll and I ran xunit.installer.exe. How can I get it to work?
I just figured out that I forgot to make the test a function in F# (so it was just a value). The error message can't be more misleading though!
You have two problems:
your Fact is broken:-
If you hover over the
please work
bit, you'll see something like: unit -> int
For a Fact to be picked up by an xUnit runner, it needs to yield `unit (void).
Hence, one key thing to get right first is to not return anything. In other words, replace your 123 with () (or an Assertion).
You can guard against this by putting a :unit stipulation on the test:-
[<Fact>]
let ``please work`` () : unit = 123
This will force a compilation error.
TestDriven.NET is reporting it cannot find the xunit.tdnet modules
It's critical to get step 1 right first. Then retry and the problem should be gone
If it remains...
Either try the VS-based runner which should work as long as it's installed and xunit.dll is getting to your output dir or look at the docs for your version of TD.NET for detailed troubleshooting notes (exec summary is if the .tdnet file was in your out dir or you undo and redo the xunit.installer from the folder containing the packages it should just work, esp if you are on latest)