I have been searching all over the web but I can't seem to find the answer to this.
Currently i am using presentViewController to start new ViewControllers, but on certain view controllers i do not dismiss it and call over it. I currently am not using any navigation controllers or anything like that.
I am just worried that if I call the same viewController again via presentViewController, that the same viewController would have 2 running instances.
Is it possible? Or does the iOS framework automatically reuse the idle viewController?
If so, how do i remove the idle view controllers?
Thank you! (I was holding back my question and tried to find it all over the web, so if you can point me in the right direction, it would be very helpful thanks!)
iOS will not reuse your view controller, you can easily check it yourself by printing your view controller in viewDidLoad, you will notice first that viewDidLoad is called every time, and next that all objects have different addresses.
Unless you create thousand of them, or the navigation of your app doesn’t let you come back to an “idle” view controller, I would not say this is an issue though.
I don’t see any clean way to remove a view controller from the memory without calling “dismiss”. You could try to:
- “refresh” your view with new data.
- use something like UIPageViewController if the workflow of your app allows this kind of behaviour.
- rework the navigation so you can dismiss the view before calling another one
Good luck
Related
My app consists of two views. The first one is a GMSMapView and the second one is used to connect to a Bluetooth device that sends coordinates.
After the Bluetooth device is connected, I use a delegate to send the information back to the map view and move a marker around. To transition between views I was previously using segues, this didn't stop the Bluetooth view controller and the data made its way like I wished to the map view.
I ran into the problem of my map view being reinitiated so I decided to use a navigation controller. Now I use a push segue to get to my second view, and pop to come back to the same instance of the first one. Great, that worked! The issue I have now is that popping the second view seems to stop it completely from running in the background like it used to. Is there a way to keep it running in the background like it did before?
What I'm currently using to pop the second view is
self.navigationController?.popViewControllerAnimated(true)
Any idea would be appreciated! Thanks!
A popped view controller does not "stop running". It is returned to you, and if you don't retain it, it is completely destroyed.
If you don't want that to happen, retain it when it is returned. You are currently ignoring the returned view controller:
self.navigationController?.popViewControllerAnimated(true)
Instead, keep a reference to it:
self.mySecondViewController =
self.navigationController?.popViewControllerAnimated(true)
Be warned, however, that this is a very unusual architecture. You will not be able to use the storyboard segue to push again, because it will push a different copy. It would be better to abandon your navigation controller architecture entirely, as it is completely unsuited to the idea of a view controller persisting after it is popped. If you want an architecture where two view controllers persist simultaneously, you would be better off using a UITabBarController — or, even better, reorganize your app completely. The notion that you need the view controller to persist after being popped is a "bad smell": it means that you have put the functionality in the wrong place. Put the functionality in a place that does persist, rather than forcing the view controller to persist in some artificial way.
I'm new to iOS dev and am not entirely sure on Storyboards/Segues/Pushing and Popping.
So in my app I have a navigation controller with 5 view controllers leading from one to another.
When it reaches the last view controller i have a segue to the first and I have a few tasks listed in the prepareForSegue method.
Out of curiosity I decided to check what happens to the [self.navigationController.viewControllers count]. I found that it keeps growing and growing which doesn't 'feel' correct.
Am i handling going back to the first screen correctly? The prepareForSegue method is useful as it allows me to send some data back to the first segue. Is it possible to maybe say when you go back clear all views on that navigation controller?
Thanks
You can use an unwind segue. Here's a good tutorial:
pragmaticstudio.com/blog/2013/2/5/unwind-segues
Make sure to create the unwind action method before you wire it up in the storyboard otherwise it won't show up when you drag to 'Exit'. That was the most confusing part for me when I first set one up. The tutorial does it in the correct order so if you follow it you should be fine.
Also, here's a sample I put together showing how to transfer data back in an unwind segue. It uses a modally presented view controller but the technique is the same:
github.com/soleares/AddToTableView
No, you should never go backwards with a segue (other than an unwind). Segues ALWAYS instantiate new controllers, so you're not actually going back to the first controller, you're just creating a new instance, which gets added to the stack. So either go back with an unwind segue or use popToViewController:animated:. Using an unwind segue will allow you to use prepareForSegue, and it does cause all the controllers in between to be deallocated (if you have no other strong pointers to them).
I am just looking for a sanity check here.
I have a screen that the user passes through on the way into the main application. That screen can be navigated back to from almost anywhere in the system.
As it stands I am just presenting ViewControllers without using a NavController to manage them (it does not seem applicable for most of my app, since screens are not necessarily sequential or related to one another).
My question is, if I have presented VC1, then navigate to other screens, and finally want to present VC1 again, I am doing something like:
[self presentViewController:[self.storyboard instantiateViewControllerWithIdentifier:#"VC1"] animated:YES completion:nil];
Is this bad form? Am I leaking memory by creating a bunch of VC1 instances or is there some magic that uses the previously created one?
If it is bad form, how do I get back to the original VC1 to reuse it?
Thanks for any input.
I think you pegged it: It's not a great idea to have multiple instances of the same view controller in memory at the same time. Every time you instantiate a new view controller and present it modally, you'll consume more memory.
The most elegant solution is the iOS 6 unwind segue. But most of us would be unwilling to give up on iOS 5 support quite yet.
If you need to support iOS 5, you could contemplate using navigation controller, but hide the navigation bar if you don't like it in your user interface. Then replace modal segues with push segues and now you can do popToRootViewController whenever you want to return to the main view controller.
I'm moving my App to Storyboards and, so far, so good.
However, I've found something that I don't really understand and worries me. I would appreciate if someone can provide some insight on this.
My app uses a normal Navigation Controller. For moving "forward" to new View Controllers, I'm using custom segues; no problems there. However, there's a point in the App where I want to move back to the beginning of the Navigation Stack. I have also configured that "navigation" using a custom segue, for that, I created the segue in Interface Builder by dragging the last view controller to the first one (that already looks weird to me), and I've implemented the custom segue perform method in the following way:
-(void)perform
{
UIViewController *src = (UIViewController *)self.sourceViewController;
UIViewController *dest = (UIViewController *)self.destinationViewController;
[src.navigationController popToRootViewControllerAnimated:NO];
// Custom animation code here
}
... It works great. However, I don't understand why it works. In my mind, the custom segue should be instantiating a new instance of my first view controller and assign it as "dest", but it looks like the segue is smart enough to realize I want to navigate to a previous, existent, instance of a View Controller and, instead of creating a new instance, it assigns to "dest" the existing one.
Does anybody know if using segues in this way is ok? Is it possible that it works by chance but might stop working in the future? Am I wasting memory in anyway as the segue is instantiating a View Controller I'm not going to use?
Thanks a lot in advance!
Am I wasting memory in anyway as the segue is instantiating a View
Controller I'm not going to use?
Yes sir! By using a segue, you effectively allocate a new view controller as it's needed to set the DestinationController property for your custom segue. Test by yourself : add a static counter into your root controller, increment it each time this class is initialized and display it in your view : you'll see it getting incremented every time you pop to root using this trick.
Does anybody know if using segues in this way is ok?
As long as you're effectively wasting memory, no!
There's at least one solution to this problem : release the DestinationController of the segue in your (void)perform implentation. This is really quick to implement, but kinda ugly since you allocate and immediately release your view controller every time... even if it's better than just leaking it, it's not what I'd call a good practice!
To my mind, a better way to achieve what you want would be to not use a segue for that transition, just to use a button or whatever and call popToRootViewController:animated when getting a touch on this button.
Is it possible that it works by chance but might stop working in the
future?
For both the first solution I suggested and the way you're currently doing it, I see absolutely no reason : these are not complicated tweaks, just 'bad-implemented' standard navigation. The second solution is perfectly normal so no worries.
I have a CoreData app with the MainView the UITableViewController which houses all of the items in the list. What i'm trying to accomplish is adding a custom back button and using the popToViewController:animated: to access the settings. When I try to use this method the app crashes. After doing extensive reading I realized that push and pop use an NSArray stack for view controllers. For example, the rootView is view 0, when you use pushToViewController:animated: it added in another view, 1 and so forth. That all made sense. What I learned was you can't pop to a view which is not loaded into the stack after the root view. My objective here is to pop to the settings view. When I change the code around in the AppDelegate.m to make the SettingsViewController the rootViewController, the UITableViewController no longer functions, it fails telling me the entity "enityName" can't be initialized. Is there any way to still have the CoreData part of the app function correctly and still pop to the settings? I have thought of using a modal view but it ruins the style of the app.
This was quite hard for me to explain, if you didn't understand any part of it, let me know.
Thanks for your help.
Update: I read in the UINavigationBar documentation that you can use - (void)setItems:(NSArray *)items animated:(BOOL)animated thus allowing you to manually set the array of pushing and popping view controllers. I just can't figure out how to do that. I've gone through apples drillDown sample code, but it didn't have the functionality I was looking for.
Perhaps you are misunderstanding Apple's navigation controller idiom. It is meant for drilling down a hierarchical structure of views and move back and forward easily and intuitively.
A view that is outside this hierarchy (it seems your Settings View belongs to this category) should really be presented modally. On the iPad, you can even use the pretty and convenient UIPopOverControllers.
Of course, if you want to keep your own look and feel (incurring the danger of confusing your users), you could fiddle with the transition animation. You could use Apple's own and thus pre-approved UIModalTransitionStyle property of UIViewControllers.
Or you could try what you did up to now and fiddle with the view hierarchy. Maybe you can eliminate your errors simply by using the view controllers sequentially and not jumping around skipping controllers in between. In this case it should be enough to use
[self.navigationController pushViewController:controller animated:YES];
and
[self.navigationController popViewControllerAnimated:YES];
rather than the more error prone versions pushToViewController and popToViewController.